Ekert, Justyna O.

BACKGROUND The authors aimed to evaluate the feasibility/safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy previously implanted with neuromodulation devices, using a retrospective cohort design evaluating patients treated at the Mayo Clinic Florida Epilepsy Center. OBSERVATIONS Nine patients (mean age 36.3 ± 10.9 years, 33% female) with prior implantation of neuromodulation devices were included. A vagus nerve stimulator was present in 8 of 9 patients, and 4 patients had undergone previous intracranial neuromodulation. Five patients underwent SEEG-RFTC. The mean SEEG monitoring duration was 6.5 ± 2.9 days. No intraoperative or procedural complications occurred, including hardware-related issues. No permanent or significant neurological/cognitive deficits occurred. One patient experienced transient postoperative neurological symptoms attributed to perilesional edema. Seizure reduction ranged from 50% to 75% following SEEG-RFTC. LESSONS SEEG and SEEG-RFTC are feasible in patients who have implanted neuromodulation devices, including intracranial implants. These procedures may be performed without interference with existing hardware and provide meaningful seizure reduction in highly refractory populations. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to better define efficacy and patient selection. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE26376

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Access to the orbit, cavernous sinus, Meckel cave (MC), and infratemporal fossa (ITF) remains challenging due to the complex 3-dimensional anatomy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. An extradural endoscopic orbitozygomatic (OZ) approach has the potential to provide a direct surgical corridor across these compartments while minimizing the limitations of compartment-specific corridors. METHODS: Five formalin-fixed, silicone-injected cadaveric heads (10 sides) were dissected using an extradural OZ approach under operative microscopy supplemented with 0° and 30° rigid endoscopes. After a two-piece OZ craniotomy, extradural dissection was performed toward the superior orbital fissure and foramen rotundum/ovale, combined with anterior petrosectomy and opening of MC. Anatomic exposure, corridor continuity, and visualization of key neurovascular structures were qualitatively assessed. RESULTS: The extradural endoscopic OZ approach created a direct working corridor from the lateral orbit to the ITF and petroclival region. Endoscopic augmentation enhanced visualization of the lateral cavernous sinus wall, trigeminal divisions (V 1 -V 3 ), cavernous internal carotid artery, medial orbital apex, deep infratemporal recesses, and the petroclival region. Anterior petrosectomy extended exposure toward the upper clivus and ventrolateral brainstem. Limitations included restricted microscopic visualization of the medial orbit and inferior ITF, which were partially mitigated by angled endoscopy. CONCLUSION: This cadaveric study demonstrates that the extradural OZ–anterior petrosectomy approach establishes a continuous anatomic corridor integrating the orbit, cavernous sinus/MC, ITF, and petroclival region, while defining its boundaries, areas of optimal exposure, and inherent limitations. As a qualitative study, the findings are descriptive in nature and do not include quantitative morphometric analysis.

Study Design Systematic Review. Objective To assess the current literature regarding the accuracy of different imaging modalities and criteria used to assess lumbar fusion, and their correlation with surgical direct observation as the current Gold Standard. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, studies were included if they focused on patients with a prior history of lumbar interbody fusion and at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. The review assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different imaging techniques, and their correlation with surgical findings. Results Thirteen studies (1989-2019) were reviewed, including 715 patients, common imaging modalities included plain radiographs (53.8%), Computed Tomography (CT) (69.2%), and dynamic radiographs (30.7%). CT appeared as the most utilized modality post-2006. There was substantial variability in diagnostic accuracy, with CT showing high variability in sensitivity and specificity. Descriptive criteria for fusion were widely used, but interobserver agreement was generally low. Conclusion The review highlights a lack of standardized criteria for assessing lumbar fusion. Despite advancements in imaging techniques, the variability in diagnostic parameters suggests a need for consensus and multicentric studies to stablish reliable, universal criteria for evaluating fusion success.

Abstract Harnessing the neuroplastic potential of the human brain is being increasingly recognized as an important neuro-oncological paradigm to facilitate safe resection of brain tumors while preserving neurological function and quality of life. Interventional neurorehabilitation, employing both invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation techniques, represents an important emerging therapeutic strategy to induce or enhance neural plasticity to promote functional recovery in brain tumor patients. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of interventional neurorehabilitation techniques for glioma patients. Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searches of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane were undertaken from database inception to November 28, 2023. Studies reporting on neuromodulation applied to glioma patients were included. Results Seven studies reporting findings from 118 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three neuromodulation techniques were identified and included transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) reported in 5 out of 7 (71.4%) studies; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); and continuous cortical electrical stimulation (cCES) using grid electrodes, reported in one study each. All studies applying noninvasive stimulation to ameliorate postoperative deficits demonstrated an improvement on at least one outcome measure. The 2 studies applying tDCS and cCES to induce plasticity reported evidence of functional reorganization. Conclusions There is emerging evidence of benefits of neuromodulation to improve postoperative outcome in glioma patients. In the current literature, noninvasive stimulation has shown to have a favorable safety profile. Large-scale, double-blind, sham-controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the effectiveness of these interventions for modulating different cognitive networks in patients undergoing glioma surgery.

OBJECTIVE Traditionally, resection of nondominant hemisphere brain tumors was performed under general anesthesia. An improved understanding of right-lateralized neural networks has led to a paradigm shift in recent decades, where the right or nondominant hemisphere is no longer perceived as "functionally silent." There is an increasing interest in awake brain mapping for nondominant hemisphere resections. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive review of the existing brain mapping paradigms for patients with nondominant hemisphere gliomas undergoing awake craniotomies. METHODS In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and American Psychological Association PsycInfo databases were undertaken from database inception to July 1, 2023. Studies providing a description of the intraoperative mapping paradigm used to assess cognition during an awake craniotomy for resection of a nondominant hemisphere glioma were included. RESULTS The search yielded 1084 potentially eligible articles. Thirty-nine unique studies reporting on 788 patients were included in the systematic review. The most frequently tested cognitive domains in patients with nondominant hemisphere tumors were spatial attention/neglect (17/39 studies, 43.6%), speech-motor/language (17/39 studies, 43.6%), and social cognition (9/39 studies, 23.1%). Within the frontal lobe, the highest number of positive mapping sites was identified for speech-motor/language, spatial attention/neglect, dual tasking assessing motor and language function, working memory, and social cognition. Within the parietal lobe, eloquence was most frequently found upon testing spatial attention/neglect, speech-motor/language, and calculation. Within the temporal lobe, the assessment of spatial attention/neglect yielded the highest number of positive mapping sites. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive testing in the nondominant hemisphere is predominantly focused on evaluating two domains: spatial attention/neglect and the motor aspects of speech/language. Multidisciplinary teams involved in awake brain mapping should consider testing an extended range of functions to minimize the risk of postoperative deficits and provide valuable information about anatomo-functional organization of cognitive networks.