Qin, Sisi

Abstract The TopBP1-ATR axis is critical for maintaining genomic stability during DNA replication stress, yet the precise regulation of TopBP1 in replication stress responses remains poorly understood. In this study, we identified PHD and Ring Finger Domains 1 (PHRF1) as an important ATR activator through its interaction with TopBP1. Our analysis revealed a correlation between PHRF1 and genomic stability in cancer patients. Mechanistically, PHRF1 is recruited to DNA lesions in a manner dependent on its PHD domain and histone methylation. Subsequently, PHRF1 mono-ubiquitinates TopBP1 at lysine 73, which enhances the TopBP1-ATR interaction and activates ATR. Depletion of PHRF1 disrupts ATR activation and sensitizes cells to replication stress-inducing agents. Furthermore, conditional knockout of Phrf1 in mice leads to early lethality and impaired ATR-Chk1 axis signaling. Collectively, our findings establish PHRF1 as a novel E3 ligase for TopBP1, coordinating the replication stress response by enhancing TopBP1-ATR signaling.

Most patients with metastatic prostate cancer eventually develop resistance to primary androgen deprivation therapy. To identify predictive biomarker for Abiraterone acetate/prednisone resistance, we screened alternative splice variants between responders and non-responders from the PROMOTE clinical study and pinned down the most significant variant, CENPK–delta8. Through preclinical patient-derived mouse xenograft (PDX) and 3D organoids obtained from responders and non-responders, as well as in vitro models, aberrant CENPK–delta8 expression was determined to link to drug resistance via enhanced migration and proliferation. The FLNA and FLOT1 were observed to specifically bind to CENK–delta8 rather than wild-type CENPK, underscoring the role of CENPK–delta8 in cytoskeleton organization and cell migration. Our study, leveraging data from the PROMOTE study, TCGA, and TCGA SpliceReq databases, highlights the important function of alternative splice variants in drug response and their potential to be prognostic biomarkers for improving individual therapeutic outcomes in precision medicine.

Abstract We identified resistance mechanisms to abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the Prostate Cancer Medically Optimized Genome-Enhanced Therapy (PROMOTE) study. We analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-sequencing data from 83 patients with metastatic biopsies before (V1) and after 12 weeks of AA/P treatment (V2). Resistance was determined by time to treatment change (TTTC). At V2, 18 and 11 of 58 patients had either short-term (median 3.6 months; range 1.4–4.5) or long-term (median 29 months; range 23.5–41.7) responses, respectively. Nonresponders had low expression of TGFBR3 and increased activation of the Wnt pathway, cell cycle, upregulation of AR variants, both pre- and posttreatment, with further deletion of AR inhibitor CDK11B posttreatment. Deletion of androgen processing genes, HSD17B11, CYP19A1 were observed in nonresponders posttreatment. Genes involved in cell cycle, DNA repair, Wnt-signaling, and Aurora kinase pathways were differentially expressed between the responder and non-responder at V2. Activation of Wnt signaling in nonresponder and deactivation of MYC or its target genes in responders was detected via SCN loss, somatic mutations, and transcriptomics. Upregulation of genes in the AURKA pathway are consistent with the activation of MYC regulated genes in nonresponders. Several genes in the AKT1 axis had increased mutation rate in nonresponders. We also found evidence of resistance via PDCD1 overexpression in responders. Implications: Finally, we identified candidates drugs to reverse AA/P resistance: topoisomerase inhibitors and drugs targeting the cell cycle via the MYC/AURKA/AURKB/TOP2A and/or PI3K_AKT_MTOR pathways.

Approximately one‐third of patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) exhibited primary abiraterone resistance. To identify alternative treatment for abiraterone nonresponders, we performed drug discovery analyses using the L1000 database using differentially expressed genes identified in tumor biopsies and patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) tumors between abiraterone responders and nonresponders enrolled in PROMOTE trial. This approach identified 3 drugs, including topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitor mitoxantrone, CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, and pan‐CDK inhibitor PHA‐793887. These drugs significantly suppressed the growth of abiraterone‐resistant cell lines and PDX models. Moreover, we identified 11 genes targeted by all 3 drugs that were associated with worse outcomes in both the PROMOTE and Stand Up To Cancer cohorts. This 11‐gene panel might also function as biomarkers to select the 3 alternative therapies for this subgroup of patients with CRPC, warranting further clinical investigation.

Objectives We previously discovered that the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) rs9940645 in the ZNF423 gene regulate ZNF423 expression and serve as a potential biomarker for response to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Here we explored pathways involved in ZNF423-mediated SERMs response and drugs that potentially sensitize SERMs. Methods RNA sequencing and label-free quantitative proteomics were performed to identify genes and pathways that are regulated by ZNF423 and the ZNF423 SNP. Both cultured cells and mouse xenograft models with different ZNF423 SNP genotypes were used to study the cellular responses to metformin. Results We identified ribosome and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling as potential pathways regulated by ZNF423 or ZNF423 rs9940645 SNP. Moreover, using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9-engineered ZR75-1 breast cancer cells with different ZNF423 SNP genotypes, striking differences in cellular responses to metformin, either alone or in the combination of tamoxifen, were observed in both cell culture and the mouse xenograft model. Conclusions We found that AMPK signaling is modulated by the ZNF423 rs9940645 SNP in estrogen and SERM-dependent fashion. The ZNF423 rs9940645 SNP affects metformin response in breast cancer and could be a potential biomarker for tailoring the metformin treatment.

We previously reported that testis‐specific Y‐encoded‐like protein (TSPYLs) are transcription regulators for CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. Here, we observed dual roles for TSPYLs in mediating serotonin transport and the metabolism of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The widely prescribed SSRIs, citalopram, and escitalopram are metabolized mainly by CYP2C19. The TSPYL1 rs3828743 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), which decreases its suppression of CYP2C19 expression, was associated with rapid escitalopram metabolism and worse treatment response in the Mayo PGRN‐AMPS clinical trial. We also found that TSPYLs can regulate expression of the serotonin transporter protein, SLC6A4, and, in turn, serotonin transport into cells. The SNPs in tight linkage disequilibrium with the TSPYL1 rs10223646 SNP were significantly correlated with baseline severity of depression in patients with MDD in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression and International SSRI Pharmacogenomics Consortium clinical trials. Our findings suggest that genetic variation in TSPYL genes may be novel indicators for baseline severity of depression and SSRI poor response.

Abstract The present project was undertaken to determine whether the activation of the EGFR family (EGFR/ErbB2/ErbB3/ErbB4) and its downstream signaling effector ERK1/2 plays a role in enzalutamide resistance and whether treatment with ErbB or ERK inhibitors overcome this resistance. C4-2B (enzalutamide sensitive) and 22Rv1 (partially enzalutamide resistant) cell lines cultured for prolonged periods in enzalutamide, developed resistance to this drug (C4-2B/MDVR and 22Rv1/MDVR, respectively). Whole genome comparison of enza-resistant to parental lines demonstrated that the ErbB signaling network was significantly upregulated in the enza-resistant lines. Comparison of various enza-sensitive and resistant lines demonstrated a strong correlation between phosphorylation at EGFR(Y1068) and enza resistance. Inhibition of EGFR, but not that of ErbB2 or ErbB3 prevented cell viability. The EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and dacomitinib, but not the ErbB2 inhibitor lapatinib, suppressed viability in combination with enzalutamide. We hypothesized that enza-resistant tumors expressing higher levels of EGFR would be more responsive to erlotinib. To test this hypothesis, we compared the effects of erlotinib and enzalutamide, individually or in combination, in organelles from PDX tumors expressing high or low EGFR levels. Significantly, tumors expressing high EGFR, but not those expressing low EGFR, were responsive to the combination. Finally, we investigated the cause for greater efficacy with erlotinib compared to lapatinib in PCa. Comparison of the effects of different ligands revealed that while both lapatinib and erlotinib inhibited EGFR phosphorylation, only erlotinib but not lapatinib was able to inhibit EGF-induced ERK phosphorylation. This indicated an important role for ERK in the mediation of EGFR ligand induced enzalutamide resistance. Continuous culture of enza-sensitive C4 cells in enzalutamide resulted in the development of ERK phosphorylation in these PTEN-null cells that normally do not express phosphorylated ERK, and the newly ERK phosphorylated cells also were more susceptible to erlotinib as well. In support of a role for ERK in mediating the effects of EGFR activation in enza-resistant cells, inhibition of EGFR but not ErbB2 or ErbB3 inhibited ERK phosphorylation, and the ERK inhibitor ulitertinib inhibited viability of enza-resistant lines. We conclude that enzalutamide treatment causes an increase in EGFR ligands that result in the phosphorylation of EGFR at Y1068, which further resulted in phosphorylation of ERK. EGFR inhibitors that prevent ERK phosphorylation were effective in suppressing viability of enza-resistant CRPC cells, whereas ErbB2 inhibitors that did not affect ERK phosphorylation were unable to affect cell viability. These results demonstrate why certain ErbB inhibitors failed to affect enza-resistant CRPC tumors but provide encouragement for others. Citation Format: Thomas M. Steele, Maitreyee K. Jathal, Salma Siddiqui, Sisi Qin, Clifford G. Tepper, Ralph W. deVere White, Manish Kohli, Liewei Wang, Allen C. Gao, Paramita M. Ghosh. Overcoming EGFR and ERK-mediated resistance to enzalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4842.

The testis‐specific Y‐encoded‐like protein (TSPYL) gene family includes TSPYL1 to TSPYL6. We previously reported that TSPYL5 regulates cytochrome P450 (CYP) 19A1 expression. Here we show that TSPYLs, especially TSPYL 1, 2, and 4, can regulate the expression of many CYP genes, including CYP17A1, a key enzyme in androgen biosynthesis, and CYP3A4, an enzyme that catalyzes the metabolism of abiraterone, a CYP17 inhibitor. Furthermore, a common TSPYL1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs3828743 (G/A) (Pro62Ser), abolishes TSPYL1's ability to suppress CYP3A4 expression, resulting in reduced abiraterone concentrations and increased cell proliferation. Data from a prospective clinical trial of 87 metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate/prednisone showed that the variant SNP genotype (A) was significantly associated with worse response and progression‐free survival. In summary, TSPYL genes are novel CYP gene transcription regulators, and genetic alteration within these genes significantly influences response to drug therapy through transcriptional regulation of CYP450 genes.