Du, Megan T.

ABSTRACT Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) and T-cell engager (TCE) therapies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) are transforming the treatment landscape for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). However, despite impressive initial response rates, most patients eventually relapse. To investigate this unmet medical need, we applied whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to MM cells from cohorts of 102 relapsed patients treated with anti-BCMA CART and TCE therapies. Several genomic alterations were associated with clinical outcomes, particularly primary refractoriness, including high genomic complexity and mutations in genes regulating plasma cell identity, which predicted resistance to therapy. Single-cell RNA sequencing further revealed that MM cells from refractory patients exhibited high proliferation signatures and reduced expression of TNFRSF17 (encoding BCMA), while were less enriched for plasma cell–associated transcriptional programs, a phenomenon we term “plasma cell identity escape.” This profile was strongly associated with immune dysregulation of CD8 T cells including increased activation and exhaustion. This evolution of MM toward a more proliferative and lineage-divergent state, refractory to the anti-BCMA T-cell redirecting therapies, was functionally validated in preclinical MM mouse models. Collectively, our results comprehensively define the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying primary resistance to anti-BCMA therapies.

Abstract Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted T cell engagers (TCEs) have emerged as a highly potent immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, both primary and acquired resistance significantly limit the durability of responses. Antigen escape and development of dysfunctional T cell responses are a significant driver of relapse post-therapy. Here, we preclinically interrogate if continual versus intermittent/response-adapted dosing differently affects development of resistance, the translatability to clinical resistance mechanisms, and how tumor-intrinsic or microenvironmental factors shape the development of resistance to BCMA-TCEs. Methods: We utilized a syngeneic transplantable Vk*MYC MM model which permits clonal tracking through unique immunoglobulin rearrangements. Two cohorts of tumor-bearing mice were treated with a murine surrogate BCMA-TCE using distinct strategies: (1) continuous weekly dosing until disease progression, and (2) an “ intermittent/response-adapted” strategy, where treatment was paused after initial response and resumed upon detection of M-spike. At time of relapse on therapy, RNA-seq was performed on isolated tumor cells to investigate mutations in- or loss of Tnfrsf17/BCMA. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was also performed on 189,025 cells isolated from bone marrow and extramedullary sites. Results: Both continuous and intermittent treatment regimens resulted in similar overall survival. BCMA-TCE treatment induced a distinctive pattern of disease progression, with para- and extra-medullary dissemination observed in 31% (17/54) of treated mice—regardless of treatment schedule. Given this treatment-induced dissemination hasn't been historically observed in our model, we further profiled BCMA expression and infiltrating immune cells to understand relapse mechanisms at these sites. Furthermore, we noted lower BCMA expression in tumors from continuously treated mice compared to untreated or stop-and-go cohorts. Importantly, reduced BCMA expression occurred without loss of plasma cell identity indicating that lineage switching may not be occurring as observed in other hematological malignancies treated similarly (Ruella, 2023, Nat Rev Drug Discov); malignant cells retained high expression of canonical plasma cell markers Irf4, Prdm1, Xbp1, Sdc1. We identified three mechanisms of acquired resistance:Genomic BCMA loss: Complete and irreversible loss of BCMA due to retrotransposition of IAP particles into the first intron of Tnfrsf17, disrupting transcription of downstream exons. This represented a genomic mechanism of antigen escape occurring with continual and prolonged TCE dosing, disrupting transcription and eliminating surface BCMA.Transient BCMA downregulation: Transient downregulation of BCMA expression associated with rapid disease relapse under continuous treatment. Tumors exhibited low BCMA levels and widespread dissemination in paramedullary sites. However, re-transplantation into naïve hosts led to restoration of BCMA expression and re-sensitization to TCE, indicating antigen loss was not permanent.Resistance without antigen loss: In the intermittent dosing regimen, several cases achieved complete remission after two doses, relapsed after treatment pause, and were not controlled after subsequent retreatment. Despite preserved BCMA expression and absence of BCMA mutations or deletions, tumors were refractory to retreatment, suggesting a tumor extrinsic mechanism of resistance. scRNA-seq analysis of the tumor microenvironment is ongoing and the role of uniquely identified immune infiltrates, like NK-like lymphocytes and distinct macrophages, in shaping the cell responses is under consideration. Conclusion: Resistance to BCMA-TCE therapy in the Vk*MYC model of MM arises through multiple mechanisms including genomic antigen loss and transient antigen downregulation. Continuous therapy drives selective pressure leading to target loss via genomic or epigenetic routes, while intermittent dosing preserves antigen but permits resistance to TCE, potentially through immune escape mediated by microenvironmental changes. These insights underscore the translatability of the Vk*MYC model for evaluating rational combination therapies to mitigate these resistance mechanisms. All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by an IACUC or through an ethical review process.

Abstract Bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and CD3, induce deep hematologic responses in ∼60% of heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We and others found that high tumor burden leads to resistance to TCE and novel strategies are urgently needed to improve responses in this setting. Ikaros degraders, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and cereblon E3 ligase modulatory drugs (CELMoDs), represent logical partners for TCEs due to their direct anti-MM effects and additional immune-stimulatory activity; however, it is unclear how to optimally combine them with TCEs. Taking advantage of the immunocompetent IMiD-sensitive Vk∗MYChCRBN murine model of MM, we optimized strategies to overcome primary resistance to BCMA-TCEs and achieve sustained remission, while maintaining a manageable safety profile. The addition of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and pomalidomide reduced the T-cell exhaustion that occurs in response to TCEs in high tumor burden settings. This allowed for a higher degree of T-cell activation and significant improvement in response rates but also increased risk of lethal cytokine release syndrome (CRS). To moderate the response and prevent CRS, we evaluated Ikaros degraders and dexamethasone (DEX) with step-up–dosed TCEs. Pretreatment with iberdomide and DEX reshaped the bone marrow T-cell compartment, promoted infiltration of naïve T cells, and generated 100% response rates and the longest survival in subjects with high tumor burden. This was accompanied by more favorable T-cell profiling, with limited expansion of regulatory T cells and exhaustion. Overall, administering a TCE after DEX and iberdomide treatments provided deeper and more durable responses with a reduced risk of CRS.

Abstract Purpose: R,R-1,2 cyclohexanediamine-pyrophosphato-platinum(II) (PT-112) is a novel immunogenic cell death–inducing small molecule under phase II development in several cancer types. It inhibits ribosome biogenesis and causes organelle stresses, leading to selective immunogenic cell death in cancer cells. The possibility of PT-112’s pyrophosphate moiety driving high drug concentrations to bone sites of disease has led to an interest in PT-112’s use in multiple myeloma. In this study, we present findings from phase I and in vivo studies for PT-112 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Experimental Design: PT-112 biodistribution was analyzed in mice via laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The activity of PT-112 was assessed in de novo and transplantable Tg(Igkv3-5*-MYC)#Plbe (Vk*MYC) multiple myeloma mouse models as monotherapy or combination therapies. M-spike levels and survival were measured. A phase I dose escalation study of PT-112 monotherapy was conducted using a 3 + 3 design in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with exhausted available therapies. Results: In vivo biodistribution imaging revealed high concentrations in the bone, kidney, lung, skin, and liver. PT-112 was active in Vk*MYC multiple myeloma mouse models, both alone and in combination. Phase I data showed that PT-112 monotherapy was safe and well-tolerated, establishing a recommended phase II dose of 360 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Confirmed responses and other signals of activity were observed. Conclusions: These results suggest a lack of cross-resistance with the standard of care and support the translational value of the Vk*MYC model system. Further clinical investigation of PT-112 is warranted in multiple myeloma.

Overview: Despite advances in therapies targeting the tumor-intrinsic aspects of the disease, multiple myeloma (MM) remains functionally incurable. Given that new alternatives such as T cell redirected therapy and monoclonal antibodies engage ADCC and CDC by leveraging other elements of the immune system, we believe that deeper studies of the tumor microenvironment are warranted. In particular, we believe that certain macrophages are associated with tumor progression, serve as markers of future relapses, are immunosuppressive, and reduce the effectiveness of otherwise successful therapies. Methods: We performed 5' scRNAseq analysis of 189,025 cells collected from spleen or bone marrow of 4 wild type, 14 de novo, and 40 tumor bearing Vk*MYC mice treated with vehicle or effective anti-MM therapies. Discoveries were cross-referenced against a set of 45,626 human bone marrow cells collected from 35 samples at different stages of disease and treatment. We experimentally recreated in vitro the cross-talk between MM cells and macrophages by co-culturing bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) with MM cells or their conditioned medium, and correlated changes in gene expression as well as the ability of polarized BMDM to inhibit CAR T mediated killing of MM cells in vitro. Results: Gene expression analysis of murine in vivo C1q macrophages and in vitro polarized BMDM revealed a common signature identified in lipid-associated macrophages and Kupffer cell-like macrophages1 (high expression of Fabp5, ApoE, Cd63, C1qa/b/c, Cd163, Cd5l, Vcam1, Fcgr4, Folr2, Maf) which is associated with immunosuppression and disease progression. Ligand-receptor analysis via LIANA identified C1qb ligand in macrophages with C1qbp in tumor among the top interactions in both human and murine single cell analyses. C1qbp is a crucial element of cell adhesion and metastasis,2 and this link between tumor and macrophage can severely limit effective therapy: BMDM following stimulation/polarization with MM lines, but not naïve/unstimulated BMDM, strongly inhibit anti-BCMA CAR T in vitro cytotoxic activity. In total, a complement-related connection between tumor and macrophage is capable of directing an immunosuppressive, chemokine response that imparts resistance to therapy. While effective therapies reduce tumor and C1q expressing macrophage populations,3 retention of C1q expressing cells may be associated with future relapses. Presence of a specific subset of C1Q expressing cells, even in very low numbers, in human samples following ASCT was associated with early relapse (6 of 8 good responding samples had zero C1Q+ cells while 12 of 16 poor responding samples had 1 or more C1Q+ cells-Fisher test p-value < 0.05). In addition to high expression of C1QA/B/C, these cells are also highly upregulated in TYROBP (known to relate to macrophage polarization4 and found in a spatial transcriptomic analysis of cells at the periphery of MM and its environment5) as well as FCER1G (known to relate to macrophage infiltration6). Conclusion: As advanced therapies manipulate elements of the immune microenvironment to impart effective treatment, the connection between tumor and macrophage should not be overlooked since macrophages likely help create an immunosuppressive niche that assists in disease growth and eventual revival. 1. Ma, R.-Y., Black, A. & Qian, B.-Z. Macrophage diversity in cancer revisited in the era of single-cell omics. Trends Immunol. 43, 546-563 (2022). 2. Wang, Y. et al. C1QBP suppresses cell adhesion and metastasis of renal carcinoma cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 999 (2017). 3. Stein, C. K., Meermeier, E., Welsh, S. J., Chesi, M. & Bergsagel, P. L. Key Subsets of Immune Cells in Bone Marrow Myeloid Compartment Indicate Degree of Tumor Infiltration and Avenues for Successful Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. Blood 140, 7082-7083 (2022). 4. Liang, T. et al. TYROBP, TLR4 and ITGAM regulated macrophages polarization and immune checkpoints expression in osteosarcoma. Sci. Rep. 11, 19315 (2021). 5. Sudupe, L. et al. Spatial Transcriptomics Unveils Novel Potential Mechanisms of Disease in a MI cγ1 Multiple Myeloma in vivo Model. Blood 142, 4076 (2023). 6. Dong, K. et al. FCER1G positively relates to macrophage infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and contributes to unfavorable prognosis by regulating tumor immunity. BMC Cancer 22, 140 (2022).

Introduction/Background: Bispecific T cell engagers (TCE) targeting BCMA and CD3 induce deep hematologic responses in approximately 60% of heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. There is an unmet need to overcome primary resistance, as this off-the-shelf therapy is readily available to patients with aggressive disease relapse and has the potential to be delivered in the community. We and others found that high tumor burden leads to primary resistance to TCE 1,2,3,4 and that combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) transiently improves responses yet exacerbates T cell exhaustion2. Here, we present preclinical strategies to overcome primary resistance which are tolerable and provide more durable responses specifically for the high tumor burden setting. Methods: We evaluated response and survival to a murine surrogate BCMA/CD3 TCE in the Vk*MYC immunocompetent mouse model of MM expressing human CRBN to investigate tumor burden as a mechanism underpinning primary resistance. We evaluated dosing methods and combination strategies with IMiDs or novel CELMoDs, checkpoint inhibitors, and dexamethasone to improve response rates while maintaining a manageable safety profile. Results: We investigated primary resistance in an expanded panel of Vk*MYC models reflecting differing genomic heterogeneity and confirmed that a threshold of tumor burden limits T cell activation and correlates with resistance to TCE. BCMA is cleaved from the tumor cell surface by gamma-secretase and thus, high density of shed BCMA may act as a sponge to BCMA TCE. However, we found that administration of gamma-secretase inhibitors, while stabilizing BCMA expression on MM cells, is not sufficient to overcome high tumor burden-driven resistance to TCE. We previously reported the combinatorial activity of BCMA TCE with IMiDs and revealed a role for tumor-extrinsic effects of IMiDs in allowing mice with a high tumor burden to transiently respond to BCMA-TCE before T cell exhaustion prevailed2. To build on that combination strategy, we first hypothesized that the addition of a PD1 checkpoint inhibitor could reduce T cell exhaustion that occurs in response the BCMA-TCE in the resistant setting. We found that this triple combination provides more persistent activation and expansion of cytolytic T cells and sustains remission but leads to toxic cytokine release syndrome and early mortality in half of the cohort. Next, to address the acute toxicity from the hyperactivated T cell response and reduce tumor burden, we combined the triple combination with dexamethasone (Dex). To our surprise, concurrent Dex, even in the absence of IMiDs/CELMoDs, boosts responses to TCE. We observe that Dex moderates T cell proliferation in response to the TCE and leads to a moderate sustained cytokine production (IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-2R) systemically and in the bone marrow compared with a high transient burst seen with TCE alone or the concurrent treatment with IMiD + PD1 blockade. We determined that incremental step-up TCE dosing allows the combination of IMiDs or CELMoDs (iberdomide or mezigdomide) with Dex to be completely tolerated. To investigate whether delivering IMiD or CELMoDs before or during TCE administration altered efficacy, we tested pre-treatment with IMiDs/CELMoDs + Dex compared with concurrent dosing and found pre-treatment led to superior durable responses. Pre-treatment with iberdomide + Dex followed by step-up dosed TCE generated 100% response rate and the highest overall survival in subjects bearing a high tumor burden. This was accompanied by a more favorable T cell profiling over time, with limited expansion of regulatory T cells and reduced accumulation of exhausted T cells. Conclusion: Modelling the dosing and combination strategies of a BCMA-TCE in our immunocompetent system has allowed us to understand the dynamic changes in T cell fitness that are required for effective, tolerable, and durable TCE therapy for MM. We illustrate how improvements to TCE therapy mitigate T cell exhaustion and overcome primary resistance, and importantly, suggest a strong immunotherapeutic strategy for MM patients with challenging-to-treat actively progressing disease. 1. Lee et al., Nat Med 29, 2295-2306 (2023) 2. Meermeier et al. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021 Jul;2(4):354-369. 3. Rees et al. Blood Cancer J. 2024 Jul 23;14(1):122. 4. Girgis et al. Blood Adv. 2023 Feb 28;7(4):644-648

Primary resistance to BCMA-directed bispecific antibodies (BCMA-BsAb) is a major clinical hurdle despite their outstanding efficacy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Primary resistance has been linked clinically to patient characteristics including tumor burden. Our previous work in the immunocompetent Vk*MYC model of MM credentialed that tumor burden also correlates with resistance to a murine BCMA-BsAb, which we addressed through drug combinations with MM backbone agents. Pairing the BsAb with cyclophosphamide (Cy) was well-tolerated, reversed primary resistance, reshaped an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and led to durable responses with immunosurveillance in all but the most aggressive settings. Here, we aimed to improve the BCMA-BsAb and Cy combination strategy with a goal of curing models representing clinically relevant Cy-refractory aggressive settings, by adding T cell checkpoint blockade. Despite a lack of single agent activity of checkpoint inhibitors in MM (and in our models), PD1 and TIGIT are relevant targets as their expression on T cells correlates with both primary and acquired resistance to BCMA-directed cell therapies. Our team hypothesized that blockade of either PD1 or TIGIT with concurrent BCMA-BsAb and Cy would deepen anti-MM responses and provide a more durable immunotherapy regimen by sustaining activation of the T cell repertoire. Methods: We preclinically tested the ability of two weeks of concurrent dosing of BCMA-BsAb with Cy, checkpoint inhibitors targeting either PD1 or TIGIT, or the triple combination to overcome primary resistance and improve survival in a Cy-resistant transplantable Vk*MYC model of MM. We followed the response longitudinally in the blood, and in the bone marrow and spleen after complete responses were achieved at five weeks. Results: The double combination of a checkpoint inhibitor to the BCMA-BsAb was well-tolerated and abolished primary resistance, yet, failed to provide curative responses. Whereas the triple combination with either PD1 or TIGIT blockade remained safe, provided robust initial responses that overcame primary resistance and resulted in durable complete and curative responses in the entire cohort. These survival benefits represent significant improvements over control combinations tested here but also over all historical preclinical anti-MM therapy tested in our models to date. Both PD1 and TIGIT blockade with Cy/BCMA-BsAb triple combinations delivered a similar multiphasic potent anti-tumor response. This response was first characterized by highly effective T cell-mediated lysis of the tumor, as evidenced by deep reduction of M-spike after two weeks of treatment. As we previously published, the addition of Cy to BCMA-BsAb rapidly reshapes the TME by depleting Tregs and exhausted T cells and brings naive T cells to the tumor. However, we observed elevated T cell checkpoint expression at times of BsAb-relapse in aggressive models, suggesting that blockade of these pathways may help sustain T cell activation. Indeed, the ensuing T cell response in the triple combination gradually builds and encourages a pool of less terminally differentiated T cells to proliferate to allow for a more sustained response with repeat dosing. For the first time, we observe that the triple combination significantly engages the CD4 T cell compartment, which can be essential for a complete anti-tumor response. At the time of complete response, single cell analysis displays that T cells retained in the BM were less exhausted and defined by elevated CCR2 expression, a known marker of activated memory T cells, suggestive of ongoing immunosurveillance. Conclusions: Here we demonstrated through controlled in vivo experimentation how the addition of Cy reverts primary resistance to BCMA-BsAb by reshaping the TME in our Cy-insensitive preclinical model. Adding checkpoint inhibitors targeting TIGIT or PD1 further improves the durability of BsAb and Cy combination to cure all mice in these cohorts, by critically lysing the tumor, resetting the suppressive TME, and instigating a gradual, multiphasic, and sustained anti-MM T cell response. The concurrently delivered triple combination is well tolerated and provides optimal temporal control of MM especially in a preclinical model reflecting primary resistance mediated by high tumor burden and may have translational benefit to MM patients.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy that is often driven by MYC and that is sustained by IRF4, which are upregulated by super-enhancers. IKZF1 and IKZF3 bind to super-enhancers and can be degraded using immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD). Successful IMiD responses downregulate MYC and IRF4; however, this fails in IMiD-resistant cells. MYC and IRF4 downregulation can also be achieved in IMiD-resistant tumors using inhibitors of BET and EP300 transcriptional coactivator proteins; however, in vivo these drugs have a narrow therapeutic window. By combining IMiDs with EP300 inhibition, we demonstrate greater downregulation of MYC and IRF4, synergistic killing of myeloma in vitro and in vivo, and an increased therapeutic window. Interestingly, this potent combination failed where MYC and IRF4 expression was maintained by high levels of the AP-1 factor BATF. Our results identify an effective drug combination and a previously unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance. Significance: These results highlight the dependence of MM on IKZF1-bound super-enhancers, which can be effectively targeted by a potent therapeutic combination pairing IMiD-mediated degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 with EP300 inhibition. They also identify AP-1 factors as an unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance in MM. See related article by Neri, Barwick, et al., p. 56. See related commentary by Yun and Cleveland, p. 5. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 4