Johnson‐Tesch, Benjamin A.

Background and Purpose Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is caused by spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. This study assessed whether the certainty and/or multifocality of CSF leaks is associated with the severity of intracranial sequelae of SIH. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was completed of patients with suspected SIH that underwent digital subtraction myelogram (DSM) preceded by brain MRI. DSMs were evaluated for the presence or absence of a CSF leak, categorized both as positive/negative/indeterminate and single versus multifocal. Brain MRIs were assessed for intracranial sequelae of SIH based on two probabilistic scoring systems (Dobrocky and Mayo methods). For each system, both an absolute “numerical” score (based on tabulation of findings) and “categorized” score (classification of probability) were tabulated. Results 174 patients were included; 113 (64.9%) were female, average age 52.0 ± 14.3 years. One or more definite leaks were noted in 76 (43.7%) patients; an indeterminate leak was noted in 22 (12.6%) patients. 16 (16.3%) had multiple leaks. There was no significant difference in the severity of intracranial findings between patients with a single versus multiple leaks ( p values ranged from .36 to .70 using categorized scores and 0.22–0.99 for numerical scores). Definite leaks were more likely to have both higher categorized intracranial scores (Mayo p = .0008, Dobrocky p = .006) and numerical scores ( p = .0002 for Mayo and p = .006 for Dobrocky). Conclusions Certainty of a CSF leak on diagnostic imaging is associated with severity of intracranial sequelae of SIH, with definite leaks having significantly more intracranial findings than indeterminate leaks. Multifocal leaks do not cause greater intracranial abnormalities.

AbstractBackgroundThis study was aimed at developing and validating a decision‐making tool predictive of overall survival (OS) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.MethodsThree hundred sixty‐one patients at one institution were used for the training set, and 182 at a second institution were used for external validation. Treatments most commonly involved one or three fractions of spine SBRT. Exclusion criteria included proton therapy and benign histologies.ResultsThe final model consisted of the following variables and scores: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 6 (1), time from primary diagnosis < 21 months (1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 (1) or ECOG performance status > 1 (2), and >1 organ system involved (1). Each variable was an independent predictor of OS (p < .001), and each 1‐point increase in the score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79–2.25; p < .0001). The concordance value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.78). The scores were discretized into three groups—favorable (score = 0–1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor survival (score = 3–5)—with 2‐year OS rates of 84% (95% CI, 79%–90%), 46% (95% CI, 36%–59%), and 21% (95% CI, 14%–32%), respectively (p < .0001 for each). In the external validation set (182 patients), the score was also predictive of OS (p < .0001). Increasing SINS<zaq;6> was predictive of decreased OS as a continuous variable (p < .0001).ConclusionsThis novel score is proposed as a decision‐making tool to help to optimize patient selection for spine SBRT. SINS may be an independent predictor of OS.

Abstract PURPOSE Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a potential adverse effect following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases. In this analysis, we developed and internally validated a risk stratification model for VCF. METHODS From an initial set of 680 treatments, we excluded those with proton therapy, prior surgical intervention, or missing data. The final dataset had 464 treatments in 313 patients. Delineations of VCF and all radiographic components of the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) were determined by a radiologist. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted using separate training (70%), internal validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. The log-rank test was used as the criterion for node splitting. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 21 months, we identified 84 VCF (18%), including 65 (77%) de novo and 19 (23%) progressive fractures. There was a median 9 months (IQR: 3 – 21) to VCF. From an initial set of 15 candidate variables, six were identified using the backwards selection method, feature importance testing, and a correlation heatmap. Four were then selected in the highest-fidelity RPA models: epidural tumor extension, lumbar location, gross tumor volume &gt; 10 cc, and SINS &gt; 6. One point was assigned to each variable, and the resulting multivariate Cox model had a concordance of 0.760. Each one point increase in score was associated with increasing rates of VCF. Low-risk lesions (score: 0-1, n=273) had 2-year freedom from VCF of 92%, compared to 80% for intermediate-risk (score: 2, n=99) and 56% (score: 3-4, n=92) for high-risk lesions (p &lt; 0.0001). Cumulative incidence curves with death as a competing risk showed increased VCF with higher scores via Gray’s test (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our internally-validated model identifies a subgroup of patients with high risk for VCF who may benefit from prophylactic surgical stabilization or vertebroplasty.