Citations

AbstractBackgroundHospitalization in older age is associated with accelerated cognitive decline, typically preceded by neuropathologic changes. We assess the association between indication for hospitalization and brain neurodegeneration.MethodsIncluded were participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population-based longitudinal study, with ≥1 brain imaging available in those older than 60 years of age between 2004 and 2017. Primary analyses used linear mixed-effects models to assess association of hospitalization with changes in longitudinal trajectory of cortical thinning, amyloid accumulation, and white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Additional analyses were performed with imaging outcomes dichotomized (normal vs abnormal) using Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsOf 2 480 participants, 1 966 had no hospitalization and 514 had ≥1 admission. Hospitalization was associated with accelerated cortical thinning (annual slope change −0.003 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.005 to −0.001], p = .002), but not amyloid accumulation (0.003 [95% CI −0.001 to 0.006], p = .107), or WMH increase (0.011 cm3 [95% CI −0.001 to 0.023], p = .062). Interaction analyses assessing whether trajectory changes are dependent on admission type (medical vs surgical) found interactions for all outcomes. While surgical hospitalizations were not, medical hospitalizations were associated with accelerated cortical thinning (−0.004 mm [95% CI −0.008 to −0.001, p = .014); amyloid accumulation (0.010, [95% CI 0.002 to 0.017, p = .011), and WMH increase (0.035 cm3 [95% CI 0.012 to 0.058, p = .006). Hospitalization was not associated with developing abnormal cortical thinning (p = .407), amyloid accumulation (p = .596), or WMH/infarctions score (p = .565).ConclusionsMedical hospitalizations were associated with accelerated cortical thinning, amyloid accumulation, and WMH increases. These changes were modest and did not translate to increased risk for crossing the abnormality threshold.

Conventional imaging has been the standard imaging modality for assessing prostate cancer recurrence and is utilized to determine treatment response to therapy. Molecular imaging with PSMA PET–CT has proven to be more accurate, sensitive, and specific at identifying pelvic or distant metastatic disease, resulting in earlier diagnosis of advanced disease. Since advanced disease may not be seen on conventional imaging, due to its lower sensitivity, but can be identified by molecular imaging, this reveals that metastatic prostate cancer occurs on a continuum from negative PSMA PET–CT and negative conventional imaging to positive PSMA PET–CT and positive conventional imaging. Understanding this continuum, the accuracy of these modalities, and treatment related outcomes based on imaging, will allow the clinician to counsel patients on management. This review will highlight the differences in conventional and molecular imaging in prostate cancer and how PSMA PET–CT can be used for the management of prostate cancer patients in different clinical scenarios, while providing cautionary notes for overtreatment.

176 Background: Despite androgen deprivation therapy, prostate cancer will develop resistance known as castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Androgen signaling is associated with pathways that influence cell proliferation and survival via cell cycle regulation. AR signaling results in inactivation of Rb tumor suppressor by way of AKT and reduction in intrinsic CDK4/6 inhibitors. Since PTEN loss is found in 40% of mCRPC and AKT pathway is a mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance, we hypothesize adding an AKT inhibitor to a CDK4/6 inhibitor will have synergistic activity while delaying CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. Preclinical xenografts have been shown to recapitulate patient response, therefore, can be used to guide clinical trials using novel combinations. Methods: We have established patient derived tumor xenograft models (GUR-017M, TMA-027 and PRJ-88T) from patients with mCRPC with each having a unique genomic alteration profile. In the clinical setting, GUR-017M was resistant to abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel and had exposure to docetaxel. TMA-027 and PRJ-88T were resistant to enzalutamide. We combined a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an AKT inhibitor and treated each of these patient tumors in NOD-SCID mice for a total duration of 40 days. Mice were implanted and separated into 4 groups (placebo, CDK4/6 inhibitor, AKT inhibitor and CDK4/6 + AKT inhibitor) with 10-13 mice in each group. Tumor volumes were measured twice a week. For GUR-017M, abemaciclib (50 mg/kg) was combined with MK2206 (120 mg/kg) and was compared to each placebo and each single agent alone. For TMA-027, palbociclib (50 mg/kg) was combined with ipatasertib (50 mg/kg). After 40 days, tumors were harvested for immunohistochemistry analysis. PRJ-88T was grown as 3D spheroids in ultra-low attachment plates and treated with palbociclib + ipatasertib (10 uM-100uM) to evaluate for synergy. Results: GUR-017M and TMA-027 showed significant delayed tumor growth compared to placebo or either single agent alone. In the GUR-017M group, the final mean tumor volume for the combination group was 149 mm3, compared to 377 mm3 (abemaciclib), 358 mm3 (MK2206) and 527 mm3 placebo group, representing a percent decrease compared to control by 72%, 29%, and 32%, respectively. For TMA-027, the final mean tumor volume for the combination group was 102 mm3, compared to 259 mm3 (palbociclib), 416 mm3 (ipatasertib), and 402 mm3 placebo group, representing a percent decrease compared to control by 75%, 36%, and 4%, respectively. PRJ-88T 3D spheroids showed synergy with palbociclib + ipatasertib. In vivo experiments using PRJ-88T are in progress. Conclusions: The preclinical results show combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with AKT inhibitors is a promising treatment strategy and provides the basis for a clinical trial in patients with mCRPC.

153 Background: The prognostic significance of DDR alterations in mCRPC remains unclear, with conflicting data from prior reports. Whether DDR alterations are predictive of outcomes with therapeutic agents other than PARP inhibitors in mCRPC is also poorly understood. With increasing use of molecular profiling in mCRPC, understanding the full prognostic and predictive utility of plasma DDR alterations is paramount. Methods: A next-generation sequencing Predicine liquid biopsy assay was used to profile cfDNA and germline DNA in 407 mCRPC patients (pts) from two independent international cohorts (n=162 Australia, n=245 US). DDR genes profiled were BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, MLH1 and MSH2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess associations between DDR alterations and clinical outcomes including PSA response rate (PSA RR), progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 74 (IQR 67-79), with median follow up 74 months and median OS 23 months. 65/407 (16%) harboured pathogenic DDR alterations, including 21 patients with ³1 alteration. Frequency of genomic aberrations are shown in the table. BRCA2 alterations were further classified as heterozygous loss (66%), homozygous loss (14%), monoallelic mutation (11%) and biallelic mutation/loss of heterozygosity (9%). Aberrations in any DDR gene, ATM, MLH1 + MSH2 or BRCA2 were associated with shorter OS on univariable analysis, but only any DDR or BRCA2 aberration remained significant upon adjusting for clinical prognosticators and ctDNA fraction (Table). Pre-treatment BRCA2 aberration was associated with significantly shorter OS and lower PSA RR compared to BRCA2 wt for pts receiving an AR pathway inhibitor (ARPI) (18 vs 32 months, p=0.006; 36 vs 60%, p=0.04 respectively) but not for taxane chemotherapy (17 vs 20 months, p=0.3; 45 vs 66, p=0.1 respectively). Conclusions: Detection of an aberration in any DDR gene or BRCA2 was an independent poor prognostic factor across 2 large independent cohorts of mCRPC patients. Intriguingly, patients with a BRCA2 alteration appeared to have worse outcomes with ARPI but not chemotherapy, suggesting predictive utility of DDR profiling. Our data collectively speak to the potential role of DDR alterations, in particular BRCA2, as prognostic and/ or predictive biomarkers in mCRPC.[Table: see text]

150 Background: With the evolving use of targeted therapies exploiting genomic vulnerabilities in mCRPC, screening patients for sensitizing alterations is of increasing relevance. However, the influence of age on the detection of relevant genomic alterations is incompletely understood. In this study, we compared the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiles of younger (age <70) versus older (age ≥70) men with mCRPC and assessed the relative prognostic impact of common genomic alterations. Methods: A next-generation sequencing-based Predicine cfDNA assay was used to profile 276 mCRPC patients from two independent international cohorts. The frequency of genomic alterations across age categories was compared using the chi-squared test, while circulating tumour DNA fraction (ctDNA%) was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Cox proportional hazards analysis with interaction testing was used to assess the association between age, genomic alteration and overall survival. Results: The median age of the combined cohort was 72 years (IQR 66-78), with 170 (62%) patients ≥70 years old. Despite differences in baseline characteristics (poorer performance status in older patients, higher Gleason score and de novo metastatic disease in younger patients), there was no significant difference in ctDNA% (median 22% vs 30%, p=0.6). We observed similar frequencies of genomic alterations across the 10 most commonly aberrant genes, including AR (<70 vs ≥70: 46% vs 49%, p=0.6), TP53 (40% vs 36%, p=0.6), BRCA2 (29% vs 21%, p=0.13) and PTEN (39% vs 35%, p=0.5). This similarity persisted when analysing mutations and copy number alterations in isolation. While driver alterations in both age categories were strongly associated with unfavourable outcomes (Table), an exploratory analysis revealed that copy number gain in PIK3CA may have a worse prognostic impact in younger men ( p for interaction = 0.03), with a lesser effect observed in AR gain ( p = 0.1) and MYC gain ( p = 0.1). Conclusions: The genomic profiles of pertinent alterations between younger and older men are comparable. Certain genomic alterations may carry a worse prognosis in younger men. Patients should be considered for precision medicine assessment and directed therapies, regardless of age. [Table: see text]

Abstract Dementia and mortality rates rise inexorably with age and consequently interact. However, because of the major logistical difficulties in accounting for both outcomes in a defined population, very little work has examined how risk factors and biomarkers for incident dementia are influenced by competing mortality. The objective of this study was to examine long-term associations between amyloid PET, APOE ɛ4, sex, education and cardiovascular/metabolic conditions, and hazard and absolute risk of dementia and mortality in individuals without dementia at enrolment. Participants were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population-based study of cognitive ageing in Olmsted County, MN, USA. All were without dementia and were age 55–92 years at enrolment and were followed longitudinally. Predictor variables were amyloid PET, APOE ɛ4 status, sex, education, cardiovascular/metabolic conditions and age. The main outcomes were incident dementia and mortality. Multivariable, multi-state models were used to estimate mortality and incident dementia rates and absolute risk of dementia and mortality by predictor variable group. Of the 4984 participants in the study, 4336 (87%) were cognitively unimpaired and 648 (13%) had mild cognitive impairment at enrolment. The median age at enrolment was 75 years; 2463 (49%) were women. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years (7.5 years after PET). High versus normal amyloid (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.43–2.79), APOE ɛ4 (women: hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.80–2.77; men: hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.71), older age and two additional cardiovascular/metabolic conditions (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.22–1.53) were associated with the increased hazard of dementia (all P &lt; 0.001). Among APOE ɛ4 carriers with elevated amyloid, remaining lifetime risk of dementia at age 65 years was greater in women [74% (95% confidence interval 65–84%) high and 58% (95% confidence interval 52–65%) moderate amyloid], than men [62% (95% confidence interval 52–73%) high and 44% (95% confidence interval 35–53%) moderate amyloid]. Overall, the hazard and absolute risk of dementia varied considerably by predictor group. The absolute risk of dementia associated with predictors characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease was greater in women than men while at the same time the combination of APOE ɛ4 non-carrier with normal amyloid was more protective in women than men. This set of findings may be attributed in part to different biological effects and in part to lower mortality rates in women.

Background. The risk of donor-derived severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in solid organ (heart, lung, liver, kidney, pancreas, and intestine) transplant recipients is poorly understood. Since hematogenous transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has not been documented to date, nonlung solid organs might be suitable for transplantation since they likely portend a low risk of viral transmission. Methods. Abdominal solid organs from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors were transplanted into uninfected recipients. Results. Between April 18, 2021, and October 30, 2021, we performed transplants of 2 livers, 1 simultaneous liver and kidney, 1 kidney, and 1 simultaneous kidney and pancreas from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors into 5 uninfected recipients. None of the recipients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection or coronavirus disease 2019, and when tested, allograft biopsies showed no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Conclusions. Transplanting nonlung organs from SARS-CoV-2–infected donors into uninfected recipients demonstrated no evidence of virus transmission.

Abstract Background Anthracycline use in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is hindered by cumulative exposure limits and risk of cardiotoxicity. Pixantrone, a novel aza-anthracenedione with structural similarities to mitoxantrone and anthracyclines, is theorized to exhibit less cardiotoxicity, mainly due to lack of iron binding. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing schedules of pixantrone in patients with refractory HER2-negative MBC. Methods Intravenous pixantrone was administered at 180 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (group A) versus 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (group B). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), median 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, quality of life, and serial assessment of circulating tumor cells. A 20% ORR was targeted as sufficient for further testing of pixantrone in this patient population. Results Forty-five patients were evaluable, with 2 confirmed partial responses in group A and 1 in group B. The trial was terminated due to insufficient activity. Overall median PFS and OS were 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-4.1) and 16.8 (95% CI: 8.9-21.6) months, respectively. Notable overall grade 3-4 adverse events were the following: neutrophil count decrease (62%), fatigue (16%), and decrease in ejection fraction (EF) (4%). Conclusion Pixantrone has insufficient activity in the second- and third-line MBC setting. It appears, however, to have limited cardiotoxicity. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01086605).

BackgroundPreferential publication of studies with positive findings can lead to overestimation of diagnostic test accuracy (i.e. publication bias). Understanding the contribution of the editorial process to publication bias could inform interventions to optimize the evidence guiding clinical decisions.Purpose/HypothesisTo evaluate whether accuracy estimates, abstract conclusion positivity, and completeness of abstract reporting are associated with acceptance to radiology conferences and journals.Study TypeMeta‐research.PopulationAbstracts submitted to radiology conferences (European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) and International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM)) from 2008 to 2018 and manuscripts submitted to radiology journals (Radiology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging [JMRI]) from 2017 to 2018. Primary clinical studies evaluating sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic imaging test in humans with available editorial decisions were included.AssessmentPrimary variables (Youden's index [YI > 0.8 vs. <0.8], abstract conclusion positivity [positive vs. neutral/negative], number of reported items on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [STARD] for Abstract guideline) and confounding variables (prospective vs. retrospective/unreported, sample size, study duration, interobserver agreement assessment, subspecialty, modality) were extracted.Statistical TestsMultivariable logistic regression to obtain adjusted odds ratio (OR) as a measure of the association between the primary variables and acceptance by radiology conferences and journals; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P‐values were obtained; the threshold for statistical significance was P < 0.05.ResultsA total of 1000 conference abstracts (500 ESGAR and 500 ISMRM) and 1000 journal manuscripts (505 Radiology and 495 JMRI) were included. Conference abstract acceptance was not significantly associated with YI (adjusted OR = 0.97 for YI > 0.8; CI = 0.70–1.35), conclusion positivity (OR = 1.21 for positive conclusions; CI = 0.75–1.90) or STARD for Abstracts adherence (OR = 0.96 per unit increase in reported items; CI = 0.82–1.18). Manuscripts with positive abstract conclusions were less likely to be accepted by radiology journals (OR = 0.45; CI = 0.24–0.86), while YI (OR = 0.85; CI = 0.56–1.29) and STARD for Abstracts adherence (OR = 1.06; CI = 0.87–1.30) showed no significant association. Positive conclusions were present in 86.7% of submitted conference abstracts and 90.2% of journal manuscripts.Data ConclusionDiagnostic test accuracy studies with positive findings were not preferentially accepted by the evaluated radiology conferences or journals.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 2.