Parish, James M.

Abstract Context. —The most common lung tissue samples seen by pathologists worldwide are obtained with the flexible bronchoscope. Specimens taken for examination of diffuse or multifocal parenchymal lung abnormalities pose special challenges for the general surgical pathologist, and these challenges are often compounded by high clinical expectations for accurate and specific diagnosis. Objective. —To present and discuss the most common histopathologic patterns and diagnostic entities seen in transbronchial biopsy specimens in the setting of diffuse or multifocal lung disease. Specifically, acute lung injury, eosinophilic pneumonia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, chronic cellular infiltrates, organizing pneumonia, alveolar proteinosis, sarcoidosis, Wegener granulomatosis, intravenous drug abuse-related microangiopathy, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and lymphangioleiomyomatosis are presented. Clinical and radiologic context is provided for the more specific diagnostic entities. Data Sources. —The published literature and experience from a consultation practice. Conclusions. —The transbronchial biopsy specimen can provide valuable information for clinical management in the setting of diffuse or multifocal lung disease. Computed tomographic scans are useful for selecting appropriate patients to undergo biopsy and in limiting the differential diagnosis. Knowledge of the clinical context, radiologic distribution of abnormalities, and histopathologic patterns is essential. With this information, the surgical pathologist can substantially influence the diagnostic workup and help guide the clinician to an accurate clinical/radiologic/pathologic diagnosis.

Purpose: To test the association between participant King-Devick Test (KDT) times and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and evaluate for improvement after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. Methods: Study dates January 30 to July 31, 2018. Patients were referred for initial evaluation of sleep disordered breathing concerns. OSA severities were defined by Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) results, with ≥15 considered at least moderate OSA. The KDT is an objective physical measure of brain function. We estimated correlation between KDT time and AHI and compared mean KDT time between patients with and without moderate OSA. For the OSA subgroup, we evaluated for potential improvement in KDT after CPAP. Results: We enrolled 60 participants, of whom 35 (58.3%) had OSA with an AHI ≥15. Initial analyses noted no significant KDT time differences between patients based on OSA severity. However, after excluding 3 participants who had baseline neurologic illness, adjusted analyses demonstrated that mean KDT time was significantly prolonged for patients with moderate or greater OSA (AHI ≥15) as compared to those with mild or no sleep apnea (AHI <15); 63.4 seconds (95% CI 58.9-67.8) versus 55.7 seconds (95% CI 50.2-61.1), P = .03. CPAP-treated subjects demonstrated significantly improved KDT test times; 63.5 seconds mean pretreatment versus 55.6 posttreatment; −6.6 seconds mean difference, 95%CI (−12.0, −1.13), P = .02. Conclusion: Neurologic abnormalities in patients with OSA are potentially demonstrable utilizing this objective physical measure. Significant improvement is achieved in patients after CPAP treatment.

Upper airway stimulation is now a well‐established treatment option for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The implanted pulse generator of this system activates the hypoglossal nerve and is routinely placed in a subcutaneous pocket overlying the pectoralis muscle. This case report describes a patient with a history of bilateral mastectomy and radiation for breast cancer who required explantation due to device exposure and infection. The patient was successfully reimplanted by placing the implantable pulse generator deep to the pectoralis major muscle. Clinical circumstances involving the chest wall may warrant subpectoral placement of the implanted pulse generator.Laryngoscope, 129:2420–2423, 2019

Iatrogenic pneumothorax has become an increasingly recognized complication of routine outpatient procedures, such as transthoracic needle biopsies of the lung and transbronchial lung biopsies. Patients with clinically significant pneumothorax are typically managed with evacuation via a percutaneously placed catheter or chest tube. Tube thoracotomy and chest tube management have traditionally been performed by cardiothoracic surgeons; however, with the increasing number of interventional radiologists and interventional pulmonologists, more chest tubes are being placed by specialists who do not admit and manage patients in the hospital setting. The responsibility for the admission of these patients to the hospital service has fallen to the internist. Hospitalists caring for such patients are often expected to manage the chest tube. General internal medicine training and the existing medical literature provide few guidelines to assist with this issue. We present a discussion of the current published literature and our management algorithms for hospitalists caring for patients admitted with iatrogenic pneumothorax. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:402–408. © 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine

Pulmonary fibrosis in surgical lung biopsies is said to have a ‘usual interstitial pneumonia- pattern ’ (UIP- pattern ) of disease when scarring of the parenchyma is present in a patchy, ‘temporally heterogeneous’ distribution. These biopsies are one of the more common non-neoplastic specimens surgical pathologists encounter and often pose a number of challenges. UIP is the expected histopathological pattern in patients with clinical idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but the UIP- pattern can be seen in other conditions on occasion. Most important among these are the rheumatic interstitial lung diseases (RILD) and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHrHP). Because theses entities have different mechanisms of injury, approach to therapy, and expected clinical progression, it is imperative for the surgical pathologist to correctly classify them. Taken in isolation, the UIP- pattern seen in patients with IPF may appear to overlap with that of RILD and CHrHP, at least when using the broadest definition of this term (patchy fibrosis). However, important distinguishing features are nearly always present in our experience, and the addition of a multidisciplinary approach will often resolve the critical differences between these diseases. In this manuscript, we review the distinguishing clinical, radiologic and histopathological features of UIP of IPF, RILD and CHrHP, based, in part, on the existing literature, but also lessons learned from a busy lung biopsy consultation practice.