Sitbon, Olivier

Abstract Rationale Seralutinib is an investigational, first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor designed for inhalation and selective for PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, CSF1R, and cKIT, targeting proliferation, inflammation, and fibrosis ─ three core drivers of pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. The phase 2 TORREY trial of seralutinib added to standard-of-care treatment in adults with PAH WHO FC II or III met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) vs. placebo at 24 weeks. Methods PROSERA (NCT05934526), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of inhaled seralutinib in PAH patients treated for up to 48 weeks. Eligible patients (WHO Group 1 PH, FC II or III; REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score ≥5 or NT-proBNP ≥300 ng/L or PVR ≥800 dyne•s/cm5) on standard background therapy were randomized 1:1 to seralutinib 90 mg or placebo delivered by dry powder inhaler twice daily. The primary endpoint was change in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 24 in the seralutinib treatment group vs. placebo. Key secondary endpoints included: time to clinical worsening (TTCW), proportion of patients with clinical improvement at week 24, change in NT-proBNP from baseline to week 24, and proportion of patients with ≥1-point decrease from baseline in REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score at week 24. Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs (SAEs). Patients who completed blinded treatment could be eligible to participate in an open-label extension study. Preliminary Blinded Results 390 patients were randomized at 132 sites worldwide. At baseline, mean age was 50.0 years. PAH etiologies included 61.0% idiopathic, 9.7% heritable, and 22.3% associated with connective tissue disease. 25.6% of patients were WHO FC II and 74.4% FC III. Mean time from diagnosis was TBD years. Most patients were receiving 2 (39.2%) or ≥ 3 (54.6%) PAH medications, 29.2% were receiving parenteral prostacyclin. Baseline PVR was 798.4 dyne•s/cm5, 6MWD was 373.7 m, and NT-proBNP was 986.8 ng/L. The difference in 6MWD from baseline to week 24 between seralutinib and placebo was TBD [SD] m (p=TBD). Secondary endpoints of TTCW, clinical improvement, NT-proBNP, and REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score will be reported. The most common AEs were TBD (x%) and TBD (y%). SAEs and discontinuations related to AE will be reported. Conclusions The PROSERA study demonstrates⋯ [to be updated following unblinding of the data]. Funding Gossamer Bio, Inc. This abstract is funded by: Gossamer Bio, Inc.

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), pulmonary arterial hypertension that develops in the setting of portal hypertension, has long been of significant interest to the pulmonary, cardiology, and hepatology communities. Optimal management of POPH has been challenging to define due to a lack of evidence from clinical trials regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies and uncertainty regarding the role of liver transplantation (LT). Initially, the high risk of intraoperative and early post-transplant death in predominantly untreated patients with POPH tempered consideration of LT. More recently, the observation that POPH can improve, and sometimes even resolve, following LT, has led to reconsideration of the role of LT in selected patients. The first International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) POPH and hepatopulmonary syndrome practice guideline was a multidisciplinary consensus of expert opinions based on available evidence. Since that publication, hemodynamic definitions, management approaches, and POPH MELD exception criteria have evolved, and there have been new randomized controlled trials in POPH as well as studies regarding long-term outcomes. In order to ensure the guidelines remained current and reflected recent evidence, the original writing committee of the 2016 guidelines, leaders of the ILTS Cardiovascular Special Interest Group, and colleagues active in POPH research were invited to participate in the writing committee. In this document, approved for publication by the ILTS executive council, we provide an update to the prior guidelines with expert recommendations to guide and advance POPH management. Recommendations in these guidelines are based on expert opinion and available evidence and were agreed upon by consensus.