Vemuri, Prashanthi

Abstract Background Brain age models are increasingly being used as measures of brain health and neurodegeneration. These models can be deep learning (DL) based and/or classical methods and provide a brain age gap (BAG) which is the difference between chronological and predicted brain age. Our goal was to develop DL‐based scanner invariant brain age models that can be applied in aging and dementia studies even when there are scanner changes that may hinder longitudinal follow‐up. Method We identified 3374 cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants with T1 scans from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). A subset of 863 CU amyloidosis negative (PiB‐PET cutoff < 25 Centiloid) and no history of diabetes and hypertension was selected (CU‐noVAβ). We built two models – Model‐A trained on CU‐noVAβ, and Model‐B trained on all CU. We included 453 MCSA MCI participants as test set for both models. We used 113 participants (74 CU, 28 MCI, 10 dementia) from MCSA and Mayo ADRC with scans from two different vendors (scanned within a week of each other) for testing cross‐vendor/scanner differences (cross‐vendor data). The two unique features of our model included histogram matching and scanner type as an input to the DenseNet model for training (Figure 1). Result In the data, the inclusion of scanner as an input decreased the prediction of mean age differences between the scanners (Model‐A=2.17 years; Model‐B=1.71 years) (Figure 2). The mean absolute error (MAE=absolute value of BAG) for Model‐A in MCI was 5.72 years and Model‐B in MCI was 4.06 years, consistent across scanners (Figure 3). Longitudinal prediction increased with age (Model‐A slope=0.53; Model‐B slope=0.63). Conclusion We found that training on all CU (Model B) rather than a subset CU‐noVAβ (Model A) allowed for the DenseNet model to backpropagate on more variable data which lowered MAE in prediction error between scanners and lowered MAE for MCIs. Histogram matching and scanner as an input to the brain age model accounted for scanner changes and resulted in scanner invariant longitudinal brain age estimation.

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of amyloid‐PET versus plasma %p‐tau217 (defined as the ratio of phosphorylated to non‐phosphorylated Tau217 × 100), Aβ42/40, and the amyloid probability score (APS2; which combines of Aβ42/40 and %p‐tau217) in tau‐PET transitions (T‐ to T+). Method Participants included were from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and had plasma markers measured by mass spectrometry (IP‐MS; C2N), had an amyloid‐PET scan, and had a tau‐PET negative scan (SUVR<1.29, temporal meta‐ROI) at the baseline, along with one or more follow‐up tau‐PET scans. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the relationship between C2N plasma %P‐Tau217 and APS2 and incident tau‐PET positivity (SUVR>=1.29) adjusting for age, sex, and APOE ε4. An analysis was also performed using amyloid‐PET centiloid as the predictor. Both the plasma markers and amyloid‐PET centiloid were scaled so that a one‐unit change corresponds to the respective interquartile range (IQR) for comparability of hazard ratios (HR). The analyses were repeated in the BioFINDER‐2 cohort for validation. Result 255 MCSA participants (122 female [47.8%] were included with a median age of 71.9 (IQR: 65.8, 78.8) years old, of which 37 progressed to tau‐PET positivity. At baseline, 238 (93.7%) were cognitively unimpaired. Higher baseline %p‐tau217 (HR: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.28, 1.8]), amyloid‐PET centiloid (HR: 1.47 [95% CI: 1.20, 1.79]), and APS2 (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.22, 2.16]) were associated with an increased risk of progressing to tau‐PET positive (Figure 1). Aβ42/40 (HR: 1.06 [95% 0.604–1.867] was not associated with incident tau positivity Among 605 participants who were tau negative at index date in BioFINDER‐2 (316 (52.2%) cognitively unimpaired), with a median age of 70.2 (IQR: 60.5‐76.4), 33 progressed to tau positivity with higher %p‐tau217 (HR: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.5, 2.17]), amyloid‐PET centiloid (HR: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.77, 2.97]), and lower Aβ 42/40 (HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.21, 0.85]) at index date all associated with an increased risk of progressing to tau‐PET positive. Conclusion In two independent cohorts , %p‐tau217 provides predictive information about those who will convert from tau negative to tau positive on PET scan with the associations being similar to amyloid‐PET.

Abstract Background Some data suggest that neuroinflammation may be associated with pro‐inflammatory states in the body. Systemic, proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL‐1, IL‐6, etc.) are produced by a variety of comorbidities. Neuroinflammation has been shown to be associated with the accumulation of amyloid in the brain (Becher, Heneka). We hypothesized that systemic cytokine production could be associated with neuroinflammation and thereby be related to brain amyloid accumulation. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neuroinflammation, amyloid accumulation and systemic cytokines. Method 90 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) received a fasting cytokine panel over a 5‐year span where IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFa levels were measured. Participants were divided into four groups: cognitively unimpaired with normal levels of amyloid (CU A‐, n = 25), cognitively unimpaired with elevated amyloid (CU A+, n = 25), and mild cognitively impaired (MCI) with amyloid positive (MCI A+, n = 25), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) with elevated amyloid (AD A+, n = 15). To compare regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) from neuroinflammation PET based on amyloid status (A+ vs A‐) and the four cytokines, Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations were used to assess pairwise group differences. Result Using Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations, no strong relationship was found between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. While comparing CUA‐ vs CUA+ in Figure 1, three regions (supplementary motor area, frontal superior medial lobe, and middle cingulate cortex) showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05). However, Figure 2 showed an overarching trend bias towards significance across most regions in IL10, IL6, and TNFa. Conclusion Although significant relationships between systemic inflammation, brain amyloid and neuroinflammation were limited, the data show an overarching trend bias in broad brain regions, suggesting that further analyses are needed, possibly with larger sample sizes, to assess the relationship of regional neuroinflammation and amyloid to systemic inflammation. Future analyses could also regress out factors like sex, age, and genotype to further proinflammatory cytokine research.

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience is the discrepancy in individuals with intermediate to high Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and normal cognition. Currently, the role of microglial activation in cognitive resilience is understudied. Method In the MCSA brain bank, high‐cognitively unimpaired (high‐CU) participants were defined as those performing in the upper quartile of their respective age groups based upon antemortem global cognition z‐scores, computed from memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial domain z‐scores. From the high‐CU group ( N = 118, global z‐scores from 1.55 to 1.78), cognitively resilient (CR) individuals were identified as those with intermediate to high ADNC upon neuropathologic evaluation. First, regression models were fit to evaluate global cognition as a function of age, sex, amyloid PET, and microglial‐specific genes of interest, including MS4A gene cluster SNPs. Second, a subset of CR participants was analyzed for postmortem ARM expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Single immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections using antibodies against beta‐amyloid (6F3D) and CD163 (10D6). Digital image analysis was performed on scanned sections (40x, Leica Aperio GT 450), and ARM (CD163%area) and beta‐amyloid (%area) measurements were obtained using QuPath. Cognitively impaired (CI) control group was matched on age, sex, ADNC level, and APOE4 status. Spearman correlations were performed between postmortem ARM and antemortem MRI, PET, plasma, and global cognition metrics. Result A third (39/118) of high‐CU cases showed intermediate/high ADNC (CR group). Furthermore, 28% of CR individuals harbored an MS4A6A SNP, which showed a protective effect on cognition via amyloid‐PET ( p = 0.043, Figure 1). Moreover, CR individuals harbored significantly higher ARM:amyloid than the CI group ( p <0.001, Figure 2) and fewer neuritic plaques ( p = 0.03, Figure 3). Antemortem white matter hyperintensities and global cognition were significantly correlated to ARM expression (r=0.556 [p=0.042] and r=0.648 [p=0.02], respectively). Conclusion Microglial specific MS4A6A SNP, which modulates microglial activation, was seen in a third of CR individuals. Postmortem analyses in CR individuals revealed increased ARM:amyloid, which was also associated with higher antemortem cognitive performance. These findings underscore the role of microglial activation in cognitive resilience. Future work is needed to investigate microglial protective mechanisms and links between vascular disease and microglial activation.