Scelsi, Laura

Abstract Rationale Seralutinib is an investigational, first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor designed for inhalation and selective for PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, CSF1R, and cKIT, targeting proliferation, inflammation, and fibrosis ─ three core drivers of pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. The phase 2 TORREY trial of seralutinib added to standard-of-care treatment in adults with PAH WHO FC II or III met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) vs. placebo at 24 weeks. Methods PROSERA (NCT05934526), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of inhaled seralutinib in PAH patients treated for up to 48 weeks. Eligible patients (WHO Group 1 PH, FC II or III; REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score ≥5 or NT-proBNP ≥300 ng/L or PVR ≥800 dyne•s/cm5) on standard background therapy were randomized 1:1 to seralutinib 90 mg or placebo delivered by dry powder inhaler twice daily. The primary endpoint was change in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 24 in the seralutinib treatment group vs. placebo. Key secondary endpoints included: time to clinical worsening (TTCW), proportion of patients with clinical improvement at week 24, change in NT-proBNP from baseline to week 24, and proportion of patients with ≥1-point decrease from baseline in REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score at week 24. Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs (SAEs). Patients who completed blinded treatment could be eligible to participate in an open-label extension study. Preliminary Blinded Results 390 patients were randomized at 132 sites worldwide. At baseline, mean age was 50.0 years. PAH etiologies included 61.0% idiopathic, 9.7% heritable, and 22.3% associated with connective tissue disease. 25.6% of patients were WHO FC II and 74.4% FC III. Mean time from diagnosis was TBD years. Most patients were receiving 2 (39.2%) or ≥ 3 (54.6%) PAH medications, 29.2% were receiving parenteral prostacyclin. Baseline PVR was 798.4 dyne•s/cm5, 6MWD was 373.7 m, and NT-proBNP was 986.8 ng/L. The difference in 6MWD from baseline to week 24 between seralutinib and placebo was TBD [SD] m (p=TBD). Secondary endpoints of TTCW, clinical improvement, NT-proBNP, and REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score will be reported. The most common AEs were TBD (x%) and TBD (y%). SAEs and discontinuations related to AE will be reported. Conclusions The PROSERA study demonstrates⋯ [to be updated following unblinding of the data]. Funding Gossamer Bio, Inc. This abstract is funded by: Gossamer Bio, Inc.

ABSTRACTPortopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), a type of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with liver disease, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The relationship between cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, PAH therapy, and survival in PoPH remains unclear. We performed a retrospective cohort study of PoPH patients from the international pulmonary hypertension (PH) meta‐registry, PVRI GoDeep. PAH was defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mmHg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 2 Wood Units. PoPH diagnoses were assigned by each center's PH specialist based on international guidelines at the time of enrollment. 246 incident PoPH patients met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis, equally split between males (51%) and females (49%), with a median age of 54 years. When compared to both patients with IPAH and those with other subtypes of PAH (not classified as PoPH or IPAH), those with PoPH had significantly lower 5‐year survival rates (46% vs. 68% vs. 65%, log‐rank p < 0.001). Amongst the PoPH patients, however, there was no significant difference in 5‐year survival when dichotomized by disease severity, either by a PVR of 5 Wood Units or a CI of 2.5 L/min/m2. Treatment of the PoPH patients with PAH‐targeted therapies was associated with significantly higher 5‐year survival rates compared to those not receiving such treatments, as shown by Kaplan–Meier analysis. This survival benefit was observed for PDE5i (50% vs. 34%, log‐rank p = 0.029), ERA (58% vs. 34%, log‐rank p < 0.001), and the combination of PDE5i and/or ERA (51% vs. 22%, log‐rank p < 0.001), as well as any PAH‐targeting treatment (50% vs. 26%, log‐rank p = 0.007). Corresponding survival advantage was noted when including only PoPH patients with MELD Score ≥ 13. PoPH is a disease with significantly worse long‐term survival than other PAH subtypes, but targeted PAH therapy is associated with a robust survival benefit. Survival did not differ across high‐risk PVR and cardiac index thresholds, suggesting the factors that influence prognosis and survival in PoPH may be unique as compared to other PAH subtypes, and warrant further investigation.

Abstract Introduction Sex-based differences in morbidity and mortality for pulmonary hypertension (PH) are insufficiently addressed in current research. However, recognizing these differences is crucial for optimal clinical management and improving outcomes. This study assesses the effect of sex on survival among PH patients, while accounting for disease severity, comorbidities, treatment, and race. Methods We analyzed data from the PVRI GoDeep meta-registry, including all incident patients with complete hemodynamic profiles. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for various confounders. Analyses included both PAH and non-PAH groups and risk assessment by the ESC/ERS 2022, REVEAL lite 2, and COMPERA 4-strata scores. All analyses were performed using R (The R Foundation). Results A total of 19,663 incident PH patients were included in the analysis, with 5,581 patients (28%) diagnosed with Group 1 PH and a median age of 64 years [IQR: 52-73]. Among these, male patients (8,704, 44%) had a significantly higher mortality risk than female patients across the entire cohort and within all PH subtypes. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in male versus female patients was 1.391 [95% CI: 1.260-1.536] in the overall population and 1.404 [95% CI: 1.264-1.561] for those with PAH. This survival difference was consistent across various severity levels, age groups, and in the presence of comorbidities such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases, as well as among those receiving PAH-specific therapies as well as patients who remained without treatment during the observation period. Notably, male disadvantage in survival was observed in low, intermediate, and high-risk categories for ESC/ERS 2022, REVEAL lite 2, and COMPERA scores but not within REVEAL 2.0, which includes male sex as a non-modifiable risk factor. Racial analysis revealed a greater mortality risk for males among White patients, with no significant differences noted in Black or Asian populations. Conclusion Our PVRI GoDeep meta-registry analysis demonstrates that male PH patients face higher mortality risk across both PAH and non-PAH groups, independent of disease etiology, age, severity, comorbidities, and treatment factors, with this risk amplified in White patients. These findings suggest that male sex should be further considered as a risk factor to refine predictive models for survival in PH.