Palta, Priya

Abstract Background Prospective investigations on blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and related‐dementias (ADRDs) and cognitive impairment provide important insights into their clinical utility in early disease diagnosis and risk stratification, but have been primarily limited to AD pathologies (e.g. amyloid‐beta and hyperphosphorylated‐tau aggregation). Studies of biomarkers reflecting other pathogenic processes that contribute to ADRDs, especially in community‐based cohorts, are lacking. We examined associations of blood biomarkers reflecting glial and neuronal dysfunction and neuroinflammation, including soluble cluster of differentiation‐14 (sCD14), chitinase‐3‐like protein‐1 (YKL‐40), glial‐fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament‐light chain (NfL), total‐Tau, and Ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH‐L1) with cognitive decline and incident dementia in ARIC study participants. Methods Blood biomarkers were measured in 1,864 ARIC Visit 3 (1993‐1995) participants using the Meso Scale Discovery assay (YKL‐40), the Quanterix Simoa Neurology 4‐Plex assay (total‐Tau, NfL, GFAP, UCH‐L1), and a commercial ELISA assay (sCD14, R&D Systems); global cognition z‐scores were derived from three cognitive tests (measuring memory, language, and executive function) administered up to six times over 25 years, and incident dementia cases were ascertained via in‐person cognitive assessments (expert‐adjudicated), informant‐based interviews, and hospitalization and death records through 2018. We used shared parameter models to simultaneously fit linear mixed‐effect models and proportional hazard models to estimate 25‐year cognitive decline and dementia rates separately for each biomarker (log‐base2‐transformed), adjusting for covariates (Table). Results Among 1,864 participants (mean±SD age:63±4.5 years, 60% female, 49% self‐reported Black), 27% developed dementia. Higher levels of each biomarker were associated with faster cognitive decline. All but UCH‐L1 were associated with elevated dementia risk (Table). For example, one standard deviation (SD) higher log‐base2 YKL‐40 was associated with ‐0.10 SD steeper 25‐year cognitive decline (95%CI:‐0.15,‐0.04) and 59% higher dementia hazard (hazard ratio (HR):1.59 (95%CI:1.20,2.10); likewise, sCD14 was associated with an additional cognitive decline of ‐0.06 (95%CI:‐0.11,‐0.01) and 38% higher dementia hazard (HR:1.38 (95%CI:1.08,1.76)). Conclusions Blood biomarkers reflecting neuropathological processes, including microglial activation, astrocytic reactivity, and neuronal degeneration, were associated with faster cognitive decline and increased dementia risk, suggesting that they may aid in risk stratification and intervention strategies for ADRDs. Future analyses will examine whether these associations differ by race and APOE‐ε4 s tatus.

Abstract Background Even among cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults, specific patterns of neuropsychological performance impart differential risk for progression to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Early identification in the prodromal phase may inform early intervention efforts. We used a data‐driven approach to classify neuropsychological phenotypes within CU older adults from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and tested for differences in ADRD and cerebrovascular outcomes. Method Participants included 4737 CU (via a previously published algorithm plus consensus diagnosis protocol) older adults (mean age=75.1 years, 60.8% female, 23.1% Black) with neuropsychological data from Visit 5 (2011‐2013) of the ARIC study. Latent profile analysis was leveraged to identify unique cognitive phenotypes using 10 demographically adjusted (age, sex/gender, education, race‐center, WRAT Reading) neuropsychological z‐scores. Cognitive phenotypes were then compared on demographics, depressive symptoms, and vascular risk factors (VRFs). In a subset with available neuroimaging and biofluid data ( n range=1102‐1678), white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and bilateral hippocampal (HV) volumes normalized for intracranial volume and plasma biomarkers (i.e., Aβ42/40, ptau181, NfL, and GFAP) were examined by phenotype. Phenotype comparisons adjusted for demographic variables, VRFs, and an indicator of kidney function (i.e., eGFR‐creatinine) for plasma biomarkers. We applied Tukey adjustment for pairwise comparisons. Result A 6‐class solution of cognitive phenotypes emerged as the best fitting model: Average Overall (28%), Low Overall/Very Low Memory (7%), Average Overall/Super Memory (11%), Subtle Low Overall/Low Executive (22%), Subtle Low Executive/High Memory (13%), and Average Overall/Low Memory (19%; Figure 1). Phenotypes differed on education, race, and word reading, despite prior adjustments for these variables when creating the neuropsychological z‐scores (Table 1). Additionally, phenotypes differed on depressive symptoms, VRFs, WMH, HV, Aβ42/40, and ptau181 (all p s < .05). The Subtle Low Overall/Low Executive group had the highest WMH volumes, the Subtle Low Executive/High Memory group had the lowest Aβ42/40, and the Low Overall/Very Low Memory group had the lowest HV and highest levels of plasma ptau181 (Table 2). Conclusion Cognitive heterogeneity is observed even among CU older adults, with lower executive performance associated with cerebrovascular changes and lower memory associated with certain AD‐related changes, possibly indicating risk for cognitive progression through distinct pathways.