Impact of Risk Factors on COVID‐19 Outcomes in Unvaccinated People With Rheumatic Diseases: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic Epochs Using the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry
ObjectiveApproximately one third of individuals worldwide have not received a COVID‐19 vaccine. Although studies have investigated risk factors linked to severe COVID‐19 among unvaccinated people with rheumatic diseases (RDs), we know less about whether these factors changed as the pandemic progressed. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with severe COVID‐19 in unvaccinated individuals in different pandemic epochs corresponding to major variants of concern.MethodsPatients with RDs and COVID‐19 were entered into the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry between March 2020 and June 2022. An ordinal logistic regression model (not hospitalized, hospitalized, and death) was used with date of COVID‐19 diagnosis, age, sex, race and/or ethnicity, comorbidities, RD activity, medications, and the human development index (HDI) as covariates. The main analysis included all unvaccinated patients across COVID‐19 pandemic epochs; subanalyses stratified patients according to RD types.ResultsAmong 19,256 unvaccinated people with RDs and COVID‐19, those who were older, male, had more comorbidities, used glucocorticoids, had higher disease activity, or lived in lower HDI regions had worse outcomes across epochs. For those with rheumatoid arthritis, sulfasalazine and B‐cell–depleting therapy were associated with worse outcomes, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were associated with improved outcomes. In those with connective tissue disease or vasculitis, B‐cell–depleting therapy was associated with worse outcomes.ConclusionRisk factors for severe COVID‐19 outcomes were similar throughout pandemic epochs in unvaccinated people with RDs. Ongoing efforts, including vaccination, are needed to reduce COVID‐19 severity in this population, particularly in those with medical and social vulnerabilities identified in this study.
Factors associated with myocarditis in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
e14674 Background: Myocarditis is an uncommon but serious adverse event (AE) of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We aimed to identify factors associated with ICI-related myocarditis in cancer patients using pooled data from multiple clinical trials. Methods: Data on 25,965 adults receiving at least one dose of an ICI (nivolumab [NIVO] or ipilimumab [IPI])-containing regimen were extracted from corporate safety and clinical trial databases. Patients missing documentation of AEs, indication, or trial ID were excluded. Myocarditis events were identified using MedDRA preferred terms. A nested case-control study design with controls who had no myocarditis selected at random from the risk sets and matched 1:5 on ICI regimen, duration of exposure to ICI regimen, and trial ID was used. Descriptive statistics were used to derive time to onset of myocarditis and to investigate patterns of myositis and rhabdomyolysis relative to myocarditis. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with myocarditis. Covariates included age, sex, race/ethnicity, medical history (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, sleep apnea), smoking, cancer type, medication use (within the prior 6 months), and co-occurrences of other AEs (pneumonitis, colitis, and hepatitis). Results: Myocarditis was documented in 122/24,106 (0.5%) patients meeting study eligibility criteria. A total of 732 patients (122 cases and 610 matched controls) from 46 trials were included in the analyses. Mean (SD) age was 63 (12) years; 65% of patients were male, 76% Caucasian, and 52% had a history of cardiovascular disease. NIVO + IPI was the most commonly used regimen (36%), followed by NIVO + relatlimab (25%) and NIVO + chemotherapy (14%). Median (Q1-Q3) time to onset of myocarditis was 38 (26-77) days from first dose of ICI. Myositis was reported in 18/122 (15%) cases and in 2/610 (0.3%) controls (p<0.001). Among the 18 cases, a majority (83%) developed myositis within 3 days before the onset of myocarditis. Rhabdomyolysis was reported in 4/122 (3%) cases, all within a month before myocarditis, and in none of the controls (p=0.001). In adjusted analyses, older age (odds ratio 1.38 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 1.12-1.70) and hepatitis (5.69, 2.24-14.44) were significantly associated with the development of myocarditis. Conclusions: In this large cohort of ICI-treated cancer patients, myocarditis had an early onset and was associated with older age and co-occurrences of hepatitis. Due to a low incidence among controls, rhabdomyolysis and myositis could not be included as covariates in adjusted analyses; however bivariate results showed strong associations between myocarditis and rhabdomyolysis or myositis. These findings suggest that co-occurrences of myositis, rhabdomyolysis, or hepatitis are associated with myocarditis and may originate from a more generalized ICI myopathy.
Association Between Race/Ethnicity and COVID‐19 Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients From the United States: Data From the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance
ObjectiveTo determine the association between race/ethnicity and COVID‐19 outcomes in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsIndividuals with SLE from the US with data entered into the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry between March 24, 2020 and August 27, 2021 were included. Variables included age, sex, race, and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, other), comorbidities, disease activity, pandemic time period, glucocorticoid dose, antimalarials, and immunosuppressive drug use. The ordinal outcome categories were: not hospitalized, hospitalized with no oxygenation, hospitalized with any ventilation or oxygenation, and death. We constructed ordinal logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between race/ethnicity and COVID‐19 severity, adjusting for possible confounders.ResultsWe included 523 patients; 473 (90.4%) were female and the mean ± SD age was 46.6 ± 14.0 years. A total of 358 patients (74.6%) were not hospitalized; 40 patients (8.3%) were hospitalized without oxygen, 64 patients (13.3%) were hospitalized with any oxygenation, and 18 (3.8%) died. In a multivariable model, Black (odds ratio [OR] 2.73 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.36–5.53]) and Hispanic (OR 2.76 [95% CI 1.34–5.69]) individuals had higher odds of more severe outcomes than White individuals.ConclusionBlack and Hispanic individuals with SLE experienced more severe COVID‐19 outcomes, which is consistent with findings in the US general population. These results likely reflect socioeconomic and health disparities and suggest that more aggressive efforts are needed to prevent and treat infection in this population.
Development of a Prediction Model for COVID‐19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: Results From the Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry
ObjectiveSome patients with rheumatic diseases might be at higher risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to develop a prediction model for COVID‐19 ARDS in this population and to create a simple risk score calculator for use in clinical settings.MethodsData were derived from the COVID‐19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Registry from March 24, 2020, to May 12, 2021. Seven machine learning classifiers were trained on ARDS outcomes using 83 variables obtained at COVID‐19 diagnosis. Predictive performance was assessed in a US test set and was validated in patients from four countries with independent registries using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A simple risk score calculator was developed using a regression model incorporating the most influential predictors from the best performing classifier.ResultsThe study included 8633 patients from 74 countries, of whom 523 (6%) had ARDS. Gradient boosting had the highest mean AUC (0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67‐0.88) and was considered the top performing classifier. Ten predictors were identified as key risk factors and were included in a regression model. The regression model that predicted ARDS with 71% (95% CI: 61%‐83%) sensitivity in the test set, and with sensitivities ranging from 61% to 80% in countries with independent registries, was used to develop the risk score calculator.ConclusionWe were able to predict ARDS with good sensitivity using information readily available at COVID‐19 diagnosis. The proposed risk score calculator has the potential to guide risk stratification for treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies, that have potential to reduce COVID‐19 disease progression.
Association Between Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and the Risk of Hospitalization or Death Among Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease and COVID-19