Knopman, David S.

Abstract Background Individuals with coexisting Alzheimer's disease (AD) and disorders of CSF dynamics such as normal‐pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) have lower CSF Aβ42 levels, which can confound interpretation of AD CSF‐biomarkers. However, little is known about how CSF dynamics influences plasma AD biomarkers. The objective of this study was to determine whether mass spectrometry‐based blood tests for AD are associated with disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) on MRI. Method 509 Individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, with MRI, 11C‐Pittsburgh compound B (Aβ) PET scans, and plasma phosphorylated‐tau protein 217, Aβ40 and Aβ42 were included. We performed an age‐adjusted logistic regression to determine whether abnormal values of p ‐Tau 217 (Abnormal if >1.55 pg/mL), %p‐tau217 defined as the ratio of phosphorylated Tau217 to non‐phosphorylated tau x 100% (Abnormal if >1.55%), Aβ42 (Abnormal if <41.5 pg/mL), and Aβ42/40 ratio (Abnormal if <0.094) were associated with the presence of DESH, as classified by a previously validated automated algorithm. Result Thirty‐two participants were classified as DESH‐positive. The median [IQR] age was 76.8 yrs [70.6, 82.9] for participants with DESH and 72.4 [59.3, 85.5] without DESH (Table 1). An abnormal plasma Aβ42 was associated with DESH (OR, 2.56 [1.19, 5.74], p = 0.018), but having an abnormal Aβ42/40 ratio (OR 2.01 [0.94, 4.56], p = 0.079) was not. There was no association between being DESH‐positive and an abnormal plasma p ‐tau217 (OR 1.30 [0.51, 3.09], p = 0.560) or with abnormal %plasma p ‐tau217 (OR 1.82 [0.74, 4.20], p = 0.17) (Figure 1). Subgroup analysis showed that only those participants who had an abnormal Aβ42 and positive amyloid PET (≥25 Centiloids) showed an association with DESH compared to biomarker‐ and PET‐negative participants (OR 3.10 [1.15, 8.43], p = 0.024 ) . Conclusion Understanding how CSF dynamics affect plasma biomarkers is critical for implementation. The relationship between lower Aβ42 and DESH is expected based on prior CSF studies, which can be addressed by using an amyloid ratio. p ‐tau217 shows robustness against DESH, making it a suitable biomarker in cases of abnormal cerebrospinal fluid dynamics although validation in a more severe CSF dynamics group is warranted.

Abstract Background Some data suggest that neuroinflammation may be associated with pro‐inflammatory states in the body. Systemic, proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL‐1, IL‐6, etc.) are produced by a variety of comorbidities. Neuroinflammation has been shown to be associated with the accumulation of amyloid in the brain (Becher, Heneka). We hypothesized that systemic cytokine production could be associated with neuroinflammation and thereby be related to brain amyloid accumulation. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neuroinflammation, amyloid accumulation and systemic cytokines. Method 90 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) received a fasting cytokine panel over a 5‐year span where IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFa levels were measured. Participants were divided into four groups: cognitively unimpaired with normal levels of amyloid (CU A‐, n = 25), cognitively unimpaired with elevated amyloid (CU A+, n = 25), and mild cognitively impaired (MCI) with amyloid positive (MCI A+, n = 25), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) with elevated amyloid (AD A+, n = 15). To compare regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) from neuroinflammation PET based on amyloid status (A+ vs A‐) and the four cytokines, Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations were used to assess pairwise group differences. Result Using Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations, no strong relationship was found between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. While comparing CUA‐ vs CUA+ in Figure 1, three regions (supplementary motor area, frontal superior medial lobe, and middle cingulate cortex) showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05). However, Figure 2 showed an overarching trend bias towards significance across most regions in IL10, IL6, and TNFa. Conclusion Although significant relationships between systemic inflammation, brain amyloid and neuroinflammation were limited, the data show an overarching trend bias in broad brain regions, suggesting that further analyses are needed, possibly with larger sample sizes, to assess the relationship of regional neuroinflammation and amyloid to systemic inflammation. Future analyses could also regress out factors like sex, age, and genotype to further proinflammatory cytokine research.

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience is the discrepancy in individuals with intermediate to high Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and normal cognition. Currently, the role of microglial activation in cognitive resilience is understudied. Method In the MCSA brain bank, high‐cognitively unimpaired (high‐CU) participants were defined as those performing in the upper quartile of their respective age groups based upon antemortem global cognition z‐scores, computed from memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial domain z‐scores. From the high‐CU group ( N = 118, global z‐scores from 1.55 to 1.78), cognitively resilient (CR) individuals were identified as those with intermediate to high ADNC upon neuropathologic evaluation. First, regression models were fit to evaluate global cognition as a function of age, sex, amyloid PET, and microglial‐specific genes of interest, including MS4A gene cluster SNPs. Second, a subset of CR participants was analyzed for postmortem ARM expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Single immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections using antibodies against beta‐amyloid (6F3D) and CD163 (10D6). Digital image analysis was performed on scanned sections (40x, Leica Aperio GT 450), and ARM (CD163%area) and beta‐amyloid (%area) measurements were obtained using QuPath. Cognitively impaired (CI) control group was matched on age, sex, ADNC level, and APOE4 status. Spearman correlations were performed between postmortem ARM and antemortem MRI, PET, plasma, and global cognition metrics. Result A third (39/118) of high‐CU cases showed intermediate/high ADNC (CR group). Furthermore, 28% of CR individuals harbored an MS4A6A SNP, which showed a protective effect on cognition via amyloid‐PET ( p = 0.043, Figure 1). Moreover, CR individuals harbored significantly higher ARM:amyloid than the CI group ( p <0.001, Figure 2) and fewer neuritic plaques ( p = 0.03, Figure 3). Antemortem white matter hyperintensities and global cognition were significantly correlated to ARM expression (r=0.556 [p=0.042] and r=0.648 [p=0.02], respectively). Conclusion Microglial specific MS4A6A SNP, which modulates microglial activation, was seen in a third of CR individuals. Postmortem analyses in CR individuals revealed increased ARM:amyloid, which was also associated with higher antemortem cognitive performance. These findings underscore the role of microglial activation in cognitive resilience. Future work is needed to investigate microglial protective mechanisms and links between vascular disease and microglial activation.

Abstract Background Neuropathologic evaluation is essential for diagnosing and treating dementia, but definitive diagnoses is only available after post‐mortem brain autopsy. Positron emission tomography (PET) offers a potential in vivo proxy for predicting neuropathology. This study proposes a semi‐supervised learning (SSL) model using a single FDG‐PET image to predict underlying neuropathology. Method The SSL model leverages a self‐organized graph structure based on a patient similarity network (PSN) created from 1,495 FDG‐PET images across the aging and neurodegenerative spectrum. Each patient is represented by a node, with edges indicating image similarity derived from principal component analysis features and cosine similarity weights. The PSN structure connects 20 nearest neighbors. Neuropathologic labels were available for 204 autopsied patients. The Poisson Learning Method was employed to propagate labels from these annotated nodes to unlabeled nodes, guided by the PSN structure. FDG‐PET images were collected from clinical and research participants at the Mayo Clinic and processed using an MRI‐free pipeline. Neuropathologic labels were assigned based on widely accepted diagnostic criteria. Leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) was used to assess model performance. Results The confusion matrix demonstrated high accuracy in predicting Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions, and Lewy body disease pathology. A Sankey diagram and label distribution analysis revealed strong correlations between clinical and predicted neuropathologic labels. Conclusion This study highlights the potential of a graph‐based SSL pipeline to predict neuropathological changes using FDG‐PET imaging data, despite limited pathology labels. The findings underscore the value of SSL in bridging the gap between abundant neuroimaging data and scarce neuropathologic labels, contributing to improved dementia diagnosis and understanding.