Koch, David

Refractory ascites often requires therapeutic paracentesis, which is associated with potential risks and diminished quality of life. Terlipressin is a vasopressin analog that is indicated for i.v. bolus injection for hepatorenal syndrome, with the potential to reduce large-volume ascites and its complications. Continuous infusion of terlipressin is associated with fewer adverse effects than bolus dosing. The efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of a novel liquid formulation of terlipressin acetate (BIV201) were evaluated in this open-label phase 2 study. Patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive two 28-day cycles of continuous infusion BIV201 plus standard of care (SOC) separated by a ≤56-day washout (n=10), or SOC alone (n=5). Data analysis was limited by the small sample size and confounded by a potential interaction with gabapentinoids in the BIV201+SOC group. Nonetheless, there were differences in favor of BIV201+SOC versus SOC in the coprimary efficacy endpoints and several quality of life assessments. The beneficial effects of BIV201 on liver complications (mean: 90% CI; BIV201-completers=2.87: 1.51; 5.46 vs. SOC=2.38: 1.20; 4.73) and the change in cumulative ascites (mean: 90% CI; BIV201-completers=−10.76: −26.51; 5.00 vs. SOC=−4.99: −21.95; 11.97) were more pronounced versus SOC in the 5 BIV201+SOC patients who completed both treatment cycles. There were also greater improvements in exploratory quality of life assessments and the percent change in therapeutic paracenteses with BIV201+SOC (−27.94±41.80) versus SOC (−16.67±45.64). Despite the high rate of hyponatremia in the BIV201+SOC group (4/10 patients), the safety profile suggested that continuous BIV201 infusion was well tolerated. These findings support further development of BIV201 in confirmatory trials.

There has been a growing interest in identifying prognostic biomarkers that alone or with available prognostic models (King’s College Criteria, KCC; MELD and ALFSG Prognostic Index) would improve prognosis in acute liver failure (ALF) patients being assessed for liver transplantation. The Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) has evaluated 15 potential prognostic biomarkers: serum AFP; apoptosis-associated proteins; serum actin-free Gc-globulin; serum glycodeoxycholic acid; sRAGE/RAGE ligands; plasma osteopontin; circulating MBL, M-, L-, H-ficolin and CL-1; plasma galectin-9; serum FABP1; serum Lct2; miRNAs; factor V; thrombocytopenia, and sCD163. The ALFSG also has reported on 4 susceptibility biomarkers: keratins 8 and 18 (K8/K18) gene variants; polymorphisms of genes encoding putative APAP-metabolizing enzymes ( UGT1A1 , UGT 1A0 , UGT 2B15 , SULT1A1 , CYP2E1 , and CYP3A5 ) as well as CD44 and BHMT1 ; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes associated with human behavior, rs2282018 in the arginine vasopressin ( AVP ) gene and rs11174811 in the AVP receptor 1A gene. Finally, rs2277680 of the CSCL16 gene in HBV-ALF patients. In conclusion, we have reviewed the prognostic and susceptibility biomarkers studied by the ALFSG. We suggest that a better approach to predicting the clinical outcome of an ALF patient will require a combination of biomarkers of pathogenic processes such as cell death, hepatic regeneration, and degree of inflammation that could be incorporated into prognostic models such as KCC, MELD or ALFSG PI.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib improves hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) in an experimental model. However, the efficacy and adverse effect profile in patients with HPS are unknown. We aimed to determine the effect of sorafenib on the alveolar‐arterial oxygen gradient (AaPO2) at 3 months in patients with HPS. We performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled parallel trial of sorafenib in patients with HPS at 7 centers. A total of 28 patients with HPS were randomized to sorafenib 400 mg by mouth daily or a matching placebo in a 1:1 ratio. We found no statistically significant difference in the median change in AaPO2 from baseline to 12 weeks between the patients allocated to sorafenib (4.5 mm Hg; IQR, –3.8 to 7.0 mm Hg) and those allocated to placebo (–2.4 mm Hg; IQR, –4.8 to 8.2 mm Hg; P = 0.70). There was also no difference between the groups in terms of degree of intrapulmonary shunting by contrast echocardiography. Sorafenib significantly reduced circulating levels of angiogenic markers, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (P < 0.01) and TIE2‐expressing M2 monocytes (P = 0.03), but it reduced the mental component scores of the Short Form 36 (P = 0.04), indicating a worse quality of life. In conclusion, sorafenib did not change the AaPO2 or other disease markers at 3 months in patients with HPS. Alternative antiangiogenic therapies or treatments targeting other pathways should be investigated.