Sung, Hyuna

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the https://www.asco.org/practice-patients/guidelines/guideline-methodology . ASCO Guidelines follow the https://www.asco.org/about-asco/legal/conflict-interest-coi . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To offer clinicians recommendations concerning breast cancer follow-up and surveillance after primary treatment. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and a formal consensus process. RESULTS One randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified and formed the evidentiary basis for the surveillance mammography guideline recommendation. No RCTs were identified that evaluated different follow-up approaches by risk of relapse in patients treated for early-stage breast cancer. Given the dearth of evidence identified in the systematic review of the literature, formal modified Delphi consensus-based recommendations were generated. RECOMMENDATIONS The guideline offers recommendations on the role of a risk-based approach to the frequency and intensity of follow-up among patients with breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended for breast cancer follow-up. Either virtual or in-person visits can be offered. Certain patients at a high risk of cancer recurrence warrant closer surveillance, such as those patients with locally advanced disease or residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Recommendations on the use of blood-based biomarkers and supplemental imaging are provided. Guideline recommendations will be updated once additional evidence-based tools become available to better individualize surveillance. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/breast-cancer .

Abstract Reduced age-related terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution has been linked to increased breast cancer risk and triple-negative breast cancer. Associations of TDLU involution levels with race and ethnicity remain incompletely explored. Herein, we examined the association between genetic ancestry and TDLU involution in normal breast tissue donated by 2014 healthy women in the United States. Women of African ancestry were more likely than European women to have increased TDLU counts (odds ratio [OR]trend = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 1.74), acini counts per TDLU (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.03), and median TDLU span (ORtrend = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.91), indicating lower involution, whereas East Asian descendants were associated with decreased TDLU counts (ORtrend = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.78) after controlling for potential confounders. These associations are consistent with the racial variations in incidence rates of triple-negative breast cancer in the United States and suggest opportunities for future work examining whether TDLU involution may mediate the racial differences in subtype-specific breast cancer risk.

BackgroundThis study was aimed at examining the risks of subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) among breast cancer survivors by hormone receptor (HR) status and age at diagnosis.MethodsData from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were used to identify 431,222 breast cancer survivors (at least 1 year) diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 84 years from 1992 to 2015. Risks of SPCs were measured as the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the excess absolute risk (EAR) per 10,000 person‐years. Poisson regression was used to test the difference in SIRs by HR status.ResultsIn comparison with the general population, the risk of new cancer diagnoses among survivors was 20% higher for those with HR‐positive cancers (SIR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19‐1.21; EAR, 23.3/10,000 person‐years) and 44% higher for those with HR‐negative cancers (SIR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.41‐1.47; EAR, 45.2/10,000 person‐years), with the risk difference between HR statuses statistically significant. The higher risk after HR‐negative cancer was driven by acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and breast, ovarian, peritoneal, and lung cancers. By age at diagnosis, the total EAR per 10,000 person‐years ranged from 15.8 (95% CI, 14.1‐17.5; SIR, 1.11) among late‐onset (age, 50‐84 years) HR‐positive survivors to 69.4 (95% CI, 65.1‐73.7; SIR, 2.24) among early‐onset (age, 20‐49 years) HR‐negative survivors, with subsequent breast cancer representing 73% to 80% of the total EAR. After breast cancer, the greatest EARs were for ovarian cancer among early‐onset HR‐negative survivors, lung cancer among early‐ and late‐onset HR‐negative survivors, and uterine corpus cancer among late‐onset HR‐positive survivors.ConclusionsRisks of SPCs after breast cancer differ substantially by subtype and age. This suggests that more targeted approaches for cancer prevention and early‐detection strategies are needed in survivorship care planning.

Extensive mammographic density (MD), a well‐established breast cancer risk factor, is a radiological representation of stromal and epithelial breast tissue content. In studies conducted predominantly among Caucasian women, histologic measures of reduced terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution have been correlated with extensive MD, but independently associated with breast cancer risk. We therefore examined associations between TDLU measures and MD among Chinese women, a low‐risk population but with high prevalence of dense breasts. Diagnostic pre‐treatment digital mammograms were obtained from 144 breast cancer cases at a tertiary hospital in Beijing and scored using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) density classification. TDLU features were assessed using three standardized measures (count/100 mm2, span [μm], and acini count/TDLU) in benign tissues.Associations between each of TDLU measures and MD were examined using generalized linear models for TDLU count and span and polytomous logistic regression for acini count with adjustment for potential confounders stratified by age. Among women ≥50 years, 63% had dense breasts; cases with dense breasts (BI‐RADS, c‐d) had greater TDLU count (21.1 [SE = 2.70] vs. 9.0 [SE = 1.83]; p = 0.0004), longer span (480.6 μm [SE = 24.6] vs. 393.8 μm [SE = 31.8]; p = 0.03), and greater acini count (ORtrend = 16.1; 95%CI = 4.08–63.1; ptrend < 0.0001) compared to those with non‐dense breasts (BI‐RADS, a‐b). Among women <50 years, 91% had dense breasts, precluding our ability to detect associations. Our findings are consistent with previously reported associations between extensive MD and reduced TDLU involution, supporting the hypothesis that breast cancer risk associated with extensive MD may be related to the amount of “at‐risk” epithelium.

Abstract Introduction: Terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution, an age-related physiological process, is characterized by the reduction of size and numbers. Reduced involution is associated with higher mammographic density, a strong breast cancer risk factor. Both factors predict risk of developing breast cancer among women with benign disease. Given that prior studies have been conducted mainly in White women, we compared the extent of TDLU involution among Western and Asian breast cancer cases to describe potential racial heterogeneity in breast cancer etiology. Method: We obtained three TDLU involution metrics (count/100 mm2, mean span, and mean acini count/TDLU; all inversely correlated with TDLU involution) measured in benign breast tissue sections from 379 Chinese (254 luminal A and 125 core basal phenotype [CBP] cases) and 476 Polish (407 luminal A and 69 CBP) breast cancer cases. Polytomous logistic regression was performed using tertiles of TDLU measures as ordinal dependent variable and race as an independent variable. Covariates included age, body mass index, and parity. Analyses were performed separately by age group (&lt;50, ≥50) and subtype (luminal A and CBP). Results: Among luminal A cases, Chinese had significantly greater TDLU count compared with Polish in both age groups (ORtrend= 11.0; 95% CI=2.80-43.2; Ptrend=0.001 for age&lt;50; ORtrend= 12.1; 95% CI=5.12-28.7; Ptrend=1E-08 for age≥50). In addition, Chinese were more likely to have greater mean span and acini count among younger cases (ORtrend=2.5; 95% CI=1.44-4.28; Ptrend=0.001 for mean span and ORtrend=7.4; 95% CI=4.13-13.4; Ptrend=3E-11 for acini count) but not among older cases. Among CBP cases, Chinese were more likely to have greater acini count compared to Polish only among younger women (ORtrend=2.6; 95% CI=1.12-6.95; Ptrend=0.03 for age&lt;50). Conclusion: We found Chinese were more likely to have reduced TDLU involution compared to Polish cases after accounting for potential confounders, with greater differences for luminal A and younger women. Studies of TDLU involution in diverse populations are needed to confirm and understand whether population difference in TDLU involution metrics are related to age at breast cancer onset and risks for specific tumor subtypes. Citation Format: Hyuna Sung, Changyuan Guo, Jennifer Guida, Shan Zheng, Erni Li, Jing Li, Nan Hu, Joseph Deng, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jonine Figueroa, Mark Sherman, Gretchen Gierach, Ning Lu, Xiaohong R. Yang. Racial variation in terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution in Chinese and Polish breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5290. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5290