Gonçalves, Rodrigo

Abstract RNA sequencing detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. Herein we examined multiple in-frame and out-of-frame ESR1 fusions and found only two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment resistant disease, encoded stable and functional in-frame fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, the N-terminal, DNA binding and dimerization motifs encoded by exons 2-6 were fused to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties included estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, anti-estrogen resistance, induction of cellular motility in vitro and the development of lung metastasis in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing experiments showed both fusions uniquely activated a metastasis-associated transcriptional program. ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Jin Cao, Meenakshi Anurag, Purba Singh, Xiaping He, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Robert Crowder, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Raquel M. Peres, Nindo Punturi, Cheryl Schmidt, Alex Bartram, Eric Jou, W V. Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri R. Davies, Shunqiang Li, Cynthia X. Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly K. Hunt, Mark A. Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, E A. Thompson, Xi Chen, Shyam M. Kavuri, Chad J. Creighton, Christopher A. Maher, Charles M. Perou, Svasti Haricharan, Matthew J. Ellis. Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5240.

Abstract Background. Dysregulation of the estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) is an established mechanism of inducing endocrine therapy resistance. We previously discovered a chromosomal translocation event generating an estrogen receptor gene fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences of YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1) that contributed to endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer models. This study compares functional, transcriptional, and pharmacological properties of additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage (ESR1-NOP2) late stage (ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x) breast cancers to gain a better understanding of therapeutic resistance and metastasis. Understanding the role of ESR1 fusions in inducing metastasis is critical, since the primary cause of death in breast cancer patients is through metastasis to distant sites. Methods. RNA-seq screens identified ESR1 fusions from early and late stage, endocrine therapy resistant breast tumor samples. Functional experiments were conducted using ER+ breast cancer cell lines, xenograft, and PDX models to test the ability of ESR1 fusions to induce therapeutic resistance and metastasis. ChIP-seq and RNA-seq were performed to examine transcriptional properties and differential gene expression induced by the fusions which directed subsequent pharmacological experiments with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Results. ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x promoted estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth in vitro and induced greater tumor growth and increased metastatic capacity to the lungs of xenografted mice. In contrast, the ESR1-NOP2 fusion was sensitive to low estrogen conditions in vitro, and did not promote tumor growth. RNA-seq profiling revealed E2F targets pathway as the most highly enriched pathway induced by the ESR1 fusions. IHC revealed higher levels of pRb in ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x xenograft tumors and subsequent CDK4/6 inhibition completely blocked tumor growth in an ESR1-YAP1 PDX model. Integrating RNA-seq with ChIP-seq data, we discovered a set of EMT and metastasis genes bound by all ESR1 fusions and WT-ER, but whose expression was strongly and uniquely up-regulated only by the ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x fusions. These studies also revealed gained sites bound only by the ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x fusions, not bound by WT-ER nor ESR1-NOP2. Genes mapping to these sites have a role in metastatic biology and were highly up-regulated by the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions, potentially mediated by long range transcriptional activation. Conclusion. ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x are driver fusions that occur in drug-resistant, advanced stage breast cancer and are a new class of recurrent somatic mutation that can cause acquired endocrine therapy resistance, yet can be treated with CDK4/6 inhibition. These driver fusions also confer increased metastatic ability through their ability to drive expression of genes that contribute to EMT and metastasis. In contrast, ESR1-NOP2 did not produce functional protein and appears to be a passenger event. These studies may provide pre-clinical rationale for targeting ESR1 translocated breast tumors, since the presence of an ESR1 driver fusion places a patient in a therapeutic category where none of the currently available endocrine therapies are likely to be effective. Citation Format: Lei JT, Shao J, Zhang J, Iglesia M, Chan DW, Cao J, Anurag M, Singh P, Haricharan S, Kavuri SM, Matsunuma R, Schmidt C, Kosaka Y, Crowder R, Hoog J, Phommaly C, Goncalves R, Ramalho S, Rodrigues-Peres RM, Lai W-C, Hampton O, Rogers A, Tobias E, Parikh P, Davies S, Ma C, Suman V, Hunt K, Watson M, Hoadley KA, Thompson A, Perou CM, Creighton CJ, Maher C, Ellis MJ. ESR1 gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-03.

Abstract Dysregulation of estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) is an established mechanism of inducing endocrine therapy resistance. We previously discovered a chromosomal translocation event generating an estrogen receptor gene fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences of YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1) that contributed to endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer models. This current study compares functional and pharmacological properties of additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage (ESR1-NOP2) and advanced endocrine therapy resistant (ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x) breast cancers. The YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions conferred estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth in T47D, an ER+ breast cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo, in contrast to the NOP2 fusion which was sensitive to hormone deprivation. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of mouse lungs revealed significantly higher numbers of micrometastatic ER+ cells from the T47D tumors expressing the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions than YFP control and NOP2 fusion. Estrogen response element (ERE) reporter and pull down assays revealed that although all ESR1 fusions studied bound EREs, only the YAP1 and PCDH11x caused ERE activation. Cell lines containing these “canonical” ESR1 fusions upregulated expression of ER responsive genes such as TFF1 and GREB1 in hormone deprived conditions. In contrast, the NOP2 fusion neither induced ERE activity nor upregulated TFF1 and GREB1 gene expression. The proliferative ability of canonical fusion-containing T47D cells was inhibited by palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo growth of patient-derived xenograft tumors naturally harboring the ESR1-YAP1 fusion (WHIM18) was significantly reduced in mice fed palbociclib-containing chow. Mice transplanted with WHIM18 also formed lung micrometastases, with an ER IHC staining pattern similar to lungs from YAP1 and PCDH11x fusion expressing T47D xenografts. In conclusion, in-frame ERE activating canonical fusions occur in end-stage, drug resistant, advanced breast cancer and can be added to ESR1 point mutations as a class of somatic mutation that may cause acquired resistance. Endocrine therapy resistant growth induced by these fusions can be treated with CDK4/6 inhibition, using an FDA approved drug, palbociclib, which could potentially improve outcomes in patients with ESR1 translocated tumors. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Xiaping He, Purba Singh, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Robert Crowder, Svasti Haricharan, Shyam Kavuri, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Wei-Chu Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri Davies, Cynthia Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly Hunt, Mark Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, Aubrey Thompson, Charles Perou, Chad J. Creighton, Chris Maher, Matthew J. Ellis. Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1033. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1033

Abstract Background. We previously reported an alternative ESR1 somatic gain-of-function chromosomal translocation event in a patient presenting with aggressive, endocrine therapy resistant estrogen receptor (ER) positive disease, producing an in-frame fusion gene consisting of N-terminal ESR1 and the C-terminus of the Hippo pathway coactivator YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1). We recently identified another ESR1 fusion through RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in advanced stage ER+ disease from a chest wall recurrence in a male patient that was refractory to multiple lines of treatment. Two examples of fusions discovered in primary breast cancer samples include ESR1 fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences from NOP2 (ESR1-NOP2), identified in a resistant cohort from a RNA-seq screen focused on 81 primary breast cancers from aromatase inhibitor clinical trials, and a second ESR1 fusion, fused in-frame to the entire coding sequence of POLH (ESR1-POLH), that was identified from RNA-seq analysis of 728 Cancer Genome Atlas breast samples. This current study extends our previous characterization of ESR1-YAP1 by comparing functional and pharmacological properties of these three additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage and advanced breast cancers. Methods. In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted to test ESR1 fusions to induce therapeutic resistance, and metastasis. The transcriptional and binding properties of each fusion was also examined. Pharmacological inhibition with Palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, was utilized to assess drug sensitivity in ESR1 fusion containing breast cancer cells and in a patient derived xenograft (PDX) model expressing ESR1-YAP1 (WHIM18). Results. The YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions conferred estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth. Immunohistochemistry revealed significantly higher numbers of ER+ cells in lungs of mice xenografted with T47D cells expressing the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions compared to YFP control, NOP2 and POLH fusions. Results from ChIP-seq and microarray studies suggest that these two fusions promote proliferation and metastasis through genomic action by binding estrogen response elements (ERE) and subsequent gene activation. We thereby define these fusions as “canonical” fusions compared to “non-canonical” NOP2 and POLH fusions, which demonstrated dramatically decreased genomic binding ability. The non-canonical fusions induced genes associated with basal-like breast cancer and promoted HER2, EGFR, and MAPK gene expression signatures in contrast to genes associated with cell cycle/proliferation induced by canonical fusions. The proliferative ability of canonical fusion-containing ER+ cells was inhibited by Palbociclib in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo WHIM18 tumors in mice fed with Palbociclib-containing chow demonstrated significantly reduced tumor volume, growth rate, and weight compared to tumors in mice on control chow. Conclusions. In-frame ERE activating canonical fusions occur in end-stage drug resistant advanced breast cancer and can be added to ESR1 point mutations as a class of recurrent somatic mutation that may cause acquired resistance. Growth induced by these fusions can be antagonized by Palbociclib and is potentially clinically helpful. Citation Format: Lei JT, Shao J, Zhang J, Iglesia M, Cao J, Chan DW, He X, Kosaka Y, Schmidt C, Matsunuma R, Haricharan S, Crowder R, Hoog J, Phommaly C, Goncalves R, Ramalho S, Lai W-C, Hampton O, Rogers A, Tobias E, Parikh P, Davies S, Ma C, Suman V, Hunt K, Watson M, Hoadley KA, Thompson A, Chen X, Perou CM, Creighton CJ, Maher C, Ellis MJ. Recurrent functionally diverse in-frame ESR1 gene fusions drive endocrine resistance in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.

Purpose To determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in estrogen receptor (ER) –positive primary breast cancer triaged to chemotherapy when the protein encoded by the MKI67 gene (Ki67) level was > 10% after 2 to 4 weeks of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. A second objective was to examine risk of relapse using the Ki67-based Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI). Methods The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1031A trial enrolled postmenopausal women with stage II or III ER-positive (Allred score, 6 to 8) breast cancer whose treatment was randomly assigned to neoadjuvant AI therapy with anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole. For the trial ACOSOG Z1031B, the protocol was amended to include a tumor Ki67 determination after 2 to 4 weeks of AI. If the Ki67 was > 10%, patients were switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A pCR rate of > 20% was the predefined efficacy threshold. In patients who completed neoadjuvant AI, stratified Cox modeling was used to assess whether time to recurrence differed by PEPI = 0 score (T1 or T2, N0, Ki67 < 2.7%, ER Allred > 2) versus PEPI > 0 disease. Results Only two of the 35 patients in ACOSOG Z1031B who were switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced a pCR (5.7%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 19.1%). After 5.5 years of median follow-up, four (3.7%) of the 109 patients with a PEPI = 0 score relapsed versus 49 (14.4%) of 341 of patients with PEPI > 0 (recurrence hazard ratio [PEPI = 0 v PEPI > 0], 0.27; P = .014; 95% CI, 0.092 to 0.764). Conclusion Chemotherapy efficacy was lower than expected in ER-positive tumors exhibiting AI-resistant proliferation. The optimal therapy for these patients should be further investigated. For patients with PEPI = 0 disease, the relapse risk over 5 years was only 3.6% without chemotherapy, supporting the study of adjuvant endocrine monotherapy in this group. These Ki67 and PEPI triage approaches are being definitively studied in the ALTERNATE trial (Alternate Approaches for Clinical Stage II or III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatment in Postmenopausal Women: A Phase III Study; clinical trial information: NCT01953588).

Abstract Background. We recently identified an in-frame ESR1 translocation in a tumor and PDX pair from a patient with endocrine therapy resistant advanced disease. The fusion gene preserved the N-terminal 365aa of ESR1 containing the intact activation function 1 (AF1), DNA-binding domain (DBD) and hinge, followed by the C-terminal transactivation domain of YAP1. The ESR1-365&gt;YAP1 fusion drove estrogen-independent and anti-estrogen-resistant tumor cell growth (Cell Reports 4:1116, 2013). We therefore sought to further investigate the role of ESR1 fusion genes in breast cancer. Methods. 711 cases from TCGA, 82 ER+ cases from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials and 25 ER+ systemic relapse samples were screened for fusion genes using RNAseq. Fusion genes involving ESR1 were subsequently assayed for estrogen response element (ERE)-mediated transcriptional activity and ability to drive estradiol independent breast cancer cell growth. Results. Multiple ESR1 fusions were identified in mostly luminal B cancers. ESR1 fusions resulted most frequently from rearrangements involving another gene on Chromosome (Chr) 6 but also fusions with genes on other chromosomes. The fusions involving partners on Chr6 that retained an intact N terminal AF1 and DNA binding domain (DBD) of ESR1 (≥1-253aa) included an Out-of-Frame (OF) fusion event with CCDC170 (a gene immediately centromeric to ESR1), POLH (in-frame or IF), AKAP12 (IF), PCMT1 (OF), SYNE1 (OF) and GPR126 (OF). Also identified were inter-chromosomal translocations involving Chr12p-NOP2 (IF) and ChrX-PCDH11X (IF) and Chr7q-AKR1D1 (OF). The ESR1 fusions with transcriptional potential (because of a retained DNA binding domain) included variable 5’ ESR1 exons that preserved 253aa, 365aa, 412aa or 458aa of ESR1 sequence: in all cases disrupting ligand binding though loss of C terminal sequence. The effect of the IF and OF 3’ sequences on the transcriptional activity of the relevant ESR1 fragment was highly variable. The most transcriptionally active fusion (more active than the relevant ESR1 fragment alone) was the ESR1-365&gt;YAP1 as well as ESR1-365&gt;PCDH11X and ESR1-253&gt;CCDC170. This is remarkable since PCDH11X is not considered a transcription factor and the CCDC170 sequence was OF – in both cases suggesting the activity of the fusion was due to "neomorphic" properties. Two fusions, NOP2 and POLH were inactive in the ERE reporter assay, yet both stimulated estradiol independent growth. In these cases we suggest that the ESR1 locus can function as a "promoter trap" which allows the identification of genes with previously unknown functions in endocrine therapy resistance. Conclusions: In luminal-type breast cancer the ESR1 gene was fused to multiple 3’ partners with remarkably heterogeneous functions. The two most transcriptionally active, ESR1-365&gt;YAP1 and ESR1-365&gt;PCDH11X, were both identified in endocrine therapy refractory advanced disease – suggesting a role in fatal disease progression. Citation Format: Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Robert J Crowder, Rodrigo Goncalves, Chanpheng Phommaly, Breast AWG and Network, Charles M Perou, Christopher A Maher, E Aubrey Thompson, Matthew J Ellis. ESR1 gene fusions implicated in endocrine therapy resistance of ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-4.

Abstract Background: The Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) is a method to predict outcome after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy that integrates Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER) analysis and pathological stage from the surgical specimen (Ellis, JNCI 100:1380, 2008). We sought to further develop the PEPI for use in clinical trials by: a) establishing an efficient SOP for Ki67 analysis, b) determining the effect of simplifying the score by removing the ER component (modified "mPEPI") and c) independent validation of mPEPI in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial (Ellis, M, JCO 29:234, 2011). Methods: Ki-67 assay development focused on reproducing a 2.7% Ki-67 cut point (CP) required for PEPI. Ventana Image analysis (IA) to replace labor-intensive visual point counting (VPC) was assessed to increase scoring efficiency. Discordant scores led to a triage approach where cases with complex histological features that could not be resolved by IA were flagged for VPC. The Ki-67 scoring approach was preliminarily validated on T1/2 N0 cases from the P024 and POL trials (SABCS 2013, abstract P3-05-190). Models with and without ER suggested ER was dispensable. A locked SOP for mPEPI was subsequently applied to the Z1031A trial. The primary endpoint was time from the date of surgery to local, regional, or distant recurrence in the mPEPI-0 group (T1/2 N0, Ki67 &lt;2.7%) versus the mPEPI&gt;0 group. Results. mPEPI by IA was evaluated on 202 of 377 (53%) patients enrolled into Z1031A (6% of IA results were triaged to VPC). All patients have been followed a minimum of 2 years (median: 5 years; max: 7 years). Only 10 patients in the mPEPI-0 group (22.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, versus 78 in the mPEPI&gt;0 group (49.4%). Time to breast cancer recurrence was decreased among those with mPEPI&gt;0 status relative to those with mPEPI-0 status (log rank p=0.012). Only one disease event among 44 (2%) cases with mPEPI-0 was observed versus 26 of 158 cases with mPEPI&gt;0 (16.5%) Conclusions. mPEPI-0 status can identify patients at low risk of relapse after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: therefore mPEPI-0 status has operational characteristics similar to pCR after chemotherapy for ER-negative disease. mPEPI is undergoing prospective validation in the Alliance ALTERNATE trial that will assess whether Fulvestrant increases the mPEPI-0 rate and also will prospectively determine whether patients with mPEPI-0 status can safely be managed without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Citation Format: Souzan Sanati, Vera J Suman, Rodrigo Goncalves, Katherine DeSchryver, Cynthia X Ma, Jeremy Hoog, Erika Crouch, Michael Barnes, Gary Unzeitig, A Marilyn Leitch, Kelly K Hunt, Matthew J Ellis. Validation of the preoperative endocrine prognostic index in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-13.

Abstract Ki-67 proliferation marker-based response monitoring will be prospectively tested in the ALternate Treatment for ER positive NeoAdjuvant TrEatment (ALTERNATE) trial. Tumor Ki-67 will be analyzed after one month of neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant or the combination to detect early resistance (Ki-67 &gt;10%) for triage to alternate treatment (chemotherapy/investigational agent). Ki-67 will be repeated on the surgical specimen after 24 weeks to detect PEPI-0 cases (path Stage 0/1/2A and Ki-67 ≤2.7%), which will be managed without adjuvant chemotherapy. A CLIA-approved Ki-67 assay was required by CTEP/FDA. FDA reviewed-components included the CONFIRM anti-Ki-67 (30-9) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody, the Benchmark XT platform and the VENTANA iScan Coreo scanner. The validation process was as follows: Step 1 was a TMA-based bridging study between a SP6-based research assay to the 30-9 CLIA assay using visual point counting (VPC); Step 2 trained a scoring SOP using Companion Algorithm Ki-67 (30-9) image analysis software with triage to VPC when certain observations were flagged; Step 3 was an independent test of the SOP using relevant patient outcome-associated samples from the P024 and POL neoadjuvant endocrine studies with two independent pathology analyses. STEP 1: Bridging Research to CLIA. Using a 28-case TMA, and VPC, the intra-class correlation (ICC) for agreement measure of Ki-67 10% cut-point (CP) between research Ki-67 and CLIA Ki-67 was 0.96 (CI 0.92-0.98). The Cohen's simple kappa for agreement measure was 0.78 (CI 0.55-1.0). STEP 2: Scanner-based Algorithm training. An SOP for the image analysis was developed by reviewing discordant cases in two independent reads at the 10% and 2.7% CP in a training set (N+ disease from P024 N = 61). Histology features that led to inaccurate scoring from the image analysis included: streaming /fascicular tumor cells, a large amount of intervening stromal cells, heavy immune cell infiltration, sparse scattered tumor cells, faint staining, and plump stromal cells. These cases were flagged for VPC. The final Ki-67 scoring SOP used image analysis with triage to VPC when necessary (required in 16% of cases). STEP 3: Scoring Algorithm Validation. The Ki-67 SOP was run on T1/2 N0 cases from the P024 trial N = 58. The% positive agreement for the combined scanner and VPC approach using the Ki-67 2.7% CP was 87.5% (95% CI 61.7- 98.5%); percent negative agreement 88.9% (95% CI: 65.3-98.6%). Minor discordance did not affect the ability to predict very similar survival outcomes (Log Rank P = 0.044 and P = 0.055). The data for the 10% CP was similar (N = 66), the percentage positive agreement was 100%; percent negative agreement 93.55% (95% CI: 78.58-99.21%). The survival predictions were again similar (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0002). The FDA ruled the use of Ki-67 in the ALTERNATE trial is “no significant risk” because previous clinical trial data indicated the majority of patients with Stage 0/1/2A disease post neoadjuvant endocrine therapy already do not receive chemotherapy. Thus the use of Ki-67 reduces the risk of under-treatment of patients with low stage disease but aggressive biology. CTEP accepted these data on assay concordance and performance and the ALTERNATE trial will proceed. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-05-10.