Back to Authors

Janardhan, Sujit

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-7818

Mayo Clinic

Rush University Medical Center

Citations 1

Safety and efficacy of continuous infusion terlipressin (BIV201): A phase 2 trial in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites
Bajaj, Jasmohan S. , Reddy, K. Rajender , Keaveny, Andrew P. , Porayko, Michael K. , Koch, David , Thuluvath, Paul J. , Angeli, Paolo, Janardhan, Sujit , Zhang, Jeffrey , Clausen, Susan, Dauphinée, Elisa, Palumbo, Joseph, Markham, Penelope , Weinberg, Ethan M , Rajender Reddy, K , Keaveny, Andrew P , Porayko, Michael K , Koch, David , Angeli, Paolo , Orman, Eric S , Palumbo, Joseph M , Weinberg, Ethan M. , Simonetto, Douglas A. , Angeli, Paolo , Orman, Eric S. , Clausen, Susan

Liver Transplantation | April 24, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1202-1214

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000623 Get It

Refractory ascites often requires therapeutic paracentesis, which is associated with potential risks and diminished quality of life. Terlipressin is a vasopressin analog that is indicated for i.v. bolus injection for hepatorenal syndrome, with the potential to reduce large-volume ascites and its complications. Continuous infusion of terlipressin is associated with fewer adverse effects than bolus dosing. The efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of a novel liquid formulation of terlipressin acetate (BIV201) were evaluated in this open-label phase 2 study. Patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive two 28-day cycles of continuous infusion BIV201 plus standard of care (SOC) separated by a ≤56-day washout (n=10), or SOC alone (n=5). Data analysis was limited by the small sample size and confounded by a potential interaction with gabapentinoids in the BIV201+SOC group. Nonetheless, there were differences in favor of BIV201+SOC versus SOC in the coprimary efficacy endpoints and several quality of life assessments. The beneficial effects of BIV201 on liver complications (mean: 90% CI; BIV201-completers=2.87: 1.51; 5.46 vs. SOC=2.38: 1.20; 4.73) and the change in cumulative ascites (mean: 90% CI; BIV201-completers=−10.76: −26.51; 5.00 vs. SOC=−4.99: −21.95; 11.97) were more pronounced versus SOC in the 5 BIV201+SOC patients who completed both treatment cycles. There were also greater improvements in exploratory quality of life assessments and the percent change in therapeutic paracenteses with BIV201+SOC (−27.94±41.80) versus SOC (−16.67±45.64). Despite the high rate of hyponatremia in the BIV201+SOC group (4/10 patients), the safety profile suggested that continuous BIV201 infusion was well tolerated. These findings support further development of BIV201 in confirmatory trials.