Back to Authors

Davies, Sherri R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-8354

Mayo Clinic

Washington University in St. Louis

Citations 4

Abstract 5240: Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer
Shao, Jieya , Iglesia, Michael D. , Chan, Doug W. , Jin, Cao , Singh, Purba , He, Xiaping , Kosaka, Yoshimasa , Matsunuma, Ryoichi , Crowder, Robert J., Phommaly, Chanpheng, Gonçalves, Rodrigo , Romalho, Susana, Peres, Raquel Mary Rodrigues , Punturi, Nindo , Schmidt, Cheryl, Bartram, Alex, Jou, Eric , Lai, W V., Rogers, Anna , Tobias, Ethan, Parikh, Poojan A., Li, Shunqiang , Cynthia, X. , Thompson, Emily A. , Kavuri, Shyam M. , Creighton, Chad J. , Maher, Christopher A. , Haricharan, Svasti , Lei, Jonathan T. , Zhang, Jin , Anurag, Meenakshi , Hoog, Jeremy , Lai, W V., Hampton, Oliver , Davies, Sherri R. , Suman, Vera J. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Watson, Mark A. , Hoadley, Katherine A. , Thompson, E A., Chen, Xi , Perou, Charles M. , Ellis, Matthew J.

Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 5240-5240

10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-5240 Get It

Abstract RNA sequencing detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. Herein we examined multiple in-frame and out-of-frame ESR1 fusions and found only two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment resistant disease, encoded stable and functional in-frame fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, the N-terminal, DNA binding and dimerization motifs encoded by exons 2-6 were fused to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties included estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, anti-estrogen resistance, induction of cellular motility in vitro and the development of lung metastasis in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing experiments showed both fusions uniquely activated a metastasis-associated transcriptional program. ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Jin Cao, Meenakshi Anurag, Purba Singh, Xiaping He, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Robert Crowder, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Raquel M. Peres, Nindo Punturi, Cheryl Schmidt, Alex Bartram, Eric Jou, W V. Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri R. Davies, Shunqiang Li, Cynthia X. Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly K. Hunt, Mark A. Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, E A. Thompson, Xi Chen, Shyam M. Kavuri, Chad J. Creighton, Christopher A. Maher, Charles M. Perou, Svasti Haricharan, Matthew J. Ellis. Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5240.
Abstract 1033: Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
Shao, Jieya , Iglesia, Michael D. , Chan, Doug W. , Matsunuma, Ryoichi , He, Xiaping , Singh, Purba , Kosaka, Yoshimasa , Crowder, Robert J., Haricharan, Svasti , Kavuri, Shyam M. , Phommaly, Chanpheng, Gonçalves, Rodrigo , Romalho, Susana, Lai, W. Victoria , Rogers, Anna , Tobias, Ethan, Parikh, P.J., Cynthia, X. , Thompson, Aubrey, Creighton, Chad J. , Lei, Jonathan T. , Zhang, Jin , Hoog, Jeremy , Hampton, Oliver , Davies, Sherri R. , Suman, Vera J. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Watson, Mark A. , Hoadley, Katherine A. , Perou, Charles M. , Maher, Christopher G. , Ellis, Matthew J.

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 1033-1033

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-1033 Get It

Abstract Dysregulation of estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) is an established mechanism of inducing endocrine therapy resistance. We previously discovered a chromosomal translocation event generating an estrogen receptor gene fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences of YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1) that contributed to endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer models. This current study compares functional and pharmacological properties of additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage (ESR1-NOP2) and advanced endocrine therapy resistant (ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x) breast cancers. The YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions conferred estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth in T47D, an ER+ breast cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo, in contrast to the NOP2 fusion which was sensitive to hormone deprivation. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of mouse lungs revealed significantly higher numbers of micrometastatic ER+ cells from the T47D tumors expressing the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions than YFP control and NOP2 fusion. Estrogen response element (ERE) reporter and pull down assays revealed that although all ESR1 fusions studied bound EREs, only the YAP1 and PCDH11x caused ERE activation. Cell lines containing these “canonical” ESR1 fusions upregulated expression of ER responsive genes such as TFF1 and GREB1 in hormone deprived conditions. In contrast, the NOP2 fusion neither induced ERE activity nor upregulated TFF1 and GREB1 gene expression. The proliferative ability of canonical fusion-containing T47D cells was inhibited by palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo growth of patient-derived xenograft tumors naturally harboring the ESR1-YAP1 fusion (WHIM18) was significantly reduced in mice fed palbociclib-containing chow. Mice transplanted with WHIM18 also formed lung micrometastases, with an ER IHC staining pattern similar to lungs from YAP1 and PCDH11x fusion expressing T47D xenografts. In conclusion, in-frame ERE activating canonical fusions occur in end-stage, drug resistant, advanced breast cancer and can be added to ESR1 point mutations as a class of somatic mutation that may cause acquired resistance. Endocrine therapy resistant growth induced by these fusions can be treated with CDK4/6 inhibition, using an FDA approved drug, palbociclib, which could potentially improve outcomes in patients with ESR1 translocated tumors. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Xiaping He, Purba Singh, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Robert Crowder, Svasti Haricharan, Shyam Kavuri, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Wei-Chu Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri Davies, Cynthia Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly Hunt, Mark Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, Aubrey Thompson, Charles Perou, Chad J. Creighton, Chris Maher, Matthew J. Ellis. Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1033. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1033
Recommendations for the Generation, Quantification, Storage, and Handling of Peptides Used for Mass Spectrometry–Based Assays
Hoofnagle, Andrew N. , Carr, Steven A. , Liu, Tao , Massoni, Sam A., Thomas, Stefani N. , Townsend, R. Reid , Zimmerman, Lisa J. , Boja, Emily S. , Chen, Jing , Crimmins, Daniel L., Davies, Sherri R. , Hiltke, Tara , Ketchum, Karen A. , Kinsinger, Christopher R. , Mesri, Mehdi , Meyer, Matthew R. , Qian, Weijun , Schoenherr, Regine M., Scott, Mitchell G., Shi, Tujin , Whiteley, Gordon , Wrobel, John A. , Wu, Chaochao, Ackermann, Brad, Barnidge, David R. , Bunk, David M. , Clarke, Nigel J. , Fishman, Jordan B., Grant, Russ P., Kushnir, Mark M. , Lowenthal, Mark S. , Neubert, Hendrik , Patterson, Scott D. , Rockwood, Alan L. , Rogers, John , Eyk, Jennifer E. Van , Wong, Steven, Zhang, Shucha, Chan, Daniel W. , Chen, Xian , Liebler, D.C. , Rodland, Karin , Rodriguez, Henry , Paulovich, Amanda G. , Whiteaker, Jeffrey R. , Kuhn, Eric W. , Gao, Yuqian , Aebersold, Ruedi , Grant, Russell P. , Kusebauch, Ulrike , Moritz, Robert L. , Singh, Ravinder J. , Ellis, Matthew J. , Smith, Richard , Zhang, Zhen , Zhang, Hui , Davies, S. J.

Clinical Chemistry | December 30, 2015 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 48-69

10.1373/clinchem.2015.250563 Get It

AbstractBACKGROUNDFor many years, basic and clinical researchers have taken advantage of the analytical sensitivity and specificity afforded by mass spectrometry in the measurement of proteins. Clinical laboratories are now beginning to deploy these work flows as well. For assays that use proteolysis to generate peptides for protein quantification and characterization, synthetic stable isotope–labeled internal standard peptides are of central importance. No general recommendations are currently available surrounding the use of peptides in protein mass spectrometric assays.CONTENTThe Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium of the National Cancer Institute has collaborated with clinical laboratorians, peptide manufacturers, metrologists, representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, and other professionals to develop a consensus set of recommendations for peptide procurement, characterization, storage, and handling, as well as approaches to the interpretation of the data generated by mass spectrometric protein assays. Additionally, the importance of carefully characterized reference materials—in particular, peptide standards for the improved concordance of amino acid analysis methods across the industry—is highlighted. The alignment of practices around the use of peptides and the transparency of sample preparation protocols should allow for the harmonization of peptide and protein quantification in research and clinical care.
Tumor Ki67 Proliferation Index within 4 Weeks of Initiating Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Early Identification of Non-Responders.
Snider, J., DeSchryver, Katherine, Allred, C, Smith, I E , A'Hern, R., Ellis, Matthew J. , Luo, Jingqin , Tao, Yu , Hoog, Jeremy , Davies, Sherri R. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Olson, John A. , Suman, Vera J. , Perou, Charles M. , Nielsen, Torsten O. , Cheang, Maggie C.U. , Dowsett, Mitch

Cancer Research | December 30, 2010 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 24_Supplement | Pages: 78-78

10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-09-78 Get It

Abstract Background: The Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) scores the independent prognostic effects of tumor pathologic staging and expression levels of ER and the “proliferation” marker Ki67 in the surgical sample to predict long term outcomes after completion of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (Ellis et al JNCI 100:1380, 2008). A limitation of the PEPI is that the prognostic information becomes available only after 4 months of treatment. We therefore evaluated the value of an early assessment of the Ki67 level in a tumor biopsy sample taken two to four weeks after initiating treatment in two neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials for the purposes of the early identification of non- respondersMethods: A Ki67 cut point of greater than 10% for poor outcome in ER+ breast cancer was derived by comparing the PAM50 intrinsic subtype profile using a qRT-PCR assay with Ki67 data in a 700+ sample data set. A baseline level of 10% or less correlated most closely with a PAM50-based definition of LumA breast cancer and above 10% LumB breast cancer. We subsequently applied the 10% cut point to the baseline and early on-treatment Ki67 data in two trials, POL (Olson et al JACS 208:906, 2009) and IMPACT (Smith et al JCO: 23, 5108, 2005).Results: At baseline the dichotomized Ki67 definition was not significantly predictive for surgical Ki67 level, PEPI score or RFS in this modest size sample set. In contrast, in a result that emphasizes the enhaced prognostic properties of the on-treatment Ki67 approach, the one month POL sample Ki67 values (62 patients) predicted a higher level of Ki67 in the surgical samples at four months after treatment initiation (P=.01), a poorer PEPI score (P=0.01), a smaller number of patients in the PEPI risk point zero group (P=0.08) and worse relapse free survival (P=0.003). The IMPACT data (153 patients) confirmed that a two week Ki67 >10% predicted higher Ki67 in the surgical specimen (P=0.001), a poorer PEPI score (P=0.001), smaller numbers of patients in the PEPI 0 risk point group (P= 0.004) and worse relapse free survival (P=0.008).Ki67 and OutcomePOL 4W Ki67% PEPI 0RFS (events)10%>1/19 (5%)5/21 (23%)10%≤10/36 (28%)1/41 (2.4%)P ValueP=0.08 (Fisher)P=0.003 (log rank)IMPACT 2W Ki67% PEPI 0RFS (events)10%>0/32 (0%)9/35 (26%)10%≤21/101 (21%)13/118 (11%)P ValueP=0.004 (Fisher)P=0.008 (log rank) Conclusions: A tumor Ki67 assessment taken a short time (2 to 4 week window) after the initiation of neoadjuvant AI identifies patients with poor outcome ER+ disease. Amendment 6 of the neoadjuvant endocrine therapy protocol ACOSOG Z1031 will triage patients with an “on treatment” Ki67 value above 10% to chemotherapy in order to assess the pathological response rate to cytotoxic therapy in this important tumor subset.Supported by R01 CA095614, Avon PFP award 3P50 CA68438-07S2, U01 CA114722, ACOSOG U10 CA 76001, Breakthrough Cancer UK and AstraZenica (IMPACT trial). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 78.