Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

16254 citation(s) found for "Ha, David R".

Characterisation of Posterior Predominant Amyloid PET Binding Across Multiple Cohorts
Giorgio, Joseph , Landau, Susan, Yokoyama, Jennifer S. , Soleimani-Meigooni, David, Carrillo, Maria, Grinberg, Lea, Seeley, William W Tenenholz, Spina, Salvatore, Nudelman, Kelly, Apostolova, Liana, Dickerson, Bradford C, Jagust, William J, Rabinovici, Gil, Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Yokoyama, Jennifer , Blazhenets, Ganna , Landau, Susan , Pezzoli, Stefania , Seeley, William W. , Spina, Salvatore , Nudelman, Kelly , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Jagust, William J. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging

No container title available | June 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.06.17.733031 | PMID 42395404 Get It

Abstract The standard approach to quantify amyloid (Aβ) PET averages uptake within a single cortical mask that assumes no clinically relevant spatial heterogeneity in uptake patterns. Here, in a sample of 12,379 clinically impaired participants taken from four phenotypically diverse cohorts we use data-driven approaches to discover heterogeneous patterns of Aβ-PET binding, uncovering a reproducible and clinically relevant pattern of posterior predominant Aβ-PET binding. In particular, Aβ-PET positive participants who have posterior predominant binding are less likely to be APOE -ε4 carriers, more severely impaired, have thinner cortex in posterior regions, and greater posterior tau PET burden. Furthermore, in a subsample of participants with neuropathological assessment, participants with posterior predominant Aβ binding have a higher likelihood of having cerebral amyloid angiopathy at autopsy. These findings suggest that Aβ-PET accumulates along two orthogonal axes with biological and clinical relevance, indicating that the standard approach to assess Aβ-PET is insufficient to capture meaningful signal from Aβ-PET imaging. This work has implications for the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and extends our understanding of the mechanisms governing variable Aβ-PET distribution and its downstream effects.
Combining post-mortem and neuroimaging measures of brain amyloidosis to accelerate genomic discovery
Wang, Ting‐Chen , Ali, Muhammad, Wu, Yiyang , Mormino, Elizabeth, Buckley, Rachel F. , Saykin, Andrew J, Jager, Philip L. De , Schneider, Julie A, Vardarajan, Badri, Mayeux, Richard, Kunkle, Brian W, Keene, C Dirk, Seshadri, S, Sperling, Reisa A, Kamboh, M Ilyas, Jagust, William J. , Schellenberg, Gerard D, Huentelman, MJ, Hamilton-Nelson, Kara, Pericak-Vance, Margaret A, Haines, Jonathan L, Montine, Thomas J, Beecham, Gary, Archer, Derek , Wu, Yiyang , Buckley, Rachel F , De Jager, Philip L , Bennett, David A. , Barnes, Lisa L , Bush, William S , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Ramanan, Vijay K , Harrison, Theresa M , Jagust, William J , Laws, Simon M , Below, Jennifer E , Cruchaga, Carlos , Seto, Mabel , Dumitrescu, Logan , Archer, Derek B. , Ali, Muhammad , Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Lee, Annie , Saykin, Andrew J. , Schneider, Julie A. , Bennett, David A. , Barnes, Lisa L. , Vardarajan, Badri Narayan , Mayeux, Richard , Kunkle, Brian W. , Bush, William S. , Keene, C Dirk, Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Kamboh, M. Ilyas , Harrison, Theresa M. , Schellenberg, Gerard D. , Hamilton‐Nelson, Kara L. , Pericak‐Vance, Margaret A. , Goate, Alison , Haines, Jonathan L. , Montine, Thomas J. , Beecham, Gary W. , Hohman, Timothy J. , Dumitrescu, Logan

Brain | June 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/brain/awag216 | PMID 42334898 Get It

Abstract Histopathological assessment has served as the gold standard for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Emerging technological advancements, including the development of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), have enabled early detection of amyloid pathology, one of the neuropathological hallmarks of AD. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) across cohorts of aging and AD, leveraging different measurements of amyloid burden, may facilitate the identification of novel genetic variants that drive the earliest neuropathological changes in AD. This study presents the largest GWAS of brain amyloidosis to date, leveraging amyloid β (Aβ) measured by in vivo amyloid PET and postmortem histopathology from 13,555 individuals of European ancestry. Amyloid positivity was defined as moderate or frequent neuritic plaques according to the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) staging scores for each postmortem cohort. A Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was applied to each amyloid PET cohort to identify the cohort and tracer-specific cut-offs that differentiate amyloid positive and negative populations. In silico and ex vivo analyses further characterized implicated loci, including interrogating the association between bulk and single-nucleus gene expression profiles and AD-related traits. Genetic covariance analysis assessed the extent amyloid PET and postmortem measures reflect the shared genetic architecture of brain amyloidosis. Our combined amyloidosis GWAS identified three established AD risk loci: BIN1 (rs6733839, OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.26, P = 1.32 × 10−11), CR1 (rs4844610, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.16-1.32, P = 4.21 × 10−10), APOE (rs429358, OR = 4.01, 95% CI = 3.66-4.38, P = 4.54 × 10−201), and a newly identified brain amyloidosis-associated variant on chromosome 17 (rs35635959, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.12-1.25, P = 1.47 × 10−8). SuSiE fine-mapping identified a single credible set of 15 putative causal variants with rs35635959 as the lead variant. Subsequent eQTL and SuSiE-based colocalization analyses prioritized rs35635959 as a strong eQTL for TUBG2, encoding tubulin gamma 2, which is involved in microtubule organization and synaptic plasticity. Further cell-type-specific characterization of this gene in neurons from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tissue indicated that decreased TUBG2 expression was associated with increased Aβ burden and AD case status (PFDR < 0.045). Furthermore, our study is the first to report a modest genetic covariance (covariance=0.17, P < 6.54 × 10−8) between the genetic architecture of amyloid burden captured by different modalities. While APOE showed a strong association with both amyloid endophenotypes, the observed genetic covariance was not substantially attenuated after excluding variants within the APOE region (covariance=0.16, P < 1.32 × 10−7). Our results highlight the benefits of leveraging compatible, harmonized AD endophenotypes to increase power to uncover new molecular insights into the etiology of AD neuropathology. Wang et al. present the largest GWAS of brain amyloidosis to date, analysing 13,555 individuals using amyloid PET and postmortem Aβ measures. They identify a novel amyloidosis-associated variant on chromosome 17, demonstrate genetic covariance between modalities, and highlight complex traits sharing genetic architecture with Aβ burden.
P257 Efficacy and safety up to 3 years of risankizumab in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis patients: COMMAND interim results
Atreya, Raja, Louis, Edouard, Loftus, Edward V, Rubin, David T, Dubinsky, Marla C., Hisamatsu, T, Kalabic, Jasmina , Méndez, Paloma, Chen, S H, Shah, Saajan, Morisset, Pierre, Duan, W Rachel, Coll, Christina, Panaccione, Remo, Atreya, Raja Narayana , Rubin, David T. , Hisamatsu, Tadakazu, Mendez, Paloma, Morisset, Pierre, Duan, W Rachel, Panaccione, Remo

E-Posters | June 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A240.2-A241

10.1136/gutjnl-2026-bsg.373 Get It

Improving the clinical trial landscape for patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease: a call to action
Graff‐Radford, Jonathan, Boon, Baayla D. C., Westman, Eric, Groot, Colin, Jones, David T., Grinberg, Lea T., Rabinovici, Gil D., Whitwell, J R, Apostolova, L G, Mj, Murray, Hammers, Dustin B., Schindler, Suzanne E., Atonsdottir, Inga, Schott, J J, Illán‐Gala, Ignacio, Chukwuanugo, Ogbuagu, Guerra, Jorge J. Llibre, Peters, Ruth, Abner, Erin L., Abdelnour, Carla , A, Cortes Llado, Joie, Renaud La, Souza, Leonardo Cruz de, Shir, Dror , Pijenburg, Yolande A. L., Carrillo, Maria C., Dickerson, Bradford C, Aisen, P, Ossenkoppele, Rik, Raman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Corriveau-Lecavalier, Nick , La Joie, Renaud , Shir, Dror , Corriveau‐Lecavalier, Nick , Falgàs, Neus , Putcha, Deepti , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Yong, Keir , Boon, Baayla D.C. , Mohanty, Rosaleena , Westman, Eric , Groot, Colin , Jones, David T. , Grinberg, Lea T. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Hammers, Dustin B , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Rhodus, Elizabeth K. , Illán‐Gala, Ignacio , OGBUAGU, CHUKWUANUGO, Abner, Erin L. , Souza, Leonardo Cruz de , Rezaii, Neguine , Carrillo, María C. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Aisen, Paul , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Raman, Rema

Alzheimer's & Dementia | June 23, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71521 | PMID 42334062 Get It

Abstract Patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease (AD) often present at a younger age with predominantly non‐amnestic impairments and a more aggressive disease course. Historically, individuals with atypical presentations have not been included in large‐scale clinical trials, which typically focus on late‐onset, sporadic amnestic‐predominant AD. Consequently, treatment options and research efforts specific to atypical AD remain limited. The emergence of amyloid‐targeting therapies that slow disease progression underscores these challenges, as evidence supporting their efficacy in early‐onset amnestic and non‐amnestic AD variants is scarce. This perspective article argues that atypical AD represents an excellent disease model for clinical trials and proposes strategies to address critical gaps in clinical trial design for this population. Key considerations include optimizing participant selection approaches, establishing syndrome‐specific or surrogate biological and clinical endpoints, and fostering advocacy to enhance early and accurate diagnosis, equitable representation, and outcomes for these populations.
Understanding Anesthesiologists’ Adoption of Evidence-based Neuromuscular Monitoring and Reversal Best Practices
Weinger, Matthew B., Andreae, Michael, Anders, Shilo, Slagle, Jason , Reale, Carrie , Faiman, Janelle, Torsher, Laurence, Shotwell, Matthew S., Gaba, David M. , Burden, Amanda, Andreae, Michael H. , Andreae, Michael H , Weinger, Matthew B. , Anders, Shilo , DeClercq, Josh , Banerjee, Arna , Torsher, Laurence C., Shotwell, Matthew S. , Burden, Amanda R.

Anesthesiology Open | June 23, 2026 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e0020

10.1097/ao9.0000000000000020 Get It

Anesthesiologists are sometimes slow to adopt new technologies despite proven benefits. The authors undertook to understand community anesthesiologists’ perspectives and practices regarding neuromuscular monitoring and reversal. Specifically, they sought to generate evidence for why some guidance-congruent practices— i.e. , quantitative train-of-four monitoring, ulnar nerve stimulation, and evidence-based reversal—remain inconsistently adopted despite robust evidence of patient harm from residual neuromuscular blockade and decades of effort to improve adoption. Thirty-six U.S. community anesthesiologists underwent a detailed qualitative cognitive interview. Analysis revealed four clinician archetypes whose neuromuscular monitoring and reversal practices are shaped by identifiable individual and practice-related biases and device- and system-level barriers. Perceived confidence in sugammadex efficacy was frequently cited as a rationale for omitting quantitative neuromuscular monitoring. The authors propose a research and implementation action agenda to close the evidence-to-practice gap in neuromuscular monitoring and reversal.
Clinical Associations of Cerebrospinal Fluid TMEM106B in Familial and Sporadic Frontotemporal Dementia
Olzinski, Molly, Downer, Joshua, Rajbanshi, Binita, Li, Jingyao, Loureiro, Joseph, Heuer, Hilary, Ljubenkov, Peter, Vandevrede, Lawren, Staffaroni, Adam, Lario‐Lago, Argentina, Leichter, Dana, Wolf, Amy, Wise, Amy, Sanderson-Cimino, Mark, Barragan, Eden, Spina, S, Grinberg, Lea T., Seeley, William W., Casaletto, Kaitlin B., Kramer, Joel, Ramos, Eilana, Geschwind, Daniel, Cook, Casey, Petrucelli, L, Forsberg, Leah K., Gendron, Tania, Boeve, Bradley F., Rademakers, Rosa, Rosen, Howard J., Saloner, Rowan, Boxer, Adam L., Rojas, Julio C., Abdullah, M. Samy, Apostolova, Liana, Appleby, Brian, Bayram, Ece, Hp, Botha, Bozoki, Andrea, Brushaber, Danielle, Clark, David, Considine, Ciaran M., Darby, R. Ryan, Day, Gregory S., Dickerson, Bradford C., Dickson, Dennis, Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko, Dwosh, Emily, Faber, Kelley M., Fields, Julie A. , Fong, Jamie C., Foroud, Tatiana, Galasko, Douglas R., Gavrilova, Ralitza, Ghoshal, Nupur , Goldman, Jill, Graff-Radford, Jonathan, Graff-Radford, Neill, Grant, Ian M., Cn, Hales, Honig, Lawrence S., Gd, Hsiung, Huey, Edward D, Irwin, David, Jones, David T., Kantarci, Kejal, Knopman, David, Kolander, Tyler , Kornak, J M, Kremers, W., Kwan, Justin , Lapid, Maria, Lee, Suzee, Litvan, Irene, Lucente, Diane, Mackenzie, Ian R., Masdeu, J C, Massimo, Lauren, McGinnis, Scott, McMillan, Corey T., Mendez, Mario F., Mester, Carly, Miyagawa, Toji , Molden, Joie, Onyike, Chiadi, Pantelyat, Alexander, Pascual, Belen, Paulson, Henry, Ramanan, Vijay, Rankin, Katherine P., Rascovsky, Katya, Rhoads, Kristoffer , Savica, Rodolfo, Snyder, Allison, Sullivan, A. Campbell, Syrjanen, Jeremy, Tartaglia, M, Taylor, Jack, Tipton, P E, WEINTRAUB, S, Wint, Dylan, Wong, Bonnie, Yokoyama, Jennifer, Paulson, Henry L. , Barmada, Sami J. , Paulson, Henry L , Barmada, Sami , Cobigo, Yann , Worringer, Kathleen A. , Heuer, Hilary W. , VandeVrede, Lawren , Staffaroni, Adam M. , Wolf, Amy , Wise, Amy B. , Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark , Barragan, Eden V. , Grinberg, Lea T. , Seeley, William W. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Kramer, Joel, Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Geschwind, Daniel H. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Gendron, Tania F. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Perneel, Jolien , Rademakers, Rosa , Rosen, Howard J. , Saloner, Rowan , Boxer, Adam L. , Rojas, Julio C. , Appleby, Brian S. , Barmada, Sami, Bayram, Ece , Botha, Hugo, Bozoki, Andrea C , Brushaber, Danielle , Clark, David, Considine, Ciaran , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dickson, Dennis, Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Dwosh, Emily , Foroud, Tatiana, Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Graff-Radford, Neill, Hales, Chadwick M., Honig, Lawrence S. , Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R., Huey, Edward D. , Jones, David T., Kantarci, Kejal , Kornak, John , Kremers, Walter, Kwan, Justin, Léger, Gabriel C. , Litvan, Irene , Lucente, Diane , Mackenzie, Ian R. , Massimo, Lauren , McGinnis, Scott, McMillan, Corey T. , Mendez, Mario F. , Mester, Carly , Pascual, Belén , Ramanan, Vijay, Rankin, Katherine P. , Roberson, Erik D. , Savica, Rodolfo , Snyder, Allison , Sullivan, A. Campbell , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Taylor, Jack C. , Tipton, Philip W., Vandebergh, Marijne , Weıntraub, Sandra , Wint, Dylan

JAMA Neurology | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 778

10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.1927 | PMID 42329632 Get It

Importance TMEM106B is a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) genetic susceptibility factor, and TMEM106B protein aggregates are a feature of aging and neurodegeneration. Whether TMEM106B protein levels are associated with clinical features is unknown. Objective To investigate the clinical associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TMEM106B in FTLD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 independent frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts (recruitment from April 2009 through July 2023, with analyses from January 2025 through April 2026), with a 2-year follow up. This multicenter clinical study integrated clinical, genetic, biomarker, and neuroimaging data. Individuals were recruited through the University of California, San Francisco (n = 3733), or ALLFTD (n = 2343). Participants with available CSF were included. A discovery cohort (n = 271) included participants with sporadic neuropathology-confirmed FTLD; presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT ; or controls. An independent validation cohort (n = 383) included participants with clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. Exposures CSF samples for TMEM106B quantification with aptamer proteomics (SomaScan version 3.0 [discovery cohort] and SomaScan version 4.1 [validation cohort]). Main Outcomes and Measures Parametric tests compared the primary outcome, CSF TMEM106B, by disease severity, TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, sex, clinical syndrome, pathological diagnosis, and pathogenic variant and determined associations with brain volume. Results In the discovery (n = 271; 136 women [51%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [38-80] years) and validation (n = 383; 183 women [48%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [50-78] years) cohorts, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe disease (β, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003), lower frontotemporal brain volumes (β, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; P < .001), and faster clinical progression (β, −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001). Associations of TMEM106B with clinical disease severity were independent of those with neurofilament light chain. TMEM106B levels were influenced by TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, where individuals with the protective G/G genotype had lower levels than the risk A/A genotype. CSF TMEM106B levels did not differentiate between FTLD subtypes or between FTLD and AD. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this cross-sectional study, TMEM106B is detectable in CSF and levels reflect disease severity in sporadic and genetic FTLD and AD, but levels are also influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype. CSF TMEM106B could support further studies to understand the mechanisms of disease and develop clinical tools in FTLD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Real‐world, multi‐omics validation of the clinical relevance of molecular taxonomy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
Sauta, Elisabetta, Lanino, Luca, Bewersdorf, Jan P, Kewan, Tariq, Ali, Najla H. Al, Fenaux, Pierre, Platzbecker, Uwe, Santini, Valeria, Brunner, Andrew M., Kuykendall, Andrew T., Bennett, John M. , Buckstein, Rena, Bejar, Rafael, Carraway, Hetty E., DeZern, Amy E., Hasserjian, R., Loghavi, Sanam, Odenike, Olatoyosi, Padron, Eric , Patnaik, Mrinal M., Stahl, Maximilian, Sekeres, M., Steensma, David P., Savona, Michael R., Taylor, Justin, Xu, Mina L., Sallman, David A., Nimer, Stephen D. , Hourigan, Christopher S., Wei, Andrew H., Riva, Elena , Ventura, Denise, Pinocchio, Nicole, Buizza, Alessandro , Russo, Antonio, D'Amico, Saverio, Delleani, Mattia , Travaglino, Erica , Tentori, Cristina A., Ferrari, Ivan, Crespi, Alessandra, Figini, Giulia , Matteo, Maria Di, Milanesi, Chiara, Castellani, Gastone, Borate, Uma M., Gore, Steven D., Kim, Tae K., Loosdrecht, Arjan A. van de , Daver, N., Wang, Sa A. , Foucar, Kathryn, Iastrebner, Marcelo, Miyazaki, Yasushi, Al‐Kali, Aref, Mittelmann, Moshe, Cluzeau, Thomas , Ades, Lionel, Germing, Ulrich, Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo, Kordasti, Shahram, Haferlach, Torsten, Zeidan, Amer M., consortia, An international study on behalf of GenoMed4all, Synthema, and icMDS, Zeidan, Amer M. , Buizza, Alessandro , Ficara, Francesca , Efficace, Fabio , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Orfao, Alberto , Wang, Sa A , Cluzeau, Thomas , Komrokji, Rami S , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Zeidan, Amer M , Maggioni, Giulia , Todisco, Gabriele , Sauta, Elisabetta , Lanino, Luca , Ball, Somedeb , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Fenaux, Pierre , Platzbecker, Uwe , Santini, Valeria , Xie, Zhuoer , Brunner, Andrew M. , Kuykendall, Andrew , Buckstein, Rena , Bejar, Rafael , Carraway, Hetty E. , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Halene, Stephanie , Hasserjian, Robert P. , List, Alan F. , Loghavi, Sanam , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Roboz, Gail J. , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Steensma, David P. , Savona, Michael R. , Sallman, David A. , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Wei, Andrew H. , Campagna, Alessia , Ubezio, Marta , Ventura, Denise , Pinocchio, Nicole , Zampini, Matteo , Russo, Antonio , Pesce, Francesco , D'Amico, Saverio , Asti, Gianluca , Tentori, Cristina Astrid , Ferrari, Ivan , Matteo, Maria Di, Brindisi, Matteo , Manes, Nicla , Crisafulli, Laura , Ficara, Francesca , Castellani, Gastone , Borate, Uma , Efficace, Fabio , Gore, Steven D. , Díez‐Campelo, María , Rozman, Marı́a , Órfão, Alberto , Foucar, Kathryn , Iastrebner, Marcelo , Scheinberg, Phillip , Miyazaki, Yasushi , Madanat, Yazan F. , Al‐Kali, Aref , Mittelman, Moshe , Adès, Lionel , Germing, Ulrich , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Kordasti, Shahram , Haferlach, Torsten , Komrokji, Rami S.

HemaSphere | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hem3.70406 | PMID 42339339 Get It

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clinically and biologically diverse disorders, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches. The International Working Group for Prognostication of MDS (IWG_PM) recently introduced a molecular classification, referred to as the MDS taxonomy, that categorizes patients into 16 subgroups based on 21 gene mutations, 6 cytogenetic abnormalities, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at TP53 and TET2 loci. This study sought to validate and enhance the clinical relevance of the MDS taxonomy by analyzing a large retrospective cohort ( n = 5136) and transcriptomic data from a prospective cohort ( n = 477). The taxonomy successfully identified subgroups with distinct clinical characteristics and disease progression patterns. However, incorporating gene interactions from taxonomy subgroups did not improve the prognostic performance of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS‐M). We further assessed whether the taxonomy could guide management in patients receiving disease‐modifying therapies. Except for the “ TP53 ‐complex” subgroup, taxonomy classifications were not predictive of hypomethylating agent response or transplant outcomes. Nonetheless, they correlated with overall survival, suggesting that while both IPSS‐M and the taxonomy capture disease biology, other non‐genetic factors may influence treatment response. RNA sequencing confirmed the biological distinctiveness of the taxonomy groups. Transcriptomic profiling of CD34+ bone marrow cells revealed unique, homogeneous gene expression patterns, particularly within the AML‐like, bi TET2 , SF3B1 , and TP53 ‐complex subgroups. Further integration of multi‐omics data may refine MDS classification, improving clinical decision‐making and guiding the development of targeted therapies.
Identification of a central CGRP circuit for trigeminal V1-mediated migraine-like pain in mice
Tanaka, Kenichi, Luo, Shizhen , Bharadwaj, Vimala, Ismail, Khaled, Anderson, Trent, Martin, Laurent F, Neugebauer, Volker, Dodick, David W., Porreca, Frank, Neugebauer, Volker , Lee, Grace J. , Kopruszinski, Caroline , Kopruszinski, Caroline Machado , Moutal, Aubin , Lee, Grace , Antenucci, Nico , Dodick, David W. , Navratilova, Edita , Porreca, Frank

Brain | June 22, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/brain/awag217 | PMID 42339700 Get It

Abstract Migraine attacks can be provoked in people with underlying primary headache disorders by multiple peripheral mechanisms suggesting the possible convergence of trigeminal nociceptive inputs onto a common, unknown central circuit. As calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) expressing cells in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) have been implicated in nociplastic pains, we hypothesized that (a) PBN CGRP-expressing neurons and their projections to the central amygdala (CeA) may be an essential central relay of multiple peripheral inputs promoting injury-free migraine headache and (b) this pathway may prioritize threat from activation of cranial afferents over other nociceptive inputs. Periorbital cutaneous allodynia (CA) was determined following supradural application of a cocktail of inflammatory mediators (IM), CGRP or pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), or systemic administration of nitroglycerin (NTG) in CalcaCre or wild-type mice. Decreased rearing and photophobia were respectively evaluated as measures of ongoing headache and light-evoked migraine-like pain. Phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (pERK) was evaluated to assess regional neuronal activation. Compared with vehicle, supradural IM increased pERK in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and PBN, but not in the paraventricular thalamus. Chemogenetic activation (Gq-DREADD) of PBN CGRP neurons elicited CA and photophobia while decreasing rearing. Lesioning of PBN neurons with ibotenic acid suppressed CA produced by supradural IM. Chemogenetic silencing (Gi-DREADD) or expression of tetanus toxin (TeNT) in PBN Calca neurons to prevent neurotransmitter release also inhibited CA elicited by supradural IM, CGRP, PACAP or systemic NTG. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of CeA receptor-associated membrane protein-1 (Ramp1) prevented IM-induced migraine-like symptoms revealing CGRP/CGRP-receptor activation from PBN→CeA projections. In contrast, PBN lesions, chemogenetic manipulation, and TeNT expression in PBN Calca cells and CeA Ramp1 CRISPR/Cas9 editing did not affect acute pain responses induced by hind paw IM injection, intraperitoneal acetic acid, or acute nociceptive behaviors from IM stimulation of the maxillary (V2) and mandibular (V3) branches of the trigeminal nerve. These data reveal a central pathway composed of PBN Calca neurons and CeA CGRP receptor signaling that is both sufficient to elicit migraine-like pain in naive mice and necessary to promote migraine-like pain following activation of the ophthalmic (V1) branch of the trigeminal nerve. Importantly, this pathway is essential for acute pain arising from V1 trigeminal, but dispensable for acute stimuli from other nociceptive afferents. The prioritization of V1 acute nociception suggests evolutionary importance for detecting threats to the head to promote survival through advantageous behaviors such as defensive coping observed in migraine.
A19-10 Seralutinib for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH): Results From the Phase 3 PROSERA Trial
Ghofrani, H A, Mclaughlin, V V, Meyer, G Bohns, Benza, R L, Channick, R N, Chin, K M, Frantz, R P, Hemnes, A R, Howard, L S, Zamanian, R T, Kopeć, G, Skride, A, Jerjes-Sánchez, C, Lescano, A J, Subías, M P Escribano, White, R J, Zamudio, T Pulido, Perna, E R, Rosenkranz, S, Badagliacca, R, Scelsi, L, Lima, M A, Sulica, R, Miller, C, Al-Hiti, H, Campos, F, Zagolin, M, Roscigno, R F, Mottola, D, Aranda, R, Cravets, M, Tompkins, C -A A, Parsley, E, Elman, E, Zisman, L S, Vachiery, J L, Sitbon, O, Ghofrani, H A, McLaughlin, Vallerie V. , Meyer, Gisela Martina Bohns , Benza, Raymond L. , Channick, R N, Chin, K M, Frantz, Robert P. , Hemnes, A R, Howard, L S, Zamanian, R.T., Kopeć, Grzegorz , Skride, Andris , Jerjes‐Sánchez, Carlos , Subias, M P Escribano, White, R. James , Perna, Eduardo , Rosenkranz, S, Badagliacca, Roberto , Scelsi, Laura , Sulica, Roxana, Miller, Chad E., Al‐Hiti, Hikmet, Roscigno, Robert F., Mottola, David, Aranda, R, Cravets, Matt , Parsley, Ed, Elman, Erin, Zisman, Lawrence S. , Vachiéry, Jean‐Luc , Sitbon, Olivier

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 212 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ajrccm/aamag286.279 Get It

Abstract Rationale Seralutinib is an investigational, first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor designed for inhalation and selective for PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, CSF1R, and cKIT, targeting proliferation, inflammation, and fibrosis ─ three core drivers of pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. The phase 2 TORREY trial of seralutinib added to standard-of-care treatment in adults with PAH WHO FC II or III met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) vs. placebo at 24 weeks. Methods PROSERA (NCT05934526), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of inhaled seralutinib in PAH patients treated for up to 48 weeks. Eligible patients (WHO Group 1 PH, FC II or III; REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score ≥5 or NT-proBNP ≥300 ng/L or PVR ≥800 dyne•s/cm5) on standard background therapy were randomized 1:1 to seralutinib 90 mg or placebo delivered by dry powder inhaler twice daily. The primary endpoint was change in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 24 in the seralutinib treatment group vs. placebo. Key secondary endpoints included: time to clinical worsening (TTCW), proportion of patients with clinical improvement at week 24, change in NT-proBNP from baseline to week 24, and proportion of patients with ≥1-point decrease from baseline in REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score at week 24. Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs (SAEs). Patients who completed blinded treatment could be eligible to participate in an open-label extension study. Preliminary Blinded Results 390 patients were randomized at 132 sites worldwide. At baseline, mean age was 50.0 years. PAH etiologies included 61.0% idiopathic, 9.7% heritable, and 22.3% associated with connective tissue disease. 25.6% of patients were WHO FC II and 74.4% FC III. Mean time from diagnosis was TBD years. Most patients were receiving 2 (39.2%) or ≥ 3 (54.6%) PAH medications, 29.2% were receiving parenteral prostacyclin. Baseline PVR was 798.4 dyne•s/cm5, 6MWD was 373.7 m, and NT-proBNP was 986.8 ng/L. The difference in 6MWD from baseline to week 24 between seralutinib and placebo was TBD [SD] m (p=TBD). Secondary endpoints of TTCW, clinical improvement, NT-proBNP, and REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score will be reported. The most common AEs were TBD (x%) and TBD (y%). SAEs and discontinuations related to AE will be reported. Conclusions The PROSERA study demonstrates⋯ [to be updated following unblinding of the data]. Funding Gossamer Bio, Inc. This abstract is funded by: Gossamer Bio, Inc.