Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co‐primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The initial STOMP and ORIOLE trial reports suggested that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) was associated with improved treatment outcomes. Here, we present long-term outcomes of MDT in omCSPC by pooling STOMP and ORIOLE and assess the ability of a high-risk mutational signature to risk stratify outcomes after MDT. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. High-risk mutations were defined as pathogenic somatic mutations within ATM, BRCA1/ 2, Rb1, or TP53. The median follow-up for the whole group was 52.5 months. Median PFS was prolonged with MDT compared with observation (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.66; P value < .001), with the largest benefit of MDT in patients with a high-risk mutation (HR high-risk, 0.05; HR no high-risk, 0.42; P value for interaction: .12). Within the MDT cohort, the PFS was 13.4 months in those without a high-risk mutation, compared with 7.5 months in those with a high-risk mutation (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.11; P = .09). Long-term outcomes from the only two randomized trials in omCSPC suggest a sustained clinical benefit to MDT over observation. A high-risk mutational signature may help risk stratify treatment outcomes after MDT.
Effectiveness of Standard vs Enhanced Self-measurement of Blood Pressure Paired With a Connected Smartphone Application
ImportanceSelf-measured blood pressure (SMBP) with commercially available connected smartphone applications may help patients effectively use SMBP measurements.ObjectiveTo determine if enhanced SMBP paired with a connected smartphone application was superior to standard SMBP for blood pressure (BP) reduction or patient satisfaction.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted among 23 health systems participating in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, and included patients who reported having uncontrolled BP at their last clinic visit, a desire to lower their BP, and a smartphone. Enrollment and randomization occurred from August 3, 2019, to December 31, 2020, which was followed by 6 months of follow-up for each patient. Analysis commenced shortly thereafter.InterventionsEligible participants were randomly assigned to enhanced SMBP using a device that paired with a connected smartphone application (enhanced) or a standard device (standard). Participants received their device in the mail, along with web-based educational materials and phone-based support as needed. No clinician engagement was undertaken, and the study provided no special mechanisms for delivering measurements to clinicians for use in BP management.Main Outcomes and MeasuresReduction in systolic BP, defined as the difference between clinic BP at baseline and the most recent clinic BP extracted from electronic health records at 6 months.ResultsEnrolled participants (1051 enhanced [50.0%] vs 1050 standard [50.0%]; 1191 women [56.7%]) were mostly middle-aged or older (mean [SD] age, 58 [13] years), nearly a third were Black or Hispanic (645 [31%]), and most were relatively comfortable using technology (mean [SD], 4.1 [1.1] of 5). The mean (SD) change in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months was −10.8 (18) mm Hg vs −10.6 (18) mm Hg (enhanced vs standard: adjusted difference, −0.19 mm Hg; 95% CI, −1.83 to 1.44;P = .81). Secondary outcomes were mostly null, except for documented attainment of BP control to lower than 140/&lt;90 mm Hg, which occurred in 32% enhanced vs 29% standard groups (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34). Most participants were very likely to recommend their SMBP device to a friend (70% vs 69%).Conclusions and RelevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that enhanced SMBP paired with a smartphone application is not superior to standard SMBP for BP reduction or patient satisfaction.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03796689
Simulation Optimization Gantry Call-Back Control Method for Proton Therapy Systems
GLI1 encodes a transcription factor that targets cell cycle regulators affecting stem cell proliferation. GLI1 gene fusions were initially described in pericytomas with a t[7;12] translocation and more recently in gastric plexiform fibromyxomas and gastroblastomas. This study describes the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of three intestinal-based neoplasms harboring GLI1 gene fusions. We studied three unique mesenchymal small bowel tumors. Paraffin embedded tumor tissues from these cases and 62 additional tumor samples that included a plexiform fibromyxoma were sequenced using a targeted RNAseq method to detect fusion events. The study patients included two women and one man who were 52, 80, and 22 years of age at the time of diagnosis. The tumors involved the submucosa and muscularis propria of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. All 3 tumors contained a proliferation of monotonous oval or spindle cells with scattered, somewhat dilated vessels. Two cases showed epithelioid structures such as glands, tubules, or nests. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed cytokeratin expression in the epithelioid components of both tumors displaying these features, and variable numbers of mesenchymal cells. Diffuse CD56 positivity was seen in the mesenchymal component of 2 tumors and desmin and smooth muscle actin staining in the other tumor. Immunostains for S-100 protein, DOG-1, and CD117 were negative in all cases. GLI1 fusions with different partner genes were detected in all tumors, and in the plexiform fibromyxoma, used as a control. Validation by fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed. None of the tumors have recurred or metastasize after surgery. We describe novel GLI1 fusions in 3 mesenchymal neoplasms of the small intestine, including 2 with biphenotypic features. Thus far, all cases have pursued indolent clinical courses. We propose the term “ GLI1 -rearranged enteric tumor” to encompass this group of unique neoplasms of the small intestine that harbor GLI1 gene fusions and expand the spectrum of gastrointestinal neoplasms with these alterations.
Virtual particle Monte Carlo: A new concept to avoid simulating secondary particles in proton therapy dose calculation
AbstractBackgroundIn proton therapy dose calculation, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are superior in accuracy but more time consuming, compared to analytical calculations. Graphic processing units (GPUs) are effective in accelerating MC simulations but may suffer thread divergence and racing condition in GPU threads that degrades the computing performance due to the generation of secondary particles during nuclear reactions.PurposeA novel concept of virtual particle (VP) MC (VPMC) is proposed to avoid simulating secondary particles in GPU‐accelerated proton MC dose calculation and take full advantage of the computing power of GPU.MethodsNeutrons and gamma rays were ignored as escaping from the human body; doses of electrons, heavy ions, and nuclear fragments were locally deposited; the tracks of deuterons were converted into tracks of protons. These particles, together with primary and secondary protons, are considered to be the realistic particles. Histories of primary and secondary protons were replaced by histories of multiple VPs. Each VP corresponded to one proton (either primary or secondary). A continuous‐slowing‐down‐approximation model, an ionization model, and a large angle scattering event model corresponding to nuclear interactions were developed for VPs by generating probability distribution functions (PDFs) based on simulation results of realistic particles using MCsquare. For efficient calculations, these PDFs were stored in the Compute Unified Device Architecture textures. VPMC was benchmarked with TOPAS and MCsquare in phantoms and with MCsquare in 13 representative patient geometries. Comparisons between the VPMC calculated dose and dose measured in water during patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) of the selected 13 patients were also carried out. Gamma analysis was used to compare the doses derived from different methods and calculation efficiencies were also compared.ResultsIntegrated depth dose and lateral dose profiles in both homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms all matched well among VPMC, TOPAS, and MCsquare calculations. The 3D–3D gamma passing rates with a criterion of 2%/2 mm and a threshold of 10% was 98.49% between MCsquare and TOPAS and 98.31% between VPMC and TOPAS in homogeneous phantoms, and 99.18% between MCsquare and TOPAS and 98.49% between VPMC and TOPAS in inhomogeneous phantoms, respectively. In patient geometries, the 3D–3D gamma passing rates with 2%/2 mm/10% between dose distributions from VPMC and MCsquare were 98.56 ± 1.09% in patient geometries. The 2D–3D gamma analysis with 3%/2 mm/10% between the VPMC calculated dose distributions and the 2D measured planar dose distributions during PSQA was 98.91 ± 0.88%. VPMC calculation was highly efficient and took 2.84 ± 2.44 s to finish for the selected 13 patients running on four NVIDIA Ampere GPUs in patient geometries.ConclusionVPMC was found to achieve high accuracy and efficiency in proton therapy dose calculation.
Women’s values and preferences on low-molecular-weight heparin and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review
Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the cornerstone of prophylaxis and treatment of thrombotic events during pregnancy. LMWH has fewer adverse effects than other anticoagulants, does not cross the placenta, and is safe for the fetus. However, the use of LMWH during pregnancy is sensitive to womens’ underlying preferences. The objective of this review is to systematically assess women’s values and preferences research evidence on this topic.Methods: We searched four electronic databases from inception to March 2022, and included studies examining values and preferences of using LMWH among pregnant women at risk of VTE. We followed a convergent integrated mixed-methods design to compare and contrast quantitative (utility and non-utility measures) and qualitative findings. We assessed the certainty of the values and preferences evidence with the GRADE approach for quantitative findings, and with GRADE-CERqual for qualitative evidence. Results were presented in a conjoint display.Results: We screened 3,393 references and identified seven eligible studies. The mixed methods analysis resulted in four themes. Datasets confirmed each other in that: 1) the majority of women consider that benefits of treatment outweigh the inconveniences of daily injections; and 2) main concerns around medication are safety and injections administration. Quantitative outcomes expanded on the qualitative findings in that: 3) participants who perceived a higher risk of VTE were more willing to take LMWH. Finally, we found a discrepancy between the datasets around: 4) the amount of information preferred to make the decision; however, qualitative data expanded to clarify that women prefer making informed decisions and receive support from their clinician in their decision-making process.Conclusions: We are moderately confident that in the context of pregnancy, using LMWH is preferred by women given its net beneficial balance. Integrating data from different sources of evidence, and representing them in a jointly manner helps to identify patient’s values and preferences. Our results may inform clinical practice guidelines and support shared decision-making process in the clinical encounter for the management of VTE in the context of pregnancy.
Methodological Comparison of Mapping the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite to EuroQoL-5D-3L Using Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data: Secondary Analysis of NRG/RTOG 0415
PURPOSE To compare the predictive ability of mapping algorithms derived using cross-sectional and longitudinal data. METHODS This methodological assessment used data from a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of patients with low-risk prostate cancer, conducted by NRG Oncology (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00331773 ), which examined the efficacy of conventional schedule versus hypofractionated radiation therapy (three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy/IMRT). Health-related quality-of-life data were collected using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and health utilities were obtained using EuroQOL-5D-3L (EQ-5D) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postintervention. Mapping algorithms were estimated using ordinary least squares regression models through five-fold cross-validation in baseline cross-sectional data and combined longitudinal data from all assessment periods; random effects specifications were also estimated in longitudinal data. Predictive performance was compared using root mean square error. Longitudinal predictive ability of models obtained using baseline data was examined using mean absolute differences in the reported and predicted utilities. RESULTS A total of 267 (and 199) patients in the estimation sample had complete EQ-5D and EPIC domain (and subdomain) data at baseline and at all subsequent assessments. Ordinary least squares models using combined data showed better predictive ability (lowest root mean square error) in the validation phase for algorithms with EPIC domain/subdomain data alone, whereas models using baseline data outperformed other specifications in the validation phase when patient covariates were also modeled. The mean absolute differences were lower for models using EPIC subdomain data compared with EPIC domain data and generally decreased as the time of assessment increased. CONCLUSION Overall, mapping algorithms obtained using baseline cross-sectional data showed the best predictive performance. Furthermore, these models demonstrated satisfactory longitudinal predictive ability.
Biochemical Failure Is Not a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9601
PURPOSE Metastasis-free survival (MFS), but not event-free survival, is a validated surrogate end point for overall survival (OS) in men treated for localized prostate cancer. It remains unknown if this holds true in biochemically recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Leveraging NRG/RTOG 9601, we aimed to determine the performance of intermediate clinical end points (ICEs) as surrogate end points for OS in recurrent prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS NRG/RTOG 9601 randomly assigned 760 men with recurrence after prostatectomy to salvage radiation therapy with 2 years of placebo versus bicalutamide 150 mg daily. ICEs assessed were biochemical failure (BF) per NRG/RTOG 9601 (prostate-specific antigen nadir + 0.3-0.5 ng/mL or initiation of salvage hormone therapy; [BF1]) and NRG/RTOG 0534 (prostate-specific antigen nadir+2 ng/mL; [BF2]), distant metastasis (DM), and MFS (DM or death). Surrogacy was assessed by the Prentice criteria and a two-stage meta-analytic approach (condition one assessed at the patient level with Kendall's τ and condition two assessed by randomly dividing the entire trial cohort into 10 pseudo trial centers and calculating the average R2 between treatment hazard ratios for ICE and OS). RESULTS BF1, BF2, DM, and MFS satisfied the four Prentice criteria. However, with the two-condition meta-analytic approach, there was strong correlation between MFS and OS (τ = 0.86), moderate correlation between DM and OS (τ = 0.66), and weaker correlation between BF1 (τ = 0.25) or BF2 (τ = 0.40) and OS. Similarly, for condition two, the treatment effect of antiandrogen therapy on MFS and OS were correlated ( R2 = 0.67), but this was not true for BF1 ( R2 = 0.09), BF2 ( R2 = 0.12), or DM ( R2 = 0.18) and OS. CONCLUSION MFS is also a strong surrogate for OS in men receiving salvage radiation therapy for recurrence after prostatectomy. Caution should be used when inferring survival benefit from effects on BF in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Lack of comorbidity data did not allow us to assess whether BF in men with no/minimal comorbidity could serve as a surrogate for OS.
P1282: DISEASE-SPECIFIC U1 SPLICEOSOMAL RNA MUTATIONS IN MATURE B-CELL NEOPLASMS
Abstract 5588: PD-1 blockade synergizes with IMiDs to enhance bispecific T cell engager immune responses to Vk*MYChCRBN multiple myeloma by preventing T cell exhaustion
Abstract Bispecific T cell engagers (TCE) are novel immunotherapies for cancer that redirect a synthetic immune response against tumors. Early clinical trial data show that BCMA-targeting TCEs are highly effective immunotherapies for treating relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Thus, it is important to define combinatorial approaches that increase the efficacy and durability of TCE. We recently investigated a murine anti-BCMA TCE in the immunocompetent IMiD-sensitive Vk*MYChCRBN model of MM. Our data show that anti-BCMA TCE was safe and efficacious in most mice, but failed in those with high-tumor burden, consistent with clinical reports of TCE in leukemia. We tested the combination of anti-BCMA TCE and IMiDs to provide an additive anti-tumor effect and stimulatory cytokines, such as IL-2 in the tumor environment. This combination expanded cytolytic T cells and improved activity even in IMiD-resistant high-tumor burden cases. Yet, survival was only marginally extended due to T cell exhaustion. We hypothesized that blockade of the inhibitory immune checkpoint PD-1 would synergize with TCE and IMiDs to potentiate the response directed by the TCE by reinvigorating exhausted T cells. We evaluated the efficacy of the triple therapy combination in Vk*MYChCRBN: the anti-BCMA TCE, pomalidomide, and anti-PD1. Checkpoint blockade alone, or in combination with TCE did not improve tumor control or survival compared to control treatments. The triple combination proved most effective at controlling tumor growth, inducing a complete response after 2 weeks of treatment, and was curative in 40% of the mice. Longitudinal analysis of the immune response showed that the addition of anti-PD1 to TCE-IMiDs rescued T cell expansion at tumor sites and sustained expression of activation markers after repeated doses. Longitudinal analysis of blood and bone marrow (BM) cytokines showed the typical profile associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) during T cell immunotherapy. Of note, we observed IL-2, IFN-γ, and GM-CSF production was sustained in the BM tumor environment in the triple combination. We suspect that these cytokines, especially IL-2, are key to sustaining non-exhausted effector T cell proliferation in response to TCE therapy. Expectedly, we observed toxicity with the elevated cytokine release in the triple combination. that we anticipate could be controlled with step-up dosing or CRS mitigation treatment. We conclude that combination of PD1 blockade, IMiDs and TCE provides superior efficacy in the immunocompetent preclinical model of MM, Vk*MYChCRBN, while increasing inflammatory pathways that can lead to CRS. Finally, as we found this combination to be curative in some mice, we will investigate whether this combination immunotherapy also enhanced an endogenous anti-tumor immune response leading to protective immunosurveillance. Citation Format: Erin W. Meermeier, Seth J. Welsh, Meaghen Sharik, Megan T. Du, Chang-Xin Shi, Bryant Chau, Feng Wang, Matthew Wheeler, Natalie Bezman, Pavel Strop, P. Leif Bergsagel, Marta Chesi. PD-1 blockade synergizes with IMiDs to enhance bispecific T cell engager immune responses to Vk*MYChCRBN multiple myeloma by preventing T cell exhaustion [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5588.