Sánchez-Garavito, Jesús E.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most lethal primary brain cancer due to its remarkable metabolic plasticity and therapeutic resistance. Here, we identify cholesterol dependency as a therapeutically exploitable vulnerability in GBM using two FDA-approved drugs: the H1 histamine antagonist clemastine and the retinoid X receptor agonist bexarotene. Combined treatment induces potent synergistic anti-tumor activity across patient-derived glioma models, suppressing proliferation, stemness, and survival at sub-IC50 concentrations. Mechanistically, this therapy disrupts cholesterol biosynthesis, transport, and homeostasis, triggering endoplasmic reticulum stress and activation of the unfolded protein response, ultimately leading to autophagy and apoptotic cell death. Orthotopic patient-derived glioma models recapitulate these mechanisms in vivo, where local intracranial administration significantly reduces tumor progression and prolongs survival using fourfold lower doses than systemic intraperitoneal delivery. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed activation of regeneration and plasticity programs, accompanied by immune microenvironment remodeling and enhanced inflammatory signaling. Importantly, syngeneic models preserved immune cell composition, supporting future integration with immunotherapeutic strategies. Together, these findings establish cholesterol dysregulation–induced metabolic collapse as a promising therapeutic approach for GBM.

Background/Objectives: Postoperative opioid exposure after lumbar fusion remains a key clinical concern. Understanding which perioperative factors are associated with lower postoperative opioid use may help optimize recovery after minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This study aimed to determine if patients undergoing MIS-TLIF under spinal anesthesia (SA) showed lower postoperative opioid use compared to those undergoing MIS-TLIF under general anesthesia (GA). Methods: We retrospectively studied all adult patients (>18 years) undergoing 1- and contiguous 2-level MIS-TLIFs performed by a single surgeon. Patients undergoing the procedure under GA were compared to those undergoing the procedure under SA. Postoperative oral opioid use, up to 3 months post discharge, was collected. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) protocol was implemented. Each outcome variable was initially assessed using univariate regression. Predictor variables with a p-value < 0.2 were included in the multivariate regression model. This was a retrospective, non-randomized study, and residual confounding cannot be excluded despite PSM. Results: The matched groups (n = 50 in each group) did not differ significantly depending on demographics or levels fused. Before regression, mean number of postoperative opioid prescriptions (p = 0.03), mean total operating room (OR) time in minutes (p < 0.01), and median length of stay (LOS) in days (p = 0.03) were significantly different. Multivariate regression showed that the GA group received 216.5 more total morphine milligram equivalents than the SA group (95% CI = 0.7–432.2, p = 0.049). The days of opioid use were higher in the GA group by 3.8 days (95% CI = 0.5 to 7.1, p = 0.025). On multivariate regression, LOS in hours was greater in the GA group by 14.1 h (p = 0.042). Conclusions: SA is an effective anesthetic modality for spinal surgery with the advantages of reduced postoperative opioid use, reduced OR time, and shorter LOS compared to GA.

OBJECTIVE The implementation of robotics and spinal anesthesia (SA) in spine surgery is rapidly expanding, offering significant benefits for an increasingly complex and aging patient population with degenerative spinal disease. Here, the authors present the largest cohort to date evaluating the combined use of these two techniques in minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed surgical outcomes of a series of patients who underwent robot-assisted (RA)–MIS TLIF under SA and general anesthesia (GA) at their institution from 2018 to 2024. Primary outcomes included operative times and postoperative pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative functional status, length of stay (LOS), and discharge status. To address potential confounders, a 1:1 propensity score–matching and regression analysis was implemented. Statistical analyses were conducted using Python. RESULTS A total of 209 patients underwent RA-MIS TLIF, with 31 (14.83%) receiving SA and 178 (85.17%) GA. After propensity score matching, the SA cohort demonstrated significantly shorter median total operating room (OR) time, total procedure time, time from entering the OR to skin incision, and time from closure to leaving the OR (all p < 0.01). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower (p < 0.01), and LOS was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) in the SA cohort. Regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, further supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS RA-MIS TLIF fusion under SA is a safe and effective approach that significantly reduces operative time, postoperative pain, and hospital LOS in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Study Design Systematic Review. Objective To assess the current literature regarding the accuracy of different imaging modalities and criteria used to assess lumbar fusion, and their correlation with surgical direct observation as the current Gold Standard. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, studies were included if they focused on patients with a prior history of lumbar interbody fusion and at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. The review assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different imaging techniques, and their correlation with surgical findings. Results Thirteen studies (1989-2019) were reviewed, including 715 patients, common imaging modalities included plain radiographs (53.8%), Computed Tomography (CT) (69.2%), and dynamic radiographs (30.7%). CT appeared as the most utilized modality post-2006. There was substantial variability in diagnostic accuracy, with CT showing high variability in sensitivity and specificity. Descriptive criteria for fusion were widely used, but interobserver agreement was generally low. Conclusion The review highlights a lack of standardized criteria for assessing lumbar fusion. Despite advancements in imaging techniques, the variability in diagnostic parameters suggests a need for consensus and multicentric studies to stablish reliable, universal criteria for evaluating fusion success.

Immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment (TME) poses a significant challenge to the efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in solid tumors, including glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and deadly primary brain tumor. Tumor and TME-residing immunosuppressive cells can hijack program death 1(PD1) pathway to evade antitumor T-cell immunity by upregulating its ligand, PD-L1. Thus, targeting PD-L1 emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy to simultaneously eliminate tumor cells and immunosuppressive components within the TME. We developed a novel PD-L1-targeting CAR T-cell therapy, MC9999, and investigated its therapeutic effects against GBM. The antigen-specific cytotoxicity of MC9999 CAR T-cells was firmly validated using a LN229 GBM cell line and its PD-L1-deficient variant, as well as patient-derived brain tumor-initiating cells (BTICs). Furthermore, in vivo therapeutic antitumor effects were confirmed in orthotopic GBM models through intracranial administration of MC9999 CAR T-cells. To pave the way to the translation of MC9999 CAR T-cell therapy to patient bedside, we established a unique experimental system using patient-specific CAR T-cells against their own tumor and immunosuppressive cells. High-quality, patient-specific MC9999 CAR T-cells were manufactured using T cells isolated from peripheral blood, while paired autologous BTICs were generated to serve as target cells. Autologous immunosuppressive cells include monocyte-derived M2 macrophages from patient’s peripheral blood and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) isolated from patient’s tumor. Data from multiple patients’ samples consistently demonstrated that these patient-specific MC9999 CAR T-cells elicited robust cytotoxicity against autologous GBM tumor and TME-residing immunosuppressive cells, supporting our hypothesis that targeting PD-L1 effectively address both tumor and its TME. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of our GBM patients’ tissues showed that PD-L1 expression was restricted to tumor cells and macrophages /microglia within the tumor, with no expression detected in neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, or blood vessels. These findings suggest that MC9999 CAR T-cells can be safely delivered to the brain without compromising normal cell populations. Ongoing studies are underway to further validate the safety profile of MC9999 CAR T-cell therapy. Collectively, the data obtained from this preclinical study support the effectiveness, feasibility and safety of local administration of MC9999 CAR T-cells as a promising new approach for GBM treatment. These encouraging results have motivated us to prepare an Investigational New Drug application to initiate a phase I clinical trial. Citation Format: Yan Luo, Yaqing Qie, Maria J. Ulloa-Navas, Jesus E. Sanchez-Garavito, Vanessa K. Jones, Martha E. Gadd, Mieu M. Brooks, Tanya Hundal, Andrew D. Brim, Isas K. Vazquez-Rosario, Haidong Dong, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Hong Qin. Intracranial delivery of MC9999 CAR T-cell therapy: a novel strategy to simultaneously eliminate GBM tumors and immunosuppressive components in the tumor microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4812.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Awake minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) generates minimal surrounding tissue damage and has been shown to be a safe, time-effective, and cost-reductive technique in single-level procedures. The purpose of this study was to advocate for the utilization of multilevel MIS-TLIF even in challenging cases as it has demonstrated positive outcomes. METHODS: Chart review was conducted for consecutive patients undergoing awake multilevel MIS-TLIF from 2020 to 2023. Various demographic, preoperative, and postoperative variables were collected and descriptively analyzed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent multilevel awake MIS-TLIF at our institution during the specified period. Among them, 87.5% underwent a two-level procedure and 12.5% a three-level procedure. The median age ± IQR was 69.5 ± 11 years, with a slight male predominance (56.25%). Common comorbidities included hypertension (56.25%), obesity (37.5%), sleep apnea (25%), and type 2 diabetes (18.75%). The American Society of Anesthesiologists risk was 2 in 43.75% of patients and 3 in 56.25%. All patients presented pain, and 12.5% showed motor deficit. Intraoperative data showed a median of 196 minutes in the operating room where 156 ± 27.75 minutes corresponded to actual procedure time. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ± 70 cc. In the immediate postoperative period, 1 patient had nausea and emesis, and 1 reported fatigue. The median pain score during this period was 4.6 ± 2.03. Pain control medications were required for various patients, with methocarbamol (50%), hydromorphone (37.5%), and oxycodone (25%) being the most commonly prescribed in the postanesthesia care unit. No patient had new neurological deficits after the surgical intervention. The median length of stay was 2 days ±1.25. All patients were discharged with no complications. CONCLUSION: Multilevel awake MIS-TLIF emerges as a safe and effective technique for complex cases, enhancing patient quality of life with minimal blood loss and postoperative pain.