Citations

Abstract Disclosure: J. Saini: None. R. Nathani: None. S. Singh: None. V. Fell: None. E. Atkinson: None. S. Achenbach: None. S. Khosla: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Previous studies reported that both cortisol secretion and bone metabolism biomarkers follow a circadian pattern of secretion. Patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) demonstrate an increased risk of fractures. As most patients with MACS do not have increased cortisol production, we hypothesized that abnormal circadian cortisol secretion is associated with impaired bone metabolism. Objective: To compare the circadian secretory pattern of bone metabolism biomarkers in relation to cortisol circadian secretion in patients with MACS versus referent subjects. Methods: We conducted a pilot cross-sectional study of patients with MACS and referent subjects. MACS was diagnosed in patients with adrenal adenomas based on an abnormal 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (cortisol >1.8 mcg/dL). Referent subjects with available abdominal imaging within 5 years and adrenal disorder were recruited from the community. Participants were admitted to the clinical research unit for blood sampling every 2 hours over 24h period. Measurements included total and free cortisol, calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, amino-terminal propeptide type 1 collagen (PINP), and carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX). Subjects with disorders or medication affecting bone metabolism were excluded. Time periods of blood draw were categorized into the morning (6 to 12 hours), afternoon (14-18 hours) and night (20-2 hours). Delta (morning measurements/afternoon measurements) was calculated. Results: Subjects included 12 patients with MACS (median age 57, IQR 48-67, 83% women) and 10 referent subjects (median age 57, IQR 50-63, 80% women). The 24-hour area under the curve for total (10342 vs 9090 mcg/dL, p=0.468) and free cortisol (437 vs 329 mcg/dL, p=0.086) was no different between patients with MACS and referent subjects. However, the mean night total (6.7 vs 4.3 mcg/dL, p=0.056) and free cortisol (0.2 vs 0.1 mcg/dL, p=0.035) was higher in MACS vs referent subjects. The area under the curve for calcium, phosphorus, CTX, osteocalcin and PINP were similar between patients and referent subjects, however, the area under the curve for PTH was higher in patients vs referent subjects (mean 64179 vs 42602 pg/mL, p=0.021). Both delta total cortisol (mean 8.6 vs 5.5, p=0.01) and delta PTH (mean -1.5 vs 4.2, p=0.051) was higher in referent subjects vs patients with MACS. Conclusion: When compared to referent subjects, patients with MACS have similar 24-hour cortisol production but demonstrate an increase in night-time cortisol secretion and a blunting of diurnal cortisol (lower morning/afternoon cortisol). Patients with MACS have higher PTH production overall, as well as an abnormal diurnal PTH secretion. Noted abnormalities in PTH may contribute to the MACS-associated impairment in bone health. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Abstract Disclosure: J. Saini: None. R. Nathani: None. S. Singh: None. K. Thangamuthu: None. M. Suresh: None. C. Zhang: None. A.L. Ebbehøj: None. M. Thomas: None. V. Fell: None. E. Atkinson: None. S. Achenbach: None. N. Stricker: None. I. Bancos: None. Introduction: While patients with overt Cushing syndrome are reported to have impaired cognition, the impact of milder, long-standing hypercortisolism on cognition is incompletely characterized. Objective: To determine the impact of MACS on cognition as compared to age, sex, and education-matched referent subjects. Methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study of adults with MACS and referent subjects. MACS was defined as serum cortisol>1.8 mcg/dL after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Referent subjects were included if they had abdominal imaging and had no adrenal disorders. Exclusion criteria were malignancy and exogenous glucocorticoid use within 1 year. All participants underwent a cognitive evaluation using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery between 1/2019 to 7/2022. NIH Toolbox assesses 8 cognitive domains using 7 tests and yields 3 composite scores: fluid cognition (executive function, episodic memory, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and processing speed), crystallized cognition (language and vocabulary), and total composite cognition (composite of all). Results are given in fully corrected T scores (adjusted for age, sex, race, and education) with an average of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A subgroup analysis was performed based on DST cortisol. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare scores between groups. Results: A total of 94 patients with MACS (median age 57.2 years, IQR 47.8-66.5, 70% women) and 94 referent subjects (median age 58 years, IQR 49.1-66.4, 70% women) were included. The median post-DST cortisol in patients with MACS was 3.3 mcg/dL (IQR, 2.4-6.2). The mean (SD) total composite T-score was lower in patients with MACS vs referent subjects (51 (9.1) vs 56.3 (9.3), P<0.001). Patients with MACS demonstrated lower mean fluid composite T-score when compared to referent subjects (49.5 (10.4) vs 56.9 (9.7), P<0.001). However, mean crystallized composite T-scores were similar in patients with MACS and referent subjects (52.3 (8.1) vs 53.9 (9.6), P=0.342). A subgroup analysis of patients with post-DST cortisol <3 mcg/dL (n=40) vs patients with post-DST cortisol >3 mcg/dL (n=54) did not show any differences in the total, fluid, or crystalized composite scores. Conclusion: Patients with MACS demonstrate lower cognitive performances than a referent group suggesting MACS has a subtle impact on cognitive functioning. The pattern of cognitive impairment in patients with MACS is similar to that seen with normal cognitive aging: impaired fluid cognitions and unaffected crystallized cognition). Cognitive performance did not differ based on the degree of MACS suggesting that in the absence of overt features of hypercortisolism, the degree of MACS is less important than the presence of MACS. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Abstract Objectives Multimorbidity is burdensome for people with RA. We investigated differences in multimorbidity and comorbidities by sex and age in the RA population. Methods This cross-sectional analysis used national administrative claims (OptumLabs® Data Warehouse) from people with RA and non-RA comparators (matched on age, sex, race, census region, index year and length of baseline insurance coverage) from 2010–2019. RA was determined using a validated algorithm. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥2 (MM2+) or ≥5 (MM5+) comorbidities from a validated set of 44 chronic conditions. We used logistic regression to assess associations between characteristics and multimorbidity. Results The sample included 154 391 RA patients and 154 391 non-RA comparators. For people aged 18–50 years, RA women (vs RA men) had 7.5 and 4.4 (vs 3.2 and 0.9 in non-RA women vs non-RA men) percentage point increases for MM2+ and MM5+, respectively. For people aged 51+ years, RA women (vs RA men) had 2.1 and 2.5 (vs 1.2 and 0.3 in non-RA women vs non-RA men) percentage point increases for MM2+ and MM5+, respectively. Interactions revealed that differences in multimorbidity between women and men were exacerbated by RA (vs non-RA) (P < 0.05), with more pronounced effects in people aged 18–50. Men had more cardiovascular-related conditions, whereas RA women had more psychological, neurological and general musculoskeletal conditions. Other comorbidities varied by sex and age. Conclusion Multimorbidity disproportionately impacts women with RA. Research, clinical and policy agendas for rheumatic diseases should acknowledge and support the variation in care needs by sex and gender across the lifespan.

ObjectiveApproximately one third of individuals worldwide have not received a COVID‐19 vaccine. Although studies have investigated risk factors linked to severe COVID‐19 among unvaccinated people with rheumatic diseases (RDs), we know less about whether these factors changed as the pandemic progressed. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with severe COVID‐19 in unvaccinated individuals in different pandemic epochs corresponding to major variants of concern.MethodsPatients with RDs and COVID‐19 were entered into the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry between March 2020 and June 2022. An ordinal logistic regression model (not hospitalized, hospitalized, and death) was used with date of COVID‐19 diagnosis, age, sex, race and/or ethnicity, comorbidities, RD activity, medications, and the human development index (HDI) as covariates. The main analysis included all unvaccinated patients across COVID‐19 pandemic epochs; subanalyses stratified patients according to RD types.ResultsAmong 19,256 unvaccinated people with RDs and COVID‐19, those who were older, male, had more comorbidities, used glucocorticoids, had higher disease activity, or lived in lower HDI regions had worse outcomes across epochs. For those with rheumatoid arthritis, sulfasalazine and B‐cell–depleting therapy were associated with worse outcomes, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were associated with improved outcomes. In those with connective tissue disease or vasculitis, B‐cell–depleting therapy was associated with worse outcomes.ConclusionRisk factors for severe COVID‐19 outcomes were similar throughout pandemic epochs in unvaccinated people with RDs. Ongoing efforts, including vaccination, are needed to reduce COVID‐19 severity in this population, particularly in those with medical and social vulnerabilities identified in this study.

Across multiancestry groups, we analyzed Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) associations in over 176,000 individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) versus controls. We demonstrate that the two diseases share the same protective association at the HLA locus. HLA-specific fine-mapping showed that hierarchical protective effects of HLA-DRB1 *04 subtypes best accounted for the association, strongest with HLA-DRB1 *04:04 and HLA-DRB1 *04:07, and intermediary with HLA-DRB1 *04:01 and HLA-DRB1 *04:03. The same signal was associated with decreased neurofibrillary tangles in postmortem brains and was associated with reduced tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid and to a lower extent with increased Aβ42. Protective HLA-DRB1 *04 subtypes strongly bound the aggregation-prone tau PHF6 sequence, however only when acetylated at a lysine (K311), a common posttranslational modification central to tau aggregation. An HLA-DRB1 *04-mediated adaptive immune response decreases PD and AD risks, potentially by acting against tau, offering the possibility of therapeutic avenues.

Congenital rubella syndrome is a constellation of birth defects that can have devastating consequences, impacting approximately 100,000 births worldwide each year. The incidence is much lower in countries that routinely vaccinate their population. In the US, postnatal immunization of susceptible women is an important epidemiological strategy for the prevention of rubella as the Center for Disease Control (CDC) does not recommend administering this vaccine during pregnancy due to its nature as a live attenuated virus vaccine. However, concerns that the co-administration of rubella vaccine with other immunoglobins (i.e., Rhogam) could compromise vaccine efficacy has produced warnings that can delay the administration of rubella vaccination postpartum, leaving women susceptible to the disease in subsequent pregnancies. We aimed to address whether the co-administration of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and Rhogam decreased antibody responses compared to those receiving only MMR vaccination. This retrospective cohort study utilized clinical data from 78 subjects who received the MMR vaccine and Rhogam after delivery and 45 subjects who received the MMR vaccine alone. Maternal demographics, pregnancy complications and rubella status at the start of a subsequent pregnancy were recorded for analysis. Overall, the two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics; however, lower parity was noted in the participants that received both MMR vaccination and Rhogam. Making assessments based on maternal antibody IgG index for rubella during the next pregnancy, we observed that 88% of the Rhogam + MMR vaccine group had positive serology scores, which was not significantly different from the 80% rate in the MMR-vaccine-only cohort (p = 0.2). In conclusion, no differences were observed in rubella immunity status in subsequent pregnancies in those mothers given both the MMR vaccine and Rhogam concurrently. Given these findings, warnings against co-administration of vaccines in combination with Rhogam appear unwarranted.

Intravenous (IV) ketamine and FDA-approved intranasal (IN) esketamine are increasingly used for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Preliminary studies have suggested a synergistic effect of ketamine and lamotrigine, although the data are inconclusive. Herein, we report the response to serial ketamine/esketamine treatment among patients with TRD with or without lamotrigine therapy. In this historical cohort study, we included adult patients with TRD who received serial IV racemic ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40−100 min) or IN esketamine (56/84 mg) treatments. A change in depressive symptoms was assessed using the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-report (QIDS-SR) scale. There were no significant differences in response or remission rates among the patients on or not on lamotrigine during the ketamine/esketamine treatments. For a percent change in the QIDS-SR from baseline, no interaction was found between the lamotrigine groups and treatment number (p = 0.70), nor the overall effect of the group (p = 0.38). There was a trend towards lower dissociation (based on the CADSS score) among current lamotrigine users, especially in patients who received IV ketamine. A major limitation is the limited number of patients taking lamotrigine (n = 13). This preliminary study provides insufficient evidence that continuing lamotrigine therapy attenuates the antidepressant effect of repeated ketamine/esketamine; however, there seems to be a signal toward attenuating dissociation with lamotrigine in patients receiving serial ketamine treatments. Further observational studies or randomized controlled trials are needed to replicate these findings.

AbstractBackgroundIt has yet to be fully elucidated how differing populations of obstetric patients adapted to the disruptions in perinatal care and postpartum support from the COVID‐19 pandemic. We surveyed an enriched sample of socioeconomically advantaged patients to understand the influence of COVID‐19 on their perinatal care experience, well‐being, and coping.MethodsWe surveyed pregnant and postpartum patients (n = 6140) at a large academic medical center in the Midwest of the United States using the Coronavirus and Perinatal Experiences instrument in Spring 2021.ResultsThe survey was sent to 6141 pregnant and postpartum patients; 1180 (17.8%) respondents completed the survey, including 256 who were pregnant and 834 postpartum. Most pregnant patients experienced no changes in their prenatal care with 16.5% indicating somewhat worsened care. In the postpartum cohort, 37.5% stated their care had somewhat worsened. In describing influences on stress and mental health, 58.1% of postpartum respondents stated it was moderately, and 17.4% significantly, worse. The pandemic had a somewhat or moderately negative influence for 72.7% of respondents, with 11.0% stating these effects were extremely negative. Both cohorts characterized a range of coping strategies, most commonly, talking with friends and family (76.3%).Conclusion(s)Even among this sample of socioeconomically advantaged patients, respondents indicated that the pandemic disrupted many facets of their medical care and daily life, especially social activities and postpartum support. Our findings suggest that counseling on coping and adaptation strategies for stressors and increased health systems support be part of perinatal care during public health emergencies for all demographic groups.