Back to Authors

Sánchez, César

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7512-6474

Mayo Clinic

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Citations 2

Updated Overall Survival and Long-Term Safety With Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With GI Stromal Tumor: Final Overall Survival Analysis From INTRIGUE
Heinrich, Michael C. , Blay, Jean‐Yves , Gelderblom, Hans , George, Suzanne , Schöffski, Patrick , Mehren, Margaret von , Jones, Robin L. , Kang, Yoon‐Koo , Razak, Albiruni R. Abdul , Attia, Steven , Cesne, Axel Le , Goldstein, David , Sánchez, César , Cox, P. H. , Davis, Erika, Sherman, Matthew L. , Ruiz‐Soto, Rodrigo , Bauer, Sebastian , von Mehren, Margaret , Jones, Robin L , Kang, Yoon-Koo , Razak, Albiruni Abdul , Trent, Jonathan , Attia, Steven , Le Cesne, Axel , Boye, Kjetil , Sánchez, César , Cox, Paulina , Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo , Bauer, Sebastian , Blay, Jean-Yves , Gelderblom, Hans , Heinrich, Michael C , George, Suzanne , Zalcberg, John , Trent, Jonathan C. , Siontis, Brittany L.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 23, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 2239-2244

10.1200/jco-24-02818 Get It

In the INTRIGUE phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501 ), adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib were randomly assigned 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily or sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). In the primary analysis, overall survival (OS) was immature. In this study, we report the final planned analysis of OS (key secondary end point), progression-free survival (PFS) on third-line therapy (second PFS; prespecified exploratory end point), and long-term safety. Final OS analysis was prespecified to occur with approximately 200 and ≥145 events in the overall and KIT exon 11 intention-to-treat (ITT) populations, respectively. As of March 15, 2023, there were 211 and 151 OS events in the overall ITT and KIT exon 11 ITT populations, respectively. Median OS was similar between second-line ripretinib and sunitinib in both populations (overall, 35.5 v 31.5 months; KIT exon 11, 35.5 v 32.8 months). Median second PFS (on third-line therapy) for the overall ITT population was similar between the ripretinib and sunitinib arms (7.7 v 7.4 months). Safety was consistent with the primary analysis. OS from this analysis was similar between arms, and second PFS suggests that receiving ripretinib did not adversely affect the PFS of third-line therapy.
A Phase I Study of the AKT Inhibitor MK-2206 in Combination with Hormonal Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Cynthia, X. , Sánchez, César , Crowder, Robert J., Creekmore, Allison, Guo, Zhanfang , Doyle, Austin, Erlichman, Charles , Gao, Feng , Naughton, Michael J. , Pluard, Timothy , Hoog, Jeremy , Lockhart, A. Craig , Ellis, Matthew J. , Sánchez, César

Clinical Cancer Research | January 18, 2016 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2650-2658

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2160 Get It

Abstract Purpose: PI3K/AKT pathway activation is an important endocrine resistance mechanism in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. After promising preclinical modeling of MK-2206, an allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor, with either estrogen deprivation or fulvestrant, we conducted a phase I trial in patients with metastatic ER+HER2− breast cancer to determine the recommended phase II treatment dose (RPTD) of MK-2206 when combined with either anastrozole, fulvestrant, or anastrozole/fulvestrant. Experimental Design: ER+ breast cancer cell lines were exposed in vitro to MK-2206 plus estrogen deprivation with or without fulvestrant and monitored for apoptosis. A standard 3+3 design was employed to first determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-2206 plus anastrozole based on cycle 1 toxicity. Each cycle was 28 days. The RPTD was determined on the basis of toxicities observed at MTD level during the first 3 cycles. Subsequent patients received MK-2206, at the RPTD determined above, plus fulvestrant or anastrozole/fulvestrant to define RPTD for these additional regimens. Results: MK-2206 induced apoptosis in parental ER+ but not in long-term estrogen-deprived cell lines, for which fulvestrant was required for apoptosis induction. Thirty-one patients enrolled. The RPTD was defined as MK-2206 150 mg orally weekly with prednisone prophylaxis for each combination. Grade 3 rash was dose limiting. 42% (95% CI, 23%–63%) patients derived clinical benefit without progression within 6 months. Response was not associated with tumor PIK3CA mutation. Conclusions: MK-2206 plus endocrine treatments were tolerable. MK-2206 in combination with anastrozole is being further evaluated in a phase II neoadjuvant trial for newly diagnosed ER+HER2− breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2650–8. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Jansen et al., p. 2599