Freund, Brin

BACKGROUND The authors aimed to evaluate the feasibility/safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy previously implanted with neuromodulation devices, using a retrospective cohort design evaluating patients treated at the Mayo Clinic Florida Epilepsy Center. OBSERVATIONS Nine patients (mean age 36.3 ± 10.9 years, 33% female) with prior implantation of neuromodulation devices were included. A vagus nerve stimulator was present in 8 of 9 patients, and 4 patients had undergone previous intracranial neuromodulation. Five patients underwent SEEG-RFTC. The mean SEEG monitoring duration was 6.5 ± 2.9 days. No intraoperative or procedural complications occurred, including hardware-related issues. No permanent or significant neurological/cognitive deficits occurred. One patient experienced transient postoperative neurological symptoms attributed to perilesional edema. Seizure reduction ranged from 50% to 75% following SEEG-RFTC. LESSONS SEEG and SEEG-RFTC are feasible in patients who have implanted neuromodulation devices, including intracranial implants. These procedures may be performed without interference with existing hardware and provide meaningful seizure reduction in highly refractory populations. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to better define efficacy and patient selection. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE26376

Abstract Background Genetic testing is increasingly used in presurgical evaluation, but the yield of resection across germline genetic epilepsies remains uncertain. Methods We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE (PubMed) and Scopus and added cases from three institutional cohorts and the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) databases, including individuals with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants besides tuberous sclerosis and neurofibromatosis who underwent resection or laser ablation. Etiologies were grouped into biologically informed categories (GATORopathies, vascular, overgrowth, CNVs, channelopathies, synaptopathies, other). Primary outcome was seizure freedom (Engel I) at last follow-up. Group comparisons used Fisher’s exact and Kruskal–Wallis tests (α=0.05; Bonferroni when applicable). Prespecified sensitivity analyses stratified by lesional status, excluded GATORopathies, and restricted to literature-only cases. Results We included 223 literature cases (64 studies), 35 institutional cases, and 11 PERC cases (n=269). Median follow-up was 24 months (IQR 12–48.0). Seizure freedom was achieved in: vascular disorders 14/19 (73.6%), GATORopathies 79/120 (67.5%), CNVs 18/31 (66.7%), overgrowth 7/13 (53.8%), other 16/25 (41.7%), channelopathies 13/43 (33.3%), and synaptopathies 4/18 (22.2%) (overall p<0.001). Among cases with known imaging, 208/253 (82.2%) had epileptogenic MRI lesions, including 64% of channelopathies and 80% of the synaptopathies. In univariate contrasts (each category vs all others), odds of seizure freedom were higher for vascular disorders (2.66-fold, 95% CI 0.87–9.72) and GATORopathies (2.46-fold, 95% CI 1.46–4.18), and lower for synaptopathies (∼4.2-fold lower, OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.05– 0.78) and channelopathies (∼4.5-fold lower, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.48). Direction and magnitude were consistent across prespecified sensitivity analyses (lesional-only, literature-only, exclusion of GATORopathies). Conclusions Resective surgeries can be effective in germline genetic epilepsies, but outcomes vary by pathway. Disorders with discrete, lesional substrates (GATORopathies, vascular) show the highest likelihood of seizure freedom, whereas channelopathies and synaptopathies, despite the presence of MRI lesions, have substantially lower yields even in lesional cases. Prospective, genotype-aware surgical registries with standardized reporting (EEG, imaging, pathology) and time-to-event outcomes are needed to refine the selection of surgical candidates and quantify seizure and non-seizure-related outcomes.

Purpose: Subcortical functional brain mapping is a valuable technique, especially involving lesions within or near white matter tracts. Motor and language deficits caused by intraoperative damage to these subcortical fibers are associated with worse outcomes. However, there are variable approaches to performing subcortical functional brain mapping. This systematic review was performed to better understand indications and optimal stimulation parameters. Methods: A systematic review was performed by PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases. Search dates ranged from inception to November 30th, 2024. Studies included adults who underwent subcortical electrical stimulation for functional brain mapping. Results: A total of 55 articles (249 patients, mean age 44.8 years, 114 female) were included. The most common pathology was brain tumor (96.3%), primarily gliomas and metastases, and 24.4% of all cases had a history of epilepsy. The most frequently mapped white matter tracts were the arcuate fasciculus, corticospinal/pyramidal tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, involving motor, language, and cognitive functions. Bipolar stimulation (50–60 Hz, 0.5–1 millisecond, 1–10 mA) was preferred over monopolar stimulation. Among 147 patients with outcome data, 89.1% did not suffer permanent adverse outcomes including neurologic deficits, although long-term outcomes were inconsistently reported. Conclusions: The methodologic variability of subcortical functional brain mapping and lack of long-term follow-up reported limits determination of optimal parameter selection for electrical stimulation although common trends are reported. Functional brain mapping approaches may be guided by the tract and network involved. Further studies are needed to develop a standardized approach and more definitive guideline to its performance.

Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been investigated for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resective surgery. Because different types of epilepsy involve distinct brain networks, numerous DBS targets have been explored, yet a comprehensive synthesis is lacking. Methods To provide a comprehensive overview of this expanding literature, we conducted a systematic review of studies for DBS in epilepsy, including case series, prospective and retrospective studies. We collected data on surgical targets, individual disease characteristics, outcomes and precise electrode placements. DBS electrode coordinates were gathered into a common template space and related to clinical outcomes. Results We included 124 studies, corresponding to 1210 patients and 20 distinct surgical targets. While the anterior (ANT) and centromedian (CM) nuclei of the thalamus remain the most studied, we also review less commonly used targets that show promise for specific forms of epilepsy and may warrant further investigation. Substantial variability in targeting strategies and electrode placement was observed within each of the target regions. Importantly, significant relationships between stimulation location and outcomes were identified for ANT-DBS and CM-DBS. For ANT-DBS, shorter distance to the mammillothalamic tract junction was associated with greater seizure reduction on both study-level and patient-level analyses (r=−0.55, p<0.001 and r=−0.51, p<0.001, respectively). For CM-DBS, localisation effects may be dependent on the form of epilepsy, with stimulation of the parvocellular CM being associated with better outcomes in generalised epilepsy. Conclusions Our results emphasise the importance of accurate targeting in DBS for epilepsy. Our database and atlas of DBS targets are made publicly available, potentially serving further meta-analytical work. PROSPERO registration number CRD420250649304.