Lockhart, A. Craig

Abstract Purpose: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse model. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor that has a tolerable safety profile. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had stable disease (SD) after at least 4 months of standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 20 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%, with one partial response (PR) and 15 SDs, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.6 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among 10 evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 70% with one PR and six SDs. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS on study treatment were 5.0 and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated and safe, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed biomarker activity in infiltrative T lymphocytes. Efficacy of this strategy may require incorporation of more potent chemotherapy in future studies.

4146 Background: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse models. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor shown to have a tolerable safety profile. We evaluated the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of defactinib in combination with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine for PDAC patients. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In 3x3 dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a RP2D. In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had treatment response or stable disease (SD) on standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate changes in tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 17 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 58.8% with one partial response (PR) and nine SDs and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 months and 9.1 months, respectively. Among the evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 63.6% with one PR and six SD. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS were 5.0 months and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed increased infiltrative T lymphocytes in post-treatment tumor biopsies. Incorporation of a more potent chemotherapy backbone should be considered to achieve better clinical response in future trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT02546531.

Abstract Background: Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is consistently hyperactivated in multiple tumor types including PDAC. Our preclinical work showed that FAK and PD-1 inhibitors elicit significant tumor regression, and that combining FAK and PD-1 inhibitors with gemcitabine achieves a maximal response. This suggests the need for a cytotoxic agent to bolster antigen presentation. Defactinib is an orally available, well-tolerated, potent FAK inhibitor. Methods: This study included a dose escalation phase (all solid tumors) and dose expansion phase (metastatic PDAC). A 3+3 design with five dose levels was used in the dose escalation phase. For the expansion phase, 10 PDAC patients with stable disease on front-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel were enrolled in the Maintenance cohort (A), while 10 patients who progressed on at least one line of therapy were enrolled in the Refractory cohort (B). Pre and on-treatment biopsied were collected from all PDAC patients. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, toxicity, objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The exploratory endpoints included developing a molecular and immune profile for treatment response. Results: In dose escalation, the common low grade (G1/2) treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue, anorexia, nausea and vomiting. No DLTs were seen. The RP2D was defactinib 400mg twice daily, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and pembrolizumab 200mg day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Safety and toxicity results in the escalation cohort were reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting. Among 8 evaluable PDAC patients enrolled on the dose escalation phase, we observed 1 (13%) partial response (PR), 3 (38%) stable disease (SD), 4 (50%) progressive disease (PD). In the Maintenance cohort, 1 (10%) PR, 6 (60%) SD, and 3 (30%) PD were observed. Two patients in the Maintenance cohort remain on study, and the median time on treatment was 4.6 months. In the Refractory cohort, 5 (50%) had SD, 4 (40%) PD, 1 not evaluable; median PFS was 2.9 months and median OS was 7.6 months. Interestingly, two confirmed PR patients both have MSS disease. Paired biopsies in PDAC patients show increased proliferating CD8+ T cells, while Tregs, macrophages, and stromal density decrease with treatment. Conclusions: The combination regimen was well tolerated. Encouraging efficacy signals were observed in both Maintenance and Refractory cohorts. Updated outcomes and correlative analyses are forthcoming. Citation Format: Andrea Wang-Gillam, Robert McWilliams, A. Craig Lockhart, Benjamin R Tan, Rama Suresh, Kian-Huat Lim, Katrina S. Pedersen, Nikolaos Trikalinos, Olivia Aranha, Haeseong Park, Lee Ratner, Nicholas Boice, David G. Denardo. Phase I study of defactinib combined with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer: Experiences of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT118.

4062 Background: Multiple clinical trials have incorporated preoperative chemotherapy and radiation (RT) in an attempt to improve local tumor control, distant disease failure and overall survival rates for locally advanced but resectable adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). This multicenter, cooperative group study combined active chemotherapy agents cisplatin (C), docetaxel (D) and the targeted EGFR agent panitumumab (P) in the induction phase followed by concurrent chemotherapy (CDP) and radiation. Pathologic complete response (pCR), a surrogate for improved survival, was the primary endpoint. Methods: From 01/15/09 to 07/22/11, 70 patients (pts) with Siewert I or II adenocarcinomas and clinical stages T3N0M0, T2-3N1M0 or T2-3N0-1M1a (celiac LN ≤ 2 cm) were accrued. Patients received cisplatin (40 mg/m2), docetaxel (40 mg/m2) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg) on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 with RT (5040 cGy, 180 cGy/day x 28d) beginning week 5. The decision rule had a 90% power with a 0.10 significance level to detect a pCR rate of at least 35%. Secondary objectives included near-pathologic complete response (near-pCR), toxicity, and overall and disease-free survival rates. Results: Five pts were ineligible. Of the remaining 65 pts (59 M, 6 F; median age 61), 12 pts did not undergo surgery (5 progressed, 4 refused, 3 other). Of the 58 evaluable pts, the pCR rate was 32.8% (90% CI: 22.6% -42.9%) and near-pCR 22.4% (90% CI: 13.4%-31.4%). Total doses of C, D, and P were achieved in 76%, 80%, and 73%, respectively (n = 70). 66 pts (94%) received the total RT dose. Sixteen pts (23%) had a grade 4+ non-heme adverse event possibly related to treatment. Venous thrombosis (5 pts) was most common. Conclusions: The CDP regimen in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with esophageal adenocarcinomas is active (pCR + near-pCR = 55.2%) and feasible. The toxicity though tolerable is substantial.

609 Background: Targeting MEK is of interest in the development of novel agents for treatment of many malignancies. However, better strategies are needed to overcome acquired resistance to MEK inhibitors. Preclinical studies have shown Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, Selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A (CsA), a non-canonical WnT pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We are conducting an NCI CTEP-approved Phase I/IB trial (NCI # 9571/COMIRB # 13-2628) of selumetinib and CsA combination. Biomarkers of response to therapy are being co-developed. We hypothesize that this combination will be safe and potentially effective in patients with mCRC and that upregulation of FZD2 may predict for sensitivity. Methods: Phase I trial with initial dose escalation investigating the combination of selumetinib and CsA in patients with advanced solid tumors (n = 18) followed by an expansion cohort in patients with irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC (n = 20). The expansion cohort utilizes a selumetinib “run-in” to evaluate efficacy in RAS-WT and RAS-MT mCRC to identify those patients most likely to respond to the combination. Results: 18 patients were enrolled in the dose escalation phase and 10 patients have been enrolled in the dose expansion phase as of September 2016. Grade 1 or 2 nausea and rash were reported as the most common AEs. Most commonly reported Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension, elevated liver enzymes and rash. Three DLTs were reported with Grade 3 hypertension noted at dose level 1 and 2 and grade 3 rash reported at dose level 2. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as Selumetinib 75 mg BID and CsA 2 mg/kg BID on a 28-day cycle. Two partial responses and sixteen stable disease responses have been observed. Six patients have exhibited progressive disease. Conclusions: Selumetinib in combination with cyclosporin A appears to be well-tolerated with evidence of activity in solid tumors. Expansion cohort will complete enrollment this month. Clinical trial information: NCT02188264.

Abstract Purpose: PI3K/AKT pathway activation is an important endocrine resistance mechanism in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. After promising preclinical modeling of MK-2206, an allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor, with either estrogen deprivation or fulvestrant, we conducted a phase I trial in patients with metastatic ER+HER2− breast cancer to determine the recommended phase II treatment dose (RPTD) of MK-2206 when combined with either anastrozole, fulvestrant, or anastrozole/fulvestrant. Experimental Design: ER+ breast cancer cell lines were exposed in vitro to MK-2206 plus estrogen deprivation with or without fulvestrant and monitored for apoptosis. A standard 3+3 design was employed to first determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-2206 plus anastrozole based on cycle 1 toxicity. Each cycle was 28 days. The RPTD was determined on the basis of toxicities observed at MTD level during the first 3 cycles. Subsequent patients received MK-2206, at the RPTD determined above, plus fulvestrant or anastrozole/fulvestrant to define RPTD for these additional regimens. Results: MK-2206 induced apoptosis in parental ER+ but not in long-term estrogen-deprived cell lines, for which fulvestrant was required for apoptosis induction. Thirty-one patients enrolled. The RPTD was defined as MK-2206 150 mg orally weekly with prednisone prophylaxis for each combination. Grade 3 rash was dose limiting. 42% (95% CI, 23%–63%) patients derived clinical benefit without progression within 6 months. Response was not associated with tumor PIK3CA mutation. Conclusions: MK-2206 plus endocrine treatments were tolerable. MK-2206 in combination with anastrozole is being further evaluated in a phase II neoadjuvant trial for newly diagnosed ER+HER2− breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2650–8. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Jansen et al., p. 2599