McLaughlin, Vallerie V.

Abstract Rationale Seralutinib is an investigational, first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor designed for inhalation and selective for PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, CSF1R, and cKIT, targeting proliferation, inflammation, and fibrosis ─ three core drivers of pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. The phase 2 TORREY trial of seralutinib added to standard-of-care treatment in adults with PAH WHO FC II or III met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) vs. placebo at 24 weeks. Methods PROSERA (NCT05934526), a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of inhaled seralutinib in PAH patients treated for up to 48 weeks. Eligible patients (WHO Group 1 PH, FC II or III; REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score ≥5 or NT-proBNP ≥300 ng/L or PVR ≥800 dyne•s/cm5) on standard background therapy were randomized 1:1 to seralutinib 90 mg or placebo delivered by dry powder inhaler twice daily. The primary endpoint was change in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 24 in the seralutinib treatment group vs. placebo. Key secondary endpoints included: time to clinical worsening (TTCW), proportion of patients with clinical improvement at week 24, change in NT-proBNP from baseline to week 24, and proportion of patients with ≥1-point decrease from baseline in REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score at week 24. Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs (SAEs). Patients who completed blinded treatment could be eligible to participate in an open-label extension study. Preliminary Blinded Results 390 patients were randomized at 132 sites worldwide. At baseline, mean age was 50.0 years. PAH etiologies included 61.0% idiopathic, 9.7% heritable, and 22.3% associated with connective tissue disease. 25.6% of patients were WHO FC II and 74.4% FC III. Mean time from diagnosis was TBD years. Most patients were receiving 2 (39.2%) or ≥ 3 (54.6%) PAH medications, 29.2% were receiving parenteral prostacyclin. Baseline PVR was 798.4 dyne•s/cm5, 6MWD was 373.7 m, and NT-proBNP was 986.8 ng/L. The difference in 6MWD from baseline to week 24 between seralutinib and placebo was TBD [SD] m (p=TBD). Secondary endpoints of TTCW, clinical improvement, NT-proBNP, and REVEAL Lite 2 Risk Score will be reported. The most common AEs were TBD (x%) and TBD (y%). SAEs and discontinuations related to AE will be reported. Conclusions The PROSERA study demonstrates⋯ [to be updated following unblinding of the data]. Funding Gossamer Bio, Inc. This abstract is funded by: Gossamer Bio, Inc.

AbstractRight heart (RH) structure and function are major determinants of symptoms and prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RH imaging provides detailed information, but evidence and guidelines on the use of RH imaging in treatment decisions are limited. We conducted a Delphi study to gather expert opinion on the role of RH imaging in decision‐making for treatment escalation in PAH. A panel of 17 physicians with expertise in PAH and RH imaging used three surveys in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the role of RH imaging in PAH. Survey 1 used open‐ended questions to gather information. Survey 2 contained Likert scale and other questions intended to identify consensus on topics identified in Survey 1. Survey 3 contained Likert scale questions derived from Survey 2 and summary information on the results of Survey 2. The Delphi panel reached consensus that RH imaging is likely to improve the current risk stratification algorithms and help differentiate risk levels in patients at intermediate risk. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right ventricular fractional area change, right atrial area, tricuspid regurgitation, inferior venae cavae diameter, and pericardial effusion should be part of routine echocardiography in PAH. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is valuable but limited by cost and access. A pattern of abnormal RH imaging results should prompt consideration of hemodynamic evaluation and possible treatment escalation. RH imaging is an important tool for decisions about treatment escalation in PAH, but systematically collected evidence is needed to clarify its role.

AbstractMacitentan is an oral endothelin receptor antagonist for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The OPsumit® USers Registry (OPUS) and the OPsumit® Historical USers cohort (OrPHeUS) medical chart review provide real‐world data for patients newly initiating macitentan. This study aims to describe the characteristics, safety profile, and clinical outcomes of PAH patients newly treated with macitentan in the combined OPUS/OrPHeUS data set. OPUS was a prospective, multicenter, long‐term, observational drug registry from April 2014 to June 2020. OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter chart review: observation period October 2013 to March 2017. All analyses were descriptive. At registry closure in June 2020, the combined population consisted of 5654 patients, of whom 81.9% were diagnosed with PAH. For these 4626 patients, median duration of macitentan exposure observed was 14.5 (Q1 = 5.2, Q3 = 29.0) months; idiopathic PAH (54.8%) was the most common form of PAH; macitentan was initiated as monotherapy (37.9%), or as part of double (48.0%) or triple therapy (14.1%); discontinuation due to nonhepatic/hepatic adverse events occurred in 17.1%/0.3% of patients; 9.9% of patients experienced ≥1 hepatic adverse events; Kaplan–Meier estimates showed that at 1 year 59.9% (95% confidence interval: 58.3, 61.5) of patients were free from hospitalization and survival was 90.4% (89.3, 91.3). This analysis of real‐world data from the combined OPUS and OrPHeUS populations demonstrated that macitentan is well tolerated in a large, diverse population of PAH patients, with overall and hepatic safety profiles consistent with previous macitentan clinical trials.

AbstractAlthough pulmonary hypertension (PH) is widely prevalent in India, care delivery for this condition has unique challenges in a lower middle‐income country (LMIC). To describe care delivery for patients with PH and associated barriers in India. We interviewed physicians across eight healthcare systems in India about PH clinical care using semi‐structured enquiries to understand care delivery and associated challenges in their specific practice as well as the associated health system. Qualitative analysis was performed using content analysis methodology. Physicians reported that common causes for PH in their practice were rheumatic mitral valve disease, coronary artery disease, and congenital heart disease (CHD). No center had a dedicated PH program. Only one center had a specific protocol for PH management. Diagnostic evaluations were limited, and right heart catheterizations were recommended for patients with CHD. Pulmonary vasodilator therapy was used for severe symptoms or markers of severe disease. Agents used to treat PH were widely variable across physicians and prostacyclins are unavailable in India. Barriers included limited training in PH for physicians, lack of consensus guidelines for PH specific to LMIC, and lack of financial incentives for health care systems to organize dedicated PH programs. Other barriers included poor patient health literacy and socioeconomic barriers that limit ability to test and treat PH. PH care delivery in India is variable with widely differing clinical practices. Dedicated training in PH management and establishing guidelines specific to LMIC like India can form the first step forward.

Aberrant kinase signaling that involves platelet‐derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) α/β, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), and stem cell factor receptor (c‐KIT) pathways may be responsible for vascular remodeling in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Targeting these specific pathways may potentially reverse the pathological inflammation, cellular proliferation, and fibrosis associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension progression. Seralutinib (formerly known as GB002) is a novel, potent, clinical stage inhibitor of PDGFRα/β, CSF1R, and c‐KIT delivered via inhalation that is being developed for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Here, we report on an ongoing Phase 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (NCT04456998) evaluating the efficacy and safety of seralutinib in subjects with World Health Organization Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension who are classified as Functional Class II or III. A total of 80 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to receive either study drug or placebo for 24 weeks followed by an optional 72‐week open‐label extension study. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline to Week 24 in pulmonary vascular resistance by right heart catheterization. The secondary endpoint is the change in distance from baseline to Week 24 achieved in the 6‐min walk test. A computerized tomography sub‐study will examine the effect of seralutinib on pulmonary vascular remodelling. A separate heart rate monitoring sub‐study will examine the effect of seralutinib on cardiac effort during the 6‐min walk test.