Citations

Abstract Early-phase clinical trials of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) degraders have demonstrated efficacy in patients with BTK inhibitor-resistant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). How clinical resistance to BTK degraders arises is unknown. Here we sequenced serial CLL samples from patients enrolled in the phase I trials of zelebrudomide and bexobrutideg and observed recurrent expansion of preexisting BTK A428D mutations at relapse. Unlike previously studied BTK inhibitor resistance mutations, BTK A428D conferred pan-resistance to BTK inhibitors and degraders. In the absence of BTK-directed therapies, however, cells bearing BTK A428D exhibited a competitive disadvantage. A crystal structure of BTK A428D revealed that the mutant aspartate clashes with the adenine ring of ATP and the adenine-mimetic moiety of BTK inhibitors and degraders. Combining BTK degraders with venetoclax mitigated the expansion of BTK A428D. These results provide the molecular basis for clinical resistance to BTK degraders and will inform the development of next-generation BTK degrader therapies.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the https://www.asco.org/practice-patients/guidelines/guideline-methodology . ASCO Guidelines follow the https://www.asco.org/about-asco/legal/conflict-interest-coi . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To offer clinicians recommendations concerning breast cancer follow-up and surveillance after primary treatment. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and a formal consensus process. RESULTS One randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified and formed the evidentiary basis for the surveillance mammography guideline recommendation. No RCTs were identified that evaluated different follow-up approaches by risk of relapse in patients treated for early-stage breast cancer. Given the dearth of evidence identified in the systematic review of the literature, formal modified Delphi consensus-based recommendations were generated. RECOMMENDATIONS The guideline offers recommendations on the role of a risk-based approach to the frequency and intensity of follow-up among patients with breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended for breast cancer follow-up. Either virtual or in-person visits can be offered. Certain patients at a high risk of cancer recurrence warrant closer surveillance, such as those patients with locally advanced disease or residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Recommendations on the use of blood-based biomarkers and supplemental imaging are provided. Guideline recommendations will be updated once additional evidence-based tools become available to better individualize surveillance. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/breast-cancer .

Background/Objectives: The PRO-CTCAE Average Composite Score (ACS), calculated as the mean of PRO-CTCAE composite scores, summarizes overall symptom and side effect burden. This study evaluated the test–retest reliability, responsiveness to change, known-groups validity, and sensitivity to group differences in the ACS. Methods: Analyses used the original PRO-CTCAE validation dataset, including lung (n = 174), breast (n = 222), and head and neck (n = 139) cancer cohorts, and data from the COMET-2 randomized phase III trial comparing cabozantinib (n = 53) and mitoxantrone–prednisone (n = 54) in men with previously treated prostate cancer. Test–retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) from two-way mixed-effects models for agreement. Responsiveness was evaluated by relating ACS change scores (Visit 1 minus follow-up Visit 2) to patient-reported global ratings of change (GRC; worsened, unchanged, or improved) using standardized response means (SRMs) and Jonckheere–Terpstra trend tests. Known-groups validity was examined by comparing mean ACS values between ECOG performance status groups (0–1 vs. 2–4). Sensitivity to treatment group differences was assessed using model-based area-under-the-curve (AUC) comparisons of longitudinal ACS trajectories. Results: Test–retest reliability was acceptable, with ICCs among GRC-defined stable patients of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70–0.87) in lung cancer, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.89) in breast cancer, and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63–0.86) in head and neck cancer; ICCs based on assessments completed one day apart ranged from 0.88 to 0.90. The ACS demonstrated responsiveness, with SRMs of 0.30/0.15/−0.37 (lung), 0.29/0.14/−0.40 (breast), and −0.01/−0.20/−0.56 (head/neck) for improved/no-change/worsened groups, respectively, and significant monotonic trends across GRC categories (all p < 0.01). Known-groups validity was supported by conceptually expected differences in ACS values across distinct levels of self-reported patient-reported physical functioning and ECOG performance status categories. Mean ACS values were lower among patients with good versus limited physical functioning (0.71 vs. 1.23 in lung cancer, 0.52 vs. 1.19 in breast cancer, and 0.69 vs. 1.29 in head and neck cancer) and among patients with ECOG PS 0–1 versus 2–4 (0.93 vs. 1.31, 0.74 vs. 1.22, and 0.90 vs. 1.06, respectively). In COMET-2, higher symptom burden was detected in the cabozantinib arm compared with the mitoxantrone–prednisone arm (AUC difference = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.2–2.8, p = 0.02). Conclusions: The ACS demonstrated acceptable test–retest reliability, responsiveness, and known-groups validity across multiple cancer populations. These findings support its use as a complementary summary measure of overall symptomatic adverse event burden alongside individual symptom-level analyses.

Abstract Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), which quantify inherited susceptibility to complex traits and diseases, have emerged as valuable tools for risk stratification and precision medicine. Despite their promise, PRS developed on European cohorts often demonstrate substantially reduced predictive accuracy in non-European populations, due to differences in genetic architecture. The disproportionate representation of European ancestry cohorts in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) leads to inequitable deployment of PRS technologies across diverse populations. Here, we introduce PRANA (Polygenic Risk Adaptation via Neural-network Architecture), a deep learning framework that adapts an existing PRS developed on one population to other ancestries. Unlike methods that require large-scale GWAS in the target population, PRANA leverages pre-trained PRS models derived from European cohorts and adapts them using modestly sized cohorts from the target population. We evaluated PRANA on seven complex traits in South Asian, East Asian and Ashkenazi Jewish populations, as well as in selected smaller East Asian subpopulations where the scarcity of training data poses a particular challenge. PRANA mostly improved predictive performance of the baseline PRS models by 5%-20% in terms of effect size (β) and Nagelkerke’s R², and, in most cases, outperformed existing cross-ancestry multi-PRS approaches. These results highlight PRANA as a scalable and practical strategy to reduce disparities in genomic risk prediction and advance the equitable application of PRS in diverse populations.

Pulmonary developmental disorders comprise a heterogeneous group of congenital abnormalities involving the airways, lung parenchyma, pulmonary vasculature, or overlapping developmental pathways. Although these conditions commonly present during infancy or childhood, many remain clinically silent until adulthood, when they are discovered incidentally or manifest with recurrent respiratory symptoms such as infection, hemoptysis, or progressive dyspnea. These abnormalities may be broadly categorized into airway, vascular, parenchymal, and mixed developmental anomalies. Airway abnormalities include congenital tracheobronchomegaly, branching anomalies of the tracheobronchial tree, bronchial atresia, bronchogenic cysts, congenital pulmonary airway malformations (CPAM), and bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS). Vascular anomalies include pulmonary artery sling, proximal interruption of the pulmonary artery, Scimitar syndrome, and meandering pulmonary veins. Parenchymal disorders encompass congenital lobar overinflation and pulmonary hypoplasia. Increasing recognition of overlapping lesions, particularly combinations of CPAM, sequestration, and bronchial atresia, has challenged traditional compartmental classification systems and supports a developmental spectrum model. This review synthesizes contemporary concepts regarding embryologic mechanisms, pathogenesis, imaging findings, and management of these entities in adults. Particular emphasis is placed on imaging evaluation with CT and MRI, updated terminology, evolving molecular understanding of CPAMs, including lesions with malignant potential, and distinctions between congenital sequestration and pseudosequestration. Recognition of these disorders and their associated anomalies is essential for accurate diagnosis, appropriate management, and surgical planning in adult patients.

ABSTRACT Background Current staging systems for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNCSCC), such as AJCC8 and BWH, often fail to adequately stratify high‐risk patients, particularly due to the exclusion of important biological and host factors. This study aimed to identify independent prognostic factors for HNCSCC outcomes in the largest multi‐institutional retrospective series to date. Methods De‐identified data from 8,610 primary HNCSCC tumors, treated with curative intent surgery across multiple international centers, were analyzed. Outcomes included local recurrence (LR), locoregional metastasis (LM), distant metastasis (DM), and disease‐specific death (DSD). Multivariable Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard regression models with robust standard errors clustered at the patient level were fitted to generate exploratory hypotheses regarding independent hazard determinants. Results During a median follow‐up of 31.4 months (IQR 14.2–52.8), the cumulative incidence was 3.3% for LR, 2.7% for LM, 0.5% for DM, and 1.2% for DSD. Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, and large‐caliber perineural invasion (LCPNI) were the strongest predictors, being significantly associated with at least three of the four outcomes. Notably, factors currently excluded from or weighted differently in staging systems also proved critical: Immunosuppression was significantly associated with LR (SHR 2.03) and DSD (SHR 1.70); and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was independently associated with LM (SHR 3.00). Poor differentiation demonstrated high prognostic impact, being a significant predictor for all four endpoints. Conclusion Tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, LCPNI, immunosuppression status, and LVI are the most critical independent factors for HNCSCC prognosis. Our multi‐institutional data provide a robust framework for hypothesis generation, highlighting that incorporating host biological features and non‐anatomic variables could significantly refine future staging system discussions.

ABSTRACT Purpose Standard spatial‐spectral excitation pulses apply a fly‐back gradient between sub‐pulses, limiting, for example, how thin the slices can be (> 4 mm). Without fly‐back gradients, slices can be as thin as 1.7 mm but require a phase calibration for the sub‐pulses with inverted gradients due to system imperfections. Here we propose and test a fast (< 1 s), localized pre‐scan enabling thin‐slice frequency‐selective excitation. Methods The calibration pre‐scan determines the correction phase between even and odd sub‐pulses by measuring the phase difference of two FIDs excited with either the last or second‐to‐last RF sub‐pulse of the spatial‐spectral pulse. Non‐localized and localized versions of the calibration pre‐scan are tested and validated for water‐only excitation in phantoms and the human heart. As an example, breath‐held coronary MR angiography is performed with a spiral multi‐slice sequence employing the proposed pulses with a slice thickness of 1.7 mm. Results The proposed calibration pre‐scan takes 11.1 ms per slice, whether it is localized or not. Localized calibration phases are validated with an image‐based calibration map. Slice profiles are visualized for pulses with different time‐bandwidth products. Fat is suppressed to below 20% and 25% of the surrounding water signal in both phantoms and the human heart, respectively. High‐quality coronary angiograms are demonstrated in all test subjects. Conclusion Spatial‐spectral pulses without fly‐back gradients can be calibrated quickly (up to 90 slices in 1 s), enabling thinner slices, higher excitation angles, or pulses with sharper slice profiles using waveforms with higher time‐bandwidth products.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget’s disease, Phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The panel convenes annually to update recommendations based on a review of recently published clinical trials. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer focuses on the recommendations for the management of recurrent or stage IV (M1) metastatic breast cancer. It summarizes the treatment strategies stratified by tumor biology, including hormone receptor status and HER2 expression, as well as clinical factors such as prior therapy and disease-free interval. Throughout all treatment lines, supportive care, quality of life preservation, toxicity minimization, and clinical trial participation are emphasized as integral components of patient care.

Abstract Genetic studies have significantly advanced our understanding of tauopathies, yet the genetic aetiology of Pick’s disease, a rare 3-Repeat tauopathy, remains unclear. The MAPT p.A152T variant has been identified as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy, but its role in Pick’s disease is unknown. In this study, we examined the prevalence of MAPT p.A152T in the largest series of neuropathologically confirmed Pick’s disease cases to date (n = 401). Through genotyping, we identified a single mutation carrier in the Pick’s disease cohort (minor allele frequency = 0.12%). We previously reported MAPT p.A152T at a 0.20% frequency in healthy controls (n = 2456), suggesting that it does not associate with 3-Repeat tauopathy risk. To further investigate the effect of the variant on MAPT transcript expression, we used bulk RNA sequencing in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy A152T mutation carriers. We did not detect significant differences in 4-Repeat tau levels, though preliminary trends may indicate more nuanced effects that need to be examined with long-read sequencing in a larger series. Overall, our study suggests that MAPT p.A152T does not increase Pick’s disease risk and may instead be linked to 4-Repeat or mixed tau pathologies, warranting further functional investigation.

Cytotoxic T cells produce the cytokine interferon-γ (IFN-γ). We sought to determine whether IFN-γ directly kills target cells and found that T cells used IFN-γ to kill murine melanoma cells lacking the kinases TBK1 and IKKε. In the absence of both kinases, IFN-γ induced the production of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) and the sensor Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) in the tumor cells to stimulate receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1)–dependent apoptosis in a cell-autonomous manner. IFN-γ also enhanced the activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling in a TNFR1-dependent manner in cells deficient in both TBK1 and IKKε. Because IFN-γ–induced apoptosis occurred in a transcription-dependent manner with slow kinetics, STAT1 and NF-κB cooperated to activate the expression of inflammatory genes in the dying cells. Thus, IFN-γ–induced cell death was accompanied by an inflammatory signature in the absence of TBK1 and IKKε. TBK1 and IKKε not only mediated the induction of type I IFN but also inhibited RIPK1-dependent death and NF-κB–dependent inflammation. Therefore, we propose that these kinases may have gained these intertwined functions so that cells infected by pathogens that produce antagonists of TBK1 and IKKε are eliminated by IFN-γ–secreting T cells in an inflammatory manner to compensate for the inhibition of type I IFN production.