Whiteaker, Jeffrey R.

AbstractIntroductionAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains one of the deadliest hematopoietic malignancies. A better understanding of the molecular biology governing AML may lead to improved risk stratification and facilitate the development of novel therapies. Proteins are responsible for much of the biology of cells. Several studies have examined the global proteome in bulk mononuclear cells (MNCs) from AML specimens, which are comprised a heterogenous population of cells at various stages of differentiation.MethodsGiven the potential impact of the nonleukemic cells on protein expression profiles, we applied an integrative proteogenomic approach utilizing next‐generation sequencing and mass spectrometry‐based proteomics to identify novel protein biomarkers in unsorted MNCs and viable leukemic blasts (VLBs) isolated from blood and bone marrow specimens obtained at the time of AML diagnosis.ResultsWe identified significant differences in protein expression between VLBs and MNCs. Subsequent studies (N = 27) focused on proteomic profiling of VLBs that identified novel candidate biomarkers associated with mutational genotypes and clinical outcome, some of which were recapitulated in an independent cohort of patients. Using mass spectrometry, we also detected mutated protein products, some of which were predicted via in silico analyses to be potential neoantigens amenable to adoptive immunotherapy. As previously described, analyses comparing transcript and protein expression showed an overall modest correlation between mRNA and protein dataset, but enriching for genes associated with mutations significantly improved the protein–RNA correlation.ConclusionTogether, the results provide insight into the biology of VLBs and demonstrate the gains derived from examining the proteome in addition to genome and transcriptome.

Abstract Platinum-based DNA cross-linking agents are widely used anti-cancer drugs. Tumor resistance to platinum compounds is a major determinant of patient survival, including in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Remarkably, despite >30 years of literature on platinum responses in human cancer, none of these findings is used clinically as a predictive biomarker to stratify patients for platinum resistance, nor exploited therapeutically to treat platinum-resistant disease. Thus, understanding mechanisms of platinum resistance is an urgent goal, both to identify predictive biomarkers of platinum response (to spare patients with platinum-resistant tumors futile platinum therapy) and to develop efficacious therapies for platinum-resistant disease. To better understand mechanisms underlying platinum resistance in HGSOC, we performed comprehensive, dynamic (+/-carboplatin), multiomic profiling of DNA, RNA, protein and post-translational modifications (phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation) to identify the cellular networks that respond to platinum treatment and associate with platinum resistance in three HGSOC intra-patient cell line pairs (PEA1S/PEA2R, PEO1S/PEO4R, PEO14S/PEO23R). The cell line pairs were derived from ascites or pleural effusions (Langdon et al., 1988) from three patients both before (PEA1S, PEO1S, PEO14S) and after (PEA2R, PEO4R, PEO23R, respectively) their tumors became clinically platinum resistant (i.e., in vivo development of resistance). The molecular profiles revealed extensive responses to carboplatin and differential responses between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant cells. Higher oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) pathway expression were observed in the platinum-resistant cells, which was further validated in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We show that pharmacologic inhibition or CRISPR knockout of CPT1A, which represents a rate limiting step of FAO, sensitize HGSOC cells to platinum. Thus, FAO, and CPT1A in particular, represent a candidate therapeutic target to overcome platinum resistance in HGSOC. Citation Format: Hong Wang, Dongqing Hugang, Shrabanti Chowdhury, Sara Savage, Richard Ivey, Jacob Kennedy, Jeffrey Whiteaker, Chenwei Lin, Xiaonan Hou, Catherine Huntoon, Uliana Voytovich, Zahra Shire, Qing Yu, Steven Gygi, Andrew Hoofnagle, Zachary Herbert, Anna Calinawan, Larry Karnitz, S. John Weroha, Scott Kaufmann, Bing Zhang, Pei Wang, Michael Birrer, Amanda Paulovich. Multiomic analysis identifies CPT1A and fatty acid oxidation as a potential therapeutic target in platinum-refractory high grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1426.

Abstract Although high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) are highly chemosensitive with an 85% initial response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, 15% of patients are “exceptional nonresponders,” with platinum-refractory tumors that remain stable or progress during treatment. Unfortunately, we have no predictive biomarkers to identify refractory patients up front, and they receive futile chemotherapy through which most patients become too ill to be eligible for clinical trials. Hence, no progress has been made in treating these deadly tumors. The goal of this study is to identify mechanisms of platinum refractoriness to: i) predict refractory HGSOCs up front and ii) identify potential new drug targets in refractory disease to point to desperately needed new therapeutic approaches. Of note, 80-90% of patients who are initially platinum responsive will relapse and develop platinum-resistant disease, and it is possible that findings in platinum-refractory tumors might also provide insights into platinum-resistant tumors. Our NCI Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC)-funded approach combines genomic and proteomic (“proteogenomic”) analyses of both preclinical models (0, 8, and 24 hours post-platinum exposure) and treatment-naïve human tumors. For preclinical models, we studied a well-characterized collection of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models (10 sensitive, 10 refractory), as well as intrapatient HGSOC cell line pairs derived from patients before and after the development of platinum resistance. For the PDX models, proteogenomic profiling included RNASeq, WES, global proteomics, and phosphoproteomics at all 3 time points (0, 8, 24 hours). For cell line models (3 sensitive, 3 resistant), proteogenomic profiling was performed at all 3 timepoints (0, 8, 24 hours), and experiments were performed in complete biologic triplicate. Analyses included RNASeq, WES, global proteomics, phosphoproteomics, ubiquitin proteome, acetylated proteome, and pTyr. A large collection of 275 human HGSOCs (an approximate equal balance of platinum sensitive and refractory tumors) is currently undergoing proteomic profiling, and genomic profiles (WGS, RNASeq) will be performed on a subset. In parallel, we have performed a comprehensive review of 31 years of published work on platinum responses of human cancers, identifying ~700 genes implicated in the response and scoring each gene with respect to strength of the published evidence. Using a Bayesian approach, we are integrating the curated candidates from the literature with our empirical proteogenomic datasets to identify a candidate signature for detecting platinum-refractory disease prior to chemotherapy. We are also performing gene-regulatory network analysis to identify potential drivers of chemo response. NextGen, targeted, multiplex, multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based assays are being developed to quantify proteins in the signature for validation studies, using independent patient cohorts. This abstract is also being presented as Poster A62. Citation Format: Jacob J. Kennedy, Shrabanti Chowdhury, Sara R. Savage, Xiaonan Hou, Catherine J. Huntoon, Richard G. Ivey, Qing Yu, Chenwei Lin, Dongqing Huang, Lei Zhao, Uliana J. Voytovich, Regine M. Schoenherr, Zahra Shire, Steven J. Skates, Jeffrey R. Whiteaker, Andrew N. Hoofnagle, Samuel C. Mok, Bing Zhang, Larry M. Karnitz, S. John Weroha, Steven P. Gygi, Scott H. Kaufmann, Pei Wang, Michael J. Birrer, Amanda G. Paulovich. Proteogenomic approach to identify mechanisms of platinum refractoriness in high-grade serous ovarian cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr PR02.

Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer worldwide, mainly due to its advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. A non-invasive method for its early detection remains mandatory to improve patients’ survival. Plasma levels of 351 proteins were quantified by Liquid Chromatography-Parallel Reaction Monitoring (LC-PRM)-based mass spectrometry in 128 lung cancer patients and 93 healthy donors. Bootstrap sampling and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalization were used to find the best protein combination for outcome prediction. The PanelomiX platform was used to select the optimal biomarker thresholds. The panel was validated in 48 patients and 49 healthy volunteers. A 6-protein panel clearly distinguished lung cancer from healthy individuals. The panel displayed excellent performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.999, positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.992, negative predictive value (NPV) = 0.989, specificity = 0.989 and sensitivity = 0.992. The panel detected lung cancer independently of the disease stage. The 6-protein panel and other sub-combinations displayed excellent results in the validation dataset. In conclusion, we identified a blood-based 6-protein panel as a diagnostic tool in lung cancer. Used as a routine test for high- and average-risk individuals, it may complement currently adopted techniques in lung cancer screening.

AbstractBACKGROUNDFor many years, basic and clinical researchers have taken advantage of the analytical sensitivity and specificity afforded by mass spectrometry in the measurement of proteins. Clinical laboratories are now beginning to deploy these work flows as well. For assays that use proteolysis to generate peptides for protein quantification and characterization, synthetic stable isotope–labeled internal standard peptides are of central importance. No general recommendations are currently available surrounding the use of peptides in protein mass spectrometric assays.CONTENTThe Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium of the National Cancer Institute has collaborated with clinical laboratorians, peptide manufacturers, metrologists, representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, and other professionals to develop a consensus set of recommendations for peptide procurement, characterization, storage, and handling, as well as approaches to the interpretation of the data generated by mass spectrometric protein assays. Additionally, the importance of carefully characterized reference materials—in particular, peptide standards for the improved concordance of amino acid analysis methods across the industry—is highlighted. The alignment of practices around the use of peptides and the transparency of sample preparation protocols should allow for the harmonization of peptide and protein quantification in research and clinical care.