Citations

Background: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) comprises infarct mechanisms presumed to be embolic and non-lacunar. One explanation for the lack of superiority of anticoagulation over aspirin is the inclusion of subcortical infarcts with white matter disease (WMD), reflecting small vessel pathology. We hypothesized that WMD is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) in ESUS and this risk is not lessened by anticoagulation. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the multicenter Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Recurrence (CASPR) registry, including ESUS patients from 27 U.S. centers (2015–2024). WMD severity was graded using the Fazekas scale from MRI and dichotomized as mild (0–1) vs. moderate-to-severe (2–3). The primary outcome was RIS. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for baseline differences. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations between WMD and outcomes. Subgroup analyses explored effect modification by age, risk factors, and treatment type. Results: Among 1,890 ESUS patients with MRI data, 684 (36.2%) had Fazekas 2–3. These patients were older with more vascular risk factors, but IPTW achieved covariate balance. In the weighted cohort, RIS occurred more frequently in Fazekas 2–3 vs. 0–1 (7.1% vs. 4.6%/year; HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10–2.22, p = 0.01). Major bleeding and mortality were similar (bleeding: 1.7% vs. 1.8%/yr, HR 0.96, p = 0.92; death: 7.0% vs. 6.7%/yr, HR 1.04, p = 0.81). Subgroup analyses showed no interaction between WMD and age, vascular risk factors, or treatment type (antiplatelet vs. anticoagulation), suggesting consistent RIS risk in those with higher WMD. Discussion: Moderate-to-severe WMD identifies ESUS patients at higher risk of ischemic stroke recurrence, with no mitigation by anticoagulation. These findings suggest that WMD may indicate non-embolic mechanisms and support the use of imaging-based risk stratification in ESUS.

Background: Studies have suggested that administering antithrombotics—oral anticoagulants (OACs) and antiplatelets (APLT)—after acute ischemic stroke(AIS) with hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is safe and can reduce ischemic recurrence. However, the safety of their early initiation after HT remains unclear. Method: This study utilized data from nine centers across several countries. The study population included patients with AIS who subsequently experienced HT. Patients with a specific HT type—hemorrhagic infarction(HI) or parenchymal hematoma(PH)—were categorized based on the time between HT and antithrombotic initiation, and their outcomes were compared. Outcomes included 30-day HT exacerbation and composite outcomes of recurrent stroke and systemic emboli, as well as 90-day vascular death and functional outcome. Results: Of 748 patients,496 received APLT, and 252 were prescribed OACs after HT. The median HT-to-APLT time was significantly shorter among HI patients than PH patients(1[IQR:0-2] vs. 3[IQR:1-5] days,p<0.001). The rates of 30-day HT exacerbation and composite outcomes, as well as 90-day vascular death and unfavorable functional outcomes, did not significantly differ between patients who received same-day, early (HI:<1day;PH:<3days), or late (HI:>1day;PH:>3days) APLTs after either HI or PH. Among patients who received OACs, those with HI had a significantly shorter median HT-to-OAC time than PH (7[IQR:2-15] vs. 15[IQR:7-32] days,p<0.001). However, 30-day HT exacerbation rates were comparable between early (HI:<7days;PH:<15days) and late (HI:>7days;PH:>15days) OAC initiation among patients with either HI or PH, late initiation among patients with PH was associated with higher rates of 30-day composite outcomes than early initiation(20.7% vs. 3%,p=0.044). Based on regression models adjusted for NIHSS and stroke severity, early initiation of APLTs or OACs was not associated with increased risk of HT exacerbation. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the same-day initiation of APLTs after HI or PH-1, and within 1-3days following PH-2, might not be associated with HT exacerbation or worsening outcomes. Similarly, OACs initiated 2-7days after HI and 7-15days after PH may not be associated with worsened patients' outcomes, whereas delays beyond these timeframes can be associated with higher thromboembolic risk.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) may result in dissecting aneurysm (DA) formation. We aimed to characterize risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with DA in a large, international CeAD cohort. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP-CAD (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort. Patients with spontaneous CeAD were assessed for DA at baseline and de novo DA formation. Significant covariates in univariable analysis were included in multivariable regression models aiming to identify factors associated with DA formation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of DA with ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 4008 patients with CeAD, 546 (13.6%) had a DA at baseline, and 221/2938 (7.5%) patients developed a de novo DA during follow-up, of which 172/221 (78.2%) were detected in the first 180 days. Patients with DA had a mean age of 47 years, and 383 (49.9%) were women. Baseline or de novo DA was associated with a history of connective tissue disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.22–3.36]), fibromuscular dysplasia (aOR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.28–2.25]), and multiple vessel dissection (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.19–1.98]). Lower odds of DA were seen in Hispanic ethnicity (aOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43–0.97]) and ischemic stroke presentation (aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.34–0.49]). Fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with de novo DA formation (aOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52–3.49]). DA was not associated with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.44–1.16]; P =0.173) or intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.42–2.84]; P =0.86) by day 180. CONCLUSIONS: DAs are relatively common manifestations of CeAD, typically occurring within 6 months of CeAD diagnosis. DA was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

In 1995, Medicare reduced payments by 50% for anesthesiologists teaching two residents concurrently. By 2004, anesthesiology residency programs were losing, on average, $400,000 per year, causing many institutions to close their anesthesiology training programs. American Society of Anesthesiologists leaders tried unsuccessfully for several years to address this situation through appeals to Medicare. They then organized an advocacy effort to pass the Medicare Anesthesiology Teaching Funding Restoration Act of 2007, which in 2010 restored full payments for teaching anesthetics. From 2010 through 2024, anesthesiologists received $1.262 billion from Medicare for 2.8 million cases involving residents, which is between $442 million and $568 million more than if the legislation had not been enacted. Anesthesiology residency programs increased from 131 to 167 after the enactment. This historic legislation taught anesthesiologists that changing Medicare policies may require congressional action and that persistent and broad-based advocacy can make a legislative campaign successful.

This joint Clinical Consensus Statement on the safety and feasibility of concomitant urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgical procedures reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. The writing group used a Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed consensus. A total of 35 statements were assessed in the following categories: (1) background, (2) treatment options, (3) timing of concurrent surgery, (4) risk factors, and (5) value-based care. Of the 35 statements, 28 reached consensus on initial review. Three statements were omitted, and 4 statements were revised and reached consensus following second review utilizing the Delphi process.

OBJECTIVE Epilepsy affects nearly 50 million individuals worldwide, with one-third of cases resistant to antiseizure medications. For these patients, surgical intervention offers a potential path to seizure freedom. While resective surgery has been the gold standard, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LITT versus resective surgery in patients with nontumoral epilepsy. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, including studies comparing seizure freedom rates, complications, and procedural outcomes between LITT and open surgery in nontumoral epilepsy. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 389 LITT and 557 open surgery patients with varying epilepsy etiologies, including temporal lobe epilepsy, focal cortical dysplasia, and tuberous sclerosis. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model to assess seizure freedom, complications, and reoperation rates. RESULTS Open surgery demonstrated higher rates of complete seizure freedom, although not reaching significance (68.1% vs 53.7%, RR 0.81, p = 0.07). This outcome was sensitive to influential analysis and reached significance in the epileptogenic zone–directed resection subgroup analysis. Although adequate seizure freedom was comparable between the groups (LITT: 63.0% vs open: 74.0%, RR 0.90, p = 0.11), the open surgery group had higher rates of control in the pediatric and non–temporal lobe epilepsy subgroups. Complication rates were significantly higher in the open surgery group (30.0% vs 18.3%, RR 0.55, p < 0.01). LITT patients had significantly shorter hospital stays (3.4 vs 6.8 days, standardized mean difference −0.93, p < 0.01). Reoperation rates were comparable between groups (13.1% for LITT vs 13.4%, RR 1.59, p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS While LITT offers a less invasive approach with reduced hospitalization and morbidity, open surgery remains slightly superior in achieving long-term seizure freedom. Patient selection remains critical, and further studies are needed to refine decision-making criteria based on epilepsy subtype and lesion characteristics.

PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine predictors of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) following cervical spinal deformity surgery. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of a prospective, multicenter adult cervical spinal deformity database. All patients had baseline and 1-year NDI scores. Patients met MCID with an improvement of NDI by 7 points between baseline and 1 year, as previously established. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and both baseline and 1-year spinopelvic parameters were evaluated for statistical significance in a univariate logistic regression analysis. Significant variables, in addition to baseline NDI, were analyzed in a multivariable logistic regression model by backward selection with Akaike information criterion minimization. RESULTS A total of 122 patients were included with a median age of 62 (IQR 56, 69) years; 62% of patients were female. Of the 122 patients, 72 (59%) achieved NDI MCID at 1 year. Predictors of achieving MCID on univariate analysis included a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) total score (OR 0.70, p = 0.03), depression as a comorbidity (OR 2.9, p = 0.02), lower C2 tilt at the 1-year follow-up (OR 0.92, p = 0.02), and a greater difference between 1-year postoperative C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and preoperative C2–7 SVA (OR 0.98, p = 0.0495). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, predictors of achieving MCID included a lower CCI (OR 0.62, p = 0.03), depression as a comorbidity (OR 3.1, p = 0.059), a greater change in C2–7 SVA at the 1-year follow-up compared with baseline (OR 0.97, p = 0.055), and baseline NDI (OR 1.02, p = 0.24) with an area under the curve of 0.74. CONCLUSIONS The best-fit multivariable model included higher baseline NDI, a greater change in C2–7 SVA, patient-reported baseline depression, and lower CCI as important factors in predicting NDI MCID.

Background: Some studies have reported more severe chondral pathology and less successful hip arthroscopic outcomes in patients with acetabular subchondral cysts. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report multicenter arthroscopic outcomes of patients with and without acetabular bone cysts. It was hypothesized that patients with acetabular cysts would demonstrate inferior outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up compared with patients without acetabular cysts. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A multicenter matched-pair study was performed across 6 medical centers with data from a large prospectively collected database. Inclusion criteria were adult patients who had undergone primary unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). The study group was defined by the presence of a superolateral acetabular subchondral cyst on preoperative imaging. A control group was matched on age; sex; body mass index (BMI); lateral center-edge angle (LCEA); alpha angle; arthroscopic treatments of femoroplasty, acetabuloplasty, and labral treatment (ie, repair, reconstruction, or debridement); Beck chondral grade; and minimum 2-year outcomes using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Results: The study included 82 patients, of whom 41 composed the study group and 41 served as matched control patients. The study group had a mean age of 42.16 ± 11.26 years with 48.78% women and a mean BMI of 26.51 ± 4.31 kg/m 2 . Mean LCEA was 33.55°± 6.30°, and mean alpha angle was 70.22°± 9.71°. Mean Beck chondral grade was 2.59 ± 1.27 in the study group and 2.70 ± 0.95 in the matched control group ( P = .72). Two-year mean postoperative iHOT-12 scores for the study and control groups were 69.49 ± 24.51 and 73.24 ± 25.16, respectively ( P = .38), whereas mean postoperative VAS scores for pain were 18.84 ± 18.17 and 20.74 ± 21.39, respectively ( P = .70). The study group reached MCID in 82.93%, SCB in 58.54%, and PASS in 65.85% and were similar to those of the control group. Conclusion: Patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for FAIS with acetabular cysts had similarly successful outcomes as patients without acetabular cysts. Acetabular subchondral cysts may not be a contraindication to hip arthroscopy in patients with FAIS who would otherwise be indicated for this surgery.