Citations

9573 Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare, highly aggressive form of melanoma with extremely high recurrence rates, despite definitive surgical resection. Median RFS has been reported to be 5.4m, with RFS rates at 1 and 2 years of 10%, and 0%, respectively (Lian B, Si L, Cui C, et al. Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing High-Dose IFN-α2b with Temozolomide Plus Cisplatin as Systemic Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma. Clinical Cancer Research 2013, 19(16):4488-4498). Currently there is no consensus on recommendations for adjuvant therapy. Data on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) adjuvantly is lacking. Methods: We performed a single arm, multicenter clinical trial using “flip dose” ipilimumab (1mg/kg q3w x4 cycles),and nivolumab (3 mg.kg q3w x4 cycles), then Nivolumab 480 mg q4w x 11 cycles to complete a year of adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the study had 85% power to detect an improvement in RFS between 5.5 and 9.5 months using a one-sided log rank test. Participants must have had R0/R1 resection <90 days prior to registration, and no prior systemic therapy (adjuvant radiation allowed), ECOG 0/1, no uncontrolled significant autoimmune disease or other invasive cancer. Patients were recruited through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Oncology Network. Results: From 9/17 to 8/21, 44 patients were approached at 6 centers. Of these 9 were ineligible, and 35 were enrolled. Of these, 29 (83%) had R0 resections, and 7 (20%) had adjuvant radiation prior to enrollment. As of Dec 2021, 31 patients have completed the treatment phase. Of the 35 patients treated on study, 20 patients have recurred (7 local, 5 distant, 3 regional, 5 sites unconfirmed), 6 stopped therapy due to adverse effects, and 8 have died. The mean age of patients was 65.8 years and 21 (60.0%) were female. The primary site of disease was vulvovaginal N=12 (32.4%) patients, sinonasal N= 11 (29.7%), anorectal N= 9 (24.3%) and other site N= 5 (13.5%). Adjuvant radiation had been given in 7 pts. Driver mutations were rare, with only 3 (8.6%) patients having a KIT mutation, and one patient (2.9%) each having a NRAS or BRAF mutation. RFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% (95% CI 31-66%) and 37% (95% CI 19-55%), with OS rates at 1 and 2 years of 87% (95% CI 68-95%) and 68% (95% CI 46-83%). Median RFS was 10.3 m (95% CI5.7-25.8). Most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (14%), hypertension (14%), hyponatremia (11%), with no grade 4/5 toxicities. Conclusions: Flip dose ipilimumab and nivolumab after resection is associated with outcomes improved over previously reported outcomes in the absence of therapy. Long term follow up is ongoing as are subgroup analyses and correlative studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03241186.

Abstract Background Randomized clinical trials demonstrated transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) efficacy in improving outcome vs. medical management for functional mitral regurgitation, but limited randomized data are available for the treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). We aimed to compare the outcome of older patients treated with TEER vs. unoperated DMR. Methods and results Registries including consecutive patients ≥65 years with symptomatic severe DMR treated with TEER (MitraSwiss and Minneapolis Heart Institute registries) or unoperated (MIDA registry) were analysed. Survival was compared overall and after matching for age, sex, EuroSCORE II, and ejection fraction. The study included 1187 patients (872 treated with TEER and 315 unoperated). During 24 ± 17 months of follow-up, 430 patients died, 18 ± 1% at 1 year and 50 ± 2% at 4 years. Patients undergoing TEER had similar age (82 ± 6 vs. 82 ± 7 years) and sex to unoperated patients, but higher surgical risk/comorbidity (EuroSCORE II 3.98 ± 4.28% vs. 2.77 ± 2.46%), more symptoms, and atrial fibrillation (P &lt; 0.0001). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair was associated with lower mortality accounting for age, sex, EuroSCORE II, New York Heart Association class, atrial fibrillation, and ejection fraction [hazard ratio (HR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37–0.58; P &lt; 0.0001]. After propensity matching (247 pairs of patients), TEER consistently showed better survival compared with unoperated patients (49 ± 6% vs. 37 ± 3% at 4 years, P &lt; 0.0001) even in comprehensive multivariable analysis (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40–0.91; P = 0.03). Procedural failure was infrequent but post-procedural mitral regurgitation, remaining moderate-to-severe in 66 (7.6%) patients, was associated with excess mortality vs. trivial residual regurgitation (30 ± 6% vs. 11 ± 1% at 1 year, P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion Amongst older patients with severe symptomatic DMR at high surgical risk, mitral TEER was associated with higher survival vs. unoperated patients. Successful control of mitral regurgitation was key to survival improvement with mitral TEER, which should be actively considered in patients deemed inoperable.

Background Most patients with advanced melanomas relapse after checkpoint blockade therapy. Thus, immunotherapies are needed that can be applied safely early, in the adjuvant setting. Seviprotimut-L is a vaccine containing human melanoma antigens, plus alum. To assess the efficacy of seviprotimut-L, the Melanoma Antigen Vaccine Immunotherapy Study (MAVIS) was initiated as a three-part multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Results from part B1 are reported here. Methods Patients with AJCC V.7 stage IIB-III cutaneous melanoma after resection were randomized 2:1, with stage stratification (IIB/C, IIIA, IIIB/C), to seviprotimut-L 40 mcg or placebo. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. For an hypothesized HR of 0.625, one-sided alpha of 0.10, and power 80%, target enrollment was 325 patients. Results For randomized patients (n=347), arms were well-balanced, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for seviprotimut-L and placebo. For the primary intent-to-treat endpoint of RFS, the estimated HR was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.233), with stratified logrank p=0.46. However, estimated HRs were not uniform over the stage randomized strata, with HRs (95% CIs) for stages IIB/IIC, IIIA, IIIB/IIIC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.19), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35 to 1.50), and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.97), respectively. In the stage IIB/IIC stratum, the effect on RFS was greatest for patients <60 years old (HR=0.324 (95% CI: 0.121 to 0.864)) and those with ulcerated primary melanomas (HR=0.493 (95% CI: 0.255 to 0.952)). Conclusions Seviprotimut-L is very well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy model estimation supports further study in stage IIB/IIC patients, especially younger patients and those with ulcerated melanomas. Trial registration number NCT01546571.

Abstract CD40 is a co-stimulatory receptor of the TNF receptor superfamily expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs). Antibodies targeting CD40 may have therapeutic benefit via multiple mechanisms including innate immune activation that can support generation of antigen-specific, antitumor T cell responses, and binding to CD40-expressing cancer cells leading to antibody-mediated target cell killing. Multiple CD40-directed antibodies are in clinical development and differ by immunoglobulin isotype, affinity to CD40, and selectivity for FcγR-binding. These alterations could lead to differences in pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity. SEA-CD40 is an agonistic non-fucosylated, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against CD40. SEA-CD40 has enhanced FcγRIIIa binding (~10x greater than parent IgG1 antibody) that drives increased effector function, resulting in more potent immune stimulatory activity than antibodies with muted or selective FcγR binding. The enhanced effector function of SEA-CD40 may confer greater immune stimulation and antitumor activity relative to other CD40-directed therapeutics. Preclinically, SEA-CD40 exposure results in a distinct signature of responses including activation of APCs, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and NK cells, and targeted depletion of CD40+ B cells. SEA-CD40 demonstrates superior activity compared to other CD40-targeted antibodies in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the enhanced effector function is critical for optimal immune cell agonism. For example, SEA-CD40 drove in vitro ADCC activity 100-fold above the parent antibody and exhibited robust ADCC with the low and high affinity FcγRIIIA genotype. At matched dose levels in cynomolgus monkeys, SEA-CD40 induced circulating cytokines and sustained B cell depletion that were up to 50-fold above that induced with the parent antibody. The SEA-CD40 signature of activation translates to increased antitumor activity as a single agent and in combination with standard of care treatments in preclinical models, suggesting the potential for beneficial combination therapy in the clinic. The SEA-CD40 immune signature was confirmed by pharmacodynamic changes in an ongoing phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic solid tumors (NCT02376699). SEA-CD40 treatment induced dose-dependent increases in circulating cytokines and chemokines associated with myeloid and lymphoid immune activation and trafficking. SEA-CD40 treatment also resulted in activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD40-targeted B cell depletion in the periphery. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of SEA-CD40. The ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is actively enrolling and includes a cohort in pancreatic cancer assessing the combination of SEA-CD40, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Haley Neff-LaFord, Juneko E. Grilley-Olson, David C. Smith, Brendan Curti, Sanjay Goel, Timothy M. Kuzel, Svetomir N. Markovic, Olivier Rixe, David L. Bajor, Thomas F. Gajewski, Martin Gutierrez, Elisabeth I. Heath, John Thompson, Sahar Ansari, Shyra Gardai, Celine Jacquemont, Michael Schmitt, Andrew L. Coveler. SEA-CD40 is a non-fucosylated anti-CD40 antibody with potent pharmacodynamic activity in preclinical models and patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5535.

4521 Background: Expression of PDL1 by RCC has been associated with aggressive histology and poor survival. Tissue obtained from the patients enrolled in the IL-2 Select Trial, a prospective, single arm, multicenter CWG study, was analyzed by IHC to determine if PDL1or PDL3 expression predicted for response to initial or subsequent therapy. Methods: Paraffin embedded tumor tissue was stained for PDL1 and PDL3 expression, and results were correlated with RECIST defined response to IL2 treatment. Tumor tissue was considered positive for PDL1 if >5% of the tumor membranes stained for the marker. A cutoff of 10% was used for PDL3. Duration of subsequent VEGFR/mTOR inhibitor therapy was also correlated with tissue PDL1/3 expression. Results: 120 eligible pts were enrolled; 115 had clear cell histology. The overall response rate (ORR) to IL2 was 25% (30/120) with a median OS of 40.6 months. 113 tumors were stained. 18 (16%) were PDL1+. ORR was 19% and 50% in the patients PDL1- and PDL1+ tumors, respectively (p=0.012). 85 (75%) tumors were PDL3+. ORR was 10.7% and 29.4% in the PDL3- and PDL3+ tumors, respectively (p=0.075). In the 17 patients who were positive for both PDL1 and PDL3, ORR was 52.9%. In the 27 pts who were negative for both PDL1 and PDL3, ORR was 11.1%. 69 patients received at least 1 dose of a VEGFR TKI as next therapy following IL2 treatment. 66 tumors were stained. Pts who were PDL1+/PDL3+ had a shorter duration on VEGFR TKI therapy compared to pts who were PDL1-/PDL3- (see Table). Conclusions: This small, retrospective analysis suggests that PDL1 and PDL3 tissue expression may predict for better response to IL2. PDL1 expression has been suggested as a possible predictor of response to anti-PD1 therapy. The current data suggests that its expression may predict for benefit to other immune therapies. PDL3 (+/- PDL1) expression appears to correlate to less benefit from subsequent VEGFR TKI therapy. Funded by NCI SPORE Grant # 5 P50 CA101942-08. [Table: see text]

TPS65 Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare and, therefore, poorly studied malignancy. Patients with resected primary tumors have a median time to recurrence of 5.5 months. While no one adjuvant therapy is of proven benefit for patients, immunotherapy has shown activity in metastatic mucosal melanoma. Methods: We are performing a single arm, phase II clinical trial through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Cancer Research Network (6 sites) for resected mucosal melanoma. The primary endpoint is recurrence free survival (RFS), and it will include 36 subjects. Patients must have had an R0 or R1 resection of a mucosal melanoma (sinonasal, anorectal, vulvar, or other), and register within 90 days of surgery. Adjuvant radiation is allowed prior to registration but not required. Therapy consists of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) IV q3w x 4, then 480 mg nivolumab x 1 year. Statistical power is calculated to be 85% to detect a change in RFS from 5.5 months to 9.5 months, with a one sided alpha of 0.05. Enrollment began Sept 2017, with current participation from 6 large volume centers in the United States, with 17 patients enrolled as of Sept 2019. Full accrual is anticipated to complete by year end 2020. Patients will be followed for RFS and OS. Translational studies will include mutational burden, c-kit, BRAF, NRAS status, and serum markers of immunity -- including soluble PD-L1 and Bim. Clinical trial information: NCT03241186.

26 Background: NKTR-262 is a novel intratumoral prodrug designed to promote tumor antigen release, an immune stimulatory environment, and antigen presentation. NKTR-214 increases CD8+ T cells and NK cells in the tumor microenvironment. The combination of NKTR-262 with NKTR-214 accesses innate and adaptive immunity to provide an abscopal response and systemic tumor immunity. The Phase 1b/2 REVEAL trial is enrolling. Methods: In a 3+3 Phase 1 design, pts who are relapsed/refractory to ≥1 CPI receive escalating doses of intratumoral (IT) NKTR-262 followed by combined q3w treatment of IT NKTR-262 and fixed-dose intravenous (IV) NKTR-214 (0.006 mg/kg). Phase 1 will evaluate PK, safety, efficacy, and determine recommended Phase 2 dose. Scans are conducted every 9 wks (± 1 wk). Peripheral blood (PB) and tumor tissue are collected to measure biomarkers of immune activation. In Phase 2 expansion, NKTR-262 + NKTR-214 ± IV nivolumab (360 mg) will be assessed in specific tumor cohorts of IO-naïve and experienced pts. Results: As of 06 Nov 2018, 11 pts had received at least one cycle of NKTR-262 + NKTR-214 therapy. 7/11 pts were efficacy evaluable with at least one on-treatment scan (4 MEL, 2 SARC, 1 CRC). 2/4 R/R melanoma pts had uPRs with 100% (scan 2) and 40% (scan 1) reductions in target lesions per RECIST 1.1, respectively. Both patients remain on treatment. Two SARC pts had stable disease at scan 1. No pts experienced G3 or higher TRAEs or immune-related adverse events (AEs). Most common G1-2 AEs were transient flu-like symptoms. Gene expression analysis of tumor and PB show dose-dependent induction (4 to 16-fold) of TLR target genes. Consistent with the mechanism of action for NKTR-214, PB flow cytometry shows an average 13-fold increase from baseline in Ki67+ CD8+T cells in 6 pts. Conclusions: NKTR-262 + NKTR-214 engage the immune activation cascade from local tumor antigen production to anti-tumor T cell response. Initial dose levels of NKTR-262 with fixed-dose NKTR-214 were well-tolerated with early evidence of clinical activity. These data support continued evaluation of the combination +/- nivolumab. Clinical trial information: NCT03435640.