Back to Authors

Kumar, Pallavi

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9896-4315

Mayo Clinic

Abramson Cancer Center

Citations 2

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Distress Management, Version 2.2023
Riba, Michelle B., Donovan, Kristine A. , Ahmed, Kauser , Braun, IIana, Breitbart, William , Brewer, Benjamin W. , Corbett, Cheyenne , Fleishman, Stewart B., Garcia, Sofia F. , Greenberg, Donna, Handzo, George , Hoofring, Laura, Hutchinson, Sean Z., Johns, Shelley A. , Keller, Jennifer A. , Kumar, Pallavi , Lahijani, Sheila , Martin, Sara , Niazi, Shehzad K. , Pailler, Megan E. , Parnes, Francine, Salman, Jaroslava, Scher, Eli D. , Schuster, Jessica , Teply, Melissa , Usher, A., Valentine, Alan , Vanderlan, Jessica, Lyons, Megan S., McMillian, Nicole R., Darlow, Susan, Garcia, Sofia F , Andersen, Barbara L. , Fann, Jesse R. , Huang, Chao‐Hui , Rao, Vinay P.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | May 8, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 450-457

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0026 Get It

These NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management discuss the identification and treatment of psychosocial problems in patients with cancer. All patients experience some level of distress associated with a cancer diagnosis and the effects of the disease and its treatment regardless of the stage of disease. Clinically significant levels of distress occur in a subset of patients, and identification and treatment of distress are of utmost importance. The NCCN Distress Management Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights describe updates to the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List, and to the treatment algorithms for patients with trauma- and stressor-related disorders.
Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of seviprotimut-L polyvalent melanoma vaccine in patients with post-resection melanoma at high risk of recurrence
Slingluff, Craig L. , Lewis, Karl D. , Andtbacka, Robert Hans Ingemar, Hyngstrom, John , Milhem, Mohammed , Bowles, Tawnya L. , Hamid, Omid , Hernandez‐Aya, Leonel F. , Claveau, Joël, Jang, Sekwon, Philips, Prejesh, Holtan, Shernan G. , Shaheen, Montaser , Curti, Brendan D. , Schmidt, William, Butler, Marcus O. , Paramo, Juan, Lutzky, Jose , Padmanabhan, Arvinda, Thomas, Sajeve , Milton, Daniel T., Pecora, Andrew L. , Sato, Takami , Hsueh, Eddy C. , Badarinath, Suprith, Keech, John A., Kalmadi, Sujith, Kumar, Pallavi , Weber, Robert, Levine, Edward A. , Berger, Adam C. , Bar, Anna, Travers, Jeffrey B. , Mihalcioiu, Catalin , Gastman, Brian , Beitsch, Peter D. , Rapisuwon, Suthee , McCarron, Edward C. , Gupta, Vinay , Behl, Deepti , Blumenstein, Brent A. , Peterkin, Joanna, Curti, Brendan , Lutzky, Jose , Rapisuwon, Suthee , Milhem, Mohammed M , Butler, Marcus O , Levine, Edward A , Holtan, Shernan , Markovic, Svetomir N. , Paramo, Juan, Milton, Daniel, Beck, J. Thaddeus , Glaspy, John A.

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | October 1, 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e003272

10.1136/jitc-2021-003272 Get It

Background Most patients with advanced melanomas relapse after checkpoint blockade therapy. Thus, immunotherapies are needed that can be applied safely early, in the adjuvant setting. Seviprotimut-L is a vaccine containing human melanoma antigens, plus alum. To assess the efficacy of seviprotimut-L, the Melanoma Antigen Vaccine Immunotherapy Study (MAVIS) was initiated as a three-part multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Results from part B1 are reported here. Methods Patients with AJCC V.7 stage IIB-III cutaneous melanoma after resection were randomized 2:1, with stage stratification (IIB/C, IIIA, IIIB/C), to seviprotimut-L 40 mcg or placebo. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. For an hypothesized HR of 0.625, one-sided alpha of 0.10, and power 80%, target enrollment was 325 patients. Results For randomized patients (n=347), arms were well-balanced, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for seviprotimut-L and placebo. For the primary intent-to-treat endpoint of RFS, the estimated HR was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.233), with stratified logrank p=0.46. However, estimated HRs were not uniform over the stage randomized strata, with HRs (95% CIs) for stages IIB/IIC, IIIA, IIIB/IIIC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.19), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35 to 1.50), and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.97), respectively. In the stage IIB/IIC stratum, the effect on RFS was greatest for patients <60 years old (HR=0.324 (95% CI: 0.121 to 0.864)) and those with ulcerated primary melanomas (HR=0.493 (95% CI: 0.255 to 0.952)). Conclusions Seviprotimut-L is very well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy model estimation supports further study in stage IIB/IIC patients, especially younger patients and those with ulcerated melanomas. Trial registration number NCT01546571.