González-Gallardo, Enrique

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCMs) are low-flow vascular lesions located within the central nervous system, with a reported prevalence in the general population of 0.16–0.5%. Patients with CCMs may remain asymptomatic or present new onset symptoms such as seizures or focal neurological deficits often related to the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage. CCM may appear sporadic or as part of familial forms linked to mutations in the CCM-gene cluster, affecting endothelial cell integrity and triggering molecular cascades, including the MEKK3/KLF2/4 signaling pathway. Recent studies have highlighted the roles of inflammatory, angiogenic, and coagulation pathways alongside the emerging evidence of a gut–brain axis influencing microbiome-driven TLR4 signaling. This systematic review aims to describe molecular biomarkers associated with CCM pathophysiology, emphasizing their potential use as diagnostic and prognostic tools. Circulating plasma biomarkers such as CRP, vitamin D, and interleukins may reflect ongoing inflammatory and endothelial processes, while some imaging biomarkers like Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) have shown a correlation with iron deposition and vascular leakage. Leveraging both circulating and imaging biomarkers may improve the therapeutic decision-making process. Further studies are encouraged to validate these findings and to facilitate the development of personalized, evidence-based strategies for the management of CCM.

Study Design Systematic Review. Objective To assess the current literature regarding the accuracy of different imaging modalities and criteria used to assess lumbar fusion, and their correlation with surgical direct observation as the current Gold Standard. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, studies were included if they focused on patients with a prior history of lumbar interbody fusion and at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. The review assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different imaging techniques, and their correlation with surgical findings. Results Thirteen studies (1989-2019) were reviewed, including 715 patients, common imaging modalities included plain radiographs (53.8%), Computed Tomography (CT) (69.2%), and dynamic radiographs (30.7%). CT appeared as the most utilized modality post-2006. There was substantial variability in diagnostic accuracy, with CT showing high variability in sensitivity and specificity. Descriptive criteria for fusion were widely used, but interobserver agreement was generally low. Conclusion The review highlights a lack of standardized criteria for assessing lumbar fusion. Despite advancements in imaging techniques, the variability in diagnostic parameters suggests a need for consensus and multicentric studies to stablish reliable, universal criteria for evaluating fusion success.