Balasubramanian, A.

Abstract Rationale: The 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension highlighted the importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patient-reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), have been associated with morbidity and mortality in PAH, but the added value of HRQOL measures to validated risk prediction models remains unknown. Methods: Adults with RHC-proven PAH from the Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics (PVDOMICS) Study, a multi-center observational study, were included in this study. The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR) was used as a validation cohort. HRQOL was measured using the emPHasis-10 score, where higher scores reflect worse HRQOL. Noninvasive risk assessment was measured by REVEAL Lite 2 risk score, categorized into 3-strata. Cox proportional hazard models were used to model survival evaluating the interaction between risk strata and HRQOL scores, adjusting for age, sex, and incident diagnosis. Harrell's C-statistics were calculated to compare discriminative performance. Results: From the PVDOMICS and PHAR cohorts, 265 and 2671 individuals with PAH and complete emPHasis-10 and REVEAL Lite 2 scores were included. Both cohorts had similar demographics, with an average age of 52±13 and 56±16 years, 75% and 72% female, 81% and 75% White, in the PVDOMICS and PHAR cohorts respectively. Over 87% of PVDOMICS were prevalent cases of PAH, while in the PHAR half were incident. Most individuals (62%) in PVDOMICS were REVEAL Lite 2 low risk, with 16% intermediate and 22% high risk; by contrast, in PHAR 33% were low, 29% intermediate, and 38% high risk. REVEAL Lite 2 scores demonstrated weak to moderate correlation with emPHasis-10 scores in both cohorts (PVDOMICS r=0.48 p<0.001; PHAR r=0.33 p<0.001). Notably, the full range of emPHasis-10 scores were observed in the low-risk individuals across both cohorts. In the PVDOMICS adjusted Cox models, higher emPHasis-10 scores predicted poorer survival (p=0.047) particularly among low-risk individuals (interaction versus high-risk group p=0.08). Similar adjusted models in PHAR demonstrated emPHasis-10 to be a confounder (p=0.001) without significant interaction by risk strata (low vs high-risk interaction p=0.94), but the greatest change in median survival time was observed in the low-risk group (Figure 1). Addition of emPHasis-10 to REVEAL Lite 2 scores improved discrimination in predicting survival (PVDOMICS: C-statistic 0.71 vs 0.73; PHAR: C-statistic 0.67 vs 0.69). Conclusions: Across two multicenter cohorts of incident and prevalent PAH, HRQOL as measured by the emPHasis-10 score improved discrimination for survival, particularly among individuals with lower risk scores.

Abstract Introduction Sex-based differences in morbidity and mortality for pulmonary hypertension (PH) are insufficiently addressed in current research. However, recognizing these differences is crucial for optimal clinical management and improving outcomes. This study assesses the effect of sex on survival among PH patients, while accounting for disease severity, comorbidities, treatment, and race. Methods We analyzed data from the PVRI GoDeep meta-registry, including all incident patients with complete hemodynamic profiles. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for various confounders. Analyses included both PAH and non-PAH groups and risk assessment by the ESC/ERS 2022, REVEAL lite 2, and COMPERA 4-strata scores. All analyses were performed using R (The R Foundation). Results A total of 19,663 incident PH patients were included in the analysis, with 5,581 patients (28%) diagnosed with Group 1 PH and a median age of 64 years [IQR: 52-73]. Among these, male patients (8,704, 44%) had a significantly higher mortality risk than female patients across the entire cohort and within all PH subtypes. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in male versus female patients was 1.391 [95% CI: 1.260-1.536] in the overall population and 1.404 [95% CI: 1.264-1.561] for those with PAH. This survival difference was consistent across various severity levels, age groups, and in the presence of comorbidities such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases, as well as among those receiving PAH-specific therapies as well as patients who remained without treatment during the observation period. Notably, male disadvantage in survival was observed in low, intermediate, and high-risk categories for ESC/ERS 2022, REVEAL lite 2, and COMPERA scores but not within REVEAL 2.0, which includes male sex as a non-modifiable risk factor. Racial analysis revealed a greater mortality risk for males among White patients, with no significant differences noted in Black or Asian populations. Conclusion Our PVRI GoDeep meta-registry analysis demonstrates that male PH patients face higher mortality risk across both PAH and non-PAH groups, independent of disease etiology, age, severity, comorbidities, and treatment factors, with this risk amplified in White patients. These findings suggest that male sex should be further considered as a risk factor to refine predictive models for survival in PH.