Everson, Gregory T.

ABSTRACT Background The accuracy of current criteria for ruling out large oesophageal varices (LEV) and other endoscopic lesions of portal hypertension (PH) may be compromised by obesity and MASLD/MASH. Aims In the US multicentre SHUNT‐V study, we evaluated the disease severity index (DSI) for detecting LEV and other lesions of PH at endoscopy. Methods Subjects were adults with compensated cirrhosis scheduled for endoscopy to screen for varices. DSI was calculated from clearances of labelled cholates after oral and intravenous administration. DSI ≤ 18.3 was evaluated as a cut‐off for ruling out LEV with acceptance criteria of negative likelihood ratio < 0.52 and sensitivity > 85%. Results SHUNT‐V enrolled 306 subjects; 275 had both DSI and endoscopy, and 238 had Child–Pugh A cirrhosis (52.1% MASLD/MASH, 25.2% chronic hepatitis C and 15.6% alcoholic liver disease; 87% were overweight, 64% were obese and 54% had diabetes). AUROCs for DSI ranged from 0.81 to 0.82 for LEV and 0.79 to 0.80 for all significant PH lesions. DSI 18.3 had sensitivity 96.3%–100% for LEV and 97.3%–100% for all significant PH lesions. If DSI ≤ 18.3 were used as the sole determinant to defer EGD, 27%–35% of EGDs could have been avoided with 0%–3.7% of LEV and 0%–2.7% of all significant PH lesions missed. Conclusions HepQuant DSI predicts the likelihood of LEV and significant PH lesions across a spectrum of patient characteristics and disease aetiologies. DSI, based on liver function and portal‐systemic shunting, can aid in the decision to defer endoscopy for varices in patients with Child–Pugh A cirrhosis. Trial Registration: The SHUNT‐V study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03583996)

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Hassanein et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18054 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18113

Summary Background The quantitative HepQuant SHUNT test of liver function and physiology generates a disease severity index (DSI) that correlates with risk for clinical complications, such as large oesophageal varices (LEVs). A derivative test, HepQuant DuO, generates an equivalent DSI and simplifies testing by requiring only oral administration of the test solution and two blood samples at 20 and 60 min. Aims Since the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT are equivalent, we compared the diagnostic performance for large oesophageal varices (LEVs) between the DSIs measured from DuO and SHUNT tests. Methods This study combined the data from two prospectively conducted US studies: HALT‐C and SHUNT‐V. A total of 455 subjects underwent both the SHUNT test and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results DSI scores correlated with the probability of LEVs ( p < 0.001) and demonstrated a stepwise increase from healthy lean controls without liver disease to subjects with chronic liver disease and no, small or large varices. Furthermore, a cutoff of DSI ≤ 18.3 from DuO had a sensitivity of 0.98 (missing only one case) and, if applied to the endoscopy (EGD) decision, would have prevented 188 EGDs (41.3%). The AUROC for DSI from DuO did not differ from that of the reference SHUNT test method (0.82 versus 0.81, p = 0.3500). Conclusions DSI from HepQuant DuO links liver function and physiology to the risk of LEVs across a wide spectrum of patient characteristics, disease aetiologies and liver disease severity. DuO is minimally invasive, easy to administer, quantitative and may aid the decision to avoid or perform EGD for LEVs.

Albumin-interferon-α (alb-IFN) is a novel recombinant protein derived from IFN-α2b genetically fused to human albumin. The resulting single polypeptide combines in one molecule the antiviral properties of IFN-α with the long serum half-life of albumin. IFN-mediated biological responses stem from the engagement of IFN-α with its target receptor and subsequent modulation of IFN-specific gene (ISG) expression. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of alb-IFN during the Phase I/II study conducted in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who had previously failed IFN-α-containing regimens, ISG induction was evaluated in peripheral blood and compared with antiviral response. Whole blood was obtained at day 0, day 7 and day 28 from 21 patients enrolled in the higher dose (500–900 μg) alb-IFN cohort, who received two injections on day 0 and day 14. Taqman real-time PCR was used to assess candidate ISG expression. There was sustained induction on day 7 and day 28 of the ISG's OAS1, IRF-7, IFI44 and IFI27. Although all patients showed a molecular response to alb-IFN, individual variability in pretreatment gene expression levels and fold of modulation during treatment was observed. At day 28, induction of OAS1, IFI44 and IRF7 showed pairwise correlation in individual patients ( P<0.05). Moreover, the induction of expression at day 28, and pretreatment levels of OAS1 and IFI44 correlated with hepatitis C virus RNA reduction at day 28 ( P<0.05). In conclusion, alb-IFN demonstrated robust induction of ISG that was consistent with the response associated with an IFN-α.

Albumin-interferon-α (IFN-α) is a novel 85.7–kDa recombinant protein consisting of IFN-α that is genetically fused to human serum albumin. In this Phase I/II, multicentre, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of albumin-IFN-α in IFN-α-experienced patients with chronic hepatitis C. Albumin-IFN-α was administered in 22 escalating doses (7–900 μg) in a single injection or in two injections 14 days apart. In the 119 patients studied, there were no discontinuations because of adverse events, and albumin-IFN-α had a favourable safety profile at doses up to 900 μg. The most common adverse events were headache (56%), fatigue (52%), injection site erythema (38%), arthralgias (32%) and pyrexia (27%). Reduced clearance resulted in a mean elimination half-life of 159h, which supports dosing at 2- to 4-week intervals. Induction of the IFN-specific gene OAS1 was maintained for ≥28 days following a single injection of albumin-IFN-α at doses of ≥40 μg. Dose-dependent antiviral activity was observed in this IFN-α-experienced study population. Antiviral activity of ≥1.0–log reductions in HCV RNA was observed in 47% (37/78) of patients in the 120- to 900-μg cohorts and in 59% (16/27) in the 400- to 900-μg double-injection cohorts. These results support further clinical studies of albumin-IFN-α for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

The development of multiple highly effective and safe direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) has resulted in greater ease and confidence in managing HCV infection in transplant recipients that in turn has impacted the solid organ transplant community as well. In the United States, the opioid epidemic has increased the number of overdose deaths with a concomitant increase in younger HCV viremic donors after brain death being identified. At the same time, a decrease in HCV viremic transplant candidates has led to a growing interest in exploring the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney donor allografts in HCV-negative recipients. To date, experience with the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts in HCV-negative recipients is limited to a few small prospective research trials, case series, and case reports. There are also limited data on recipient and donor selection for HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts. In response to this rapidly changing landscape in the United States, experts in the field of viral hepatitis and liver and kidney transplantation convened a meeting to review current data on liver and kidney recipient selection and developed consensus opinions related specifically to recipient and donor selection of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts.