Back to Authors

Hansen, Aaron R

0000-0002-2363-8707

Mayo Clinic

Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Citations 4

International Consensus-Driven Recommendations for Patient-Reported Outcome Research Objectives in Early Phase Dose-Finding Oncology Trials: OPTIMISE-ROR
Alger, Emily , Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee , Dueck, A. C. , Minchom, Anna, pe, madeline, Peipert, John Devin , Snyder, C. J., Symeonides, Stefan N. , Wilson, Roger , Basch, Ethan , Qiao, Yu , Dean, Lizzie, Hansen, Aaron R. , Kholmanskikh, Olga , Kobayashi, Ken, Tourneau, Christophe Le, Lee, J. Jack, Patel, Sheetal, Petrie, Joan, Pond, Gregory R. , Prior, Kieran, Rantell, Khadija , Reeve, John F., Solovyeva, O., Wages, Nolan A. , Weber, Harald A., Yap, C., Dueck, Amylou C. , Yap, Christina , Snyder, Claire , Minchom, Anna , Snyder, Claire , Bates, Susan E , Bulbeck, Helen , Di Maio, Massimo , Hansen, Aaron R , Kholmanskikh, Olga , Kobayashi, Ken , Landers, Dónal , Lee, J Jack , Ma, Brigette B Y , Marshall, Lynley V , Petrie, Joan , Pond, Gregory Russell , Solovyeva, Olga , Wages, Nolan A , Yap, Christina , Peipert, John Devin , Pe, Madeline , Basch, Ethan , Bates, Susan E. , Bulbeck, Helen , Tourneau, Christophe Le , Ma, Brigette , Weber, Harald, Calvert, Melanie

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 23, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 709-719

10.1200/jco-25-01625 Get It

PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.
509 A first-in-human phase 1 study of NL-201 in patients with relapsed or refractory cancer
Callahan, Margaret K. , Costello, Brian A. , Curti, Brendan D. , Hansen, Aaron R. , Long, Georgina V. , Shankles, Brooke, Ulge, Umut Y. , Weickhardt, Andrew , Long, Georgina V , Hansen, Aaron R , Naing, Aung , Hall, Evan , Joshua, Anthony M.

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 9, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A540-A540

10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.509 Get It

A phase 2 study of vorinostat in locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma
Gonçalves, Priscila , Heilbrun, Lance K. , Barrett, Michael T. , Hansen, Aaron R. , Sukari, Ammar , Smith, Daryn , Casetta, Lindsay, Boerner, Scott A. , Chen, Alice P. , Lenkiewicz, Elizabeth, Malasi, Smriti, LoRusso, Patricia , Kummar, Shivaani , Siu, Lillian L. , Piekarz, Richard , Chao, Joseph , Pilat, Mary Jo , Hansen, Aaron R

Oncotarget | March 22, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 32918-32929

10.18632/oncotarget.16464 Get It

A phase IB study of the combination of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced solid tumors with an expansion cohort in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Krishnamurthy, Anuradha , Stein, Mark N. , Sanoff, Hanna K. , Lee, James J. , Hansen, Aaron R. , Malhotra, Usha , Rippke, Sarah, Davis, S. Lindsey , Messersmith, Wells A. , Eckhardt, S. Gail, Dasari, Arvind , Lockhart, A. Craig , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Yao, James C. , Meric‐Bernstam, Funda , Lieu, Christopher H. , Sanoff, Hanna , Hansen, Aaron R

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 21, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 609-609

10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.609 Get It

609 Background: Targeting MEK is of interest in the development of novel agents for treatment of many malignancies. However, better strategies are needed to overcome acquired resistance to MEK inhibitors. Preclinical studies have shown Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, Selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A (CsA), a non-canonical WnT pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We are conducting an NCI CTEP-approved Phase I/IB trial (NCI # 9571/COMIRB # 13-2628) of selumetinib and CsA combination. Biomarkers of response to therapy are being co-developed. We hypothesize that this combination will be safe and potentially effective in patients with mCRC and that upregulation of FZD2 may predict for sensitivity. Methods: Phase I trial with initial dose escalation investigating the combination of selumetinib and CsA in patients with advanced solid tumors (n = 18) followed by an expansion cohort in patients with irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC (n = 20). The expansion cohort utilizes a selumetinib “run-in” to evaluate efficacy in RAS-WT and RAS-MT mCRC to identify those patients most likely to respond to the combination. Results: 18 patients were enrolled in the dose escalation phase and 10 patients have been enrolled in the dose expansion phase as of September 2016. Grade 1 or 2 nausea and rash were reported as the most common AEs. Most commonly reported Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension, elevated liver enzymes and rash. Three DLTs were reported with Grade 3 hypertension noted at dose level 1 and 2 and grade 3 rash reported at dose level 2. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as Selumetinib 75 mg BID and CsA 2 mg/kg BID on a 28-day cycle. Two partial responses and sixteen stable disease responses have been observed. Six patients have exhibited progressive disease. Conclusions: Selumetinib in combination with cyclosporin A appears to be well-tolerated with evidence of activity in solid tumors. Expansion cohort will complete enrollment this month. Clinical trial information: NCT02188264.