Back to Authors

Brown, Amberly

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-5701

Mayo Clinic

Washington University in St. Louis

Citations 3

Neoadjuvant epacadostat (INCB024360) combined with short course radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Efficacy and safety from a phase 2 trial.
Khushman, M., Park, Haeseong , Huang, K, Parikh, Parag J., Lim, Kian-Huat, Tan, Benjamin, Andreatos, Nikolaos , Mutch, Matthew, Chapman, William, Hunt, Steven, Silviera, Matthew L., Cowan, Michelle L., Wise, Paul E, Kim, Hyun, Ciorba, Matthew A. , Pedersen, Katrina S. , Brown, Amberly , Lim, Kian-Huat, Suresh, Rama , Mutch, Matthew G. , Hunt, Steven R., Mo, Allen , Shetty, Anup S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 12, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 2_suppl | Pages: 162-162

10.1200/jco.2026.44.2_suppl.162 Get It

162 Background: In preclinical studies, the tryptophan-metabolizing enzyme, Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), promotes resistance to radiation in colorectal cancer, and IDO1 inhibition with epacadostat improves tumor radiosensitivity. In a phase 1 trial, patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC, n=17) were treated with epacadostat in combination with short course radiotherapy (SCRT) and CAPOX which was well-tolerated, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of epacadostat was 400mg BID. Here we report efficacy and safety from the NCI-supported phase 2 (NCT03516708) multicenter, open-label trial (treatment cohort). Methods: Pts were treated with standard of care (SOC) SCRT, then SOC neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by SOC surgical resection or non-operative management (NOM). Epacadostat (400 mg BID) started with SCRT and continued until starting NAC (a minimum of 21 days). Eight pts were enrolled prior to discontinuation of epacadostat by Incyte in February/March 2025. The primary endpoint is Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score. In patients who underwent NOM, we calculated MRI-based tumor regression grade (MR-TRG). Secondary endpoints are pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, complete clinical response (cCR) rate, and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics and endpoints (primary and secondary). NOM was pursued in 7/8 (87.5%) pts, surgical resection was performed on 1/8 (12.5%). At median follow-up of 12 months, local tumor regrowth occurred in 1 pt initially treated with NOM (after tumor regrowth, he underwent salvage surgery and is currently on surveillance). Treatment with epacadostat was interrupted in 2/8 (25%) patients due to grade 3 maculopapular skin rash. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) regardless of causality (all grades (G)/G3-4) were bloating (75%/0%), increased ALT (62.5%/0%), increased AST (50%/0%), nausea (50%/0%), and constipation (50%/0%). Grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 non-cardiac chest pain occurred in 1 patient each (both unrelated to epacadostat). Conclusions: Epacadostat demonstrates promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with LARC. The biomarker cohort and correlative studies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03516708 . Baseline characteristics and endpoints. Patient Age Sex Ethnicity Stage Surgery/NOM NAR MR-TRG cCR/pCR Recurrence 1 52 M Caucasian T3N1 NOM NA 2 Y/NA No 2 45 M Caucasian T3N1 NOM NA 3 Y/NA Local tumor regrowth 3 48 M Caucasian T3N2 NOM NA 3 Y/NA No 4 61 M Caucasian T4N2 NOM NA 3 Y/NA No 5 57 M Caucasian T3N0 NOM NA 1 Y/NA No 6 60 F Caucasian T3N1 Surgery 15 3 N/ypT3N0 No 7 67 M Caucasian T4N0 NOM NA 3 Y/NA No 8 51 M Caucasian T4N2 NOM NA P NA No
Defactinib, Pembrolizumab, and Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Treatment Refractory Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase I Dose Escalation and Expansion Study
Wang‐Gillam, Andrea , McWilliams, Robert R. , Suresh, Rama , Lockhart, A. Craig , Brown, Amberly , Breden, Marcus , Belle, Jad I. , Herndon, John M. , Bogner, Savannah J. , Tan, Benjamin , Boice, Nicholas , Acharya, Abhi , Abdiannia, Mina , Yoon, Harry H. , Zhu, Mojun , Aranha, Olivia , Herzog, Brett H. , Lim, Kian-Huat , McWilliams, Robert R , Suresh, Rama , Lockhart, Albert C , Brown, Amberly , Breden, Marcus , Belle, Jad I , Herndon, John , Bogner, Savannah J , Pedersen, Katrina , Tan, Benjamin , Boice, Nicholas , Acharya, Abhi , Abdiannia, Mina , Gao, Feng , Yoon, Harry H , Zhu, Mojun , Trikalinos, Nikolaos A , Ratner, Lee , Aranha, Olivia , Hawkins, William G , Herzog, Brett H , DeNardo, David G , Wang-Gillam, Andrea , Pedersen, Katrina S. , Gao, Feng , Trikalinos, Nikolaos A. , Ratner, Lee

Clinical Cancer Research | October 13, 2022 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 5254-5262

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0308 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse model. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor that has a tolerable safety profile. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had stable disease (SD) after at least 4 months of standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 20 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%, with one partial response (PR) and 15 SDs, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.6 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among 10 evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 70% with one PR and six SDs. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS on study treatment were 5.0 and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated and safe, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed biomarker activity in infiltrative T lymphocytes. Efficacy of this strategy may require incorporation of more potent chemotherapy in future studies.
Phase I dose escalation and expansion study of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced treatment-refractory pancreatic cancer.
Lim, Kian-Huat, Tan, Benjamin , Boice, Nicolas, Abdiannia, Mina , Gao, Feng , Yoon, Harry H. , Zhu, Mojun , Aranha, Olivia , Herzog, Brett H. , Wang‐Gillam, Andrea , Lim, Kian-Huat , McWilliams, Robert R. , Suresh, Rama , Lockhart, A. Craig , Brown, Amberly , Herndon, John M. , Pedersen, Katrina S. , Trikalinos, Nikolaos A. , Ratner, Lee , Hawkins, William G , DeNardo, David G

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 4146-4146

10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4146 Get It

4146 Background: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse models. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor shown to have a tolerable safety profile. We evaluated the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of defactinib in combination with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine for PDAC patients. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In 3x3 dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a RP2D. In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had treatment response or stable disease (SD) on standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate changes in tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 17 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 58.8% with one partial response (PR) and nine SDs and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 months and 9.1 months, respectively. Among the evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 63.6% with one PR and six SD. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS were 5.0 months and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed increased infiltrative T lymphocytes in post-treatment tumor biopsies. Incorporation of a more potent chemotherapy backbone should be considered to achieve better clinical response in future trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT02546531.