Scholand, Mary Beth

Abstract Rationale Dyspnea is a prominent symptom of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), limiting patients’ activity and impairing their quality of life. The University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ) is a 24-item instrument used to assess dyspnea severity in patients with various respiratory conditions. Objectives This study aimed to examine the reliability and responsiveness of the UCSD-SOBQ score, its validity as a measure of dyspnea severity, and its prognostic value in a prospective cohort with fHP. Methods We conducted psychometric analyses on UCSD-SOBQ response data and assessed the association between score changes and survival in patients with fHP who completed the UCSD-SOBQ and other HP severity metrics at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We introduce the reliable change index (RCI) and the likely change index (LCI) to assess the statistical significance of within-individual change in UCSD scores. Results At baseline, internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). Significant moderately strong correlations were observed between UCSD-SOBQ scores and percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), r = -0.46, percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), r = -0.32, and Borg dyspnea scores r = 0.56. UCSD-SOBQ scores were significantly different between the lowest and highest strata of FVC% (64.9 ± 18.9 vs. 36.2 ± 22.9), DLCO% and Borg scores. The threshold for worsening within-individual change in the UCSD-SOBQ score at 95% confidence was 12 points. A 1-point higher baseline UCSD-SOBQ score was associated with a 2% increase in the risk of death or transplant (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Conclusions In fHP, the UCSD-SOBQ score is a reliable and valid measure of dyspnea severity, is responsive to change, discriminates patients with differing severities, and is associated with transplant free survival. Additional qualitative data and psychometric analyses could tailor the UCSD-SOBQ to fHP and may further improve its measurement properties.

Abstract Rationale Quantitative CT using multiple instance learning (MIL)-usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) classifier and data-driven textural analysis (DTA) provides objective and reproducible measurements of disease pattern and extent, respectively. However, the understanding of their individual or combined relationships with outcomes in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) remains limited. Objectives To determine whether visual CT patterns of fHP or UIP, a MIL-UIP classifier, baseline and changes in DTA over 12-months and DTA at 12 months are associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in fHP. Methods The primary cohort included 134 participants with fHP. Associations between CT variables and subsequent lung function change, and PFS were assessed using linear mixed models and Cox hazards models. Results were validated in a combined dataset from three independent populations (N = 216). Results Visual patterns of fHP or UIP were not associated with PFS. A baseline MIL-UIP classification and DTA were significantly associated with 24-month PFS. However, the MIL-UIP did not predict PFS after adjusting for DTA fibrosis extent. Over 12 months, a 1-point increase in DTA across and within patients resulted in a significant decline in FVC% and DLCO%. A 12-month change in DTA (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.13) and DTA at 12-months (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05) were associated with subsequent 12-month PFS. Similar estimates were observed in the validation cohort. Conclusions In fHP, the objectively measured extent of lung fibrosis is more prognostic than either a UIP classifier or visual CT patterns of fHP or UIP. Baseline DTA, DTA at 12 months, and its change over 12-months are associated with PFS.

Objective Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can stabilize or improve lung function in systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease (SSc‐ILD). We hypothesized that combining MMF with pirfenidone (PFD) would produce a significantly more rapid and/or greater improvement in lung function. Methods A randomized (1:1), double‐blind, placebo (PLA)‐controlled phase 2 trial was conducted in SSc‐ILD in which patients received PFD or PLA (801 mg three times daily) along with MMF (1,500 mg twice daily) for 18 months. The primary outcome was change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC‐%). Linear mixed‐effects models assessed treatment differences in a modified intention‐to‐treat population. Results Only fifty‐one of 150 intended subjects (34%) were randomized (MMF+PLA, n = 24; MMF+PFD, n = 27). The FVC‐% improved from baseline to 18 months by 2.24 ± 1.35 (least‐squares mean [LSM] ± SEM) in the MMF+PLA group and 2.09 ± 1.28 in the MMF+PFD group (LSM treatment difference −0.14; P = 0.93). Median time to achieve a ≥3% improvement in FVC‐% was numerically faster in the MMF+PFD versus MMF+PLA group (12.3 vs 17.8 months, respectively), but the difference was not significant ( P = 0.33). For secondary outcomes, only the change over 18 months in the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29‐item physical function score, favoring MMF+PFD, reached statistical significance ( P = 0.04). Although other related patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) numerically favored the MMF+PFD group, as did quantitative high‐resolution computed tomography measures of ILD, the differences between groups did not reach statistical significance. Early withdrawals from study medication and adverse events of special interest were numerically greater with MMF+PFD (n = 8 vs 2 and n = 20 vs 7, respectively). Conclusion In this underpowered study, there was no statistically significant treatment difference in overall change in FVC‐% between groups. MMF+PFD was not as well tolerated as MMF+PLA.

Objective We provide evidence‐based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Methods We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. Results Thirty‐five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first‐line SARD‐ILD treatment, treatment of SARD‐ILD progression despite first‐line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis–ILD as a first‐line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first‐line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. Conclusion This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Objective We provide evidence‐based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Methods We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. Results Thirty‐five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first‐line SARD‐ILD treatment, treatment of SARD‐ILD progression despite first‐line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis–ILD as a first‐line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first‐line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. Conclusion This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

ObjectiveWe provide evidence‐based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease.MethodsWe developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation.ResultsFifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high‐resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6‐minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs.ConclusionThis clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

Objective We provide evidence‐based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. Methods We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. Results Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high‐resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6‐minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. Conclusion This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

AbstractPulmonary hypertension (PH) is a risk factor for mortality in patients with sarcoidosis. Severe PH in chronic lung disease has previously been defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥ 35 mmHg or mPAP 25 ≥ mmHg with cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2 L/min/m2. However, there is no clear definition denoting severity of sarcoidosis‐associated PH (SAPH). We aimed to determine pulmonary hemodynamic cut‐off values where transplant‐free survival was worse among patients with SAPH. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the Registry of SAPH database focusing on pulmonary hemodynamic predictors of transplant‐free survival among patients with precapillary SAPH. Cox regression was performed to determine which pulmonary hemodynamic values predicted death or lung transplantation. Kaplan−Meier survival analysis was performed on statistically significant predictors to determine pulmonary hemodynamic cut‐off values where transplant‐free survival was decreased. Decreased transplant‐free survival occurred among SAPH patients with mPAP ≥ 40 mmHg and SAPH patients with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥ 5 Woods units (WU). Transplant‐free survival was not decreased in patients who fulfilled prior criteria of severe PH in chronic lung disease. We identified new cut‐offs with decreased transplant‐free survival in the SAPH population. Neither cut‐off of mPAP ≥ 40 mmHg nor PVR ≥ 5 WU has previously been shown to be associated with decreased transplant‐free survival in SAPH. These values could suggest a new definition of severe SAPH. Our PVR findings are in line with the most recent European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guideline definition of severe PH in chronic lung disease.

Abstract Context. —The most common lung tissue samples seen by pathologists worldwide are obtained with the flexible bronchoscope. Specimens taken for examination of diffuse or multifocal parenchymal lung abnormalities pose special challenges for the general surgical pathologist, and these challenges are often compounded by high clinical expectations for accurate and specific diagnosis. Objective. —To present and discuss the most common histopathologic patterns and diagnostic entities seen in transbronchial biopsy specimens in the setting of diffuse or multifocal lung disease. Specifically, acute lung injury, eosinophilic pneumonia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, chronic cellular infiltrates, organizing pneumonia, alveolar proteinosis, sarcoidosis, Wegener granulomatosis, intravenous drug abuse-related microangiopathy, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and lymphangioleiomyomatosis are presented. Clinical and radiologic context is provided for the more specific diagnostic entities. Data Sources. —The published literature and experience from a consultation practice. Conclusions. —The transbronchial biopsy specimen can provide valuable information for clinical management in the setting of diffuse or multifocal lung disease. Computed tomographic scans are useful for selecting appropriate patients to undergo biopsy and in limiting the differential diagnosis. Knowledge of the clinical context, radiologic distribution of abnormalities, and histopathologic patterns is essential. With this information, the surgical pathologist can substantially influence the diagnostic workup and help guide the clinician to an accurate clinical/radiologic/pathologic diagnosis.