Burger, Charles D.

ABSTRACT Pulmonary hypertension (PH) comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by elevated pressure in the pulmonary arteries. Despite advances in awareness, utilization of non‐invasive screening with echocardiography, increasing number of targeted therapies, and evolving clinical guidelines emphasizing referral to PH specialty centers, barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment persist. Key challenges span patient‐related and system‐level domains that hinder the effective diagnosis, management, and treatment of PH, particularly pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In this article, the obstacles to PH care are examined and actionable recommendations are proposed. By integrating patient‐related and system‐level perspectives, this review provides a framework to bridge persistent gaps in PH care delivery in the United States.

ABSTRACT Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH‐ILD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Real‐world patients initiating inhaled treprostinil are not well‐characterized. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate healthcare resource utilization in patients with PH‐ILD who initiated treatment with inhaled treprostinil vs patients who remained untreated. Adult patients diagnosed with PH‐ILD were indexed on initiation of inhaled treprostinil and patients who remained untreated were indexed on first observed PH diagnosis (31 March 2021–30 September 2024). Patients were excluded if they were ever treated with any pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy. Inhaled treprostinil patients were matched to up to four untreated patients. All‐cause per‐patient per‐month (PPPM) hospitalizations and ICU‐related hospitalizations were the primary outcomes of interest. 294 patients treated with inhaled treprostinil and 736 untreated patients were identified. Mean all‐cause PPPM hospitalizations remained unchanged in the pre‐index vs post‐index periods in the inhaled treprostinil cohort (0.11 vs 0.12; p = 0.42) but significantly increased in untreated patients (0.12 vs 0.23; p < 0.01). ICU utilization also remained unchanged in the pre‐index vs post‐index periods for the inhaled treprostinil cohort (0.06 vs 0.07; p = 0.11) compared to the untreated cohort (0.06 vs 0.13; p < 0.01). Untreated patients had significantly higher post‐index PPPM hospitalizations ( p < 0.01) and ICU utilization ( p < 0.01) compared to inhaled treprostinil patients. Patients who initiated inhaled treprostinil had a 30% decreased risk of hospitalization compared to untreated patients (relative risk: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59–0.83; p < 0.01). Among real‐world patients with PH‐ILD, treatment with inhaled treprostinil is associated with fewer all‐cause hospitalizations and ICU‐related hospitalizations compared to untreated patients with PH‐ILD.

Abstract Rationale Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The extent of medication nonadherence in PAH is uncertain and may be linked to adverse outcomes. There has been a lack of multicenter, registry-based studies assessing medication nonadherence and patient-centered outcomes in PAH. Objectives To determine the prevalence of self-reported nonadherence in Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR) participants with PAH or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and the relationship of nonadherence with several patient-centered outcomes (mortality, hospitalization rates, emergency department visits, and health-related quality of life). Methods Self-reported PAH medication nonadherence was captured at PHAR enrollment and during follow-up visits. Predictors of nonadherence were modeled using generalized estimating equations assuming a binary distribution. Outcomes associated with nonadherence were modeled using generalized estimating equations with a Poisson distribution. Results A total of 1,543 patients were included, of whom 1,092 (70.8%) were female and 1,340 (86.8%) had PAH. The overall rate of any self-reported nonadherence was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3–6.9). Predictors of nonadherence included self-reported male sex at birth (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0–1.9; P = 0.02), poverty (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2–2.3; P = 0.01), not being married or partnered (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–1.9; P = 0.01), having Medicaid or no health insurance (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5–2.9; P &lt; 0.001), and having completed high school but not having a college degree (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.9; P &lt; 0.001). PHAR participants who reported any nonadherence had 50.0% more emergency department visits (P &lt; 0.001), 13.3% more hospital admissions (P = 0.03), and 61.9% more days hospitalized (P = 0.01). No relationship was observed between nonadherence and the type or number of PAH therapies or all-cause mortality. Participants reporting nonadherence had worse mean Short Form-12 scores (P &lt; 0.001) and worse emPHasis-10 scores (P = 0.02). Conclusions The rate of self-reported nonadherence in PHAR registrants was low but was associated with male sex and several social determinants of health. Although the complexity or type of PAH regimen did not appear to influence nonadherence, nonadherence was associated with numerous adverse patient-centered outcomes, including greater healthcare use and worse health-related quality of life. Because of limitations in the structure of the gathered data, relationships between exposure and outcomes were not temporally definitive; these observations warrant additional prospective studies.

Background. The current model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception policies for portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) require serial right heart catheterizations (RHCs) every 3 mo to maintain exception points. RHC is necessary for the initial diagnosis of POPH, but the utility of serial catheterizations has not been studied. In patients with POPH MELD exceptions, we sought to compare noninvasive and invasive hemodynamics and determine the sensitivity of echocardiography for the detection of hemodynamically severe POPH that would preclude liver transplant. Methods. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with POPH MELD exceptions who underwent liver transplant from December 2008 to January 2024. Results were validated at an external center. Echocardiograms and RHCs performed within 1 mo were compared. Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots assessed the association between echocardiogram and RHC variables. We examined varied echocardiographic parameters to optimize sensitivity for the detection of hemodynamically severe POPH. Results. Twenty-two individuals underwent 60 follow-up RHCs with paired echocardiograms. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and cardiac index estimated with echocardiogram were not strongly correlated with RHC measurements at follow-up (RVSP and RHC pulmonary artery systolic pressure: R = 0.30, P = 0.02; cardiac index: R = 0.17, P = 0.21). However, echocardiograms with RVSP ≥48 mm Hg had 100% sensitivity for detecting hemodynamically severe POPH, with 100% negative predictive value. In external validation of 13 paired echocardiograms and RHCs, our algorithm had 64% specificity and 100% negative predictive value. Conclusions. Although echocardiogram and RHC hemodynamic estimates were not strongly correlated, these results could potentially negate the current requirement for repeat RHC every 3 mo to maintain POPH MELD exception.

Introduction: Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) and associated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) elevation is seen in the context of underlying portal hypertension and liver disease. In the systemic circulation, liver cirrhosis can cause inappropriate splanchnic and systemic vasodilation with decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Midodrine is used to maintain blood pressure in the setting of low SVR. Pulmonary vasodilators have systemic vasodilatory effects; the implications of combined midodrine and pulmonary vasodilator use in POPH are unanswered questions. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that SVR would decrease over time in patients with POPH started on pulmonary vasodilators, and that use of midodrine (as a surrogate for depressed SVR), may be associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with POPH starting pulmonary vasodilator therapy. Methods: Patients from the 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, MN; Jacksonville, FL; Scottsdale, AZ) diagnosed with POPH from 1988-2020 were included in the database. Patients met hemodynamic criteria for POPH via right heart catheterization (RHC). Hemodynamics were obtained from echocardiography and RHC at initial and subsequent visits. The hazard ratio for risk of death was estimated using Cox proportional hazards method. SVR was calculated using mean arterial pressure and cardiac output. Results: Analysis included 147 POPH patients, 34 (23%) on midodrine and 113 (77%) not requiring midodrine. There were 116 patients with longitudinal SVR data. The mean initial SVR was 1224 Dyne sec cm-5 and decreased 251 Dyne sec cm-5 [95% CI -337 to -165 251 Dyne sec cm-5, p<0.0001] with no difference between midodrine groups (p=0.57). Patients in the midodrine POPH group had an increased risk of mortality compared to those without midodrine use (HR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.02-2.21, p=0.0371). Conclusions: Patients with POPH starting pulmonary vasodilator have a reduction in SVR related to vasodilator therapy. Midodrine use with pulmonary vasodilator therapy is associated with increased mortality in the POPH population. Further study of the safety of combined midodrine and pulmonary vasodilator use in POPH is needed along with exploration of more selective pulmonary vasodilators.

Objectives Mayo Clinic’s hospital-at-home program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH), launched in 2020. While hospital-at-home literature reported safe and effective care for the general patient population and those with COVID, comparative outcomes between these two groups were unknown. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of COVID and non-COVID patients enrolled in ACH and evaluate if COVID patients can be safely treated in this setting. Methods Demographics, clinical characteristics, and safety outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to compare COVID and non-COVID patients discharged from ACH between November 2020 and May 2022. Patient characteristics analyzed included severity of illness (SOI) and risk of mortality (ROM), calculated using All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG). Hospitalization-specific variables included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day readmission rates. Results Of 1051 patients, 173 (16%) had COVID, and 878 (84%) were non-COVID patients. The average age in the COVID cohort was 66.6 (15.3) years, compared with 72.2 (14.0) in the non-COVID cohort. Extreme SOI was higher in the COVID group (43.3% versus 17.4%), as was extreme ROM (46.2% versus 16.2%), but LOS was shorter (5.7 versus 7 days). Escalation of care (7.5% in COVID cohort versus 8.4%) and 30-day readmission outcomes (9.2% for COVID patients versus 12.9%) were not statistically different between the groups. Conclusions Despite higher SOI and ROM, COVID patients had shorter LOS with outcomes that were not statistically different from non-COVID patients. COVID patients can be safely and efficiently cared for in ACH.

ImportanceA subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial established the efficacy of selexipag plus background therapy (monotherapy or double oral therapy [DOT]) vs placebo plus background therapy and found that the addition of selexipag within 6 months had an added benefit. However, the timing of selexipag addition to DOT and the incremental benefit in clinical practice is not well studied.ObjectiveTo compare triple oral therapy (TOT) consisting of selexipag, endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) vs DOT consisting of ERA and PDE5i.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis comparative effectiveness study was conducted using data from the US Komodo claims database to emulate a randomized trial. Patients aged 18 years or older with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with ERA plus PDE5i with records from July 2015 through June 2022 were duplicated to TOT and DOT and artificially censored when observed treatment deviated from assigned treatment. Hypothetical randomization was emulated using inverse probability of treatment weighting, and the study accounted for censoring-induced selection bias using inverse probability of censoring weighting. A pooled logistic model estimated the per-protocol difference between treatment groups. Data were analyzed from November 2022 through July 2023.InterventionsTOT (addition of selexipag within 3, 6, and 12 months of initiating DOT) vs DOT.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAdjusted risk of all-cause hospitalization, PAH-related hospitalization, and PAH-related disease progression over a 2-year follow-up.ResultsA total of 2966 patients with PAH (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [14.0] years; 2125 female [71.6%]) met eligibility criteria. Adding selexipag within 6 months of ongoing DOT was associated with a reduction in risk for all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94), PAH-related hospitalization (aHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95), and PAH-related progression (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95) vs DOT alone. There were no associations if selexipag was initiated within 12 months for all-cause hospitalization, PAH-related hospitalization, or PAH-related disease progression. The association remained with a greater decrease in risk for disease progression vs DOT for selexipag initiation within 3 months (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that early selexipag addition to ERA plus PDE5i was associated with a reduction in risk of hospitalization and disease progression. These findings suggest that delays in selexipag initiation likely contribute to suboptimal patient and health system outcomes.

AbstractSelexipag is an oral selective agonist of the prostacyclin receptor approved to treat adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Selexipag is initiated at a dose of 200 μg twice daily (bid) and usually titrated up by 200 μg bid weekly (per label) or more slowly (e.g., every other week in real‐world clinical practice) to the highest tolerated individualized dose (ID) ranging from 200 to 1600 µg bid. In the Phase 3 GRIPHON trial, selexipag delayed disease progression and reduced risk of PAH‐related hospitalization compared with placebo; the effect was consistent across three prespecified ID groups: low (200–400 µg bid), medium (600–1000 µg bid), and high (1200–1600 µg bid). This study evaluated patient outcomes across selexipag dose ranges in real‐world practice. Data were analyzed from 1186 US adult patients with PAH on selexipag from the Komodo closed‐claims database (2015‒2022). Of these, 634 (53.5%) patients completed titration and reached their selexipag ID (43.8% high ID, 29.8% medium ID, 26.3% low ID). Subsequently, 72.4% of patients in the low ID group had dose adjustments compared with 61.9% (medium ID) and 34.5% (high ID; standardized mean difference 0.63). There were no significant differences in patient outcomes, i,e, persistence (time to discontinuation) and risk of all‐cause and PAH‐related hospitalization across ID groups. The findings in this diverse, real‐world population of patients with PAH reinforced an individualized approach to the dosing scheme to maximize benefit‐risk and achieve the highest tolerated dose with selexipag similar to findings from the GRIPHON trial and other studies.