Sato, Takami

Abstract Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare tumor of the eye which is biologically distinct from cutaneous melanoma (CM) and carries a poor prognosis once metastatic. We aimed to examine a multi-omics profile of UM as compared to CM. Methods: A total of 277 UM and 1,297 CM metastatic or primary samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NextSeq, 592 genes and WES, NovaSeq, >700 genes) and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS; NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was measured by totaling somatic mutations per tumor (TMB-high cutoff >10 mutations per MB). Immune cell fraction was calculated by QuantiSeq. T- cell inflamed score was calculated using gene expression data. Pathway gene enrichment analysis using WTS data was performed using GSEA. Biostatistical significance was determined using chi-square/Fisher-Exact or Wilcoxon rank sum test and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: For all cases (primary and metastatic), UM compared to CM had a higher rate of GNAQ/11 (93.8% vs. 2.1% p≤0.001), SF3B1 (20.4% vs 3% p≤0.001), and BAP1 (52.9% vs. 1.5% p≤0.001) mutations. UM also had higher levels of MYC (7% vs 0.9% p≤0.001), NCOA2 (3.1% vs 0.1% p≤0.001), and RUNX1T1 genomic amplifications (2.3% vs 0.2% p≤0.001). Assessing only samples of liver metastases, UM was shown to have higher abundance of M2 macrophages (P≤0.0001) and less abundance of M1 macrophages(P≤0.0001), monocytes(P≤0.0001), CD4 T-cells(P≤0.0001), and regulatory T-cells (p = 0.0003) as compared to CM. GSEA comparison between liver metastases of UM and CM samples showed G2M checkpoint (NES score, 1.60 p≤0.0001) and E2F targets (NES score, 1.58 p=0.002) to be higher in metastatic CM. When comparing T-cell inflamed, intermediate, and non-inflamed tumors from any site, CM or UM, the average Z scores for both G2M and E2F were highest for inflamed and lowest for non-inflamed, P≤0.0001. A similar trend of higher Z score was seen for TMB high vs TMB low tumors, p≤0.0001. Conclusions: UM and CM are characterized by significantly different genomic and transcriptomic alterations, and cellular composition of TME. Further understanding of these characteristics may lead to better treatment strategies for metastatic UM. Citation Format: Justin C. Moser, Yusra F. Shao, Joanne Xiu, Yasmine Baca, Takami Sato, Lauren A. Dalvin, Sourat Darabi, Michael Korn, Burton Eisenberg, Geoff Gibney, Evidio Domingo-Musibay, Gino In, Dave Hoon, Michael S. Gordon. Multi-omics and immune cell profiling of metastatic uveal melanomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 50.

Background Most patients with advanced melanomas relapse after checkpoint blockade therapy. Thus, immunotherapies are needed that can be applied safely early, in the adjuvant setting. Seviprotimut-L is a vaccine containing human melanoma antigens, plus alum. To assess the efficacy of seviprotimut-L, the Melanoma Antigen Vaccine Immunotherapy Study (MAVIS) was initiated as a three-part multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Results from part B1 are reported here. Methods Patients with AJCC V.7 stage IIB-III cutaneous melanoma after resection were randomized 2:1, with stage stratification (IIB/C, IIIA, IIIB/C), to seviprotimut-L 40 mcg or placebo. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. For an hypothesized HR of 0.625, one-sided alpha of 0.10, and power 80%, target enrollment was 325 patients. Results For randomized patients (n=347), arms were well-balanced, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for seviprotimut-L and placebo. For the primary intent-to-treat endpoint of RFS, the estimated HR was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.233), with stratified logrank p=0.46. However, estimated HRs were not uniform over the stage randomized strata, with HRs (95% CIs) for stages IIB/IIC, IIIA, IIIB/IIIC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.19), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35 to 1.50), and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.97), respectively. In the stage IIB/IIC stratum, the effect on RFS was greatest for patients <60 years old (HR=0.324 (95% CI: 0.121 to 0.864)) and those with ulcerated primary melanomas (HR=0.493 (95% CI: 0.255 to 0.952)). Conclusions Seviprotimut-L is very well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy model estimation supports further study in stage IIB/IIC patients, especially younger patients and those with ulcerated melanomas. Trial registration number NCT01546571.

CRA9003 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Saturday, June, 1, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Saturday edition of ASCO Daily News.

Purpose: To review immune checkpoint inhibitor indications and ophthalmic side effects. Methods: A literature review was performed using a PubMed search for publications between 1990 and 2017. Results: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are designed to treat system malignancies by targeting one of three ligands, leading to T-cell activation for attack against malignant cells. These ligands (and targeted drug) include cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4, ipilimumab), programmed death protein 1 (PD-1, pembrolizumab, nivolumab), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). These medications upregulate the immune system and cause autoimmune-like side effects. Ophthalmic side effects most frequently manifest as uveitis (1%) and dry eye (1–24%). Other side effects include myasthenia gravis (n = 19 reports), inflammatory orbitopathy (n = 11), keratitis (n = 3), cranial nerve palsy (n = 3), optic neuropathy (n = 2), serous retinal detachment (n = 2), extraocular muscle myopathy (n = 1), atypical chorioretinal lesions (n = 1), immune retinopathy (n = 1), and neuroretinitis (n = 1). Most inflammatory side effects are managed with topical or periocular corticosteroids, but advanced cases require systemic corticosteroids and cessation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Conclusion: Checkpoint inhibitors enhance the immune system by releasing inhibition on T cells, with risk of autoimmune-like side effects. Ophthalmologists should include immune-related adverse events in their differential when examining cancer patients with new ocular symptoms.

CRA9003 Background: Gq/11 mutations are early oncogenic events in UM resulting in MAPK pathway activation. We demonstrated decreased viability in UM cell lines harboring Gq/11 mut with sel, a small molecule inhibitor of MEK1/2 (Ambrosini, CCR 2012). Methods: We conducted a 16 center randomized phase II study of hyd-sulfate sel 75 mg BID vs TMZ 150 mg/m2 daily for 5 days in 28-day cycles (or DTIC 1000 mg/m2 q21 days) for patients (pts) with metastatic UM with a Q209 Gq/11 mut who have not received prior TMZ/DTIC. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR). Select pts underwent tumor biopsies at baseline and after 14 (+/- 3 days) of sel. Our statistical plan required ≥80 pts randomized and ≥68 events to detect a PFS hazard ratio of 0.6 (p=0.1). Randomization was stratified by mut (Gq vs G11), M stage and number of prior therapies (tx). Tumor assessment occurred every 4 weeks (wks) for 8 wks and then every 8 wks using RECIST 1.1. Pts receiving TMZ who progressed could receive sel (TMZ→sel). Results: 80 pts were randomized. Sel (n=39): median age 66 (range 32-86), 54% male, 54% G11 mut, median ECOG PS 0 (range 0-1), 97% M1c, median prior tx 0 (range 0-2). TMZ (n=41): median age 60 (range 34-81), 63% male, 58% G11 mut, median ECOG PS 0 (range 0-1), 93% M1c, median prior tx 0 (range 0-2). 11/39 (28%) pts on sel experienced grade (gr) 3 toxicity (tox) manageable with dose modification (5 CPK elevation, 3 LFT elevation, 1 rash, 1 lymphopenia, 1 edema). 1/41 (2%) pt on TMZ experienced gr 3 tox (neutropenia). No gr 4/5 tox occurred. 28 pts on sel underwent paired tumor biopsies with inhibition of pERK and cyclinD1 observed by Western blot at day 14. At interim analysis (9/25/12), 55 pts were evaluable with 45 progression events and 16 deaths. Sel (n=27): median PFS 16 wks (95% CI 8-30.9), RR 11%, median OS 11.8 months (95% CI 4.8-not reached). TMZ (n=28): median PFS 4 wks (95% CI 3.7-15), RR 0%, median OS 4.7 months (95% CI 4.3-14.3). TMZ→sel (n=25): median PFS 8.1 wks (95% CI 7-15), RR 0%. Conclusions: Sel is the first drug to ever show improved clinical activity in UM relative to TMZ. Sustained target inhibition is observed with sel. Final results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01143402.

Abstract Background: Activation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor receptor (MET) pathway promotes tumor growth, invasion and dissemination. Emibetuzumab is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits ligand-dependent and ligand-independent activation of MET. In the first-in-human dose escalation study NCT0128756, emibetuzumab demonstrated favorable tolerability when administered up to 2000mg Q2W IV in unselected patients. The study was expanded to evaluate emibetuzumab in expansion cohorts for patients with tumors positive for MET expression. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastasis, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received 2000 mg emibetuzumab Q2W IV on a 28-day cycle. RCC, NSCLC, and HCC patients were required to have measurable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 and have MET positive tumors (≥50% of cells to be ≥2+ for MET expression) as determined by a MET IHC assay (Ventana). The objectives were to evaluate the safety and activity of emibetuzumab in patients with MET positive tumors. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Results: A total of 62 patients received emibetuzumab across the 4 cohorts: CRPC n = 15, RCC n = 19, NSCLC n = 19,and HCC n = 9, with a median of prior systemic oncology therapies of 6, 3, 5, and 3, respectively. Common possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue (29% all grades, 3% Gr3/4), nausea (13% all grades, no Gr3/4), edema of limbs (8% all grades, 2% Gr3/4), and anorexia (8%, no Gr3/4) and were similar among cohorts. No evidence of clinical activity was observed in CRPC patients. For RCC, NSCLC, and HCC patients with MET positive tumors, an overall disease control rate (DCR = partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]) of 32% (15/47) was observed. In the individual cohorts, DCR was 26% (5/19) in RCC, 26% (5/19) in NSCLC, and 56% (5/9) in HCC. The median duration of disease stabilization in the 3 cohorts was: 4.2 months (range 1.6-24.6) in RCC, 3.9 months (range 2.5-6.4) in NSCLC, and 3.7 months (range 1.2-6.6) in HCC. One PR was observed in an HCC patient with MET amplification. After a single dose of 2000 mg emibetuzumab, PK parameters were similar among these cohorts and also comparable to patients treated at this dose during dose escalation. Conclusions: In cohorts enriched for tumor MET expression, limited single-agent activity of emibetuzumab was observed indicating that MET positivity by IHC (Ventana assay) at the cut-point employed here might not be a sufficient predictive biomarker to select patients receiving benefit from emibetuzumab monotherapy for the tumor types studied. Further evaluation of biomarkers/assays to identify patients who may benefit from treatment with emibetuzumab may be warranted. Citation Format: Michaela S. Banck, Rashmi Chugh, Ronald B. Natale, Alain Algazi, Bradley C. Carthon, Lee S. Rosen, Michael E. Menefee, Andrew Xiuxuan Zhu, Takami Sato, Brian Moser, P. Kellie Turner, Jay Tuttle, Xuejing Aimee Wang, Volker Wacheck, Frederick E. Millard. Phase 1 results of emibetuzumab (LY2875358), a bivalent MET antibody, in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer, and MET positive renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr A55.