Back to Authors

Schefter, Tracey E.

Mayo Clinic

University of Colorado Anschutz

Citations 4

Association of Radiotherapy Duration With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated in NRG Oncology Trials
Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Moughan, Jennifer, Haddock, Michael G. , Herskovic, Arnold, Minsky, Bruce D. , Suntharalingam, Mohan, Zeitzer, Kenneth L. , Garg, Madhur , Greenwald, Bruce D. , Komaki, Ritsuko , Puckett, Lindsay , Kim, Harold E., Lad, Thomas E. , Okawara, Gordon, Raben, Adam , Schefter, Tracey E., Barker, Jerry L. , Videtic, Gregory M.M. , Jacob, Rojymon , Winter, Kathryn, Crane, Christopher H. , Kim, Harold E , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Kim, Hyun Jee , Lloyd, Shane , Bush, David A. , Meyer, Joshua E. , Falkson, Carla I.

JAMA Network Open | April 21, 2023 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e238504

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8504 Get It

Importance For many types of epithelial malignant neoplasms that are treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), treatment prolongation and interruptions have an adverse effect on outcomes. Objective To analyze the association between RT duration and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Design, Setting, and Participants This study was an unplanned, post hoc secondary analysis of 3 prospective, multi-institutional phase 3 randomized clinical trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 8501, RTOG 9405, and RTOG 0436) of the National Cancer Institute–sponsored NRG Oncology (formerly the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, RTOG, and Gynecologic Oncology Group). Enrolled patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer underwent definitive CRT in the trials between 1986 and 2013, with follow-up occurring through 2014. Data analyses were conducted between March 2022 to February 2023. Exposures Treatment groups in the trials used standard-dose RT (50 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcomes were local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable models were used to examine the associations between these outcomes and both RT duration and interruptions. Radiotherapy duration was analyzed as a dichotomized variable using an X-Tile software to choose a cut point and its median value as a cut point, as well as a continuous variable. Results The analysis included 509 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [57-70] years; 418 males [82%]; and 376 White individuals [74%]). The median (IQR) follow-up was 4.01 (2.93-4.92) years for surviving patients. The median cut point of RT duration was 39 days or less in 271 patients (53%) vs more than 39 days in 238 patients (47%), and the X-Tile software cut point was 45 days or less in 446 patients (88%) vs more than 45 days in 63 patients (12%). Radiotherapy interruptions occurred in 207 patients (41%). Female (vs male) sex and other (vs White) race and ethnicity were associated with longer RT duration and RT interruptions. In the multivariable models, RT duration longer than 45 days was associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04). The HR for OS was 1.33, but the results were not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.77; P = .05). Radiotherapy duration longer than 39 days (vs ≤39 days) was associated with a higher risk of LRF (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.65; P = .01). As a continuous variable, RT duration (per 1 week increase) was associated with DFS failure (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; P = .03). The HR for LRF 1.13, but the result was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study indicated that in patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive CRT, prolonged RT duration was associated with inferior outcomes; female patients and those with other (vs White) race and ethnicity were more likely to have longer RT duration and experience RT interruptions. Radiotherapy interruptions should be minimized to optimize outcomes.
Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Benson, Al B. , D’Angelica, Michael I. , Abbott, Daniel E. , Anaya, Daniel A. , Are, Chandrakanth , Brown, Daniel B. , Burgoyne, Adam M. , Chahal, Prabhleen , Chang, Daniel T. , Cloyd, Jordan M. , Covey, Anne M. , Iyer, Renuka , Jacob, Rojymon, Kelley, Robin Kate , Kim, Robin D. , Palta, Manisha , Park, James O. , Reddy, Sanjay S. , Sahai, Vaibhav , Schefter, Tracey E., Singh, Gagandeep , Stein, Stacey , Yopp, Adam C. , McMillian, Nicole R., Hochstetler, Cindy, Darlow, Susan, Sahai, Vaibhav , Anders, Robert A. , Bachini, Melinda , Borad, Mitesh J. , Glazer, Evan S. , Goyal, Lipika , Hawkins, William G , Levine, Matthew H , Raman, Steven S. , Vauthey, Jean‐Nicolas , Venook, Alan P.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 26, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 541-565

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0022 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.
A phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin, docetaxel, panitumumab plus radiation therapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (ACOSOG Z4051).
Reed, Carolyn E., Decker, Paul A. , Schefter, Tracey E., Meyers, Bryan , Ferguson, Mark K. , Oeltjen, A.R., Cassivi, Stephen D. , Decker, Paul A. , Putnam, Joe B. , Lockhart, A. Craig

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 4062-4062

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4062 Get It

4062 Background: Multiple clinical trials have incorporated preoperative chemotherapy and radiation (RT) in an attempt to improve local tumor control, distant disease failure and overall survival rates for locally advanced but resectable adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). This multicenter, cooperative group study combined active chemotherapy agents cisplatin (C), docetaxel (D) and the targeted EGFR agent panitumumab (P) in the induction phase followed by concurrent chemotherapy (CDP) and radiation. Pathologic complete response (pCR), a surrogate for improved survival, was the primary endpoint. Methods: From 01/15/09 to 07/22/11, 70 patients (pts) with Siewert I or II adenocarcinomas and clinical stages T3N0M0, T2-3N1M0 or T2-3N0-1M1a (celiac LN ≤ 2 cm) were accrued. Patients received cisplatin (40 mg/m2), docetaxel (40 mg/m2) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg) on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 with RT (5040 cGy, 180 cGy/day x 28d) beginning week 5. The decision rule had a 90% power with a 0.10 significance level to detect a pCR rate of at least 35%. Secondary objectives included near-pathologic complete response (near-pCR), toxicity, and overall and disease-free survival rates. Results: Five pts were ineligible. Of the remaining 65 pts (59 M, 6 F; median age 61), 12 pts did not undergo surgery (5 progressed, 4 refused, 3 other). Of the 58 evaluable pts, the pCR rate was 32.8% (90% CI: 22.6% -42.9%) and near-pCR 22.4% (90% CI: 13.4%-31.4%). Total doses of C, D, and P were achieved in 76%, 80%, and 73%, respectively (n = 70). 66 pts (94%) received the total RT dose. Sixteen pts (23%) had a grade 4+ non-heme adverse event possibly related to treatment. Venous thrombosis (5 pts) was most common. Conclusions: The CDP regimen in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with esophageal adenocarcinomas is active (pCR + near-pCR = 55.2%) and feasible. The toxicity though tolerable is substantial.
Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2019
Benson, Al B. , D’Angelica, Michael I., Abbott, Daniel E. , Anaya, Daniel A. , Are, Chandrakanth , Brown, Daniel B. , Cloyd, Jordan M. , Covey, Anne M. , Iyer, Renuka , Jacob, Rojymon , Karachristos, Andreas , Kelley, Robin Kate , Kim, Robin D. , Palta, Manisha , Park, James O. , Sahai, Vaibhav , Schefter, Tracey E., Singh, Gagandeep , Sohal, Davendra , Stein, Stacey , Tian, Guo , Hammond, Lydia J., Darlow, Susan, Abrams, Thomas A. , Alberts, Steven R. , Anders, Robert A. , Chang, Daniel T. , Hawkins, William G , Sicklick, Jason Keith , Tian, G. Gary, Vauthey, Jean‐Nicolas , Venook, Alan P. , Sahai, Vaibhav

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 8, 2019 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 302-310

10.6004/jnccn.2019.0019 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers provide treatment recommendations for cancers of the liver, gallbladder, and bile ducts. The NCCN Hepatobiliary Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s discussion and updated recommendations regarding systemic therapy for first-line and subsequent-line treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.