Vestal, Brian

Abstract Rationale Dyspnea is a prominent symptom of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), limiting patients’ activity and impairing their quality of life. The University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ) is a 24-item instrument used to assess dyspnea severity in patients with various respiratory conditions. Objectives This study aimed to examine the reliability and responsiveness of the UCSD-SOBQ score, its validity as a measure of dyspnea severity, and its prognostic value in a prospective cohort with fHP. Methods We conducted psychometric analyses on UCSD-SOBQ response data and assessed the association between score changes and survival in patients with fHP who completed the UCSD-SOBQ and other HP severity metrics at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We introduce the reliable change index (RCI) and the likely change index (LCI) to assess the statistical significance of within-individual change in UCSD scores. Results At baseline, internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). Significant moderately strong correlations were observed between UCSD-SOBQ scores and percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), r = -0.46, percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), r = -0.32, and Borg dyspnea scores r = 0.56. UCSD-SOBQ scores were significantly different between the lowest and highest strata of FVC% (64.9 ± 18.9 vs. 36.2 ± 22.9), DLCO% and Borg scores. The threshold for worsening within-individual change in the UCSD-SOBQ score at 95% confidence was 12 points. A 1-point higher baseline UCSD-SOBQ score was associated with a 2% increase in the risk of death or transplant (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Conclusions In fHP, the UCSD-SOBQ score is a reliable and valid measure of dyspnea severity, is responsive to change, discriminates patients with differing severities, and is associated with transplant free survival. Additional qualitative data and psychometric analyses could tailor the UCSD-SOBQ to fHP and may further improve its measurement properties.

Abstract Rationale Quantitative CT using multiple instance learning (MIL)-usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) classifier and data-driven textural analysis (DTA) provides objective and reproducible measurements of disease pattern and extent, respectively. However, the understanding of their individual or combined relationships with outcomes in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) remains limited. Objectives To determine whether visual CT patterns of fHP or UIP, a MIL-UIP classifier, baseline and changes in DTA over 12-months and DTA at 12 months are associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in fHP. Methods The primary cohort included 134 participants with fHP. Associations between CT variables and subsequent lung function change, and PFS were assessed using linear mixed models and Cox hazards models. Results were validated in a combined dataset from three independent populations (N = 216). Results Visual patterns of fHP or UIP were not associated with PFS. A baseline MIL-UIP classification and DTA were significantly associated with 24-month PFS. However, the MIL-UIP did not predict PFS after adjusting for DTA fibrosis extent. Over 12 months, a 1-point increase in DTA across and within patients resulted in a significant decline in FVC% and DLCO%. A 12-month change in DTA (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.13) and DTA at 12-months (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05) were associated with subsequent 12-month PFS. Similar estimates were observed in the validation cohort. Conclusions In fHP, the objectively measured extent of lung fibrosis is more prognostic than either a UIP classifier or visual CT patterns of fHP or UIP. Baseline DTA, DTA at 12 months, and its change over 12-months are associated with PFS.