Keaveny, Andrew P.

Refractory ascites often requires therapeutic paracentesis, which is associated with potential risks and diminished quality of life. Terlipressin is a vasopressin analog that is indicated for i.v. bolus injection for hepatorenal syndrome, with the potential to reduce large-volume ascites and its complications. Continuous infusion of terlipressin is associated with fewer adverse effects than bolus dosing. The efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of a novel liquid formulation of terlipressin acetate (BIV201) were evaluated in this open-label phase 2 study. Patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive two 28-day cycles of continuous infusion BIV201 plus standard of care (SOC) separated by a ≤56-day washout (n=10), or SOC alone (n=5). Data analysis was limited by the small sample size and confounded by a potential interaction with gabapentinoids in the BIV201+SOC group. Nonetheless, there were differences in favor of BIV201+SOC versus SOC in the coprimary efficacy endpoints and several quality of life assessments. The beneficial effects of BIV201 on liver complications (mean: 90% CI; BIV201-completers=2.87: 1.51; 5.46 vs. SOC=2.38: 1.20; 4.73) and the change in cumulative ascites (mean: 90% CI; BIV201-completers=−10.76: −26.51; 5.00 vs. SOC=−4.99: −21.95; 11.97) were more pronounced versus SOC in the 5 BIV201+SOC patients who completed both treatment cycles. There were also greater improvements in exploratory quality of life assessments and the percent change in therapeutic paracenteses with BIV201+SOC (−27.94±41.80) versus SOC (−16.67±45.64). Despite the high rate of hyponatremia in the BIV201+SOC group (4/10 patients), the safety profile suggested that continuous BIV201 infusion was well tolerated. These findings support further development of BIV201 in confirmatory trials.

Introduction: Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) and associated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) elevation is seen in the context of underlying portal hypertension and liver disease. In the systemic circulation, liver cirrhosis can cause inappropriate splanchnic and systemic vasodilation with decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Midodrine is used to maintain blood pressure in the setting of low SVR. Pulmonary vasodilators have systemic vasodilatory effects; the implications of combined midodrine and pulmonary vasodilator use in POPH are unanswered questions. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that SVR would decrease over time in patients with POPH started on pulmonary vasodilators, and that use of midodrine (as a surrogate for depressed SVR), may be associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with POPH starting pulmonary vasodilator therapy. Methods: Patients from the 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, MN; Jacksonville, FL; Scottsdale, AZ) diagnosed with POPH from 1988-2020 were included in the database. Patients met hemodynamic criteria for POPH via right heart catheterization (RHC). Hemodynamics were obtained from echocardiography and RHC at initial and subsequent visits. The hazard ratio for risk of death was estimated using Cox proportional hazards method. SVR was calculated using mean arterial pressure and cardiac output. Results: Analysis included 147 POPH patients, 34 (23%) on midodrine and 113 (77%) not requiring midodrine. There were 116 patients with longitudinal SVR data. The mean initial SVR was 1224 Dyne sec cm-5 and decreased 251 Dyne sec cm-5 [95% CI -337 to -165 251 Dyne sec cm-5, p<0.0001] with no difference between midodrine groups (p=0.57). Patients in the midodrine POPH group had an increased risk of mortality compared to those without midodrine use (HR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.02-2.21, p=0.0371). Conclusions: Patients with POPH starting pulmonary vasodilator have a reduction in SVR related to vasodilator therapy. Midodrine use with pulmonary vasodilator therapy is associated with increased mortality in the POPH population. Further study of the safety of combined midodrine and pulmonary vasodilator use in POPH is needed along with exploration of more selective pulmonary vasodilators.

Aim: The differential diagnosis of intrinsic nonfibrotic conditions that may lead to portal hypertension include hepatoportal sclerosis (HPS), nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). In this article, we characterize the clinical features and outcome of these lesions when they manifest as portal hypertension. Methods: Data was collected through retrospective patient medical records. Results: Patients (HPS: 28, NRH: 17, SOS: 11) were identified more frequently in recent years. All groups presented with signs and symptoms of portal hypertension. All patients had complex medical histories. An elevated serum alkaline phosphatase occurred in all groups and an elevated bilirubin with SOS. Imaging of the liver with HPS and NRH suggested cirrhosis, which was not seen with SOS. 11%, 12%, and 9% of patients in the HPS, NRH, and SOS respectively, underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement to manage the complications of portal hypertension, while 43%, 24%, and 36% of patients respectively, received a liver transplant. Conclusions: Patients with HPS, NRH, and SOS had complex medical histories, likely contributing to the development of these lesions. They are recognized more frequently now. In contrast to HPS and NRH, SOS occurred in liver transplant recipients, was associated with elevated serum bilirubin, and imaging did not suggest the presence of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. Liver transplantation appeared to be a viable treatment for complications related to HPS and NRH. Retransplantation for SOS yielded mixed results. HPS, SOS, and NRH should be considered when evaluating liver specimens from patients with unexplained nonfibrotic portal hypertension. Key message: Intrinsic nonfibrotic causes of portal hypertension appear to be increasing in frequency. The differential diagnosis includes NRH, HPS, and SOS. These conditions are associated with complex diseases and possibly due to treatments. Pathologists need to be aware of this differential diagnosis when presented with liver biopsies performed to assess portal hypertension.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Hassanein et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18054 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18113

Summary Background The quantitative HepQuant SHUNT test of liver function and physiology generates a disease severity index (DSI) that correlates with risk for clinical complications, such as large oesophageal varices (LEVs). A derivative test, HepQuant DuO, generates an equivalent DSI and simplifies testing by requiring only oral administration of the test solution and two blood samples at 20 and 60 min. Aims Since the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT are equivalent, we compared the diagnostic performance for large oesophageal varices (LEVs) between the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT tests. Methods This study combined the data from two prospectively conducted US studies: HALT‐C and SHUNT‐V. A total of 455 subjects underwent both the SHUNT test and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results DSI scores correlated with the probability of LEVs ( p < 0.001) and demonstrated a stepwise increase from healthy lean controls without liver disease to subjects with chronic liver disease and no, small or large varices. Furthermore, a cutoff of DSI ≤ 18.3 from DuO had a sensitivity of 0.98 (missing only one case) and, if applied to the endoscopy (EGD) decision, would have prevented 188 EGDs (41.3%). The AUROC for DSI from DuO did not differ from that of the reference SHUNT test method (0.82 versus 0.81, p = 0.3500). Conclusions DSI from HepQuant DuO links liver function and physiology to the risk of LEVs across a wide spectrum of patient characteristics, disease aetiologies and liver disease severity. DuO is minimally invasive, easy to administer, quantitative and may aid the decision to avoid or perform EGD for LEVs.

The number of kidney after liver transplants (KALT) increased after the implementation of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) safety net policy, but the effects of the policy on KALT outcomes remain unknown. Using the UNOS database, we identified KALT between 60 and 365 days from liver transplant from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. The main outcome was 1- and 3-year patient, liver, and kidney graft survival. Secondary outcomes included 6-month and 1-year acute rejection (AR) of liver and kidney, and 1-year kidney allograft function. Of the 256 KALT, 90 were pre-policy and 166 post-policy. Compared to pre-policy, post-policy 1- and 3-year liver graft survival was higher (54% and 54% vs. 86% and 81%, respectively, p <0.001), while 1- and 3-year kidney graft survival (99% and 75% vs. 92% and 79%, respectively, p =0.19), and 1- and 3-year patient survival (99% and 99% vs. 95% and 89%, respectively, p =0.11) were not significantly different. Subgroup analysis revealed similar trends in patients with and without renal failure at liver transplant. Liver AR at 6 months was lower post-policy (6.3% vs. 18.3%, p =0.006) but was similar (10.5% vs. 13%, p =0.63) at 1 year. Kidney AR was unchanged post-policy at 6 months and 1 year. Creatinine at 1 year did not differ post-policy versus pre-policy (1.4 vs. 1.3 mg/dL, p =0.07) despite a higher proportion of deceased donors, higher Kidney Donor Profile Index, and longer kidney cold ischemia time post-policy ( p <0.05 for all). This 3-year follow-up after the 2017 UNOS policy revision demonstrated that the safety net implementation has resulted in improved liver outcomes for patients who underwent KALT with no increased AR of the liver or the kidney allografts.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis can develop respiratory failure (RF), which is associated with a poor prognosis, but predisposing factors are unclear. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled a multicenter North American cirrhosis inpatient cohort and collected admission and in-hospital data (grading per European Association for the Study of Liver-Chronic Liver Failure scoring system, acute kidney injury [AKI], infections [admission/nosocomial], and albumin use) in an era when terlipressin was not available in North America. Multivariable regression to predict RF was performed using only admission day and in-hospital events occurring before RF. RESULTS: A total of 511 patients from 14 sites (median age 57 years, admission model for end-stage liver disease [MELD]-Na 23) were enrolled: RF developed in 15%; AKI occurred in 24%; and 11% developed nosocomial infections (NI). At admission, patients who developed RF had higher MELD-Na, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding/AKI-related admission, and prior infections/ascites. During hospitalization, RF developers had higher NI (especially respiratory), albumin use, and other organ failures. RF was higher in patients receiving albumin (83% vs 59%, P < 0.0001) with increasing doses (269.5 ± 210.5 vs 208.6 ± 186.1 g, P = 0.01) regardless of indication. Admission for AKI, GI bleeding, and high MELD-Na predicted RF. Using all variables, NI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.02, P = 0.0004), GI bleeding (OR = 3.1, P = 0.002), albumin use (OR = 2.93, P = 0.01), AKI (OR = 3.26, P = 0.008), and circulatory failure (OR = 3.73, P = 0.002) were associated with RF risk. DISCUSSION: In a multicenter inpatient cirrhosis study of patients not exposed to terlipressin, 15% of patients developed RF. RF risk was highest in those admitted with AKI, those who had GI bleeding on admission, and those who developed NI and other organ failures or received albumin during their hospital course. Careful volume monitoring and preventing nosocomial respiratory infections and renal or circulatory failures could reduce this risk.

Background. The age of a liver transplant (LT) candidate is one of many variables used in the transplant selection process. Most research about the age at transplant has used prespecified age ranges or categories in assessing associations with transplant outcomes. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the age at transplant and survival. This study aimed to examine associations of age at transplant as a continuous variable, in conjunction with other patient and disease-related factors, with patient and graft survival after LT. Methods. We used the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data to identify LT recipients between January 2002 and June 2018. Cox regression models with a restricted cubic spline term for age examined associations with graft and patient survival after LT. We assessed the interactions of age with recipients’ sex, race/ethnicity, region, indication for transplant, body mass index, model for end-stage liver disease score, diabetes, functional status at transplant, and donor risk index. Results. Age at the time of LT showed a nonlinear association with both graft and patient survival. Each demographic, clinical, transplant-related, and donor-related factor influenced these relationships differently. Conclusions. Our results suggest that some older LT candidates may be better than some younger candidates and that clinicians should not exclusively use age to determine who receives LT.