Scott, Mitchell G.

Abstract Background Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid associated with illicit drug use and overdose deaths. The SEFRIA Immunalysis (IAL) and ARK fentanyl assays are both FDA-cleared, open channel immunoassays for fentanyl detection in urine. However, limited data are available in the literature comparing these assays. The objective of this study was to perform a direct comparison of these two fentanyl immunoassays. Methods IAL and ARK fentanyl immunoassays were performed on a Roche Cobas e602 automated chemistry analyzer. Repeatability and total imprecision were compared by diluting fentanyl into urine at concentrations above, below, and at the manufacturers’ cutoffs of 1.0 ng/mL. Cross-reactivity was assessed for norfentanyl and the fentanyl analogs acetylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, and furanylfentanyl. Concordance was assessed in 90 patient samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the gold standard. Results Repeatability varied from 11.4%–17.8% on the IAL assay and 2.8%–5.5% on the ARK assay. Total imprecision was 18.9%–40.7% on the IAL assay and 2.9%–6.4% on the ARK assay. Both assays cross-reacted with acetylfentanyl (∼100%), acrylfentanyl (∼100%), and furanylfentanyl (∼20%), but only the ARK assay cross-reacted with norfentanyl (∼3%). An admixture of 0.5 ng/mL fentanyl and 6 ng/mL norfentanyl produced a positive result on the ARK assay. Total concordance between IAL and ARK for 90 tested patient samples was 93% (kappa = 0.85). Relative to LC-MS/MS, the IAL assay had a concordance of 90% (kappa = 0.79) and the ARK assay had a concordance of 94% (kappa = 0.88). Including norfentanyl in the LC-MS/MS confirmation increased the concordance of the ARK to 96% (kappa = 0.90). Conclusions The ARK assay recognized the metabolite norfentanyl, demonstrated superior precision, and had better concordance with LC-MS/MS compared to the IAL assay.

Background The recent introduction of high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs‐cTn) assays has allowed clinicians to measure hs‐cTn before and after cardiac stress testing, but the hs‐cTn release pattern and potential utility in identifying inducible myocardial ischemia are unclear. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to improve our understanding of hs‐cTn release associated with exercise and pharmacological stress testing. Methods and Results Studies published between January 2008 and July 2016 that reported hs‐cTn change values (high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs‐cTnT] or high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I [hs‐cTnI]) in relation to cardiac stress testing were searched and reviewed by 2 independent screeners. Primary outcomes were pooled estimates of absolute and relative hs‐cTn changes after cardiac stress test, stratified by the presence of inducible myocardial ischemia. This meta‐analysis included 11 studies (n=2432 patients). After exercise stress testing, hs‐cTnT increased by 0.5 ng/L or 11% (6 studies, n=406) and hs‐cTnI by 2.4 ng/L or 41% (4 studies, n=365) in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia versus hs‐cTnT by 1.1 ng/L or 18% (8 studies, n=629; P =0.29) and hs‐cTnI by 1.8 ng/L or 72% (4 studies, n=831; P =0.61) in patients who did not develop inducible myocardial ischemia. After pharmacological stress test, hs‐cTnT changed by −0.1 ng/L or −0.4% (6 studies, n=251) and hs‐cTnI by 2.4 ng/L or 32% (2 studies, n=108) in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia versus hs‐cTnT by 0.7 ng/L or 11% (5 studies, n=443, P =0.44) and hs‐cTnI by 1.7 ng/L or 38% (2 studies, n=116; P =0.62) in patients who did not develop inducible myocardial ischemia. Conclusions hs‐cTn rising patterns after exercise and pharmacological stress testing appear inconsistent and comparably small, and do not appear to be correlated with inducible myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether preoperatively measured high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N -terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) improve cardiac risk prediction in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery compared with the standard risk indices. METHODS: In this ancillary study to the Vitamins in Nitrous Oxide trial, patients were included who had preoperative hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP measured (n = 572). Study outcome was the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) within the first 3 postoperative days. hs-cTnT was considered elevated if >14 ng/L and NT-proBNP if >300 ng/L. Additional cutoff values were investigated on the basis of receiver operating characteristic statistics. Biomarker risk prediction was compared with Lee’s Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) with the use of standard methods and net reclassification index. RESULTS: The addition of hs-cTnT (>14 ng/L) and NT-proBNP (>300 ng/L) to RCRI significantly improved the prediction of postoperative MI (event rate 30/572 [5.2%], Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.590 to 0.716 with a 0.66 net reclassification index [95% confidence interval 0.32–0.99], P < .001). The use of 108 ng/L as a cutoff for NT-proBNP improved sensitivity compared with 300 ng/L (0.87 vs 0.53). Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value for hs-cTnT were 0.70, 0.60, 0.09, and 0.97 and for NT-proBNP were 0.53, 0.68, 0.08, and 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cardiac biomarkers hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP to RCRI improves the prediction of adverse cardiac events in the immediate postoperative period after major noncardiac surgery. The high negative predictive value of preoperative hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP suggest usefulness as a “rule-out” test to confirm low risk of postoperative MI.

AbstractBACKGROUNDFor many years, basic and clinical researchers have taken advantage of the analytical sensitivity and specificity afforded by mass spectrometry in the measurement of proteins. Clinical laboratories are now beginning to deploy these work flows as well. For assays that use proteolysis to generate peptides for protein quantification and characterization, synthetic stable isotope–labeled internal standard peptides are of central importance. No general recommendations are currently available surrounding the use of peptides in protein mass spectrometric assays.CONTENTThe Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium of the National Cancer Institute has collaborated with clinical laboratorians, peptide manufacturers, metrologists, representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, and other professionals to develop a consensus set of recommendations for peptide procurement, characterization, storage, and handling, as well as approaches to the interpretation of the data generated by mass spectrometric protein assays. Additionally, the importance of carefully characterized reference materials—in particular, peptide standards for the improved concordance of amino acid analysis methods across the industry—is highlighted. The alignment of practices around the use of peptides and the transparency of sample preparation protocols should allow for the harmonization of peptide and protein quantification in research and clinical care.

Abstract Background: Enzymatic creatinine assays are routinely used in clinical laboratories to provide more accurate estimated glomerular filtration rates and to avoid a perceived lack of analytical specificity associated with picrate (Jaffe) methods. Negative interferences with the enzymatic creatinine assay, which we noted in several patients on dopamine or dobutamine, prompted our further investigation into interference of catecholamines with enzymatic methods. Methods: Spiked solutions of dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were added to pooled sera at catecholamine concentrations consistent with clinically relevant dosing. Creatinine was measured enzymatically on the Roche P-Modular, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Vitros 350, and Abbott i-STAT. Jaffe methods were performed on the Roche P-Modular and Siemens Dimension RxL. In 10 patients receiving dopamine and/or dobutamine via a venous or arterial line we evaluated and compared the extent of in vivo creatinine interference in paired serum samples obtained by venipuncture and from indwelling catheters. Results: All catecholamines caused significant negative interference with the Roche enzymatic creatinine assay, most pronounced for dopamine and dobutamine. The Vitros enzymatic assay demonstrated slight negative interferences, and i-STAT enzymatic and Jaffe methods were unaffected by the presence of catecholamines. Significant (P &lt; 0.001) differences in creatinine concentrations by Roche enzymatic vs Jaffe methods were observed in venipuncture specimens compared with arterial or venous catheter specimens, suggesting dopamine and dobutamine reversibly adhere to the catheter lumen. Conclusions: Negative interferences were pronounced for Roche enzymatic results in blood samples obtained from indwelling catheters, a phenomenon not observed in peripheral draws. Physicians and laboratorians should be alert to the possibility of a falsely low creatinine result and reevaluate questionable samples using a method unaffected by catecholamines.