Sykes, Anne-Marie G.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of computer-aided detection (CAD) and human readers to detect pulmonary nodules ≥5 mm using 100 kV ultra–low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) utilizing a tin filter. Materials and Methods: After informed consent, 55 patients prospectively underwent standard-dose chest CT (SDCT) using 120 kV followed by ULDCT using 100 kV/tin. Reference nodules ≥5 mm were identified by a thoracic radiologist using SDCT. Four thoracic radiologists marked detected nodules on SDCT and ULDCT examinations using a dedicated computer workstation. After a 6-month memory extinction, readers were shown the same ULDCT cases with all CAD markings as well as their original detections, and characterized CAD detections as true positive or false positive. Results: Volume CT Dose index (CTDIvol) for SDCT and ULDCT were 5.3±2 and 0.4±0.2 mGy (P<0.0001), respectively. Forty-five reference nodules were detected in 30 patients. Reader sensitivity varied widely but similarly for SDCT (ranging from 45% to 87%) and ULDCT (45% to 83%). CAD sensitivity was 76% (34/45) for SDCT and 71% (32/45) for ULDCT. After CAD, reader sensitivity substantially improved by 19% and 18% for 2 readers, and remained nearly unchanged for the other 2 readers (0% and 2%), despite reader perception that many more nodules were identified with CAD. There was a mean of 2 false-positive CAD detections/case. Conclusions: ULDCT with 100 kV/tin reduced patient dose by over 90% without compromising pulmonary nodule detection sensitivity. CAD can substantially improve nodule detection sensitivity at ULDCT for some readers, maintaining interobserver performance.

Despite its nonionizing technique and exquisite soft tissue characterization, noncardiovascular, and nonmusculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest has been considered impractical due to various challenges such as respiratory motion, cardiac motion, vascular pulsatility, air susceptibility, and paucity of signal in the lung. With advances in MRI, it is now possible to perform diagnostically useful and good quality MRIs of the chest, but literature on subspecialized chest MRI practices is limited. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the rationale, nuances, and logistics that went into developing such a practice in the Division of Thoracic Radiology at our institution. The topics addressed include technical and clinical considerations, support at administrative and clinical levels, protocol development, and economic considerations compared with conventional practices. Various MRI techniques are also specifically discussed to facilitate chest MRI at other sites. Although chest MRI is used in a relatively small number of patients at this point, in certain patients, chest MRI can provide additional information to optimize medical management. A few clinical cases illustrate the quality and clinical utility of chest MRI. Given recent advances in MRI techniques, it is now an opportune time to develop a chest MRI practice.