Back to Authors

Byrne, Richard

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville College

Citations 1

Stereo-electroencephalography–guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices: patient series
Freund, Brin , Vijayanarasimhan, Venkateshwaran , Safa, Adrian , Colella, Filippo Emmanuele , Sabsevitz, David S. , Perez‐Vega, Carlos , Middlebrooks, Erik H. , Byrne, Richard, Tatum, William O., Freund, Brin E , Ekert, Justyna, Colella, Filippo Emmanuele , Block, Cady, Perez-Vega, Carlos , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Ekert, Justyna O. , Block, Cady K. , Mirsattari, Seyed M. , Byrne, Richard, Tatum, William O.

Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons | August 5, 2026 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.3171/case26376 Get It

BACKGROUND The authors aimed to evaluate the feasibility/safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy previously implanted with neuromodulation devices, using a retrospective cohort design evaluating patients treated at the Mayo Clinic Florida Epilepsy Center. OBSERVATIONS Nine patients (mean age 36.3 ± 10.9 years, 33% female) with prior implantation of neuromodulation devices were included. A vagus nerve stimulator was present in 8 of 9 patients, and 4 patients had undergone previous intracranial neuromodulation. Five patients underwent SEEG-RFTC. The mean SEEG monitoring duration was 6.5 ± 2.9 days. No intraoperative or procedural complications occurred, including hardware-related issues. No permanent or significant neurological/cognitive deficits occurred. One patient experienced transient postoperative neurological symptoms attributed to perilesional edema. Seizure reduction ranged from 50% to 75% following SEEG-RFTC. LESSONS SEEG and SEEG-RFTC are feasible in patients who have implanted neuromodulation devices, including intracranial implants. These procedures may be performed without interference with existing hardware and provide meaningful seizure reduction in highly refractory populations. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to better define efficacy and patient selection. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE26376