Sood, Namita

ABSTRACT Pulmonary hypertension (PH) comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by elevated pressure in the pulmonary arteries. Despite advances in awareness, utilization of non‐invasive screening with echocardiography, increasing number of targeted therapies, and evolving clinical guidelines emphasizing referral to PH specialty centers, barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment persist. Key challenges span patient‐related and system‐level domains that hinder the effective diagnosis, management, and treatment of PH, particularly pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In this article, the obstacles to PH care are examined and actionable recommendations are proposed. By integrating patient‐related and system‐level perspectives, this review provides a framework to bridge persistent gaps in PH care delivery in the United States.

Abstract Rationale Dyspnea is a prominent symptom of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), limiting patients’ activity and impairing their quality of life. The University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ) is a 24-item instrument used to assess dyspnea severity in patients with various respiratory conditions. Objectives This study aimed to examine the reliability and responsiveness of the UCSD-SOBQ score, its validity as a measure of dyspnea severity, and its prognostic value in a prospective cohort with fHP. Methods We conducted psychometric analyses on UCSD-SOBQ response data and assessed the association between score changes and survival in patients with fHP who completed the UCSD-SOBQ and other HP severity metrics at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We introduce the reliable change index (RCI) and the likely change index (LCI) to assess the statistical significance of within-individual change in UCSD scores. Results At baseline, internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). Significant moderately strong correlations were observed between UCSD-SOBQ scores and percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), r = -0.46, percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), r = -0.32, and Borg dyspnea scores r = 0.56. UCSD-SOBQ scores were significantly different between the lowest and highest strata of FVC% (64.9 ± 18.9 vs. 36.2 ± 22.9), DLCO% and Borg scores. The threshold for worsening within-individual change in the UCSD-SOBQ score at 95% confidence was 12 points. A 1-point higher baseline UCSD-SOBQ score was associated with a 2% increase in the risk of death or transplant (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Conclusions In fHP, the UCSD-SOBQ score is a reliable and valid measure of dyspnea severity, is responsive to change, discriminates patients with differing severities, and is associated with transplant free survival. Additional qualitative data and psychometric analyses could tailor the UCSD-SOBQ to fHP and may further improve its measurement properties.

Abstract Rationale Quantitative CT using multiple instance learning (MIL)-usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) classifier and data-driven textural analysis (DTA) provides objective and reproducible measurements of disease pattern and extent, respectively. However, the understanding of their individual or combined relationships with outcomes in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) remains limited. Objectives To determine whether visual CT patterns of fHP or UIP, a MIL-UIP classifier, baseline and changes in DTA over 12-months and DTA at 12 months are associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in fHP. Methods The primary cohort included 134 participants with fHP. Associations between CT variables and subsequent lung function change, and PFS were assessed using linear mixed models and Cox hazards models. Results were validated in a combined dataset from three independent populations (N = 216). Results Visual patterns of fHP or UIP were not associated with PFS. A baseline MIL-UIP classification and DTA were significantly associated with 24-month PFS. However, the MIL-UIP did not predict PFS after adjusting for DTA fibrosis extent. Over 12 months, a 1-point increase in DTA across and within patients resulted in a significant decline in FVC% and DLCO%. A 12-month change in DTA (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.13) and DTA at 12-months (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05) were associated with subsequent 12-month PFS. Similar estimates were observed in the validation cohort. Conclusions In fHP, the objectively measured extent of lung fibrosis is more prognostic than either a UIP classifier or visual CT patterns of fHP or UIP. Baseline DTA, DTA at 12 months, and its change over 12-months are associated with PFS.

AbstractDual combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase‐5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended for most patients with intermediate‐risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The RESPITE and REPLACE studies suggest that switching from a PDE5i to a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activator may provide clinical improvement in this situation. The optimal approach to escalation or transition of therapy in this or other scenarios is not well defined. We developed an expert consensus statement on the transition to sGC and other treatment escalations and transitions in PAH using a modified Delphi process. The Delphi process used a panel of 20 physicians with expertise in PAH. Panelists answered three questionnaires on the management of treatment escalations and transitions in PAH. The initial questionnaire included open‐ended questions. Later questionnaires consolidated the responses into statements that panelists rated on a Likert scale from −5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree) to determine consensus. The Delphi process produced several consensus recommendations. Escalation should be considered for patients who are at high risk or not achieving treatment goals, by adding an agent from a new class, switching from oral to parenteral prostacyclins, or increasing the dose. Switching to a new class or within a class should be considered if tolerability or other considerations unrelated to efficacy are affecting adherence. Switching from a PDE5i to an SGC activator may benefit patients with intermediate risk who are not improving on their present therapy. These consensus‐based recommendations may be helpful to clinicians and beneficial for patients when evidence‐based guidance is unavailable.

In patients treated with macitentan (Opsumit®, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), prevention and/or effective management of treatment‐related adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of these adverse events can be challenging and the base of evidence and clinical experience for macitentan is limited. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using macitentan to treat PAH may benefit patients and physicians who are using macitentan. Consensus recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with macitentan and PAH using a modified Delphi process. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of macitentan in PAH and rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. The panel of 18 physicians participated and developed a total of 118 statements on special populations, add‐on therapy, drug–drug interactions, warnings and precautions, hospitalization and functional class, and adverse event management. The resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide practical guidance on real‐world issues in using macitentan to treat patients with PAH.