Crowder, Robert J.

Abstract RNA sequencing detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. Herein we examined multiple in-frame and out-of-frame ESR1 fusions and found only two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment resistant disease, encoded stable and functional in-frame fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, the N-terminal, DNA binding and dimerization motifs encoded by exons 2-6 were fused to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties included estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, anti-estrogen resistance, induction of cellular motility in vitro and the development of lung metastasis in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing experiments showed both fusions uniquely activated a metastasis-associated transcriptional program. ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Jin Cao, Meenakshi Anurag, Purba Singh, Xiaping He, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Robert Crowder, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Raquel M. Peres, Nindo Punturi, Cheryl Schmidt, Alex Bartram, Eric Jou, W V. Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri R. Davies, Shunqiang Li, Cynthia X. Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly K. Hunt, Mark A. Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, E A. Thompson, Xi Chen, Shyam M. Kavuri, Chad J. Creighton, Christopher A. Maher, Charles M. Perou, Svasti Haricharan, Matthew J. Ellis. Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5240.

Abstract Dysregulation of estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) is an established mechanism of inducing endocrine therapy resistance. We previously discovered a chromosomal translocation event generating an estrogen receptor gene fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences of YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1) that contributed to endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer models. This current study compares functional and pharmacological properties of additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage (ESR1-NOP2) and advanced endocrine therapy resistant (ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x) breast cancers. The YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions conferred estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth in T47D, an ER+ breast cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo, in contrast to the NOP2 fusion which was sensitive to hormone deprivation. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of mouse lungs revealed significantly higher numbers of micrometastatic ER+ cells from the T47D tumors expressing the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions than YFP control and NOP2 fusion. Estrogen response element (ERE) reporter and pull down assays revealed that although all ESR1 fusions studied bound EREs, only the YAP1 and PCDH11x caused ERE activation. Cell lines containing these “canonical” ESR1 fusions upregulated expression of ER responsive genes such as TFF1 and GREB1 in hormone deprived conditions. In contrast, the NOP2 fusion neither induced ERE activity nor upregulated TFF1 and GREB1 gene expression. The proliferative ability of canonical fusion-containing T47D cells was inhibited by palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo growth of patient-derived xenograft tumors naturally harboring the ESR1-YAP1 fusion (WHIM18) was significantly reduced in mice fed palbociclib-containing chow. Mice transplanted with WHIM18 also formed lung micrometastases, with an ER IHC staining pattern similar to lungs from YAP1 and PCDH11x fusion expressing T47D xenografts. In conclusion, in-frame ERE activating canonical fusions occur in end-stage, drug resistant, advanced breast cancer and can be added to ESR1 point mutations as a class of somatic mutation that may cause acquired resistance. Endocrine therapy resistant growth induced by these fusions can be treated with CDK4/6 inhibition, using an FDA approved drug, palbociclib, which could potentially improve outcomes in patients with ESR1 translocated tumors. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Xiaping He, Purba Singh, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Robert Crowder, Svasti Haricharan, Shyam Kavuri, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Wei-Chu Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri Davies, Cynthia Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly Hunt, Mark Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, Aubrey Thompson, Charles Perou, Chad J. Creighton, Chris Maher, Matthew J. Ellis. Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1033. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1033

Abstract Purpose: PI3K/AKT pathway activation is an important endocrine resistance mechanism in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. After promising preclinical modeling of MK-2206, an allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor, with either estrogen deprivation or fulvestrant, we conducted a phase I trial in patients with metastatic ER+HER2− breast cancer to determine the recommended phase II treatment dose (RPTD) of MK-2206 when combined with either anastrozole, fulvestrant, or anastrozole/fulvestrant. Experimental Design: ER+ breast cancer cell lines were exposed in vitro to MK-2206 plus estrogen deprivation with or without fulvestrant and monitored for apoptosis. A standard 3+3 design was employed to first determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-2206 plus anastrozole based on cycle 1 toxicity. Each cycle was 28 days. The RPTD was determined on the basis of toxicities observed at MTD level during the first 3 cycles. Subsequent patients received MK-2206, at the RPTD determined above, plus fulvestrant or anastrozole/fulvestrant to define RPTD for these additional regimens. Results: MK-2206 induced apoptosis in parental ER+ but not in long-term estrogen-deprived cell lines, for which fulvestrant was required for apoptosis induction. Thirty-one patients enrolled. The RPTD was defined as MK-2206 150 mg orally weekly with prednisone prophylaxis for each combination. Grade 3 rash was dose limiting. 42% (95% CI, 23%–63%) patients derived clinical benefit without progression within 6 months. Response was not associated with tumor PIK3CA mutation. Conclusions: MK-2206 plus endocrine treatments were tolerable. MK-2206 in combination with anastrozole is being further evaluated in a phase II neoadjuvant trial for newly diagnosed ER+HER2− breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2650–8. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Jansen et al., p. 2599

Abstract Background. We recently identified an in-frame ESR1 translocation in a tumor and PDX pair from a patient with endocrine therapy resistant advanced disease. The fusion gene preserved the N-terminal 365aa of ESR1 containing the intact activation function 1 (AF1), DNA-binding domain (DBD) and hinge, followed by the C-terminal transactivation domain of YAP1. The ESR1-365>YAP1 fusion drove estrogen-independent and anti-estrogen-resistant tumor cell growth (Cell Reports 4:1116, 2013). We therefore sought to further investigate the role of ESR1 fusion genes in breast cancer. Methods. 711 cases from TCGA, 82 ER+ cases from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials and 25 ER+ systemic relapse samples were screened for fusion genes using RNAseq. Fusion genes involving ESR1 were subsequently assayed for estrogen response element (ERE)-mediated transcriptional activity and ability to drive estradiol independent breast cancer cell growth. Results. Multiple ESR1 fusions were identified in mostly luminal B cancers. ESR1 fusions resulted most frequently from rearrangements involving another gene on Chromosome (Chr) 6 but also fusions with genes on other chromosomes. The fusions involving partners on Chr6 that retained an intact N terminal AF1 and DNA binding domain (DBD) of ESR1 (≥1-253aa) included an Out-of-Frame (OF) fusion event with CCDC170 (a gene immediately centromeric to ESR1), POLH (in-frame or IF), AKAP12 (IF), PCMT1 (OF), SYNE1 (OF) and GPR126 (OF). Also identified were inter-chromosomal translocations involving Chr12p-NOP2 (IF) and ChrX-PCDH11X (IF) and Chr7q-AKR1D1 (OF). The ESR1 fusions with transcriptional potential (because of a retained DNA binding domain) included variable 5’ ESR1 exons that preserved 253aa, 365aa, 412aa or 458aa of ESR1 sequence: in all cases disrupting ligand binding though loss of C terminal sequence. The effect of the IF and OF 3’ sequences on the transcriptional activity of the relevant ESR1 fragment was highly variable. The most transcriptionally active fusion (more active than the relevant ESR1 fragment alone) was the ESR1-365>YAP1 as well as ESR1-365>PCDH11X and ESR1-253>CCDC170. This is remarkable since PCDH11X is not considered a transcription factor and the CCDC170 sequence was OF – in both cases suggesting the activity of the fusion was due to "neomorphic" properties. Two fusions, NOP2 and POLH were inactive in the ERE reporter assay, yet both stimulated estradiol independent growth. In these cases we suggest that the ESR1 locus can function as a "promoter trap" which allows the identification of genes with previously unknown functions in endocrine therapy resistance. Conclusions: In luminal-type breast cancer the ESR1 gene was fused to multiple 3’ partners with remarkably heterogeneous functions. The two most transcriptionally active, ESR1-365>YAP1 and ESR1-365>PCDH11X, were both identified in endocrine therapy refractory advanced disease – suggesting a role in fatal disease progression. Citation Format: Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Robert J Crowder, Rodrigo Goncalves, Chanpheng Phommaly, Breast AWG and Network, Charles M Perou, Christopher A Maher, E Aubrey Thompson, Matthew J Ellis. ESR1 gene fusions implicated in endocrine therapy resistance of ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-4.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptors are over-expressed in around 70% of breast cancer cases. The genetic changes that occur during aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment are not well understood and may differ depending upon the patient's response phenotype. Methods: We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) of matched blood, pre-treatment, and post-treatment biopsy samples from 22 estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitors. For 5 cases, we performed the whole genome sequencing (WGS) on patients’ matched normal, two pre AI-treatment, and two post AI-treatment DNA isolates from biopsy samples. We validated all putative coding and non-coding somatic mutations using deep sequencing. By comparing the validated somatic mutations from pre- and post- AI treatment biopsy samples, we were able to determine the alterations in the tumor genomes. In every case we defined the clonal architecture of each pair of pre-treatment and post-treatment biopsy samples by comparing the variant allele frequencies from thousands of validated somatic mutations. Results: Comparisons of the two pre AI-treatment biopsy samples from the same patient indicates that the variant allele frequencies of mutations showed high concordances in all 5 cases, 0.74 to 0.95 range of correlation coefficient. Only a small percentage of somatic mutations were detected in one pre-treatment sample and not the other (4.65% overall). In comparing the somatic variations between pre-treatment and matched post-treatment biopsy samples in 22 cases, we found that patients with good clinical response to AI treatment retained known driver mutations only in their pre-treatment tumors. Conversely, those patients with poor clinical response presented new driver mutations in their post-treatment samples. Furthermore, the variant allele frequency for most mutated genes decreased in post AI treatment samples for patients with good AI treatment response; on the contrary, the variant allele frequency increased for patients with poor clinical response. Conclusions: From WGS of matched normal, pre-treatment, and post-treatment biopsy samples, we identified new driver genes mutated in patients with poor clinical response, while patients with good clinical response had lost mutated driver genes in their post-treatment biopsy samples. The genetic landscape revealed by WGS of pre-treatment and post-treatment biopsy samples reveals mutational repertoires are remodeled by AI therapy. This finding suggests deep sequencing of AI treated samples will be necessary to reveal the complete complement of mutations present in a patient's tumor. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-423. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-423