Back to Authors

Paolini, John F

0000-0001-7622-8851

Mayo Clinic

Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Lexington MA USA.

Citations 3

Sustained Pericarditis Recurrence Risk Reduction With Long‐Term Rilonacept
Imazio, Massimo , Klein, Allan L. , Brucato, Antonio , Abbate, Antonio , Arad, Michael , Cremer, Paul , LeWinter, Martin M. , Lewis, Basil S. , Lin, David , Sutej, Paul, Wasserstrum, Yishay , Clair, JoAnn , Agarwal, Indra, Wang, Sheldon, Paolini, John F. , Investigators, for the RHAPSODY, Cremer, Paul C , LeWinter, Martin M , Lewis, Basil S , Luis, Sushil A , Wasserstrum, Yishay , Clair, JoAnn , Paolini, John F , Brucato, Antonio , Klein, Allan , Imazio, Massimo , Insalaco, Antonella , Luis, Sushil Allen , Nicholls, Stephen J. , Investigators, for the RHAPSODY

Journal of the American Heart Association | March 12, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.032516 Get It

Background Rilonacept, a once‐weekly interleukin‐1 alpha and beta cytokine trap, reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 study, RHAPSODY (Rilonacept Inhibition of Interleukin‐1 Alpha and Beta for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study). The RHAPSODY long‐term extension further explored recurrent pericarditis natural history and treatment duration decision‐making during 24 additional months of open‐label rilonacept treatment. Methods and Results Seventy‐four patients commenced the long‐term extension, with a median (maximum) total rilonacept duration of 22 (35) months. Individually, 18 months after the most proximal pericarditis recurrence, investigators decided to continue rilonacept on study, suspend rilonacept for off‐treatment observation (rescue allowed), or discontinue the study. The annualized incidence of pericarditis recurrence on rilonacept up to the 18‐month decision milestone was 0.04 events/patient‐year versus 4.4 events/patient‐year prestudy while on oral therapies. At the 18‐month decision milestone, 64% (33/52) continued rilonacept, 15% (8/52) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (11/52) discontinued the study. Among the 33 patients (1/33; 3.0%) continuing rilonacept (median time to recurrence could not be estimated due to too few events), a single recurrence occurred 4 weeks after a treatment interruption. Among patients suspending rilonacept, 75% (6/8) experienced recurrence (median time to recurrence, 11.8 weeks [95% CI, 3.7 weeks to not estimable]). There was a 98% reduction in risk of pericarditis recurrence among patients continuing rilonacept treatment after the 18‐month decision milestone versus those suspending treatment for observation (hazard ratio, 0.02; P <0.0001). Conclusions In the RHAPSODY long‐term extension, continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued response; treatment suspension at the 18‐month decision milestone was associated with pericarditis recurrence. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.
Transition to rilonacept monotherapy from oral therapies in patients with recurrent pericarditis
Brucato, Antonio , Wheeler, Alistair, Abbate, Antonio , Cremer, Paul , Zou, Liangxing, LeWinter, Martin M. , Lin, David , Pancrazi, Massimo, Paolini, John F. , Luis, Sushil Allen , Klein, Allan , Paolini, John F , Brucato, Antonio , Cremer, Paul C , Insalaco, Antonella , Lewis, Basil S. , Nicholls, Stephen J. , Klein, Allan L. , Imazio, Massimo

Heart | October 31, 2022 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 297-304

10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321328 Get It

Objective Polypharmacy management of recurrent pericarditis (RP) often involves long-term therapies, often with negative effects. Slow tapering of oral therapies is often required to avoid recurrence. A post hoc analysis of the phase III trial Rilonacept inHibition of interleukin-1 Alpha and beta for recurrent Pericarditis: a pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study (RHAPSODY) evaluated investigator approaches to transitioning to IL-1 blockade monotherapy with rilonacept, which was hypothesised to allow accelerated withdrawal of common multidrug pericarditis regimens. Methods RHAPSODY was a multicentre (Australia, Israel, Italy, USA), double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised-withdrawal trial in adults and adolescents with RP. Investigators initiated rilonacept at the labelled dose level and discontinued oral pericarditis therapies during the 12-week run-in; randomised patients received study drug as monotherapy. Time to rilonacept monotherapy was quantified in patients receiving multidrug regimens at baseline who achieved rilonacept monotherapy during run-in. Results In 86 enrolled patients, mean time to rilonacept monotherapy was 7.9 weeks, with no recurrences. Of these, 64% (n=55) entered on multidrug regimens: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) plus colchicine (44% (24/55)), colchicine plus glucocorticoids (24% (13/55)), or NSAIDs, colchicine, plus glucocorticoids (33% (18/55)). Investigators transitioned patients receiving colchicine and glucocorticoids at baseline to rilonacept monotherapy without recurrence regardless of taper approach: sequential (n=14; median, 7.7 weeks) or concurrent (n=17; median, 8.0 weeks). Median time to rilonacept monotherapy was similar regardless of glucocorticoid dose and duration: ≤15 mg/day (n=21): 7.3 weeks; >15 mg/day (n=18): 8.0 weeks; long-term (≥28 days): 7.6 weeks. Conclusions Rapid discontinuation of oral RP therapies while transitioning to rilonacept monotherapy was feasible without triggering pericarditis recurrence. Trial registration number NCT03737110.
Interleukin‐1 Trap Rilonacept Improved Health‐Related Quality of Life and Sleep in Patients With Recurrent Pericarditis: Results From the Phase 3 Clinical Trial RHAPSODY
Brucato, Antonio , Lim-Watson, Michelle , Klein, Allan L. , Imazio, Massimo , Cella, David , Cremer, Paul , LeWinter, Martin M. , Lin, David , Lotan, Dor , Pancrazi, Massimo, Trotta, Lucia , Klooster, Brittany , Litcher‐Kelly, Leighann , Zou, Liangxing, Magestro, Matt , Wheeler, Alistair, Paolini, John F. , Abbate, Antonio , Abo‐Auda, Wael, Akhtar, Asif, Arad, Michael , Baibhav, Bipul, Bhalla, Karan, Cross, David, Eisen, Alon , FREEDBERG, NAHUM A., Fuchs, Shmuel, Gaddam, Eliyazar, Gelfand, Eli V. , Grena, Paul, Halabi, Majdi , Harris, David C.H. , Karim, Amin H., Kontzias, Apostolos , Kornberg, Robert, Latif, Faisal , Leibowitz, David , Lotan, Dor, Lim-Watson, Michelle Z , Klein, Allan , Luis, Sushil A , Lotan, Dor , Klooster, Brittany , Litcher-Kelly, Leighann , Paolini, John F , Brucato, Antonio , Cremer, Paul C , Imazio, Massimo , Luis, Sushil Allen , Atar, Shaul , Collins, Sean P. , Colquhoun, David Martin , Dwivedi, Girish , Gattorno, Marco , Insalaco, Antonella , Karim, Amin, Knowlton, Kirk U. , Lotan, Dor

Journal of the American Heart Association | October 17, 2022 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 20 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.121.023252 Get It

Background Recurrent pericarditis is characterized by painful flares and inflammation, which negatively impact health‐related quality of life. RHAPSODY (rilonacept inhibition of interleukin‐1 alpha and beta for recurrent pericarditis: a pivotal symptomatology and outcomes study) evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL‐1α and ‐β cytokine trap) in recurrent pericarditis. A secondary analysis of these data evaluated the patient‐reported outcome questionnaire score change during the trial. Methods and Results Participants completed 5 patient‐reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing pericarditis pain, health‐related quality of life, general health status, sleep impact, and overall symptom severity. PRO score changes during the treatment run‐in period (12 weeks) and the blinded randomized withdrawal period (up to 24 weeks) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and mixed model repeated measures analyses. Participants with PRO data from the run‐in period (n=84) and the randomized withdrawal period (n=61; 30 rilonacept, 31 placebo) were included in analyses. Run‐in baseline PRO scores indicated that pericarditis symptoms during pericarditis recurrence impacted health‐related quality of life. All PRO scores significantly improved ( P <0.001) on rilonacept treatment during the run‐in period. For the randomized withdrawal period, PRO scores were maintained for participants receiving rilonacept. For those receiving placebo and who experienced a recurrence, PRO scores deteriorated at the time of recurrence and then improved following rilonacept bailout. At randomized withdrawal Week 24/End of Study, scores of participants who received bailout rilonacept were similar to those of participants who had continued rilonacept. Conclusions These results demonstrate the burden of pericarditis recurrences and the improved physical and emotional health of patients with recurrent pericarditis while on rilonacept treatment. These findings extend prior rilonacept efficacy results, demonstrating improvements in patient‐reported health‐related quality of life, sleep, pain, and global symptom severity while on treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.