Todd, Kennedi T.

AbstractBackgroundThe meningeal layers form a unique interface between the central nervous and peripheral immune systems. The lymphatic vasculature that is present in the meningeal dura and drains cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) becomes dysregulated during aging and in models of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Apolipoprotein E (APOE), and the isoform APOE4 in particular, increases the risk for late‐onset sporadic AD. However, it is still poorly understood whether changes in meningeal lymphatic morphology and drainage are mediating the deleterious effects of APOE4 expression. In the present study, we investigate the effects of human APOE3 or APOE4 on meningeal lymphatic function and immunity.MethodWe evaluated the morphology of lymphatic vessels in dural whole mounts of age‐matched wild type, Apoe‐KO, APOE3, and APOE4 mice at 2‐3, and 11‐12 months. This assessment was performed in both male and female mice. The drainage function of meningeal lymphatics is being assessed in the same mice by in vivo imaging of CSF‐derived fluorescent tracers into the deep cervical lymph nodes. We have also performed RNAscope and protein measurements using murine meningeal tissue to investigate the main cellular source(s) of Apoe, and single‐cell RNA sequencing to explore the cell‐specific transcriptomic signatures linked to the changes in meningeal lymphatic function.ResultLymphatic vessel length is increased in 11‐12‐month‐old APOE4 male mice, when compared to their APOE3 counterparts. Interestingly, the same was not detected in female mice. Dural myeloid cells, expressing Itgam (encoding for CD11b), are the main source of Apoe mRNA transcripts, and one of the main sources of apoE protein in the brain dura mater. APOE4 expression and age markedly alter the transcriptional profile of meningeal myeloid cells, which show overexpression of lysosomal, antigen presentation, and complement genes.ConclusionAPOE4 expression leads to a sex‐dependent meningeal lymphatic vascular remodeling, which is associated with an exacerbated activation of meningeal macrophages. In future studies, we will test whether the changes in meningeal lymphatics observed in mice expressing APOE4 are mediated by myeloid cell derived APOE.

Aducanumab, an anti-amyloid immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease, efficiently reduces Aβ, though its plaque clearance mechanisms, long-term effects, and effects of discontinuation are not fully understood. We assessed the effect of aducanumab treatment and withdrawal on Aβ, neuritic dystrophy, astrocytes, and microglia in the APP/PS1 amyloid mouse model. We found that reductions in amyloid and neuritic dystrophy during acute treatment were accompanied by microglial and astrocytic activation, and microglial recruitment to plaques and adoption of an aducanumab-specific pro-phagocytic and pro-degradation transcriptomic signature, indicating a role for microglia in aducanumab-mediated Aβ clearance. Reductions in Aβ and dystrophy were sustained 15 but not 30 wk after discontinuation, and reaccumulation of plaques coincided with loss of the microglial aducanumab signature and failure of microglia to reactivate. This suggests that despite the initial benefit from treatment, microglia are unable to respond later to restrain plaque reaccumulation, making further studies on the effect of amyloid-directed immunotherapy withdrawal crucial for assessing long-term safety and efficacy.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy that is often driven by MYC and that is sustained by IRF4, which are upregulated by super-enhancers. IKZF1 and IKZF3 bind to super-enhancers and can be degraded using immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD). Successful IMiD responses downregulate MYC and IRF4; however, this fails in IMiD-resistant cells. MYC and IRF4 downregulation can also be achieved in IMiD-resistant tumors using inhibitors of BET and EP300 transcriptional coactivator proteins; however, in vivo these drugs have a narrow therapeutic window. By combining IMiDs with EP300 inhibition, we demonstrate greater downregulation of MYC and IRF4, synergistic killing of myeloma in vitro and in vivo, and an increased therapeutic window. Interestingly, this potent combination failed where MYC and IRF4 expression was maintained by high levels of the AP-1 factor BATF. Our results identify an effective drug combination and a previously unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance. Significance: These results highlight the dependence of MM on IKZF1-bound super-enhancers, which can be effectively targeted by a potent therapeutic combination pairing IMiD-mediated degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 with EP300 inhibition. They also identify AP-1 factors as an unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance in MM. See related article by Neri, Barwick, et al., p. 56. See related commentary by Yun and Cleveland, p. 5. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 4

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable form of plasma cell cancer in which primary and secondary chromosomal translocations routinely juxtapose oncogenes to plasma cell-specific super-enhancers. Coincidentally, drugs which target super-enhancers have had success clinically. For example, immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) degrade super-enhancer-binding pioneer factors IKAROS and AIOLOS, while glucocorticoids (Dexamethasone) and proteasome inhibitors (Bortezomib) have the ability to transrepress or block the processing of super-enhancer-forming NF-κB proteins, respectively. Currently, alternative enhancer-targeting drugs are also in clinical development, like p300 inhibitors which target the acetyl-binding bromodomains and/or histone acetyl transferase activity of the chromatin-regulating coactivator homologs CBP and EP300. Despite showing therapeutic promise, our understanding of how these drugs function, alone or together, remains incomplete. Case in point, we find that IMiD-induced degradation of its target proteins IKAROS and AIOLOS does not guarantee a therapeutic response in vitro, and patients successfully treated with IMiDs eventually relapse; meanwhile, coactivator-targeting therapies like p300 inhibitors are often too toxic in vivo, and lack a therapeutic window. To improve the outcomes of MM patients we need to understand the heterogeneous genetics and transcription-factor milieus of the myeloma enhancer landscape, as well as how to increase the precision of enhancer-disrupting drugs. To accomplish this, our lab utilizes more than 60 human myeloma cell lines that have been extensively characterized at the genetic, proteomic, and drug-therapeutic-response levels. Additionally, we have generated a highly-predictive immunocompetent mouse model (Vk*MYC hCRBN+) that develops human-like MM and is sensitive to both IMiDs and a new class of therapeutics termed "degronimids" (normal mice do not respond to IMiDs or degronimids). Our central hypothesis is that combining a broad coactivator-targeting drug (e.g., the p300 inhibitor GNE-781), with a MM-specific transcription factor-targeting drug (e.g., IMiDs) restricts toxicities to myeloma cells and thus improves the therapeutic window. Currently, we are testing a variety of coactivator-targeting compounds alongside traditional IMiD therapies and other preclinical transcription factor-targeting drugs both in vivo and in vitro. We show that Vk*MYC hCRBN+ mice are exquisitely sensitive to GNE-781, requiring one fourth of the dose needed to treat other cancers and therefore avoiding the neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen at higher doses. Second, we show that although IMiDs and GNE-781 induce an effective but transient response in vivo as single agents, the combination of the two drugs proved curative, with a progressive deepening of the anti-tumor response occurring even after therapy is discontinued. Ongoing experiments aim to determine how this drug combination, and other coactivator + transcription factor-targeting combinations, permanently disrupt myeloma-specific super-enhancers. Disclosures Neri: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bahlis: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy. Boise: AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chesi: Abcuro: Patents & Royalties: Genetically engineered mouse model of myeloma; Pi Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Genetically engineered mouse model of myeloma; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: human CRBN transgenic mouse; Palleon Pharmaceuticals: Patents & Royalties: Genetically engineered mouse model of myeloma.

Abstract BCMA is an ideal target antigen for myeloma immunotherapy as it is specifically expressed by plasma cells and T cell-engaging, BCMA-bispecific antibodies show potent tumor killing activity in human multiple myeloma (MM). However, a lack of longevity, potential immunotoxicity, and efficacy in high tumor burden situations are limitations to effective clinical utility. In order to optimize this therapeutic approach, we performed in vitro and in vivo assessments of a BCMA bispecific tool using the Vk*MYC immunocompetent mouse model of MM. Analysis at gene and protein level revealed variable levels of BCMA in Vk*MYC tumors, mirroring the heterogeneity of BCMA observed in human MM. In addition, we found that treatment with a gamma secretase inhibitor enhanced BCMA expression in Vk*MYC MM cells, similar to observations from patients. Having found the Vk*MYC model as a suitable model for BCMA targeted therapy, we treated Vk*MYC de novo and transplant mice with the BCMA targeting tool and established that the treatment was safe and efficacious (significant reduction in M-spike levels compared to control antibody). However, the response was transient and modest activity was noted in high tumor burden setting, likely because of poor T cell infiltration. Therefore, we hypothesized that combining BCMA therapy with agents capable of debulking the tumors would prolong and deepen therapeutic benefits and thus selected IMiDs for their anti-tumor and immunomodulatory properties. Because mice are resistant to therapy with IMiDs, we generated a humanized transgenic mouse strain with robust human CRBN expression and crossed it with the Vk*MYC mouse to obtain a novel immunocompetent, IMiD-responsive model, Vk*MYChCRBN. When combined with the IMiD pomalidomide (POM), bispecific-directed T cell control of MM was enhanced relative to bispecific alone. M-spike levels in two different transplantable models were reduced regardless of tumor burden. In addition, POM increased T cell effector activation, proliferation, and cytokine production. We also monitored transient weight loss unique to the bispecific-POM combination. Following this promising combinatorial result in vivo, we studied the relative roles of POM on target vs. effector cells by an in vitro killing assay using Vk*MYC tumor and splenocytes with or without expression of CRBN. Separately from the direct tumoricidal effects of POM on the tumor, we observed T cell-intrinsic effects of POM on the enhancement of BCMA-bispecific directed tumor lysis that correlated with T cell activation and proliferation. In summary, POM potentiated BCMA-CD3 bispecific directed T cell cytolysis of MM in the Vk*MYChCRBN animal model by enhancing effector cell activation, proliferation, cytokine production and directly reducing tumor burden. These results support ongoing preclinical studies of the benefits of combining standard of care therapy with potent T cell immunotherapy for MM. Citation Format: Erin W. Meermeier, Meaghen E. Sharik, Seth J. Welsh, Caleb K. Stein, Victoria M. Garbitt, Sochilt Brown, Kennedi T. Todd, Marco Bergsagel, P. Leif Bergsagel, Marta Chesi. Anti-BCMA bispecific tool therapy against Vk*MYC multiple myeloma is enhanced by IMiDs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5630.