Citations

Abstract Background Prior studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker disclosure have answered important questions about individuals’ experiences learning amyloid results. In comparison, the experiences of individuals performing AD biomarker disclosure have been under characterized. The present study examines the clinician experience disclosing amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) results within the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative's ADNI‐4 study. Methods The ADNI‐4 longitudinal cohort study includes a pragmatic process for amyloid PET disclosure for participants across the cognitive spectrum. Disclosing clinicians complete a short questionnaire after each disclosure session, reporting on the visit length, the clinician's rating of participant and study partner understanding and emotional reactions, topics discussed, challenges, assessment of the visit overall, and any feedback about the process. Results Across the first 100 disclosures (48 cognitively normal, 35 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), 17 dementia) in ADNI‐4, visits lasted an average of 29.4 minutes (SD 13.9, range 10‐90). Most cognitively impaired participants had a loved one present at the disclosure visit (dementia 94%, MCI 80%) but the majority of cognitively normal participants (73%) did not. Clinicians rated understanding of the result as adequate for all study partners and the vast majority (94%) of participants. Clinicians reported feeling “very confident” in their ability to assess readiness to receive result (70%), disclose (73%), and answer questions (77%). Clinicians rated all visits as “good” or better, with two‐thirds (65%) rated as “excellent.” Frequently discussed topics included meaning of result (99%), other risk factors (72%), and emotional impact of result (49%). Stigma and discrimination were rarely discussed, coming up in 12% and 3% of disclosure sessions, respectively. Challenges were infrequent (7%) and primarily included desire for additional information and challenges related to the participant's impairment. Clinicians provided the study team feedback about the disclosure process for 25% of disclosure visits. Comments included the desire for additional information or resources, positive feedback, and the importance of the study partner. Conclusions Clinicians disclosing amyloid PET results in ADNI‐4 report high confidence, adequate participant and study partner understanding, and few challenges. These data from clinicians, in combination with participant data, will inform future disclosure practices in both research and care.

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder marked by early impairments in executive function and altered prefrontal neural circuitry. These traits are also observed in Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), suggesting the possibility of shared mechanisms and a role for developmental neurocognitive factors in the onset of FTD. High‐penetrance mutations in GRN, C9orf72, and MAPT increase FTD risk and are suspected to influence neurodevelopment. This study hypothesizes that pre‐symptomatic carriers of these mutations exhibit cognitive and behavioral traits that overlap with those observed in ADD/ADHD. Method This cross‐sectional study analyzed participants from the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTLD (ALLFTD) Study. Inclusion criteria restricted the sample to mutation carriers with pathogenic variants in GRN, C9orf72, or MAPT while excluding individuals with prior psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) and those taking antipsychotic or anxiolytic medications to avoid potential confounding effects on test validity and interpretation. The final sample included N = 338 participants, categorized as pre‐symptomatic mutation carriers ( N = 227) or asymptomatic noncarriers ( N = 111). To assess potential overlaps with ADD/ADHD traits, a targeted subset of measures reflecting executive function, working memory, attention, social behavior, and hyperactivity were extracted from validated cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments. Mutation carriers were further classified as either converters ( N = 20) who progressed to symptomatic FTD (CDR ≥ 1) or non‐converters ( N = 95) who remained asymptomatic. Only pre‐conversion scores were analyzed for converters. Group comparisons were conducted using general linear models adjusted for age and sex. Result Pre‐symptomatic mutation carriers showed significantly lower verbal fluency ( p = 0.004) and a trend toward reduced working memory ( p = 0.05) compared to noncarriers. Converters exhibited poorer overall cognitive performance ( p <0.0001), verbal fluency ( p = 0.001), and memory and attention ( p = 0.04) compared to non‐converters. Converters demonstrated higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores ( p = 0.0001), particularly in hyperactivity ( p = 0.003), reflecting greater behavioral disturbances. Conclusion Baseline impairments in cognitive function, memory, and neuropsychiatric profiles distinguish converters from non‐converters, highlighting overlaps between ADD/ADHD traits and prodromal FTD. These findings suggest shared neurobiological mechanisms and underscore the need for mutation‐specific studies to further explore the neurodevelopmental factors driving FTD progression.

Abstract Background Even among cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults, specific patterns of neuropsychological performance impart differential risk for progression to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Early identification in the prodromal phase may inform early intervention efforts. We used a data‐driven approach to classify neuropsychological phenotypes within CU older adults from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and tested for differences in ADRD and cerebrovascular outcomes. Method Participants included 4737 CU (via a previously published algorithm plus consensus diagnosis protocol) older adults (mean age=75.1 years, 60.8% female, 23.1% Black) with neuropsychological data from Visit 5 (2011‐2013) of the ARIC study. Latent profile analysis was leveraged to identify unique cognitive phenotypes using 10 demographically adjusted (age, sex/gender, education, race‐center, WRAT Reading) neuropsychological z‐scores. Cognitive phenotypes were then compared on demographics, depressive symptoms, and vascular risk factors (VRFs). In a subset with available neuroimaging and biofluid data ( n range=1102‐1678), white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and bilateral hippocampal (HV) volumes normalized for intracranial volume and plasma biomarkers (i.e., Aβ42/40, ptau181, NfL, and GFAP) were examined by phenotype. Phenotype comparisons adjusted for demographic variables, VRFs, and an indicator of kidney function (i.e., eGFR‐creatinine) for plasma biomarkers. We applied Tukey adjustment for pairwise comparisons. Result A 6‐class solution of cognitive phenotypes emerged as the best fitting model: Average Overall (28%), Low Overall/Very Low Memory (7%), Average Overall/Super Memory (11%), Subtle Low Overall/Low Executive (22%), Subtle Low Executive/High Memory (13%), and Average Overall/Low Memory (19%; Figure 1). Phenotypes differed on education, race, and word reading, despite prior adjustments for these variables when creating the neuropsychological z‐scores (Table 1). Additionally, phenotypes differed on depressive symptoms, VRFs, WMH, HV, Aβ42/40, and ptau181 (all p s < .05). The Subtle Low Overall/Low Executive group had the highest WMH volumes, the Subtle Low Executive/High Memory group had the lowest Aβ42/40, and the Low Overall/Very Low Memory group had the lowest HV and highest levels of plasma ptau181 (Table 2). Conclusion Cognitive heterogeneity is observed even among CU older adults, with lower executive performance associated with cerebrovascular changes and lower memory associated with certain AD‐related changes, possibly indicating risk for cognitive progression through distinct pathways.

Abstract Background Agitation is a clinically significant symptom contributing to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) but is poorly understood across the different syndromes related to Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD). This study investigates sex differences in agitation across FTLD‐related syndromes and its relationship to various neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Method We analyzed data from 1,654 participants (916 males, 738 females; average ages 65.8 and 65.9, respectively) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study with a FTLD‐related syndrome: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), Primary Progressive Aphasia (non‐fluent variant (nfvPPA), semantic variant (svPPA)), Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). Participants’ symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Prevalence ratios and odds ratios were computed to assess the likelihood of NPS comorbidities when agitation was present in males and females. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to identify NPS associated with agitation and how they varied by sex. Result Males were more likely to experience anxiety (bvFTD: p <0.001, CBS: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.0001), apathy (nfvPPA: p <0.01, PSP: p <0.01), depression (bvFTD: p <0.0001, PSP<0.01), disinhibition (nfvPPA: p <0.0001), PSP: p <0.001), and motor symptoms (bvFTD: p <0.01, CBS: p <0.01) when agitation was present. In contrast, females had a higher likelihood of experiencing disinhibition in svPPA ( p <0.001). These findings suggest that agitation is associated with a wider range of NPS in males than in females. Agitation and NPS are especially prominent in males with PSP. Conclusion This study reveals significant sex differences in NPS in FTLD‐related syndromes when agitation is present. Males and especially PSP, are more likely to experience a broader range of NPS in association with agitation. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving these sex differences, particularly focusing on the neurobiological impact of agitation, the recognition of symptoms in the presence of greater behavioral disturbances, and potential variations from informant reports. Understanding these factors will provide valuable insights into the role of agitation in the presentation of NPS across FTLD‐related syndromes. Ultimately, addressing these gaps will enhance our ability to effectively treat and manage agitation in both male and female patients with FTLD‐related syndromes.

Abstract Background Motor disturbances are common in neurodegenerative disorders. Digital health technologies can be a tool for remote, accessible, and low‐burden motor assessments. The ALLFTD Mobile App includes a finger‐tapping test (mApp‐FTT) to assess dexterity. We evaluated the reliability and construct validity of smartphone‐based measures of finger tapping in an in‐person sample. Methods Participants ( n = 33; mean age=68.2 [SD=8.6]) completed the mobile finger‐tapping test (mApp‐FTT) on iOS and Android devices (two counterbalanced 20‐second trials per hand) and the mechanical finger‐tapping test (FTT). The sample included cognitively unimpaired participants (22.2%) and those diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia‐spectrum disorders (41.7%), Alzheimer's dementia (22.2%), and progressive supranuclear palsy or corticobasal syndrome (13.9%). A motor domain was calculated based on neurological exam and added to the Clinical Dementia Rating® plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center–Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD). Pearson's correlations assessed associations between mApp‐FTT performance and FTT performance, clinical severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Score), motor rating scales (Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale [PSPRS] and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS]), and cognitive function. Due to small sample size, PSPRS subdomains were dichotomized, and t‐tests were performed to evaluate group differences based on symptom presence. Results Total mApp‐FTT taps on iOS and Android were strongly correlated ( r = 0.86, 95% CI [0.76, 0.92], p < .001). mApp‐FTT was associated with manual FTT on iOS ( r = 0.70, 95% CI [0.52, 0.82], p < .001) and Android ( r = 0.62, 95% CI [0.41, 0.77], p < .001). Among iOS users, total PSPRS score was negatively correlated with mApp‐FTT ( r = ‐0.60, 95% CI [‐0.75, ‐0.39], p < .001). Worse mApp‐FTT performance was observed in participants with higher limb rigidity (mean difference=15.46, 95% CI [3.40, 27.52], p < .001), limb dystonia (mean difference=19.22, 95% CI [5.67, 32.77], p < .001), and finger tapping (mean difference=12.74, 95% CI [3.42, 22.06], p < .001). Total UPDRS score correlated with lower mApp‐FTT ( r = ‐0.48, 95% CI [‐0.66, ‐0.28], p < .001), as did disease severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Score; r=‐0.46, 95% CI [‐0.66, ‐0.22], p < .001). Conclusion Smartphone‐based finger‐tapping assessments effectively detect motor and cognitive impairment, with stronger associations for motor function. Findings in iOS users highlight the need to assess operating system‐related biases and validate in Android. Remote smartphone assessments offer a scalable tool for tracking disease progression, warranting larger longitudinal studies.

Abstract Background Staging disease severity in dementia research requires input from an informant. The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR) is the most used instrument for staging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD); but has been expanded to stage patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD. An informant effect on the CDR has been reported in AD. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether informant characteristics influence the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD in a large cohort of participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Method We included participants with a FTLD‐related syndrome from the ALLFTD study. We included participants with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD higher than 0, information on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q). We performed a conditional growth model using multilevel linear regression analysis. We performed an exploratory stratified analysis by patient sex. Result We included 1411 participants, totalling 2063 visits. The patient's age at the initial visit was 64.7±9.4 years and 44.0% were females. Females were 69.2% of the informants, and the relationship was 79.1% spouse or partner, 10.6% children, 4.1% were siblings and 6.2% other. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were affected by informant characteristics. The CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores were 0.41 (CI 95%:0.08 to 0.75) higher with female informants. The frequency of visits was associated with a CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD score 0.86 higher (CI 95%:0.17 to 0.56) when visiting at least once a week, 1.46 higher (CI 95%:0.46 to 2.47) when visiting daily, and 0.83 higher (CI 95%:0.06 to 1.60) when living with the patient compared with visiting less than once a week. As expected, CDR‐FLTD scores increased with lower MoCA and higher NPI‐Q scores. In the stratified analysis by sex, we found that female informant was associated with higher CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD scores only when patients were male. Conclusion We found that the CDR PLUS NACC‐FTLD is influenced by informant sex and frequency of visits in patients with FTLD‐related syndromes. These results are similar to those observed in AD patients and underscore the need to recognize that informant characteristics may impact dementia severity scales.

Abstract Background Some data suggest that neuroinflammation may be associated with pro‐inflammatory states in the body. Systemic, proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL‐1, IL‐6, etc.) are produced by a variety of comorbidities. Neuroinflammation has been shown to be associated with the accumulation of amyloid in the brain (Becher, Heneka). We hypothesized that systemic cytokine production could be associated with neuroinflammation and thereby be related to brain amyloid accumulation. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neuroinflammation, amyloid accumulation and systemic cytokines. Method 90 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) received a fasting cytokine panel over a 5‐year span where IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFa levels were measured. Participants were divided into four groups: cognitively unimpaired with normal levels of amyloid (CU A‐, n = 25), cognitively unimpaired with elevated amyloid (CU A+, n = 25), and mild cognitively impaired (MCI) with amyloid positive (MCI A+, n = 25), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) with elevated amyloid (AD A+, n = 15). To compare regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) from neuroinflammation PET based on amyloid status (A+ vs A‐) and the four cytokines, Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations were used to assess pairwise group differences. Result Using Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations, no strong relationship was found between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. While comparing CUA‐ vs CUA+ in Figure 1, three regions (supplementary motor area, frontal superior medial lobe, and middle cingulate cortex) showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05). However, Figure 2 showed an overarching trend bias towards significance across most regions in IL10, IL6, and TNFa. Conclusion Although significant relationships between systemic inflammation, brain amyloid and neuroinflammation were limited, the data show an overarching trend bias in broad brain regions, suggesting that further analyses are needed, possibly with larger sample sizes, to assess the relationship of regional neuroinflammation and amyloid to systemic inflammation. Future analyses could also regress out factors like sex, age, and genotype to further proinflammatory cytokine research.

Abstract Background The Joint Propagation Model (JPM)‐based CenTauR scale was recently introduced to harmonize tau‐PET quantification across different radiotracers. This study examined how CenTauR harmonization enhances the comparability of tau‐PET quantification across matched cohorts using different tracers. The evaluation focused on three key aspects: (1) comparing tau‐PET positivity rates as defined by CenTauR, (2) evaluating its diagnostic accuracy for symptomatic AD, and (3) analyzing longitudinal changes in tau‐PET rates over time. Method The JPM, developed by the CPAD‐led Tau PET Harmonization Working Group (Leuzy et al., Alzheimers Dement. 2024; Figure 1A), models relationships between anchor point subjects and head‐to‐head tau‐PET SUVR data onto the CenTauR scale, providing conversion equations for multiple tracers. JPM equations were applied to [¹⁸F]flortaucipir SUVR (Meta‐temporal ROI) data from 561 cognitively impaired participants in the ADNI and OASIS‐3 studies. Using ROC analysis, we determined the CenTauR cut‐off for positivity (T+) that maximized the Youden index for discriminating between FDA‐approved positive/negative visual reads. Three separate cohorts, scanned using [¹⁸F]flortaucipir (ADNI), [¹⁸F]MK‐6240 (CPAS), and [¹⁸F]RO‐948 (BioFINDER‐2), were matched 1:1 by age, MMSE, amyloid‐β, and clinical diagnosis. CenTauR‐based metrics were compared across these cohorts. Result A cut‐off of 18 CenTauRs was found to optimally classify [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET visual reads (Figure 1B). The matching procedure identified 1089 participants (363 per cohort). The frequency of T+ using the 18 CenTauRs cut‐off for the Meta‐Temporal ROI was highly comparable across tracers across groups, except for the Aβ‐positive cognitively unimpaired group, where variability was more pronounced due to a smaller sample size (Figure 2A). Similarly, tau‐PET discriminative accuracy for symptomatic AD vs controls remained similar across [ 18 F]flortaucipir and [ 18 F]MK‐6240 (Figure 2B). In a separate sample of 212 matched participants from ADNI ([¹⁸F]flortaucipir) and AIBL ([¹⁸F]MK‐6240) with baseline and 1‐year follow‐up tau‐PET scans, 1‐year change in CenTauRs was comparable (Figure 2C). An exploratory voxelwise transformation, utilizing the Meta‐Temporal conversion equation in a representative case scanned with both [¹⁸F]flortaucipir and [¹⁸F]MK‐6240, demonstrates the potential for voxelwise CenTauR harmonization (Figure 3). Conclusion These analyses suggest that CenTauR harmonization increases the comparability of tau‐PET data acquired with different tracers. Additional validation analyses with larger cohorts including other radiotracers ([¹⁸F]PI‐2620) are underway.

Abstract The immune mechanisms underlying Kawasaki disease (KD), a febrile systemic vasculitis in children, are poorly understood. Reports indicate elevated levels of circulating IL-33 in acute KD patients; however, if IL-33 contributes to the pathogenesis of KD vasculitis remains unclear. Here, we used the Lactobacillus casei cell wall extract (LCWE)-induced murine model of KD to determine the contribution of IL-33 to vasculitis development. We observed increased expression of Il33 transcripts and IL-33 protein in LCWE-induced cardiovascular lesions. Bone marrow chimera experiments suggest that IL-33 production by both hematopoietic and stromal cells is important for LCWE-induced KD vasculitis; however, single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and flow cytometric analysis revealed that stromal cells were the predominant sources of IL-33. Furthermore, immune cells infiltrating LCWE-induced cardiovascular lesions expressed Il1rl1 transcripts, coding for the IL-33 receptor ST2. In vitro stimulation of bone marrow-derived macrophages with IL-33 enhanced their production of IL-1b and TNF-α. In vivo blockade of IL-33, using either neutralizing IL-33 antibody or Il33-/- mice, effectively attenuated LCWE-induced cardiovascular inflammation. Our results indicate that IL-33 contributes to LCWE-induced vascular inflammation through redundant mechanisms across multiple immune cell subsets rather than a single population and highlight IL-33 as a potential therapeutic target.

Abstract Vaccine‐induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a new disorder that emerged in the wake of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccination. It is a rare but life‐threatening condition that requires an aggressive course of treatment to improve patient outcomes. Currently, the diagnosis of VITT relies on a comprehensive panel of criteria, including a history of recent vaccination, platelet count, positive enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) result for a closely related thrombotic disorder, heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and platelet factor 4 (PF4)‐dependent functional assays. The study describes a technically simple antigenic assay designed to detect autoimmune antibodies associated with VITT. It is first shown that cross‐linked platelet factor 4 (c‐PF4) represents an antigenic target specific for VITT/VITT‐like Abs. This antigenic target is then incorporated into a microfluidic electrochemical biosensor and specific and sensitive detection of VITT/VITT‐like antibodies is demonstrated in a fully automated manner while using microliter volumes of patient sera. Fifty‐five serum samples are tested using the microfluidic electrochemical biosensor and demonstrated high accuracy for the detection of VITT sera and VITT‐like monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic ignificance (MGTS) antibodies compared to healthy controls and HIT patients. It is envisioned that the microfluidic electrochemical biosensor will be used in combination with other clinical criteria to enable timely, sensitive, and specific diagnosis of VITT.