Citations

AbstractBackgroundThis study was aimed at developing and validating a decision‐making tool predictive of overall survival (OS) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.MethodsThree hundred sixty‐one patients at one institution were used for the training set, and 182 at a second institution were used for external validation. Treatments most commonly involved one or three fractions of spine SBRT. Exclusion criteria included proton therapy and benign histologies.ResultsThe final model consisted of the following variables and scores: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 6 (1), time from primary diagnosis < 21 months (1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 (1) or ECOG performance status > 1 (2), and >1 organ system involved (1). Each variable was an independent predictor of OS (p < .001), and each 1‐point increase in the score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79–2.25; p < .0001). The concordance value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.78). The scores were discretized into three groups—favorable (score = 0–1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor survival (score = 3–5)—with 2‐year OS rates of 84% (95% CI, 79%–90%), 46% (95% CI, 36%–59%), and 21% (95% CI, 14%–32%), respectively (p < .0001 for each). In the external validation set (182 patients), the score was also predictive of OS (p < .0001). Increasing SINS<zaq;6> was predictive of decreased OS as a continuous variable (p < .0001).ConclusionsThis novel score is proposed as a decision‐making tool to help to optimize patient selection for spine SBRT. SINS may be an independent predictor of OS.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the most impactful articles relevant to the pharmacotherapy of critically ill adult patients published in 2021. DATA SOURCE: PubMed/MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or systematic review/meta-analyses of adult critical care patients assessing a pharmacotherapeutic intervention and reporting clinical endpoints published between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. DATA EXTRACTION: Candidate articles were organized by clinical domain based on the emerging themes from all studies. A modified Delphi process was applied to obtain consensus on the most impactful publication within each clinical domain based on overall contribution to scientific knowledge and novelty to the literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search revealed 830 articles, of which 766 were excluded leaving 64 candidate articles for the Delphi process. These 64 articles were organized by clinical domain including: emergency/neurology, cardiopulmonary, nephrology/fluids, infectious diseases, metabolic, immunomodulation, and nutrition/gastroenterology. Each domain required the a priori defined three Delphi rounds. The resultant most impactful articles from each domain included five randomized controlled trials and two systematic review/meta-analyses. Topics studied included sedation during mechanical ventilation, anticoagulation in COVID-19, extended infusion beta-lactams, interleukin-6 antagonists in COVID-19, balanced crystalloid resuscitation, vitamin C/thiamine/hydrocortisone in sepsis, and promotility agents during enteral feeding. CONCLUSIONS: This synoptic review provides a summary and perspective of the most impactful articles relevant to the pharmacotherapy of critically ill adults published in 2021.

Adolescents and young women (AYA) with breast cancer represent a unique patient population, compared to the general population with breast cancer. We performed a literature review to evaluate the factors that influenced the surgical outcomes in this patient population. Fifty-two studies were identified, which evaluated breast surgery type, axillary surgery, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), surgical timing, psychological factors, disparities, and imaging use. AYA patients had equivalent oncologic outcomes with breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. CPM did not improve survival. There are limited data on axillary management in the AYA population, and while more data would be beneficial, this is currently extrapolated from the general breast cancer population. A shorter time to initiate treatment correlated to better outcomes, and disparities need to be overcome for optimal outcomes. AYA patients appreciated involvement in clinical decisions, and shared decision making should be considered whenever possible. Providers must keep these factors in mind when counseling AYA patients, regarding the surgical management of breast cancer.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Background Recurrent pericarditis is characterized by painful flares and inflammation, which negatively impact health‐related quality of life. RHAPSODY (rilonacept inhibition of interleukin‐1 alpha and beta for recurrent pericarditis: a pivotal symptomatology and outcomes study) evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL‐1α and ‐β cytokine trap) in recurrent pericarditis. A secondary analysis of these data evaluated the patient‐reported outcome questionnaire score change during the trial. Methods and Results Participants completed 5 patient‐reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing pericarditis pain, health‐related quality of life, general health status, sleep impact, and overall symptom severity. PRO score changes during the treatment run‐in period (12 weeks) and the blinded randomized withdrawal period (up to 24 weeks) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and mixed model repeated measures analyses. Participants with PRO data from the run‐in period (n=84) and the randomized withdrawal period (n=61; 30 rilonacept, 31 placebo) were included in analyses. Run‐in baseline PRO scores indicated that pericarditis symptoms during pericarditis recurrence impacted health‐related quality of life. All PRO scores significantly improved ( P <0.001) on rilonacept treatment during the run‐in period. For the randomized withdrawal period, PRO scores were maintained for participants receiving rilonacept. For those receiving placebo and who experienced a recurrence, PRO scores deteriorated at the time of recurrence and then improved following rilonacept bailout. At randomized withdrawal Week 24/End of Study, scores of participants who received bailout rilonacept were similar to those of participants who had continued rilonacept. Conclusions These results demonstrate the burden of pericarditis recurrences and the improved physical and emotional health of patients with recurrent pericarditis while on rilonacept treatment. These findings extend prior rilonacept efficacy results, demonstrating improvements in patient‐reported health‐related quality of life, sleep, pain, and global symptom severity while on treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome that affects over 60 million persons worldwide.1 The 5-year survival rate of HF is less than 50% irrespective of ejection fraction (EF) and the limitations of EF in sufficiently phenotyping HF are recognized.2,3 High throughput proteomics assays are an attractive option for precision phenotyping.4 Purpose To explore the proteomic profiles and biomarker pathways associated with death in an HF community cohort. Methods We measured proteomics in plasma specimens collected from an HF cohort (2003–2012) of patients predominantly of European Ancestry (92%). The relative concentrations of circulating plasma proteins were measured using an aptamer-based assay containing 7335 human protein targets. Proteins significantly associated with mortality were selected while adjusting for age, sex, and eGFR. These proteins were employed in clustering analysis and subjected to 10-fold cross-validation. We quantified and corrected the clustering bias via bootstrapping and subsequently validated the results via semi-supervised clustering. Multivariable Cox regression was implemented for the cluster variable while adjusting for the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score. Additionally, we performed enrichment and pathway analysis of the outcome-associated proteins considering significance thresholds of −log10(P-value) &gt;2, FDR corrected P&lt;0.05 (regulator analysis) and Z-scores of &gt;2 and &lt;−2 as thresholds for activation and inhibition of proteins/pathways. Results From a total of 1,388 patients (mean age 75±13; 52% male), 2 distinct clusters, (HR: 2.04; 95% CI [1.78–2.34]; p-value: &lt;0.0001 independent of MAGGIC) were identified, cluster 1; n=722, mean age 72±14; NYHA class III/IV: 41%/26%; EF: 47%±17 and cluster 2; n=666, mean age 79±11; NYHA class III/IV: 41%/31%, EF: 48%±16 based on the 447 proteins [354 positively and 93 negatively] significantly associated with mortality (1,158 events). Gene-set enrichment analysis of all 447 proteins revealed cell adhesion, extracellular matrix organization, enzyme-linked protein/tyrosine kinase signaling pathways, humoral immune response, tissue development, growth factor signaling, post-translational protein modification, and platelet degranulation as the dominant biological themes. Finally, we found 18 upstream regulators predicted to be driving the expressions of the proteins in the dataset including a predicted outcome-associated protein-Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 – TGFB1 (p=7.46E-09), Interleukin 1B, IL1B (p=9.40E-08), and oncostatin M, OSM (p=6.61E-05) as the top 3 regulators (predicted activation) based on FDR-corrected statistical significance of P&lt;0.05 (Figure 1) Conclusion We identified distinct clusters based on proteomic profiles associated with HF mortality independently of clinical prognostic makers. Further, we delineated protein regulators driving the major pathways associated with HF survival. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Intramural Research, NIH/NHLBI

Establishing causal links between inherited polymorphisms and cancer risk is challenging. Here, we focus on the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs55705857, which confers a sixfold greater risk of isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH) –mutant low-grade glioma (LGG). We reveal that rs55705857 itself is the causal variant and is associated with molecular pathways that drive LGG. Mechanistically, we show that rs55705857 resides within a brain-specific enhancer, where the risk allele disrupts OCT2/4 binding, allowing increased interaction with the Myc promoter and increased Myc expression. Mutating the orthologous mouse rs55705857 locus accelerated tumor development in an Idh1 R132H -driven LGG mouse model from 472 to 172 days and increased penetrance from 30% to 75%. Our work reveals mechanisms of the heritable predisposition to lethal glioma in ~40% of LGG patients.

105 Background: Screening for cervical cancer with pap smears and HPV testing can improve patient outcomes by allowing for early identification of cervical cancer. The Minnesota Community Measure and Mayo Clinic's goal is to have a cervical cancer screening rate of 82% (Detailed Report-Cervical Cancer Screening, 2020). Healthy People 2030 aims to have a cervical cancer screening rate of 83.4% (Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer -C-09, 2021). Community Internal Medicine cervical cancer screening rates are below this level at 63.09% compliance, with 5,239 patients non-compliant, who are eligible for cervical cancer screenings. Olmsted County only offers acute services on the weekends with no primary care services, which leaves women who work during the week or have childcare/caregiver issues with no options on the weekend or evenings when they have availability to attend appointments. Methods: Based on guidelines for pap smear screening (women ages 21-65), 14,195 women were identified within CIM to be eligible for screening. Of those, 5,239 were due for screening. The Saturday Pap Smear Clinic had 88 available spots. We aimed to improve cervical cancer screening rates among non-compliant women within Community Internal Medicine by 1% (52 women, total noncompliant women = 5,239) by January 2021 without adversely impacting coverage of existing clinic hours. Results: The electronic medical record (EMR), EPIC, was utilized to identify all patients who were eligible for a pap smear based on current guidelines (Total eligible = 14,195; Sample size/non-compliant: 5,239 patients) within Community Internal Medicine (CIM) of the Baldwin Building in Rochester, MN. Interventions included: surveys that were sent to patients via the Patient Portal. Advertising for the Saturday Clinic included Primary Care News, E-boards, Posters, Social Media, SCOPE, Mayo News, and Providers. The Saturday clinic allowed time outside the traditional hours. One unique feature of the clinic is that all females staffed it during clinic hours in an attempt to alleviate some of the fear/anxiety. After completion of the pilot Saturday Pap Clinic, pap smear compliance from the Saturday Pap Clinic alone arose 1.2% (62 patients) within CIM. Conclusions: Post-intervention, cervical screening rates among non-compliant women within Baldwin CIM improved by 1.2% (62 women total).